Jump to content

This May Anger Left and Right. Best Description EVER.


Recommended Posts

NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PARTISAN ARTICLE ! IT IS WRITTEN BY A VERY INTELLIGENT MAN WHO IS FED UP, WITH BOTH RIGHT AND LEFT, AND IS BRILLIANT! - BUT IT IS HONEST, SO IF THAT HURTS, BE AWARE.

 

CAUTION !! THE FOLLOWING WORDS ARE FULL OF LOGIC !! - YOU ARE BEING FOREWARNED !!

 

IF THE THOUGHT OF HEARING WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY DISTURBS YOU, PROCEED WITH CAUTION !!

 

IF READING WHAT YOUR GOVERNMENT(OF BOTH PARTIES) AND YOUR "INSTITUTIONS" ARE DOING TO YOU, SO THAT SOLUTIONS MAY BE FOUND IS DISTURBING, BE CAREFUL !!

 

IF YOU LOVE THE STATUS QUO OF IDENTITY POLITICS, AND REDUCING EVERYTHING TO A STRAWMAN ARGUMENT, WITHOUT FIXING OUR "REPRESENTATIVE GOVT.", THEN DO NOT CONTINUE !!

votezealot.jpg
ZEALOT

A few weeks ago we observed the 15th anniversary of attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Looking back, we know history will most definitely conclude that our response to the attacks was swift, despite the lack of investigation as to who was involved and who funded it. Within hours of the attacks, the media reported and had pictures of the hijackers and who had hired them. We were told their leader was Osama bin Laden, the Saudi millionaire and former CIA asset in the Cold War.

National Security Adviser and now adviser to Barack Obama, Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on CNN that the U.S. organized and supported bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda” in the 1970s to fight the Soviets.

We were told by George W. Bush that the terrorists were evil, In fact, they were evil lunatics and their motive was simply because they hated our freedom. President George W. Bush was explicit when he said there would be a war and struggle pitting good vs. evil.

This was simple spin to eliminate question the events of the day. It would not be a complicated investigation, nor would there be a criminal court – it was the president promising to rid the world of evil.

From there, the media learned that people are easily swayed by simple-watered down euphemisms that were useful in creating straw man arguments against anyone who did not support the illusory fight against evil. You were either with the government or with the terrorists. There were no gray areas—no place for dialogue, and no tome to question how the vent happened. It was evil – and if you got in the way of the fight against evil you were evil to.

I am simply saying we were fighting a good vs. evil battle was newspeak shorthand that clouded and obscured all of the complexities of what happened that led to the attacks. There was no accountability for our decades of flawed foreign policy in the Middle East – no talk of blowback and culpability – it was good old good guys and bad guys – it was Matt Dillon shooting the guy wearing the black hat.

The sad thing is, it worked.

From that time forward the straw man argument was a tool used by many politicians and the media to strike down opposing points of view with logical fallacy. This type of back and forth – us vs. them reasoning somehow became a monster within media circles and eventually became the underlying theme of the ubernarrative that has been used to program the behavior of anyone within ear shot of the mainstream agenda.

54A4C0BA-8BE5-4AD2-805B20F57FE40AEA_agen

When you watch the mainstream news or listen to any media anymore there has to be the creation of a fictitious adversary, victim, or problem in order to create the impression that whatever the problem or pain it causes, the media can solve it, or they will interview those who claim to have the solutions, namely the politicians they choose to endorse.

The media will break down a crisis with a simple “us vs. them” straw man argument that can easily be accepted depending on the philosophies of the network that programs the demographic they choose to appeal to.

The solution is always Politician “A” can create equality, alleviate oppression, or solve the problem through more government intervention and laws. Perhaps you have heard something like “exhibit crisis 1 has been plaguing us for some time and thus there needs to be the solution of eliminating the problem by punishing everyone and limiting the freedom that is used to create this crisis.”

There should be a myriad of solutions, and there should be many ideas presented, but they are all whittled down to one good idea (theirs) and one bad idea (yours).

It is the foundation for keen and stealthy manipulation. It plays on peer pressure, need to be accepted, and that we know better than you do – so please do as we say, do as I do, or if you like what I do, or if you are like us you will give your support to the person we have chosen to manipulate you.

Manipulating the feelings of various groups for political advantage plays one group off another. Diversity actually encourages division, inherent contradictions, and double standards when everyone is given special treatment.

Yet here in the United States, we have turned the demand for equality, racial and sexual oppression, victimhood and racial and sexual orientation insensitivity into a cottage industry.

The cottage industry of “diversity,” is the newest and most divisive. It ironically supports division and breeds divisiveness. Unity becomes the polar opposite of diversity, which turns into laughable bumper sticker activism.

