Jump to content

NAILED IT....PERFECT TRUTH!!!!!!!!&#33


Recommended Posts

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

A conservative man is always politically incorrect and unimpeded in his words and thoughts – for he answers to God, not to the least of the common of society’s populace and political elite cesspool.

He enjoys fast horses, fast cars with big gas-guzzling engines, a good three or four hour cigar, fine wine, and smooth aged single-barrel whiskey. He likes guns, and he likes shooting guns, and to him guns have nothing to do with extensions of phallic fantasies because he leaves such psycho-babble to the liberal college professors to sit and fret over their “feelings” while he is out hunting and shooting animals and putting food on the table.

And he doesn’t enjoy killing animals, and he never kills anything he doesn’t eat, but sometimes he puts the heads of the animals he’s killed on the walls of his dens.

Oh, yeah, conservative men like dens. They like the deep northern wilderness and campfires and danger and quiet trout streams — and at the end of the day they like sitting quietly alone by the fireside and tasting the rich blend of Virginia, Mahalla, Dubac, and Mountain Leaf Latakia burning mellow and easy in their briar pipes and watching the wafting wreaths of pipe smoke in the cool dark peace of the evening woods.

A conservative man cares about the youth of America and the future of each man’s individual sovereignty. He cares about fairness and brotherhood and people less fortunate than he is, but if you are an adult and you choose to be selfish and lazy and mean and stupid, then he doesn’t bother to waste his time on you, as long as you keep your life away from his.

Oh, he is interested in changing the world, but always from within reality – always from within his own personal center of existence – that philosophical balance where all the power in his own universe lies within his own manhood and his own peace and where at any time he can make the existential choice to step outside that center. But all of that is in reserve in some dimension of some far forever, beyond the known universe, and right now he has only his personal existential choices to define his essence and existence – every day, one exciting new day at a time.

With that depth of what he holds in reserve, a conservative man keeps his life simple and good, satisfying his various appetites and moods and his need to take care of business.

Life is good when a man understands that discrimination is a survival skill. He discriminates against anything or anyone who threatens to compromise his family, his safety, his personal code of morality. And he practices hatred against drug dealers, child molesters, and traitors. But, unlike most liberals, he doesn’t demand others think as he does.

Simply stated, a conservative “believes,” and he acts on his well-thought-out beliefs. Conversely, a liberal “feels” and acts on a mindlessness that either feels good or feels bad.

Most liberals are scared senseless of individuality. If they are vegetarians, everyone else must be a vegetarian, and the government must have the power to make everyone conform because conformity is where everyone is safest.

If a liberal is a non-smoker or a non-drinker or a non-consumer of trans-fat, salt, and fast cars, then everyone must be made to do and be the same – for the good of all mankind.

Liberals love their government to be “masterful” — powerful enough to give and to take away, to make things happen, to redistribute everyone’s wealth, guarantee jobs and homes and healthcare and a bland, predictable education.

Liberals hate. They hate those big wealthy, risk-taking, adventurous, cigar-smoking, gun-totting, lusty individualists who succeed in a “free to fail” nation of fearless men and women – those who remain optimists in God’s glorious world of love and freedom.

Secretly, down deep, liberals hate being “girly-man/sissies,” but they are. They are feckless sissies because they just don’t believe in, nor do they trust the gifts and talents and fortitude God instills in all men and all women.

Simply put, liberals are afraid to fail, so they want their government to create a world where nobody fails. They haven’t learned, as conservative men and women have learned, that a person grows stronger and wiser and grander after each disappointment, after each painful failure.

Liberals are more comfortable (liberals love the word “comfortable”) when failure is collective and communal and no one person feels its sting. As for success – success is disparaged by liberals because success is usually achieved by raw nerves and pluck, and by believing in oneself and God, and by a lot of very hard work.

But should success come along — accidently or otherwise – liberals “feel,” too, that such success cannot be trusted because it can be lost too easily — because to maintain success, the hard work must never ends – life’s effort must never end.

Success must be fed, it must be lived and must be repeated every day, proven every day, asserted every day, renewed every day — as Sisyphus well knew. And so, to a spineless, sissy liberal, any and all success should be collective and communal and in that way it is less guilt-ridden either in its gaining or in its losing.

