Jump to content

Military Backing Hillary


Recommended Posts

Members of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trump

 

 

Active and retired members of the military have been showing far more support for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton than for her Republican rival, at least as measured by the checks they’ve written to her campaign.

 

Individuals who listed their employers as the U.S. Department of Defense or major branches of the military, or who say they’re retired from one of those, have contributed a total of $972,709 to both nominees so far this year. Clinton has claimed $771,471 of the contributions, or nearly 80 percent.

 

All major branches of the armed forces – including the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard – have favored Clinton to a much greater degree than GOP nominee Donald Trump. Members of the Army have contributed more than other branches of the service this cycle, giving a total of $191,712 to the two presidential hopefuls, 72 percent of which went to Clinton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Members of the military giving three times as much to Clinton as to Trump

 

 

Active and retired members of the military have been showing far more support for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton than for her Republican rival, at least as measured by the checks they’ve written to her campaign.

 

Individuals who listed their employers as the U.S. Department of Defense or major branches of the military, or who say they’re retired from one of those, have contributed a total of $972,709 to both nominees so far this year. Clinton has claimed $771,471 of the contributions, or nearly 80 percent.

 

All major branches of the armed forces – including the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard – have favored Clinton to a much greater degree than GOP nominee Donald Trump. Members of the Army have contributed more than other branches of the service this cycle, giving a total of $191,712 to the two presidential hopefuls, 72 percent of which went to Clinton.

 

 

 

 

So what ...... no fucking reason to keep the two most corrupt parties in the world running OUR government.

 

YOU KNOW THE TWO WHO FORCED THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS FROM MANAGING THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE COMMISSION THEN CONVERTED IT TO A GOP/DEMO PRIVATE CORPORATION !!!

 

WHAT THE HELL !!!

 

How did the big letters happen? I don't know..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Placing either Clinton or Trump in office is a waste of time and allowing the criminal elements to run over the middle class, kill more jobs and run government in general by way of fraud.

War will remain the foreign policy and economic policy of the USA government!

"Rebuilding America's Defences," openly advocates for total global military domination” (Very dangerous position which threatens this nations economy, OUR freedoms,the nations security and world peace.)

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Total global USA military domination” is a dangerous position which threatens this nations economy, OUR freedoms,the nations security and world peace.

I then question authority:

• WHY do we need to increase defense spending significantly to carry out our global protection for Wal-Mart,Oil,Coca Cola,Pepsico,diamonds,gold etc etc etc

• WHY do we need to strengthen our ties to dictator regimes friendly to American interests and Bogus values;

• WHY do we need to promote the cause of the political right wing and economic rape for corp USA abroad;

• WHY do we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in forcing others to accept our corrupt multi national principles.

Such a war mongering policy of military strength and immoral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the extortions of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness no matter how many innocent USA soldiers and innocent mothers,children and fathers abroad die.

Do I want to blindly support all of the above? NO

​Bring Jill Stein to office to provide the necessary guidance to USA legislators.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dump probably getting reimbursed on travel voucher

I guess they know who butters their bread, takes care of them and their families.

Let's not forget 50 national security advisers, former CIA chiefs and generals that backed Hillary and said Trump is UNFIT TO SERVE.

None of the generals that are on Trump's side said Hillary is unfit to serve.

I would like to get a list of all those people, which also included scientist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...