Jump to content

Trump did ok given he was debating Hillary AND THE MODERATOR.


Recommended Posts

Trump has rightly accused Lester Holt of bias during the debate.

 

So lets talk the evidence for that bias

 

Holt challenged Trump (incorrectly by the way) repeatedly about claims Trump made. Not once did he have a follow up comment or question to any of Hillary's claims. Probably didnt want to get her off script.

 

Holt interrupted Trump about twice as often as he interrupted Hillary (30 to 19).

 

Holt's choice of topics was definitely biased. For example, he only asked Hillary about the emails after Trump mentioned the subject, then he let Hillary call it a mistake, apologize and simply moved one (no follow up or challenge).

 

In addition to ignoring Servergate, Holt asked no questions about the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi. Yet he grilled Trump at length about his tax returns, implying there was something hidden in those returns. And then Holt raised the birther nonsense but failed to mention that Hillarys camp was deeply involved in starting the rumor in the first place. He added three follow up questions trying to *get* Trump on that ridiculous topic.

 

He didnt ask Hillary ANY questions about her actions in the past vis a vis Filegate, Chinagate, the Travel Office or the death of Vince Foster just for starters. It's like Hillary didn't have any past she had to explain or defend.

 

Over and over he framed his questions to make Trump appear racist or sexist. And he served up Hillary opportunities to do so. It almost looked like Hillary knew the questions that Holt would asked ... that she was working from a script. Did you notice that she looked down often at her the notes on her podium. Trump used no notes. And they made damn sure to collect Hillary's notes as soon as the debate ended:

 

w1izpkav42ox.png

 

Holt made a big deal of Hillary being the first nominated woman candidate. When Trump tried to respond to this, Holt interrupted him.

 

Holt attacked Trump for supporting the Iraq War but didnt mention that Clinton actually voted for it. And never mind that Holts view that the Iraq War was bad makes me again question his *Republican* credentials ... regardless of Trump's views on the subject.

 

Holt misrepresented Trumps tax plan in a way that again showed his leftist bias. He seemed to hold liberal views on that issue, too.

 

In short, Holt didnt act as an impartial moderator. He definitely tried to help Hillary during the debate in various ways And I wouldnt put it past NBC to have provided Hillary with the list of the questions before the debate began. One of Hillarys emails revealed that NBC was leaking possible questions to Hillarys staff ahead of an appearance she made on Meet the Press back in 2009 (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/email-reveals-hillary-clinton-was-fed-questions-before-meet-the-press-appearance/ ). These people arent above doing that. The emails also show other evidence of collusion between the media and Hillary. The DNC approved articles about Hillary before they were published by CNN. So perhaps theres a reason why Hillary seemed so calm (other then meds). She had a script. Every one of the answers seemed canned. Practiced. Memorized.

 

Now the left is trying to play up the fact that Holt is a registered Republican so he couldnt possibly be biased against Trump. But everyone knows that NBC is a nest of Democrats and he would not have the position he has at NBC if he didnt go along with them act the Democrat at work. Trump is right is saying Lester is a Democrat. Its a phony system. They are all Democrats. While at NBC, Holt has celebrated Obama administration policies. A real Republican wouldnt do that. A real Republican wouldnt say The ObamaCare law" is "quite literally a lifesavor (as he did in June 2015). A real Republican wouldnt asked Trump if he can cry or emote (as he did in July). A real Republican wouldnt show so much excitement about seeing the first female president especially if that female was Hillary (as he did in March during the Democratic Party Convention). A real Republican wouldn't declare that delaying Obamas amnesty dashes American dreams (as he did in February 2015). A real Republican wouldnt call Obamas Iran policies a major win (as he did in September 2015) or characterize concerns about Syrian refugees as fear talk by Republicans (as he did in November 2015). A real Republican wouldnt go all in to support the global warming agenda promoted by NBC. The truth is that Holt knows who butters his bread and his Republican registration is merely a ploy a disguise. He appears to believe all the memes of the left. NBC donated $5.6 million to the DNC. Why else would Holt CHOSE to work at NBC? Would ANY self-respecting Republican want to that? I don't think so. Why else would NBC let Holt work there? Were not stupid. We see the game the media is playing. Just saying ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Now get this …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15YBpGgSAlk&feature=youtu.be

That proves that Lester Holt was wearing an earpiece during the debate.