And although liberals do not “feel” personally satisfied with success, they can at least feel comfortable with collective success.

Collective success is an affirmation of a universal, benevolent cooperative big government. Success is collectively gained, collectively accepted, and collectively heralded – a sweet, blind comfort. Anathema to a liberal is a Judeo-Christian citizenry held personally responsible to an all-knowing God.

Of course successes are few in the communal world of big government unless you are one of the elite power mongers at the top. But that inequity matters little to the work-a-day liberal in the blind comfort of his mindless socialism. Ah, cooperative community living and cooperative community values.

“Tofu, anyone?”

 

by Gary Spina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

A conservative man is always politically incorrect and unimpeded in his words and thoughts – for he answers to God, not to the least of the common of society’s populace and political elite cesspool.

 

 

by Gary Spina

 

Promoting a local politician on the world wide web I see. Vertical axis of how and why centered on a horizontal plane of what, where, when, and who does what they do to defend their reality and protect the means of their denying the self evident.

 

doesn't matter what side or which corner used with 6 degrees of deflection, they all operate the same way using separated excuses to feel exempt from self contained by the same moment here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

A conservative man is always politically incorrect and unimpeded in his words and thoughts – for he answers to God, not to the least of the common of society’s populace and political elite cesspool.

He enjoys fast horses, fast cars with big gas-guzzling engines, a good three or four hour cigar, fine wine, and smooth aged single-barrel whiskey. He likes guns, and he likes shooting guns, and to him guns have nothing to do with extensions of phallic fantasies because he leaves such psycho-babble to the liberal college professors to sit and fret over their “feelings” while he is out hunting and shooting animals and putting food on the table.

And he doesn’t enjoy killing animals, and he never kills anything he doesn’t eat, but sometimes he puts the heads of the animals he’s killed on the walls of his dens.

Oh, yeah, conservative men like dens. They like the deep northern wilderness and campfires and danger and quiet trout streams — and at the end of the day they like sitting quietly alone by the fireside and tasting the rich blend of Virginia, Mahalla, Dubac, and Mountain Leaf Latakia burning mellow and easy in their briar pipes and watching the wafting wreaths of pipe smoke in the cool dark peace of the evening woods.

A conservative man cares about the youth of America and the future of each man’s individual sovereignty. He cares about fairness and brotherhood and people less fortunate than he is, but if you are an adult and you choose to be selfish and lazy and mean and stupid, then he doesn’t bother to waste his time on you, as long as you keep your life away from his.

Oh, he is interested in changing the world, but always from within reality – always from within his own personal center of existence – that philosophical balance where all the power in his own universe lies within his own manhood and his own peace and where at any time he can make the existential choice to step outside that center. But all of that is in reserve in some dimension of some far forever, beyond the known universe, and right now he has only his personal existential choices to define his essence and existence – every day, one exciting new day at a time.

With that depth of what he holds in reserve, a conservative man keeps his life simple and good, satisfying his various appetites and moods and his need to take care of business.

Life is good when a man understands that discrimination is a survival skill. He discriminates against anything or anyone who threatens to compromise his family, his safety, his personal code of morality. And he practices hatred against drug dealers, child molesters, and traitors. But, unlike most liberals, he doesn’t demand others think as he does.

Simply stated, a conservative “believes,” and he acts on his well-thought-out beliefs. Conversely, a liberal “feels” and acts on a mindlessness that either feels good or feels bad.

Most liberals are scared senseless of individuality. If they are vegetarians, everyone else must be a vegetarian, and the government must have the power to make everyone conform because conformity is where everyone is safest.

If a liberal is a non-smoker or a non-drinker or a non-consumer of trans-fat, salt, and fast cars, then everyone must be made to do and be the same – for the good of all mankind.

Liberals love their government to be “masterful” — powerful enough to give and to take away, to make things happen, to redistribute everyone’s wealth, guarantee jobs and homes and healthcare and a bland, predictable education.

Liberals hate. They hate those big wealthy, risk-taking, adventurous, cigar-smoking, gun-totting, lusty individualists who succeed in a “free to fail” nation of fearless men and women – those who remain optimists in God’s glorious world of love and freedom.

Secretly, down deep, liberals hate being “girly-man/sissies,” but they are. They are feckless sissies because they just don’t believe in, nor do they trust the gifts and talents and fortitude God instills in all men and all women.

