Jump to content

Whoever wins election, Americans are the losers.

Recommended Posts

You couldn't be more wrong. Hillary Clinton is the most prepared candidate ever to be president.

Get your head out of your ass and head down to her web site and educate yourself.



Her website is politically driven nothing more nothing less. Simple as that.


Of course her website is there to sell her ......


Does her website disclose her relationships with the big banks and other large corporate donors?


Hillary Clinton is not Bernie Sanders,Elizabeth Warren nor Jill Stein. Not by a long shot.


When voters idolize political names then the country is in trouble and politicians are more easily to deceive voters. Politicians are not to be worshipped they are to be watched which is which is why watch dog groups got born.


90% of politicians are to be replaced every voting cycle. The USA does not need dynasties controlling the country.


Neither the Clintons nor the Bushes need to come back ever again.


Be Smart and Fiscally Correct VOTE JILL STEIN !!!





The Jill Stein ticket would be the most powerful ever for Single Payer Medical Insurance. This would be a help to lower income families,middle-class families and upper income families = everybody wins.


Women's Rights would see formidable support as well.


Jill Stein offers a strong Green Party platform ----- yes she does. I speculate a lot of votes will come from the Progressive Democrats of America for Jill Stein.


Jill Stein is the TEAM LEADER which can represent the largest number of American Citizens which encompass moderate republicans,moderate democrats/progressive democrats and Green Party constituents and other smart constituents.



Will Hillary Push The Robin Hood Tax If Elected? The Clintons are wall street insiders.



--- Robin Hood Tax to Fund College Education


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Documents released by WikiLeaks Wednesday give the fullest picture so far of the way that Bill and Hillary Clinton built up their private fortune during the years after they left the White House in 2001. Hundreds of memos and emails detail how corporations and banks were recruited to funnel millions into the for-profit activities of the enterprise that a top aide, Douglas Band, called “Bill Clinton Inc.”

As detailed in a devastating 12-page memo written in November 2011, Band established a consulting firm called Teneo to recruit corporate CEOs and bankers to give large donations to the Clinton Foundation. At the same time, he would urge them to provide lucrative speaking fees for an address by the former president, usually in the six-figure range.

As the Washington Post described it in its front-page report Thursday, the Band memo “detailed a circle of enrichment in which he raised money for the Clinton Foundation from top-tier corporations such as Dow Chemical and Coca-Cola that were clients of his firm, Teneo, while pressing many of those same donors to provide personal income to the former president.”

Band wrote the detailed memorandum, supplying precise figures for the flow of funds into the pockets of Bill Clinton, as the result of a bitter internal feud inside the Clinton camp. Chelsea Clinton, who married hedge fund executive Marc Mezvinsky in 2010, after working on Wall Street, became a board member of the Clinton Foundation in 2011 and began to question Band’s activities.

According to the email exchanges made public over the past month, Chelsea Clinton accused Band and his business partner, Declan Kelly, of profiting personally from Band’s longstanding connection with her father—he was Clinton’s personal aide, who travelled with him everywhere, during the final years of his presidency.

Band drafted the memo to the law firm of Simpson Thacher, which had been called in to conduct an internal review of the Clinton Foundation’s operations, in an effort to refute the charge of profiteering. He even turned it back on the Clintons, pointing out that Bill Clinton had made far more money on his own account than Band or Teneo.

Band complained that he was required to sign a conflict of interest document for the Clinton Global Initiative, disavowing any personal profit from the charity’s activities, but “Oddly, WJC [William Jefferson Clinton, the ex-president] does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc.”


More important than the large sums Band helped to raise for the Clinton Library and the Clinton Foundation were the companies he recruited to direct a portion of their funding to Bill Clinton personally.

More on this issue:



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...