fishhead Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sole result Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Another Poss Perot wannabe. that will fly a long way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 That giant sucking sound Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishhead Posted September 28, 2016 Author Share Posted September 28, 2016 Conformist dicklickers. Your future is short. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pogorocks Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 The debate already had one douchebag on stage.....they certainly didn't need another one....like that corporate stooge Johnson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishhead Posted September 28, 2016 Author Share Posted September 28, 2016 The debate already had one douchebag on stage.....they certainly didn't need another one....like that corporate stooge Johnson. Ignorant asshole!! Reap what you sow cowgirl! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pogorocks Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Ignorant asshole!! Reap what you sow cowgirl!I'm afraid that in this case, you are the bamboozled "ignorant asshole", fishy. Gary Johnson is a radical rightwing nutjob and crackpot. He is a corporate stooge....just like all of the bamboozled Libertarians.....only he knows it and is quite happy being one. Gary Johnson Is a Hardcore Right-Wing Radical His rhetoric on marijuana and against war serve as a shield for a litany of radical-right positions. The True History of Libertarianism in America: A Phony Ideology to Promote a Corporate Agenda Before Milton Friedman was earning plaudits as an economic genius, he was a shill for the real estate industry and an early pioneer for big business propaganda known as libertarianism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Mack Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishhead Posted September 28, 2016 Author Share Posted September 28, 2016 I'm afraid that in this case, you are the bamboozled "ignorant asshole", fishy. Gary Johnson is a radical rightwing nutjob and crackpot. He is a corporate stooge....just like all of the bamboozled Libertarians.....only he knows it and is quite happy being one. Gary Johnson Is a Hardcore Right-Wing Radical His rhetoric on marijuana and against war serve as a shield for a litany of radical-right positions. The True History of Libertarianism in America: A Phony Ideology to Promote a Corporate Agenda Before Milton Friedman was earning plaudits as an economic genius, he was a shill for the real estate industry and an early pioneer for big business propaganda known as libertarianism. 'swig, swig'. I'm afraid that in this case, you are the bamboozled "ignorant asshole", fishy. Gary Johnson is a radical rightwing nutjob and crackpot. He is a corporate stooge....just like all of the bamboozled Libertarians.....only he knows it and is quite happy being one. Gary Johnson Is a Hardcore Right-Wing Radical His rhetoric on marijuana and against war serve as a shield for a litany of radical-right positions. The True History of Libertarianism in America: A Phony Ideology to Promote a Corporate Agenda Before Milton Friedman was earning plaudits as an economic genius, he was a shill for the real estate industry and an early pioneer for big business propaganda known as libertarianism. California queer, jizz up the ass malarkey..Hannity jack-off queen...Laughable!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintao Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Mr. Trump told reporters in the spin room he was happy with Mr. Holt’s moderating. “I thought Lester did a great job,” he said during a brief appearance on the rope line. “Honestly, I thought he did a great job.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintao Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pogorocks Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 I'm afraid that in this case, you are the bamboozled "ignorant asshole", fishy. Gary Johnson is a radical rightwing nutjob and crackpot. He is a corporate stooge....just like all of the bamboozled Libertarians.....only he knows it and is quite happy being one. Gary Johnson Is a Hardcore Right-Wing RadicalHis rhetoric on marijuana and against war serve as a shield for a litany of radical-right positions. The True History of Libertarianism in America: A Phony Ideology to Promote a Corporate AgendaBefore Milton Friedman was earning plaudits as an economic genius, he was a shill for the real estate industry and an early pioneer for big business propaganda known as libertarianism. 'swig, swig'. California queer, jizz up the ass malarkey..Hannity jack-off queen...Laughable!!! Too bad you can't handle the truth about the crackpot, astroturfed, corporate-stooge Libertarians (your personal cult perhaps?), and their far-rightwing stealth candidate for President. Your response is indeed "laughable!!!". It seems I touched a nerve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Mack Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 The one thing missing in the debate... FAST FOOD SNACKS ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XavierOnassis Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Johnson could never get elected. Neither could any other Libertarian. If this did happen, then they would have no support in Congress. The Constitution is written in such a way as to favor two parties, Unfortunate, perhaps, but that is the way it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pogorocks Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 If there was ever an election where a third party might do well.. this is it.And there's that old delusional thinking again. The Green Party is polling in the low single digits and is on the ballot in only half the states. Their candidate is an unknown to most people. The stealth far-rightwing 'Libertarian' Johnson is polling at only about 10%....so he wasn't in the debates, few people know him or his positions (which is probably a good thing for him, given how vile his far-right positions are) and can only act as a 'spoiler' for the actual candidates. Neither one has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the general election in November. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
123urout Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 And there's that old delusional thinking again. The Green Party is polling in the low single digits and is on the ballot in only half the states. Their candidate is an unknown to most people. The stealth far-rightwing 'Libertarian' Johnson is polling at only about 10%....so he wasn't in the debates, few people know him or his positions (which is probably a good thing for him, given how vile his far-right positions are) and can only act as a 'spoiler' for the actual candidates. Neither one has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the general election in November. HE MOST RESEMBLES DEMONCRATS AND THEIR IGNORANCE..LIBERALS HATE CREATING JOBS....HENCE THEY LOVE HUSSEIN AND KILLARY........BUT DONALD ISNT EVEN PRESIDENT YET AND HE IS CREATING MORE JOBS THAN KILLARY AND HUSSEIN COMBINED... LIBERALS....JUST PLAIN DUMB! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclectic skeptic Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 If you don't where Aleppo is or WHAT it is, he doesn't deserve to be on the stage. Plus I'm sure Trump didn't know the city either, but we can't keep the imbecile off the stage. He needs to be there so HRC can humiliate him again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishhead Posted September 28, 2016 Author Share Posted September 28, 2016 In my book, not knowing about Aleppo is a good thing. Fuck Syria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XavierOnassis Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 How does the Constitution favor two parties? I think it is just public sentiment. The US Constitution was patterned after the British government of the 1770's, in which there were two parties, the Tories (supporters of the Crown. largely nobility) and the Whigs (in simplified terms, business interests who only favored colonial ventures when it could turn them a profit). We have had only three elections in which there were more than two viable contenders: 1824 (John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay & William Crawford) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1824 and 1860 (Abraham Lincoln. Stephen Douglas, John Breckenridge and John Bell) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1860 and 1912 (Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson and Eugene V Debs) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1912 I agree, it is all about public sentiment: the public sentiment is that only two parties count and one of the two will always win. The public sentiment has always been, "vote third party and you are throwing your vote away." It has been a self-fulfilling prophesy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bludog Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 I agree, it is all about public sentiment: the public sentiment is that only two parties count and one of the two will always win. The public sentiment has always been, "vote third party and you are throwing your vote away." It has been a self-fulfilling prophesy. And again, in this election cycle, the same bromide is being shouted from the rooftops. And again, it happens to be the truth. Can a third party candidate ever emerge who is destined to win? It hasn't happened yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neue regel Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 True Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pogorocks Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 In my book, not knowing about Aleppo is a good thing. Fuck Syria. You must have the same book that T'Rump uses, dickhead. The one for willfully ignorant idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.