Simply put, liberals are afraid to fail, so they want their government to create a world where nobody fails. They haven’t learned, as conservative men and women have learned, that a person grows stronger and wiser and grander after each disappointment, after each painful failure.

Liberals are more comfortable (liberals love the word “comfortable”) when failure is collective and communal and no one person feels its sting. As for success – success is disparaged by liberals because success is usually achieved by raw nerves and pluck, and by believing in oneself and God, and by a lot of very hard work.

But should success come along — accidently or otherwise – liberals “feel,” too, that such success cannot be trusted because it can be lost too easily — because to maintain success, the hard work must never ends – life’s effort must never end.

Success must be fed, it must be lived and must be repeated every day, proven every day, asserted every day, renewed every day — as Sisyphus well knew. And so, to a spineless, sissy liberal, any and all success should be collective and communal and in that way it is less guilt-ridden either in its gaining or in its losing.

And although liberals do not “feel” personally satisfied with success, they can at least feel comfortable with collective success.

Collective success is an affirmation of a universal, benevolent cooperative big government. Success is collectively gained, collectively accepted, and collectively heralded – a sweet, blind comfort. Anathema to a liberal is a Judeo-Christian citizenry held personally responsible to an all-knowing God.

Of course successes are few in the communal world of big government unless you are one of the elite power mongers at the top. But that inequity matters little to the work-a-day liberal in the blind comfort of his mindless socialism. Ah, cooperative community living and cooperative community values.

“Tofu, anyone?”

 

by Gary Spina

 

liberalism-300x180.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

A conservative man is always politically incorrect and unimpeded in his words and thoughts – for he answers to God, not to the least of the common of society’s populace and political elite cesspool.

He enjoys fast horses, fast cars with big gas-guzzling engines, a good three or four hour cigar, fine wine, and smooth aged single-barrel whiskey. He likes guns, and he likes shooting guns, and to him guns have nothing to do with extensions of phallic fantasies because he leaves such psycho-babble to the liberal college professors to sit and fret over their “feelings” while he is out hunting and shooting animals and putting food on the table.

And he doesn’t enjoy killing animals, and he never kills anything he doesn’t eat, but sometimes he puts the heads of the animals he’s killed on the walls of his dens.

Oh, yeah, conservative men like dens. They like the deep northern wilderness and campfires and danger and quiet trout streams — and at the end of the day they like sitting quietly alone by the fireside and tasting the rich blend of Virginia, Mahalla, Dubac, and Mountain Leaf Latakia burning mellow and easy in their briar pipes and watching the wafting wreaths of pipe smoke in the cool dark peace of the evening woods.

A conservative man cares about the youth of America and the future of each man’s individual sovereignty. He cares about fairness and brotherhood and people less fortunate than he is, but if you are an adult and you choose to be selfish and lazy and mean and stupid, then he doesn’t bother to waste his time on you, as long as you keep your life away from his.

Oh, he is interested in changing the world, but always from within reality – always from within his own personal center of existence – that philosophical balance where all the power in his own universe lies within his own manhood and his own peace and where at any time he can make the existential choice to step outside that center. But all of that is in reserve in some dimension of some far forever, beyond the known universe, and right now he has only his personal existential choices to define his essence and existence – every day, one exciting new day at a time.

With that depth of what he holds in reserve, a conservative man keeps his life simple and good, satisfying his various appetites and moods and his need to take care of business.

Life is good when a man understands that discrimination is a survival skill. He discriminates against anything or anyone who threatens to compromise his family, his safety, his personal code of morality. And he practices hatred against drug dealers, child molesters, and traitors. But, unlike most liberals, he doesn’t demand others think as he does.

Simply stated, a conservative “believes,” and he acts on his well-thought-out beliefs. Conversely, a liberal “feels” and acts on a mindlessness that either feels good or feels bad.

Most liberals are scared senseless of individuality. If they are vegetarians, everyone else must be a vegetarian, and the government must have the power to make everyone conform because conformity is where everyone is safest.

If a liberal is a non-smoker or a non-drinker or a non-consumer of trans-fat, salt, and fast cars, then everyone must be made to do and be the same – for the good of all mankind.