The media continues to encourage identity politics and pander to different groups. Just like good vs. evil we have simplified our problems with the poor vs. the rich, black vs. white, male vs. female, straight vs. gay, religious vs. secular, and unionist vs. environmentalist.

shutterstock_232149235-x900.jpg

The majority of Americans no longer sees themselves as a unit of proud citizens; they now play the game of fragmentation and identity politics. This leads to zealous nationalistic infighting which is why we are seeing this problem of football players deciding not to stand for the national anthem.

Small doses of nationalism and pride are a healthy part of patriotism however now militant zealots and sycophants in the middle of their “us vs. them” crisis have now been placed front and center in the ubernarrative because this is what now fuels the dialogue in this country.

It is now all about straw man arguments and identity politics. The media is fabricating the illusion that one side is more right than the other proclaiming they are the ones to solve the problems at the root of so much social division.

We are told that one side is better or on the side of good while another side is more evil and both liberal and conservative zealots lick it up. It breeds political bigotry where people mistakenly think that their political party is always good and the other is always evil.

It gets worse when the political ideology one holds turns into the litmus test for who they want to scapegoat for the problems of the world, who they want to make the straw man.

This is happening all the time.

One person identifies with a political party and literally hates the other and will somehow see people with that philosophy as a lesser human.

This type of behavior jumpstarted the heart of Nazism and the core strategy of the Soviet Union’s liquidation or even erasure of what the leaders determined to be enemies of the state.

It breeds a pathological society.

People now see whistle blowing, insurrection, rebellion and other thwarting of the oligarchy as all politically motivated either leaning liberal or leaning conservative.

If a group of Native Americans wish to protest a pipeline and a private firm unleashes dogs on them, it becomes a political issue as green party candidates and political environmentalists can’t pass up the opportunity to stump in the middle of the chaos. Vocal and pathological conservatives overlook the maiming and injuring of the people protesting – in order to push their idea of “drill baby drill” and job opportunities that will be destroyed if the pipeline doesn’t go through. I have heard from ugly political zealots “Who cares if the National Guard shows up to threaten these people – they crossed a blockade and are trespassing – if they don’t want an RPG pointed at them – they will do as their told.”

It is amazing how their unarmed act of protesting is seen as evil against the men with guns, dogs and tanks.

Can any see how this attitude is pathological and dangerous?

The core of identity politics is that if you fail to identify with the party line, you are a traitor not just to the party, but to your country, your race and your religion.

How Orwellian is that?

In the United States both political parties deploy identity politics, however we are now hearing from the democrat side that if you don’t vote the Democratic ticket, you will be choosing a narcissist dictator, a racist, a misogynist, and a vote for him makes you a traitor.

81970_600-300x229.jpg

The Democrat side is making up conspiracy theories about conspiracy theorists and saying that concerns about the health of their candidate is a right wing conspiracy concocted by the Kremlin. This accusation is made as their candidate struggles to get into a van after visit to the 911 memorial.

Never have there been so many accusations of “racist wallpapering” from the so-called progressives as there are now.

Most of this “racist” wall papering is being derived from white “progressives” that assume that there is a growing group of racists that are hiding amongst 9/11 Truth seekers, conspiracy theorists and a new group of trouble makers that the liberal left have called “The Birthers,” or those who question the birth place of Barack Obama.

The birther idea has once again crept into this election campaign as Hillary Clinton has demanded that Donald Trump apologize for questioning Obama’s birth eligibility for president. Once again we see another Strawman argument being thrown into the media zeitgeist to take our minds off of her health.

So in his smug way he basically threw it back at Clinton by stating at a press conference that he has “finished” Hillary Clinton’s “birther” campaign.

I knew exactly what he meant – but the media was outraged. They felt they were played…some even say that he pulled a political “Rick Roll.” The media had to scramble to figure out why he would accuse Hillary of starting such a vicious rumor about Barack Obama not being born in the United States.

The truth is Trump also knows how to use straw man logic and he did it against his opponent.

For the record Hillary did not start the rumor; however her silence of the issue spoke volumes when her staff and a group of angry Democrat Hillary supporters called PUMA started up the rumor that was first brought up when he was running for the senate of Illinois in 2004 by his rival Andy Martin.

It needs to be said that that the first man who brought Obama’s citizenship into question during his presidential run was a left-wing Jewish Democrat named Philip J. Berg, who actually backed Hillary Clinton for president. Berg, a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania actually sued the Bush Administration charging Bush and 154 others with complicity in the 9/11 attacks

natural120808840.jpg

Berg argued in 2008 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya in 1961 to an American woman, Stanley Ann Dunham, and a Kenyan man, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, as reportedly shown by a birth certificate from Mombasa Maternity Hospital and witnessed by Barack’s relatives.