Yet the Commission on Presidential Debates explicitly banned the moderator from wearing one.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/debate-moderators-no-earpieces/2016/09/18/id/748840/

Presidential debate moderators Lester Holt, Martha Raddatz, Anderson Cooper and Chris Wallace won't be permitted to wear earpieces at any of the upcoming face-offs between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, the New York Post reports.


http://www.worldtribune.com/no-ear-mics-allowed-for-presidential-debate-moderators-what-about-the-candidates/

September 25, 2016

While presidential debate moderators are not allowed to wear earpieces during the proceedings, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has not specifically ruled out the use of ear mics for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the first debate on Sept. 26.


Rub two neurons together, folks.

The debate was rigged.

Just like Trump predicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump did ok given he was debating Hillary AND THE MODERATOR.

 

Trump had it easy compared to the Commander-In-Chief Forum where moderator Matt Lauer interrupted Hillary 100% of the time with drawn-out policy positions, giving her almost no time to answer. Although Lauer made a show of severity with Trump at first, he pitched softball questions at Trump the rest of the time and gave him plenty of time to answer with no interruptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey CON scum, Trump interrupted over 50 times. Hillary never interrupted Trump. She let him hang himself with his litany of lies.

 

Lester Holt is a Republican,

 

SCORE BOARD!

 

TRUMP LIED 16 times and Hillary lied 0 times

 

Pathetic CONS are crying FOUL!

 

 

 

sc090304.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump has rightly accused Lester Holt of bias during the debate.

 

So lets talk the evidence for that bias

 

Holt challenged Trump (incorrectly by the way) repeatedly about claims Trump made. Not once did he have a follow up comment or question to any of Hillary's claims. Probably didnt want to get her off script.

 

Holt interrupted Trump about twice as often as he interrupted Hillary (30 to 19).

 

Holt's choice of topics was definitely biased. For example, he only asked Hillary about the emails after Trump mentioned the subject, then he let Hillary call it a mistake, apologize and simply moved one (no follow up or challenge).

 

In addition to ignoring Servergate, Holt asked no questions about the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi. Yet he grilled Trump at length about his tax returns, implying there was something hidden in those returns. And then Holt raised the birther nonsense but failed to mention that Hillarys camp was deeply involved in starting the rumor in the first place. He added three follow up questions trying to *get* Trump on that ridiculous topic.

 

He didnt ask Hillary ANY questions about her actions in the past vis a vis Filegate, Chinagate, the Travel Office or the death of Vince Foster just for starters. It's like Hillary didn't have any past she had to explain or defend.

 

Over and over he framed his questions to make Trump appear racist or sexist. And he served up Hillary opportunities to do so. It almost looked like Hillary knew the questions that Holt would asked ... that she was working from a script. Did you notice that she looked down often at her the notes on her podium. Trump used no notes. And they made damn sure to collect Hillary's notes as soon as the debate ended:

 

w1izpkav42ox.png

 

Holt made a big deal of Hillary being the first nominated woman candidate. When Trump tried to respond to this, Holt interrupted him.

 

Holt attacked Trump for supporting the Iraq War but didnt mention that Clinton actually voted for it. And never mind that Holts view that the Iraq War was bad makes me again question his *Republican* credentials ... regardless of Trump's views on the subject.

 

Holt misrepresented Trumps tax plan in a way that again showed his leftist bias. He seemed to hold liberal views on that issue, too.