Liberals love their government to be “masterful” — powerful enough to give and to take away, to make things happen, to redistribute everyone’s wealth, guarantee jobs and homes and healthcare and a bland, predictable education.

Liberals hate. They hate those big wealthy, risk-taking, adventurous, cigar-smoking, gun-totting, lusty individualists who succeed in a “free to fail” nation of fearless men and women – those who remain optimists in God’s glorious world of love and freedom.

Secretly, down deep, liberals hate being “girly-man/sissies,” but they are. They are feckless sissies because they just don’t believe in, nor do they trust the gifts and talents and fortitude God instills in all men and all women.

Simply put, liberals are afraid to fail, so they want their government to create a world where nobody fails. They haven’t learned, as conservative men and women have learned, that a person grows stronger and wiser and grander after each disappointment, after each painful failure.

Liberals are more comfortable (liberals love the word “comfortable”) when failure is collective and communal and no one person feels its sting. As for success – success is disparaged by liberals because success is usually achieved by raw nerves and pluck, and by believing in oneself and God, and by a lot of very hard work.

But should success come along — accidently or otherwise – liberals “feel,” too, that such success cannot be trusted because it can be lost too easily — because to maintain success, the hard work must never ends – life’s effort must never end.

Success must be fed, it must be lived and must be repeated every day, proven every day, asserted every day, renewed every day — as Sisyphus well knew. And so, to a spineless, sissy liberal, any and all success should be collective and communal and in that way it is less guilt-ridden either in its gaining or in its losing.

And although liberals do not “feel” personally satisfied with success, they can at least feel comfortable with collective success.

Collective success is an affirmation of a universal, benevolent cooperative big government. Success is collectively gained, collectively accepted, and collectively heralded – a sweet, blind comfort. Anathema to a liberal is a Judeo-Christian citizenry held personally responsible to an all-knowing God.

Of course successes are few in the communal world of big government unless you are one of the elite power mongers at the top. But that inequity matters little to the work-a-day liberal in the blind comfort of his mindless socialism. Ah, cooperative community living and cooperative community values.

“Tofu, anyone?”

 

by Gary Spina

 

a1vs3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

A conservative man is always politically incorrect and unimpeded in his words and thoughts – for he answers to God, not to the least of the common of society’s populace and political elite cesspool.

He enjoys fast horses, fast cars with big gas-guzzling engines, a good three or four hour cigar, fine wine, and smooth aged single-barrel whiskey. He likes guns, and he likes shooting guns, and to him guns have nothing to do with extensions of phallic fantasies because he leaves such psycho-babble to the liberal college professors to sit and fret over their “feelings” while he is out hunting and shooting animals and putting food on the table.

And he doesn’t enjoy killing animals, and he never kills anything he doesn’t eat, but sometimes he puts the heads of the animals he’s killed on the walls of his dens.

Oh, yeah, conservative men like dens. They like the deep northern wilderness and campfires and danger and quiet trout streams — and at the end of the day they like sitting quietly alone by the fireside and tasting the rich blend of Virginia, Mahalla, Dubac, and Mountain Leaf Latakia burning mellow and easy in their briar pipes and watching the wafting wreaths of pipe smoke in the cool dark peace of the evening woods.

A conservative man cares about the youth of America and the future of each man’s individual sovereignty. He cares about fairness and brotherhood and people less fortunate than he is, but if you are an adult and you choose to be selfish and lazy and mean and stupid, then he doesn’t bother to waste his time on you, as long as you keep your life away from his.

Oh, he is interested in changing the world, but always from within reality – always from within his own personal center of existence – that philosophical balance where all the power in his own universe lies within his own manhood and his own peace and where at any time he can make the existential choice to step outside that center. But all of that is in reserve in some dimension of some far forever, beyond the known universe, and right now he has only his personal existential choices to define his essence and existence – every day, one exciting new day at a time.

With that depth of what he holds in reserve, a conservative man keeps his life simple and good, satisfying his various appetites and moods and his need to take care of business.

Life is good when a man understands that discrimination is a survival skill. He discriminates against anything or anyone who threatens to compromise his family, his safety, his personal code of morality. And he practices hatred against drug dealers, child molesters, and traitors. But, unlike most liberals, he doesn’t demand others think as he does.

