benson13 Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 trying to bring that Idiot up to speed.. think sarah palin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mothertrumper Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Trumps just waiting for Ivanka to divorce Jared, so he can have her all for himself! Sick bastard, lusted after his own daughter, said she had a nice body, and if she wasn't his daughter, he'd be DATING her. Real presidential... He's a mentally ill, bigot, narcissist, neo-nazi loving punk. He will get what he deserves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sole result Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 trying to bring that Idiot up to speed.. think sarah palin Both Hillary and Donald are opportunists, and the separation between them was Donald work through economics buying political favors and Hillary mooched through selling political favors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sole result Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Business as usual has its conflicts of interest... There must be some benefit to being a politician??? Why do folks work so hard to get in? For the good of mankind?? Government seems less philanthropic than ever in 2016.. It is a power grab now.. power=wealth. Trump winning could be interpreted as a coupe de' tat by some. Power is gained by suggesting anything is possible and the public rents the ideas for life. This is how ruling elites, middle class, and rule classiications exist in reality. Technology has eliminated the need for the management classes between ruling elites and ruled by law. Now is the critic time to get back to natural balancing keeping everything eternally separated only within the moment here. Time to put corruption out in the open. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsouth Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 I'd be sure to have Trump bring this up - - - the character thing you know. “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality. This is well documented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sole result Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 I'd be sure to have Trump bring this up - - - the character thing you know. “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality. This is well documented. Deniers tell the truth about how they believe anything is possible. that is how the law functions defending career character's right to ignore the self evident in civil, contract, and criminal law. so care to explain how double jeapordy works when losing in criminal court they can be tried in civil court for the same event. Sounds like something where ruling elites play the coin toss game of heads they win and tails everyone else loses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishhead Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Can Trump answer a question, or just sling mud? What do his constituents want? Sling Mud!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsouth Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Can Trump answer a question, or just sling mud? What do his constituents want? Sling Mud!!! Say what you will about Trump; this is well documented, and ( this alone ) certainly brings Hillary's character into question. This is very very serious. “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 again...think palin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsouth Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 This is not a statement that would have been made lightly. Say what you will about Trump; this is well documented, and ( this alone ) certainly brings Hillary's character into question. This is very very serious. “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality. again...think palin Palin??? What is she running for? This deserves it's own OP. Be right back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XavierOnassis Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 This is not a statement that would have been made lightly.Could you provide us with some statements that WOULD have been made lightly, so we can see the difference and judge for ourselves? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.