 

In short, Holt didnt act as an impartial moderator. He definitely tried to help Hillary during the debate in various ways And I wouldnt put it past NBC to have provided Hillary with the list of the questions before the debate began. One of Hillarys emails revealed that NBC was leaking possible questions to Hillarys staff ahead of an appearance she made on Meet the Press back in 2009 (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/email-reveals-hillary-clinton-was-fed-questions-before-meet-the-press-appearance/ ). These people arent above doing that. The emails also show other evidence of collusion between the media and Hillary. The DNC approved articles about Hillary before they were published by CNN. So perhaps theres a reason why Hillary seemed so calm (other then meds). She had a script. Every one of the answers seemed canned. Practiced. Memorized.

 

Now the left is trying to play up the fact that Holt is a registered Republican so he couldnt possibly be biased against Trump. But everyone knows that NBC is a nest of Democrats and he would not have the position he has at NBC if he didnt go along with them act the Democrat at work. Trump is right is saying Lester is a Democrat. Its a phony system. They are all Democrats. While at NBC, Holt has celebrated Obama administration policies. A real Republican wouldnt do that. A real Republican wouldnt say The ObamaCare law" is "quite literally a lifesavor (as he did in June 2015). A real Republican wouldnt asked Trump if he can cry or emote (as he did in July). A real Republican wouldnt show so much excitement about seeing the first female president especially if that female was Hillary (as he did in March during the Democratic Party Convention). A real Republican wouldn't declare that delaying Obamas amnesty dashes American dreams (as he did in February 2015). A real Republican wouldnt call Obamas Iran policies a major win (as he did in September 2015) or characterize concerns about Syrian refugees as fear talk by Republicans (as he did in November 2015). A real Republican wouldnt go all in to support the global warming agenda promoted by NBC. The truth is that Holt knows who butters his bread and his Republican registration is merely a ploy a disguise. He appears to believe all the memes of the left. NBC donated $5.6 million to the DNC. Why else would Holt CHOSE to work at NBC? Would ANY self-respecting Republican want to that? I don't think so. Why else would NBC let Holt work there? Were not stupid. We see the game the media is playing. Just saying ...

Why on earth would Holt ask her about your completely discredited lies and smears?

 

He asked Trump about his vile behavior, actions, statements and lies that are actual FACT.

 

I know you can't see the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trump had it easy compared to the Commander-In-Chief Forum where moderator Matt Lauer interrupted Hillary 100% of the time with drawn-out policy positions, giving her almost no time to answer. Although Lauer made a show of severity with Trump at first, he pitched softball questions at Trump the rest of the time and gave him plenty of time to answer with no interruptions.

 

 

Garbage. You just don't like how Lauer dared to question Hillary about her ongoing email criminality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump has rightly accused Lester Holt of bias during the debate.

 

So lets talk the evidence for that bias

 

Holt challenged Trump (incorrectly by the way) repeatedly about claims Trump made. Not once did he have a follow up comment or question to any of Hillary's claims. Probably didnt want to get her off script.

 

Holt interrupted Trump about twice as often as he interrupted Hillary (30 to 19).

 

Holt's choice of topics was definitely biased. For example, he only asked Hillary about the emails after Trump mentioned the subject, then he let Hillary call it a mistake, apologize and simply moved one (no follow up or challenge).

 

In addition to ignoring Servergate, Holt asked no questions about the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi. Yet he grilled Trump at length about his tax returns, implying there was something hidden in those returns. And then Holt raised the birther nonsense but failed to mention that Hillarys camp was deeply involved in starting the rumor in the first place. He added three follow up questions trying to *get* Trump on that ridiculous topic.

 

He didnt ask Hillary ANY questions about her actions in the past vis a vis Filegate, Chinagate, the Travel Office or the death of Vince Foster just for starters. It's like Hillary didn't have any past she had to explain or defend.