Simply stated, a conservative “believes,” and he acts on his well-thought-out beliefs. Conversely, a liberal “feels” and acts on a mindlessness that either feels good or feels bad.

Most liberals are scared senseless of individuality. If they are vegetarians, everyone else must be a vegetarian, and the government must have the power to make everyone conform because conformity is where everyone is safest.

If a liberal is a non-smoker or a non-drinker or a non-consumer of trans-fat, salt, and fast cars, then everyone must be made to do and be the same – for the good of all mankind.

Liberals love their government to be “masterful” — powerful enough to give and to take away, to make things happen, to redistribute everyone’s wealth, guarantee jobs and homes and healthcare and a bland, predictable education.

Liberals hate. They hate those big wealthy, risk-taking, adventurous, cigar-smoking, gun-totting, lusty individualists who succeed in a “free to fail” nation of fearless men and women – those who remain optimists in God’s glorious world of love and freedom.

Secretly, down deep, liberals hate being “girly-man/sissies,” but they are. They are feckless sissies because they just don’t believe in, nor do they trust the gifts and talents and fortitude God instills in all men and all women.

Simply put, liberals are afraid to fail, so they want their government to create a world where nobody fails. They haven’t learned, as conservative men and women have learned, that a person grows stronger and wiser and grander after each disappointment, after each painful failure.

Liberals are more comfortable (liberals love the word “comfortable”) when failure is collective and communal and no one person feels its sting. As for success – success is disparaged by liberals because success is usually achieved by raw nerves and pluck, and by believing in oneself and God, and by a lot of very hard work.

But should success come along — accidently or otherwise – liberals “feel,” too, that such success cannot be trusted because it can be lost too easily — because to maintain success, the hard work must never ends – life’s effort must never end.

Success must be fed, it must be lived and must be repeated every day, proven every day, asserted every day, renewed every day — as Sisyphus well knew. And so, to a spineless, sissy liberal, any and all success should be collective and communal and in that way it is less guilt-ridden either in its gaining or in its losing.

And although liberals do not “feel” personally satisfied with success, they can at least feel comfortable with collective success.

Collective success is an affirmation of a universal, benevolent cooperative big government. Success is collectively gained, collectively accepted, and collectively heralded – a sweet, blind comfort. Anathema to a liberal is a Judeo-Christian citizenry held personally responsible to an all-knowing God.

Of course successes are few in the communal world of big government unless you are one of the elite power mongers at the top. But that inequity matters little to the work-a-day liberal in the blind comfort of his mindless socialism. Ah, cooperative community living and cooperative community values.

“Tofu, anyone?”

 

by Gary Spina

 

antieverything.jpgantieverything.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

A conservative man is always politically incorrect and unimpeded in his words and thoughts – for he answers to God, not to the least of the common of society’s populace and political elite cesspool.

He enjoys fast horses, fast cars with big gas-guzzling engines, a good three or four hour cigar, fine wine, and smooth aged single-barrel whiskey. He likes guns, and he likes shooting guns, and to him guns have nothing to do with extensions of phallic fantasies because he leaves such psycho-babble to the liberal college professors to sit and fret over their “feelings” while he is out hunting and shooting animals and putting food on the table.

And he doesn’t enjoy killing animals, and he never kills anything he doesn’t eat, but sometimes he puts the heads of the animals he’s killed on the walls of his dens.

Oh, yeah, conservative men like dens. They like the deep northern wilderness and campfires and danger and quiet trout streams — and at the end of the day they like sitting quietly alone by the fireside and tasting the rich blend of Virginia, Mahalla, Dubac, and Mountain Leaf Latakia burning mellow and easy in their briar pipes and watching the wafting wreaths of pipe smoke in the cool dark peace of the evening woods.

A conservative man cares about the youth of America and the future of each man’s individual sovereignty. He cares about fairness and brotherhood and people less fortunate than he is, but if you are an adult and you choose to be selfish and lazy and mean and stupid, then he doesn’t bother to waste his time on you, as long as you keep your life away from his.

Oh, he is interested in changing the world, but always from within reality – always from within his own personal center of existence – that philosophical balance where all the power in his own universe lies within his own manhood and his own peace and where at any time he can make the existential choice to step outside that center. But all of that is in reserve in some dimension of some far forever, beyond the known universe, and right now he has only his personal existential choices to define his essence and existence – every day, one exciting new day at a time.