The Birther conspiracy theory gained momentum and was pushed by renegade members of the original Obama haters, Party Unity My Ass, known more commonly by their acronym, the PUMAs. They were a splinter group of hard-core Hillary Clinton supporters who did not want to give up the ghost after the bitter 50-state Bataan Death March to the 2008 Democratic nomination.

In the early summer of ’08, message boards on sites like PUMAParty.com began lighting up with the ultimate reversal-of-fortune fantasy—that their party’s nomination could be overturned on constitutional grounds. “Obama May Be Illegal to Be Elected President!” read one representative e-mail: “This came from a USNA [u.S. Naval Academy] alumnus. It’ll be interesting to see how the media handle this…WRITE TO YOUR LOCAL newspaper editors etc. Keep this out there every day possible. Also write to the DNC too!”

That June, the Obama campaign released his certificate of live birth on its Web site as part of its “fight the smears” effort. Factcheck.org and other organizations examined the document in person and declared it genuine.

But posters at the PUMA sites were unimpressed: saying “Nobody believes it’s for real, except the Kool-Aid drinkers themselves.”

Before all of these accusations there was also the pictures that were e-mailed by aides of Hillary Clinton that showed Obama dressed as a Somali Elder, during his visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya.

Obama-Somali-Garb.jpg

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe accused the Clinton campaign of “shameful offensive fear-mongering” by circulating a photo as an attempted smear.

Plouffe said in a statement: “On the very day that Senator Clinton is giving a speech about restoring respect for America in the world, her campaign has engaged in the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we’ve seen from either party in this election. This is part of a disturbing pattern that led her county chairs to resign in Iowa, her campaign chairman to resign in New Hampshire, and it’s exactly the kind of divisive politics that turns away Americans of all parties and diminishes respect for America in the world,” said Plouffe.

The Clinton campaign issued an official response to the growing anger – but the statement from campaign manager Maggie Williams did not respond to the central question of whether staffers circulated the photo.

They merely complained back that if Obama can’t take the heat, he should how out.

Maggie Williams said in 2008 “If Barack Obama’s campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

“This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry. We will not be distracted.”

Now she is busting Trump for his statements about Obama because it is politically expedient that she does so — and every partisan Zealot in the media is coming to her defense as Trump once again plays the tune – and the media dances to it no matter bad it sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Hillary): EMAIL, ABOUT BARACK BORN IN KENYA? WHAT EMAIL, I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT ANY EMAIL!!


PRIVATE SERVER, NEXT TO MY HORSECOCK DILDOS AND STRAP-ONS, IN THE BARN AT CHAPPAQUA?...WHAT PRIVATE SERVER? I DON'T KNOW......


AMBASSADOR CHRIS STEVENS, MURDERED GROM 600 IGNORED REQUESTS TO ME?....WHAT IGNORED REQUESTS????


I SAID IT WAS CAUSED BY A "YOUTUBE VIDEO"??...WHAT "YOUTUBE VIDEO" ????



Politico, April 22, 2011: The answer lies in Democratic, not Republican politics, and in the bitter, exhausting spring of 2008. At the time, the Democratic presidential primary was slipping away from Hillary Clinton and some of her most passionate supporters grasped for something, anything that would deal a final reversal to Barack Obama.


According to the article, the theory that Obama was born in Kenya “first emerged in the spring of 2008, as Clinton supporters circulated an anonymous email questioning Obama’s citizenship.”


The second article, which ran several days after the Politico piece, was published by theTelegraph, a British paper, which stated:


“An "anonymous email" (WHO, ME?)circulated by "supporters" of Mrs Clinton", Mr Obama’s main rival for the party’s nomination, thrust a new allegation into the national spotlight — that he had not been born in Hawaii.”


Both of those stories comport with what we here at FactCheck.org wrote two-and-a-half years earlier, on Nov. 8, 2008:


“This claim was first advanced by "diehard Hillary Clinton supporters" (WHO, ME?)as her campaign for the party’s nomination faded, and has enjoyed a revival among John McCain’s partisans as he fell substantially behind Obama in public opinion polls.”


Claims about Obama’s birthplace appeared in chain emails bouncing around the Web, and one of the first lawsuits over Obama’s birth certificate was filed by Philip Berg, a former deputy Pennsylvania attorney general and a self-described “ liberal” who supported Clinton.