 

Over and over he framed his questions to make Trump appear racist or sexist. And he served up Hillary opportunities to do so. It almost looked like Hillary knew the questions that Holt would asked ... that she was working from a script. Did you notice that she looked down often at her the notes on her podium. Trump used no notes. And they made damn sure to collect Hillary's notes as soon as the debate ended:

 

w1izpkav42ox.png

 

Holt made a big deal of Hillary being the first nominated woman candidate. When Trump tried to respond to this, Holt interrupted him.

 

Holt attacked Trump for supporting the Iraq War but didnt mention that Clinton actually voted for it. And never mind that Holts view that the Iraq War was bad makes me again question his *Republican* credentials ... regardless of Trump's views on the subject.

 

Holt misrepresented Trumps tax plan in a way that again showed his leftist bias. He seemed to hold liberal views on that issue, too.

 

In short, Holt didnt act as an impartial moderator. He definitely tried to help Hillary during the debate in various ways And I wouldnt put it past NBC to have provided Hillary with the list of the questions before the debate began. One of Hillarys emails revealed that NBC was leaking possible questions to Hillarys staff ahead of an appearance she made on Meet the Press back in 2009 (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/email-reveals-hillary-clinton-was-fed-questions-before-meet-the-press-appearance/ ). These people arent above doing that. The emails also show other evidence of collusion between the media and Hillary. The DNC approved articles about Hillary before they were published by CNN. So perhaps theres a reason why Hillary seemed so calm (other then meds). She had a script. Every one of the answers seemed canned. Practiced. Memorized.

 

Now the left is trying to play up the fact that Holt is a registered Republican so he couldnt possibly be biased against Trump. But everyone knows that NBC is a nest of Democrats and he would not have the position he has at NBC if he didnt go along with them act the Democrat at work. Trump is right is saying Lester is a Democrat. Its a phony system. They are all Democrats. While at NBC, Holt has celebrated Obama administration policies. A real Republican wouldnt do that. A real Republican wouldnt say The ObamaCare law" is "quite literally a lifesavor (as he did in June 2015). A real Republican wouldnt asked Trump if he can cry or emote (as he did in July). A real Republican wouldnt show so much excitement about seeing the first female president especially if that female was Hillary (as he did in March during the Democratic Party Convention). A real Republican wouldn't declare that delaying Obamas amnesty dashes American dreams (as he did in February 2015). A real Republican wouldnt call Obamas Iran policies a major win (as he did in September 2015) or characterize concerns about Syrian refugees as fear talk by Republicans (as he did in November 2015). A real Republican wouldnt go all in to support the global warming agenda promoted by NBC. The truth is that Holt knows who butters his bread and his Republican registration is merely a ploy a disguise. He appears to believe all the memes of the left. NBC donated $5.6 million to the DNC. Why else would Holt CHOSE to work at NBC? Would ANY self-respecting Republican want to that? I don't think so. Why else would NBC let Holt work there? Were not stupid. We see the game the media is playing. Just saying ...

 

44682569.jpg

 

NBCTrumpWomen_0.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump has rightly accused Lester Holt of bias during the debate.

 

So lets talk the evidence for that bias

 

Holt challenged Trump (incorrectly by the way) repeatedly about claims Trump made. Not once did he have a follow up comment or question to any of Hillary's claims. Probably didnt want to get her off script.

 

Holt interrupted Trump about twice as often as he interrupted Hillary (30 to 19).

 

Holt's choice of topics was definitely biased. For example, he only asked Hillary about the emails after Trump mentioned the subject, then he let Hillary call it a mistake, apologize and simply moved one (no follow up or challenge).

 

In addition to ignoring Servergate, Holt asked no questions about the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi. Yet he grilled Trump at length about his tax returns, implying there was something hidden in those returns. And then Holt raised the birther nonsense but failed to mention that Hillarys camp was deeply involved in starting the rumor in the first place. He added three follow up questions trying to *get* Trump on that ridiculous topic.

