Jump to content

What will be the Trump foreign policy?


merrill
 Share

Recommended Posts

Meet PNAC: Same as Reagan/Bush

 

"Rebuilding America's Defences," openly advocates for total global military domination” (Very dangerous position which threatens this nations economy, OUR freedoms,the nations security and world peace.)

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

 

Total global USA military domination” is a dangerous position which threatens this nations economy, OUR freedoms,the nations security and world peace.

 

I then question authority:

 

• WHY do we need to increase defense spending significantly to carry out our global protection for Wal-Mart,Oil,Coca Cola,Pepsico,diamonds,gold etc etc etc

 

• WHY do we need to strengthen our ties to dictator regimes friendly to American interests and Bogus values;

 

• WHY do we need to promote the cause of the political right wing and economic rape for corp USA abroad;

 

• WHY do we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in forcing others to accept our corrupt multi national principles.

 

Such a war mongering policy of military strength and immoral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the extortions of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness no matter how many innocent USA soldiers and innocent mothers,children and fathers abroad die.

 


Strategic Errors of Monumental Proportions

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/odom.php?articleid=10396

 

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/stockbauer1.html

 

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

 

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0208-05.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, how does it theaten this country economically when done "inhouse" from raw materials to finished products? Think you have some misguided opinion about time being linear or worth money.

 

Time is immovable. Nothing staying the same again produces one of a kind results never duplicated again all the time.

 

now how rare can one of a kind be when every lifetime is one of a kind ever?

 

need to know vs want to ignore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PNAC never went away .......

 

Endorsed by:

 

Elliott Abrams / Gary Bauer / William J. Bennett / GHW Bush / GW Bush / Jeb Bush

 

Dick Cheney / Eliot A. Cohen / Midge Decter / Paula Dobriansky / Steve Forbes /

 

Aaron Friedberg / Francis Fukuyama / Frank Gaffney / Newt Gingrich / Fred C. Ikle /

 

Donald Kagan / Zalmay Khalilzad / Charles Krauthammer / I. Lewis Libby /

 

Richard Perle / Norman Podhoretz / Vice Adm John Poindexter / Dan Quayle /

 

Peter W. Rodman / Stephen P. Rosen / Henry S. Rowen / Donald Rumsfeld /

 

Vin Weber / George Weigel / Paul Wolfowitz

 

 

Expect to see some of these Reagan/Bush people brought back to Capitol Hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meet PNAC: Same as Reagan/Bush

 

"Rebuilding America's Defences," openly advocates for total global military domination (Very dangerous position which threatens this nations economy, OUR freedoms,the nations security and world peace.)

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

 

Total global USA military domination is a dangerous position which threatens this nations economy, OUR freedoms,the nations security and world peace.

 

I then question authority:

 

WHY do we need to increase defense spending significantly to carry out our global protection for Wal-Mart,Oil,Coca Cola,Pepsico,diamonds,gold etc etc etc

 

WHY do we need to strengthen our ties to dictator regimes friendly to American interests and Bogus values;

 

WHY do we need to promote the cause of the political right wing and economic rape for corp USA abroad;

 

WHY do we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in forcing others to accept our corrupt multi national principles.

 

Such a war mongering policy of military strength and immoral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the extortions of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness no matter how many innocent USA soldiers and innocent mothers,children and fathers abroad die.

 

 

Strategic Errors of Monumental Proportions

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/odom.php?articleid=10396

 

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/stockbauer1.html

 

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

 

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0208-05.htm

Lol

Wow. That's different. They wanted different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is that in the constitution?

"provide for the common defense". You really need to actually READ the Constitution sometime.

 

Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution lists 17 separate powers that are granted to the Congress. Six of those powers deal exclusively with the national defense—far more than any other specific area of governance—and grant the full range of authorities necessary for establishing the defense of the nation as it was then understood. Congress is given specific authority to declare war, raise and support armies, provide for a navy, establish the rules for the operation of American military forces, organize and arm the militias of the states, and specify the conditions for converting the militias into national service.

 

And then there is the whole "Commander in Chief" language in Article 2.

 

It's amazing how ignorant you idiots are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"provide for the common defense". You really need to actually READ the Constitution sometime.

 

Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution lists 17 separate powers that are granted to the Congress. Six of those powers deal exclusively with the national defensefar more than any other specific area of governanceand grant the full range of authorities necessary for establishing the defense of the nation as it was then understood. Congress is given specific authority to declare war, raise and support armies, provide for a navy, establish the rules for the operation of American military forces, organize and arm the militias of the states, and specify the conditions for converting the militias into national service.

 

And then there is the whole "Commander in Chief" language in Article 2.

 

It's amazing how ignorant you idiots are.

Our defense. Of our nation. Not provide for the defense of other nations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...