********************************************************************



In the United States both political parties deploy identity politics, however we are now hearing from the democrat side that if you don’t vote the Democratic ticket, you will be choosing a narcissist dictator, a racist, a misogynist, and a vote for him makes you a traitor.


81970_600-300x229.jpg


The Democrat side is making up conspiracy theories about conspiracy theorists and saying that concerns about the health of their candidate is a right wing conspiracy concocted by the Kremlin. This accusation is made as their candidate struggles to get into a van after visit to the 911 memorial.


Never have there been so many accusations of “racist wallpapering” from the so-called progressives as there are now.


Most of this “racist” wall papering is being derived from white “progressives” that assume that there is a growing group of racists that are hiding amongst 9/11 Truth seekers, conspiracy theorists and a new group of trouble makers that the liberal left have called “The Birthers,” or those who question the birth place of Barack Obama.


The birther idea has once again crept into this election campaign as Hillary Clinton has demanded that Donald Trump apologize for questioning Obama’s birth eligibility for president. Once again we see another Strawman argument being thrown into the media zeitgeist to take our minds off of her health.


So in his smug way he basically threw it back at Clinton by stating at a press conference that he has “finished” Hillary Clinton’s “birther” campaign.


I knew exactly what he meant – but the media was outraged. They felt they were played…some even say that he pulled a political “Rick Roll.” The media had to scramble to figure out why he would accuse Hillary of starting such a vicious rumor about Barack Obama not being born in the United States.


The truth is Trump also knows how to use straw man logic and he did it against his opponent.


For the record Hillary did not start the rumor; however her silence of the issue spoke volumes when her staff and a group of angry Democrat Hillary supporters called PUMA started up the rumor that was first brought up when he was running for the senate of Illinois in 2004 by his rival Andy Martin.


It needs to be said that that the first man who brought Obama’s citizenship into question during his presidential run was a left-wing Jewish Democrat named Philip J. Berg, who actually backed Hillary Clinton for president. Berg, a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania actually sued the Bush Administration charging Bush and 154 others with complicity in the 9/11 attacks


natural120808840.jpg


Berg argued in 2008 that Barack Obama was born in Kenya in 1961 to an American woman, Stanley Ann Dunham, and a Kenyan man, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, as reportedly shown by a birth certificate from Mombasa Maternity Hospital and witnessed by Barack’s relatives.


The Birther conspiracy theory gained momentum and was pushed by renegade members of the original Obama haters, Party Unity My Ass, known more commonly by their acronym, the PUMAs. They were a splinter group of hard-core Hillary Clinton supporters who did not want to give up the ghost after the bitter 50-state Bataan Death March to the 2008 Democratic nomination.


In the early summer of ’08, message boards on sites like PUMAParty.com began lighting up with the ultimate reversal-of-fortune fantasy—that their party’s nomination could be overturned on constitutional grounds. “Obama May Be Illegal to Be Elected President!” read one representative e-mail: “This came from a USNA [u.S. Naval Academy] alumnus. It’ll be interesting to see how the media handle this…WRITE TO YOUR LOCAL newspaper editors etc. Keep this out there every day possible. Also write to the DNC too!”


That June, the Obama campaign released his certificate of live birth on its Web site as part of its “fight the smears” effort. Factcheck.org and other organizations examined the document in person and declared it genuine.


But posters at the PUMA sites were unimpressed: saying “Nobody believes it’s for real, except the Kool-Aid drinkers themselves.”


Before all of these accusations there was also the pictures that were e-mailed by aides of Hillary Clinton that showed Obama dressed as a Somali Elder, during his visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya.


Obama-Somali-Garb.jpg


Obama campaign manager David Plouffe accused the Clinton campaign of “shameful offensive fear-mongering” by circulating a photo as an attempted smear.


Plouffe said in a statement: “On the very day that Senator Clinton is giving a speech about restoring respect for America in the world, her campaign has engaged in the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we’ve seen from either party in this election. This is part of a disturbing pattern that led her county chairs to resign in Iowa, her campaign chairman to resign in New Hampshire, and it’s exactly the kind of divisive politics that turns away Americans of all parties and diminishes respect for America in the world,” said Plouffe.


The Clinton campaign issued an official response to the growing anger – but the statement from campaign manager Maggie Williams did not respond to the central question of whether staffers circulated the photo.


They merely complained back that if Obama can’t take the heat, he should how out.


Maggie Williams said in 2008 “If Barack Obama’s campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.


“This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry. We will not be distracted.”


Now she is busting Trump for his statements about Obama because it is politically expedient that she does so — and every partisan Zealot in the media is coming to her defense as Trump once again plays the tune – and the media dances to it no matter bad it sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...