 

He didnt ask Hillary ANY questions about her actions in the past vis a vis Filegate, Chinagate, the Travel Office or the death of Vince Foster just for starters. It's like Hillary didn't have any past she had to explain or defend.

 

Over and over he framed his questions to make Trump appear racist or sexist. And he served up Hillary opportunities to do so. It almost looked like Hillary knew the questions that Holt would asked ... that she was working from a script. Did you notice that she looked down often at her the notes on her podium. Trump used no notes. And they made damn sure to collect Hillary's notes as soon as the debate ended:

 

w1izpkav42ox.png

 

Holt made a big deal of Hillary being the first nominated woman candidate. When Trump tried to respond to this, Holt interrupted him.

 

Holt attacked Trump for supporting the Iraq War but didnt mention that Clinton actually voted for it. And never mind that Holts view that the Iraq War was bad makes me again question his *Republican* credentials ... regardless of Trump's views on the subject.

 

Holt misrepresented Trumps tax plan in a way that again showed his leftist bias. He seemed to hold liberal views on that issue, too.

 

In short, Holt didnt act as an impartial moderator. He definitely tried to help Hillary during the debate in various ways And I wouldnt put it past NBC to have provided Hillary with the list of the questions before the debate began. One of Hillarys emails revealed that NBC was leaking possible questions to Hillarys staff ahead of an appearance she made on Meet the Press back in 2009 (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/email-reveals-hillary-clinton-was-fed-questions-before-meet-the-press-appearance/ ). These people arent above doing that. The emails also show other evidence of collusion between the media and Hillary. The DNC approved articles about Hillary before they were published by CNN. So perhaps theres a reason why Hillary seemed so calm (other then meds). She had a script. Every one of the answers seemed canned. Practiced. Memorized.

 

Now the left is trying to play up the fact that Holt is a registered Republican so he couldnt possibly be biased against Trump. But everyone knows that NBC is a nest of Democrats and he would not have the position he has at NBC if he didnt go along with them act the Democrat at work. Trump is right is saying Lester is a Democrat. Its a phony system. They are all Democrats. While at NBC, Holt has celebrated Obama administration policies. A real Republican wouldnt do that. A real Republican wouldnt say The ObamaCare law" is "quite literally a lifesavor (as he did in June 2015). A real Republican wouldnt asked Trump if he can cry or emote (as he did in July). A real Republican wouldnt show so much excitement about seeing the first female president especially if that female was Hillary (as he did in March during the Democratic Party Convention). A real Republican wouldn't declare that delaying Obamas amnesty dashes American dreams (as he did in February 2015). A real Republican wouldnt call Obamas Iran policies a major win (as he did in September 2015) or characterize concerns about Syrian refugees as fear talk by Republicans (as he did in November 2015). A real Republican wouldnt go all in to support the global warming agenda promoted by NBC. The truth is that Holt knows who butters his bread and his Republican registration is merely a ploy a disguise. He appears to believe all the memes of the left. NBC donated $5.6 million to the DNC. Why else would Holt CHOSE to work at NBC? Would ANY self-respecting Republican want to that? I don't think so. Why else would NBC let Holt work there? Were not stupid. We see the game the media is playing. Just saying ...

Here's the problem you've got dipshit. Lester Holt is a registered Republican.

 

Fail number 1

 

Lester Holt is an actual journalist. Not a Fox News reporter, or an AM talk radio clown.

 

Fail number 2

 

Being an actual journalist, Holt wasn't there to carry the rightwing clown shows water for them.

 

Fail number 3

 

Also because he is an actual journalist, moderating a debate, and not an embarrassment of anything conservative, he has the character to act like an adult, not a conservative, and fact check the bullshit that drips from Trumps mouth.

 

Fail number 4

 

It isn't going to get any better for Trump or his supporters, so if any of you think Trump is going to get away spewing the bullshit you clowns listen to on Fox, or AM talk radio. I have some really bad news for you.