With that depth of what he holds in reserve, a conservative man keeps his life simple and good, satisfying his various appetites and moods and his need to take care of business.

Life is good when a man understands that discrimination is a survival skill. He discriminates against anything or anyone who threatens to compromise his family, his safety, his personal code of morality. And he practices hatred against drug dealers, child molesters, and traitors. But, unlike most liberals, he doesn’t demand others think as he does.

Simply stated, a conservative “believes,” and he acts on his well-thought-out beliefs. Conversely, a liberal “feels” and acts on a mindlessness that either feels good or feels bad.

Most liberals are scared senseless of individuality. If they are vegetarians, everyone else must be a vegetarian, and the government must have the power to make everyone conform because conformity is where everyone is safest.

If a liberal is a non-smoker or a non-drinker or a non-consumer of trans-fat, salt, and fast cars, then everyone must be made to do and be the same – for the good of all mankind.

Liberals love their government to be “masterful” — powerful enough to give and to take away, to make things happen, to redistribute everyone’s wealth, guarantee jobs and homes and healthcare and a bland, predictable education.

Liberals hate. They hate those big wealthy, risk-taking, adventurous, cigar-smoking, gun-totting, lusty individualists who succeed in a “free to fail” nation of fearless men and women – those who remain optimists in God’s glorious world of love and freedom.

Secretly, down deep, liberals hate being “girly-man/sissies,” but they are. They are feckless sissies because they just don’t believe in, nor do they trust the gifts and talents and fortitude God instills in all men and all women.

Simply put, liberals are afraid to fail, so they want their government to create a world where nobody fails. They haven’t learned, as conservative men and women have learned, that a person grows stronger and wiser and grander after each disappointment, after each painful failure.

Liberals are more comfortable (liberals love the word “comfortable”) when failure is collective and communal and no one person feels its sting. As for success – success is disparaged by liberals because success is usually achieved by raw nerves and pluck, and by believing in oneself and God, and by a lot of very hard work.

But should success come along — accidently or otherwise – liberals “feel,” too, that such success cannot be trusted because it can be lost too easily — because to maintain success, the hard work must never ends – life’s effort must never end.

Success must be fed, it must be lived and must be repeated every day, proven every day, asserted every day, renewed every day — as Sisyphus well knew. And so, to a spineless, sissy liberal, any and all success should be collective and communal and in that way it is less guilt-ridden either in its gaining or in its losing.

And although liberals do not “feel” personally satisfied with success, they can at least feel comfortable with collective success.

Collective success is an affirmation of a universal, benevolent cooperative big government. Success is collectively gained, collectively accepted, and collectively heralded – a sweet, blind comfort. Anathema to a liberal is a Judeo-Christian citizenry held personally responsible to an all-knowing God.

Of course successes are few in the communal world of big government unless you are one of the elite power mongers at the top. But that inequity matters little to the work-a-day liberal in the blind comfort of his mindless socialism. Ah, cooperative community living and cooperative community values.

“Tofu, anyone?”

 

by Gary Spina

 

THE ENLIGHTENED ,GOOD AND DECENT AMERICANS CAN CLEARLY SEE HOW CORRUPT THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS. WE ARE NOT STUPID, WE DO NOT LET THE WOOL BE PULLED OVER OUR EYES AS DO THE COMPLETE AND IGNORANT LIBERAL VOTERS AND ESPECIALLY THE IGNORANT IMBECILES ON THIS FORUM.

 

THE FOOLISH IN HERE ARE CLUELESS TO THE DAMAGE THE PEOPLE THEY SUPPORT ARE DOING TO THEM AND TO US.

 

LIBERAL FOOLS AND TOOLS,THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS AND IT MEANS EVERYTHING TO THE YOUNG OF OUR NATION.

 

WHO AMONG US WANTS TO SEE OUR YOUNG GROW UP IN A DESTROYED NATION AND WORSE OFF THAN WE WERE?

 

WELL , SADLY IT IS THE LIBERAL MORONS BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO EDUCATE THEMSELVES TO ANY DEGREE OF COMPETENCE.

 

THE AUTHOR OF THE LETTER BELOW UNDERSTANDS WHAT IT MEANS TO ALLOW THIS LAWLESS ADMINISTRATION TO CONTINUE ON WITH ITS CRIMES,HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT HAPPENS TO A CIVIL SOCIETY WHEN THE CRIMINALS ARE RUNNING THE SHOW.....

 

LIBERALS HAVE NO SHAME .....OR BRAINS...IT IS SICKENING.

 

I HOPE YOU LIBERALS ARE NOT TO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MAN IS SAYING, I WISH YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND,IT IS NOT A DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN THING.IT IS A MORAL OR IMMORAL THING....I HAVE DOUBT YOU LIBERALS ARE SMART ENOUGH TO EVEN READ IT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 25, 2016

A Retired FBI Agent Addresses James Comey on the Hillary Clinton Investigation

Mr. James Comey, Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Sir,

I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court.­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.

Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her.

Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified… and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world… for entirely political reasons.

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation... NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S., but instead personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself.

Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence, or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community.

All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. This is a RICO case if

there ever were one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted. You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that year I operated “outside the wire” patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices. Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space. It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop. But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of Secret. Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is how serious this violation is considered.

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law. How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

Sincerely,

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI Agent, Retired)

THIS IS WHAT THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS RUINED,TRUST FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.......JUST SO SAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

THE ENLIGHTENED ,GOOD AND DECENT AMERICANS CAN CLEARLY SEE HOW CORRUPT THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS. WE ARE NOT STUPID, WE DO NOT LET THE WOOL BE PULLED OVER OUR EYES AS DO THE COMPLETE AND IGNORANT LIBERAL VOTERS AND ESPECIALLY THE IGNORANT IMBECILES ON THIS FORUM.

 

THE FOOLISH IN HERE ARE CLUELESS TO THE DAMAGE THE PEOPLE THEY SUPPORT ARE DOING TO THEM AND TO US.

 

LIBERAL FOOLS AND TOOLS,THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS AND IT MEANS EVERYTHING TO THE YOUNG OF OUR NATION.

 

WHO AMONG US WANTS TO SEE OUR YOUNG GROW UP IN A DESTROYED NATION AND WORSE OFF THAN WE WERE?

 

WELL , SADLY IT IS THE LIBERAL MORONS BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO EDUCATE THEMSELVES TO ANY DEGREE OF COMPETENCE.

 

THE AUTHOR OF THE LETTER BELOW UNDERSTANDS WHAT IT MEANS TO ALLOW THIS LAWLESS ADMINISTRATION TO CONTINUE ON WITH ITS CRIMES,HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT HAPPENS TO A CIVIL SOCIETY WHEN THE CRIMINALS ARE RUNNING THE SHOW.....

 

LIBERALS HAVE NO SHAME .....OR BRAINS...IT IS SICKENING.

 

I HOPE YOU LIBERALS ARE NOT TO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MAN IS SAYING, I WISH YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND,IT IS NOT A DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN THING.IT IS A MORAL OR IMMORAL THING....I HAVE DOUBT YOU LIBERALS ARE SMART ENOUGH TO EVEN READ IT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 25, 2016

A Retired FBI Agent Addresses James Comey on the Hillary Clinton Investigation

Mr. James Comey, Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Sir,

I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court.­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.

Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her.

Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified… and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world… for entirely political reasons.

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation... NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S., but instead personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself.

Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence, or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community.

All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. This is a RICO case if

there ever were one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted. You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that year I operated “outside the wire” patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices. Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space. It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop. But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of Secret. Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is how serious this violation is considered.

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law. How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

Sincerely,

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI Agent, Retired)

THIS IS WHAT THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS RUINED,TRUST FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.......JUST SO SAD.

 

alinsky%2Brules%2Bbecome%2Blaw...great%2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Promoting a local politician on the world wide web I see. Vertical axis of how and why centered on a horizontal plane of what, where, when, and who does what they do to defend their reality and protect the means of their denying the self evident.

 

doesn't matter what side or which corner used with 6 degrees of deflection, they all operate the same way using separated excuses to feel exempt from self contained by the same moment here.