 

Fail number 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Garbage. You just don't like how Lauer dared to question Hillary about her ongoing email criminality.

Uh, wrong. The C&C debate was solely held for the benefit of the troops to demonstrate how each candidate would handle the job, with only 30 minutes of time to respond, and by Lauers own rules, was to stay on topic, and only use the time alotted to answer questions from service members that were present.

 

He blew that right from the start by asking questions himself about the emails, and then interuppting Clinton in the middle of an answer.

 

Those emails don't mean anything to anybody except rightwing fruitloop land.

 

They mean nothing to the actual issues, and the only criminality belongs to Donald Trump, with his felony acts of colluding with the enemy in Russia, and his university that scammed people of their money, and the criminal tax evasion which is why he won't release his tax returns.

 

Clintons email server will not hurt her at all.

 

Donnie Dooms problem have only just begun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lester Holt is a registered Republican.

But he doesn't act like one. He ACTS like a stealth Democrat. As I proved with specific examples.

 

Lester Holt is an actual journalist.

A REAL journalist would have asked Hillary a probing question about the ongoing email/server scandal. Or Benghazi. Or the Clinton Foundation.

 

Being an actual journalist, Holt wasn't there to carry the rightwing clown shows water for them.

Yet he carry the leftwing clown shows water (like the tax return and birther nonsense).

 

he has the character to act like an adult, not a conservative, and fact check the bullshit that drips from Trumps mouth.

Character assassination aside, Holt was absolutely wrong about "stop and frisk" and claiming our economy is doing wonderful.

 

His fact checking was a JOKE.

 

It isn't going to get any better for Trump or his supporters

Yeah, you keep telling yourself that, skews.

 

You cretins still haven't figured out Trump.

 

You still haven't grasped the fact that mainstream America is just tired of the establishment lies (by both parties).

 

 

Those emails don't mean anything to anybody except rightwing fruitloop land.

Yeah, you keep telling yourself that, MORON.

 

But Hillary has a BIG problem.

 

The statute of limitations won't have expired by the time Trump takes office.

 

And Trump has said he will proceed to get to the bottom of what Hillary and her staff did in that case.

 

And that means there will be an indictment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trump had it easy compared to the Commander-In-Chief Forum where moderator Matt Lauer interrupted Hillary 100% of the time with drawn-out policy positions, giving her almost no time to answer. Although Lauer made a show of severity with Trump at first, he pitched softball questions at Trump the rest of the time and gave him plenty of time to answer with no interruptions.

if i was the GOP i would never do another debate with the lib media until they agreed to go in order fox, msnbc, fox, cnn, fox, abc, fox, cbs, fox

 

fuck the faggot party or the dem party

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump did ok given he was debating Hillary AND THE MODERATOR.

The default or fallback tactic of the rightwingnuts, including T'Rump, when they get their asses handed to them, is ALWAYS crackpot conspiracy theories.

 

"I didn't lose - they conspired against me"

 

And ol' BeALoser is the absolute King of Crackpot Conspiracy Theories....so it is appropriate that he would try to push this one that T'Rump has invented.

 

Blame anything....except the fact that T'Rump is a totally unqualified, ignorant, boorish asswipe and liar....for his humiliating defeat in the first debate.....maybe it was the "microphone" they all conspired to give him? LOLOLOLOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump has rightly accused Lester Holt of bias during the debate.

 

So lets talk the evidence for that bias

 

Just saying ...

AFTER TRUMPS SNIFF SNIFF SNIFF POOR PERFORMANCE, I WOULD BE TRYING TO BLAME THE MODERATOR TOO!!! LMAO~~~

 

YOUR BOY NEEDS A NEW BRAIN, SNIFF, SNIFF

scarecrow-wizard-of-oz.jpgbrainondrugsbacon_573930_6936.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the left is trying to play up the fact that Holt is a registered Republican so he couldnt possibly be biased against Trump.