Oh shut up! lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

THE ENLIGHTENED ,GOOD AND DECENT AMERICANS CAN CLEARLY SEE HOW CORRUPT THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS. WE ARE NOT STUPID, WE DO NOT LET THE WOOL BE PULLED OVER OUR EYES AS DO THE COMPLETE AND IGNORANT LIBERAL VOTERS AND ESPECIALLY THE IGNORANT IMBECILES ON THIS FORUM.

 

THE FOOLISH IN HERE ARE CLUELESS TO THE DAMAGE THE PEOPLE THEY SUPPORT ARE DOING TO THEM AND TO US.

 

LIBERAL FOOLS AND TOOLS,THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS AND IT MEANS EVERYTHING TO THE YOUNG OF OUR NATION.

 

WHO AMONG US WANTS TO SEE OUR YOUNG GROW UP IN A DESTROYED NATION AND WORSE OFF THAN WE WERE?

 

WELL , SADLY IT IS THE LIBERAL MORONS BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO EDUCATE THEMSELVES TO ANY DEGREE OF COMPETENCE.

 

THE AUTHOR OF THE LETTER BELOW UNDERSTANDS WHAT IT MEANS TO ALLOW THIS LAWLESS ADMINISTRATION TO CONTINUE ON WITH ITS CRIMES,HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT HAPPENS TO A CIVIL SOCIETY WHEN THE CRIMINALS ARE RUNNING THE SHOW.....

 

LIBERALS HAVE NO SHAME .....OR BRAINS...IT IS SICKENING.

 

I HOPE YOU LIBERALS ARE NOT TO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MAN IS SAYING, I WISH YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND,IT IS NOT A DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN THING.IT IS A MORAL OR IMMORAL THING....I HAVE DOUBT YOU LIBERALS ARE SMART ENOUGH TO EVEN READ IT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 25, 2016

A Retired FBI Agent Addresses James Comey on the Hillary Clinton Investigation

Mr. James Comey, Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Sir,

I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court.­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.

Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her.

Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified… and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world… for entirely political reasons.

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation... NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S., but instead personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself.

Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence, or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community.

All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. This is a RICO case if

there ever were one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted. You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that year I operated “outside the wire” patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices. Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space. It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop. But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of Secret. Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is how serious this violation is considered.

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law. How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

Sincerely,

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI Agent, Retired)

THIS IS WHAT THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS RUINED,TRUST FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.......JUST SO SAD.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To a conservative man, life is simple. He eats when he’s hungry, sleeps when he’s tired, and chases his woman when he’s in the mood. There’s not much beyond that. A conservative man takes care of his wife and family and the things he has to do. “The things he has to do” would be what’s called his responsibilities in life.

He works hard, comes home from work for a few cold beers, a home cooked meal – preferably a thick rare steak charred on the grill – and he devotes all the fire in his belly to the love and wellbeing of his family and his belief in his Creator who hold him responsible for all he does and all he does not do. After that, leave him alone, and he’ll leave you alone.

 

 

by Gary Spina

 

Intellectual stupidity projecting again. A human being human conserves natural balancing, not societal evolution taking control away from instinctive navigation while simultaneously existing at the same time being kinetically spaced apart.

 

Understanding real is simple, making reality govern ancestrally is complicated and always directing social behavior into acting out self fulfilling prophecies until extinction silences the attempts of escaping self containment by only living now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This describes me. You can speak in any ridiculous way you want but based on what I see from researching

this forum all week is no one takes you serious anyway. I have more common sense in my little finger and can rebuild a motor, bbq for my family,

and love my children at the same time while eating a ham sandwich. I guarantee you i could do the same amount of work in an hour as you could in a week.

Point is...dems are lazy, nasty people that want everyone for free. Just look at history. Now go back to watching msnbc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This describes me. You can speak in any ridiculous way you want but based on what I see from researching

this forum all week is no one takes you serious anyway. I have more common sense in my little finger and can rebuild a motor, bbq for my family,

and love my children at the same time while eating a ham sandwich. I guarantee you i could do the same amount of work in an hour as you could in a week.

Point is...dems are lazy, nasty people that want everyone for free. Just look at history. Now go back to watching msnbc.

AND THEY ARE COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT. WE ARE GOING TO PUSH THROUGH OUR TRUE AMERICAN AGENDA AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK AND GET IT ON THE RIGHT TRACK AGAIN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...