 

 

I can give you a list of republicans as long as my arm who are biased against Trump, including my republican governor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The default or fallback tactic of the rightwingnuts, including T'Rump, when they get their asses handed to them, is ALWAYS crackpot conspiracy theories.

 

"I didn't lose - they conspired against me"

 

And ol' BeALoser is the absolute King of Crackpot Conspiracy Theories....so it is appropriate that he would try to push this one that T'Rump has invented.

 

Blame anything....except the fact that T'Rump is a totally unqualified, ignorant, boorish asswipe and liar....for his humiliating defeat in the first debate.....maybe it was the "microphone" they all conspired to give him? LOLOLOLOL.

we all know that the nig moderator give hilbo all the questions in advance and slanted everything for her,,,yup another lib rigged debate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The default or fallback tactic of the rightwingnuts, including T'Rump, when they get their asses handed to them, is ALWAYS crackpot conspiracy theories.

 

"I didn't lose - they conspired against me"

 

And ol' BeALoser is the absolute King of Crackpot Conspiracy Theories....so it is appropriate that he would try to push this one that T'Rump has invented.

 

Blame anything....except the fact that T'Rump is a totally unqualified, ignorant, boorish asswipe and liar....for his humiliating defeat in the first debate.....maybe it was the "microphone" they all conspired to give him? LOLOLOLOL.

See....

 

Trump Suggests There Was A Plot To Sabotage His Debate Microphone

"I dont want to believe in conspiracy theories, of course."

The Huffington Post

09/27/2016

Donald Trump insisted that he won Monday nights debate despite having a faulty microphone, which he suggested might have been set up to undermine his performance.

 

"My microphone -- in the room they couldnt hear me," the GOP nominee told Fox News "Fox and Friends" in a Tuesday phone interview. "You know it was going on and off which isnt exactly great."

 

"I wonder if it was set up that way," he added. "It was terrible."

 

Trump recalled having no problem with the microphone during the sound test an hour before the debate, which led him to believe something sinister might have been done in the interim.

 

"It was on and off and it was much lower than hers," he said, referring to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. "I dont want to believe in conspiracy theories of course but it was much lower than hers and it was crackling."

 

Later, Trump blamed the microphone following reports that he sniffled throughout the debate.

 

"No sniffles, no," he said. "The mic was very bad, but maybe it was good enough to hear breathing."

 

The audience appeared to hear Trump just fine when he said, "My strongest asset, maybe by far, is my temperament." That comment prompted the crowd to erupt into laughter, ignoring instructions not to make noise.

 

Clinton mocked Trump's complaints during a press conference aboard her campaign airplane on Tuesday. The former secretary of state had begun to walk away from the gaggle of reporters, when she turned around to address Trump's frets about the microphone.

 

"Anybody who complains about the microphone is not having a good night," she said.

 

Contrary to his remarks, Trump has routinely used conspiracy theories to attack his political opponents. He even jumped on conspiracists claims that Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, murdered an aide. And of course, the brash businessman laid the groundwork for his presidential run by pushing the birther conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States.

 

Trump's complaints about the microphone were not the only aspect of the debate he suggested was unfair to him. He accused NBC News moderator Lester Holt of bias against him, giving Holt a "C" grade for his performance.

 

Editors note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims -- 1.6 billion members of an entire religion -- from entering the U.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey CON scum, Trump interrupted over 50 times. Hillary never interrupted Trump. She let him hang himself with his litany of lies.

 

Lester Holt is a Republican,

 

SCORE BOARD!

 

TRUMP LIED 16 times and Hillary lied 0 times

 

Pathetic CONS are crying FOUL!

 

 

 

sc090304.gif

0 times? That's simply not true. Get your head out of your ass.

 

Trump was, however, not prepared. And a proven serial liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...