Jump to content

What Is A Species.


Recommended Posts

The scientific definition for a "species" (race?) is whether or not two similar creatures can interbreed and have viable offspring. That is a politically correct answer. Not a correct one. For example, bobcats and lynx are said to be the same species. Because depending on the paring, they can interbreed and have viable offspring. But a bobcat isn't a lynx and a lynx isn't a bobcat. I will tell you what truly defines a separate species.

 

A long time ago, a species of finch managed to make it all the way to the Galapagos Islands. Once there, for the most part, they obviously weren't isolated from each other. Yet over time, this species of bird managed to diverge into different species of bird. They took on different physical attributes suited to exploit different ecological niches.

 

Near the beginning of this process, there obviously were far fewer differences between those birds than there are, for example, between Whites and negroes. But despite living mostly in the same areas, they still managed to diverge. Obviously, at the beginning, what constituted a separate species had to be little more than a state of mind. Because it was that state of mind that led to there actually being different species of bird by anybody's definition. So let me run that by you again. What constitutes a separate species is little more than a state of mind!

 

What does this mean in human terms? One thing is that to me, there is little difference between culture, custom or ecological niche. Also, divergence has happened all over the planet throughout history. Sometimes because of climate and geographical separation. But as in the case of the Galapagos finches, sometimes not. Slightly different kinds of creatures also tend to stick to their own kind. The reason why is probably an instinctual urge that leads to divergence. Because divergence is important. The reason why is that in the event of some cataclysmic ecological disaster, being suited to different ecological niches could increase the chances of some surviving.

 

There is probably still a lot to be learned from the geological history of humans. But there were many different kinds of humans. Some lived at the same time as others, some not. There is Homo sapiens. There is also Homo neanderthalensis. Which despite sometimes being called a different species of Homo sapiens, we were able to successfully interbreed with. There was also Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Denisova hominins and Sima hominins. Because they were so different, I doubt if we could have successfully interbred with Homo Floesiensis.

 

In zoology, every type of creature is given it's own unique zoological classification. No matter how small the difference is between them and a slightly different kind of creature. I don't know of any that exist for the different kinds of humans. So I created some. The zoological classification for Whites is now Homo aryanus. For those that are nearly White, they are Homo caucaisis. For Orientals, their zoological classification is now Homo mongolis. For negroes, their zoological classification now is Homo negrosis.

 

For all you misguided people out there who think that we're all the same species, I also have some photographs for you to consider.

648OgDv.jpg

 

hrAMBXp.jpg

 

FmpN5iA.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The scientific definition for a "species" (race?) is whether or not two similar creatures can interbreed and have viable offspring. That is a politically correct answer. Not a correct one. For example, bobcats and lynx are said to be the same species. Because depending on the paring, they can interbreed and have viable offspring. But a bobcat isn't a lynx and a lynx isn't a bobcat. I will tell you what truly defines a separate species.

 

A long time ago, a species of finch managed to make it all the way to the Galapagos Islands. Once there, for the most part, they obviously weren't isolated from each other. Yet over time, this species of bird managed to diverge into different species of bird. They took on different physical attributes suited to exploit different ecological niches.

 

Near the beginning of this process, there obviously were far fewer differences between those birds than there are, for example, between Whites and negroes. But despite living mostly in the same areas, they still managed to diverge. Obviously, at the beginning, what constituted a separate species had to be little more than a state of mind. Because it was that state of mind that led to there actually being different species of bird by anybody's definition. So let me run that by you again. What constitutes a separate species is little more than a state of mind!

 

What does this mean in human terms? One thing is that to me, there is little difference between culture, custom or ecological niche. Also, divergence has happened all over the planet throughout history. Sometimes because of climate and geographical separation. But as in the case of the Galapagos finches, sometimes not. Slightly different kinds of creatures also tend to stick to their own kind. The reason why is probably an instinctual urge that leads to divergence. Because divergence is important. The reason why is that in the event of some cataclysmic ecological disaster, being suited to different ecological niches could increase the chances of some surviving.

 

There is probably still a lot to be learned from the geological history of humans. But there were many different kinds of humans. Some lived at the same time as others, some not. There is Homo sapiens. There is also Homo neanderthalensis. Which despite sometimes being called a different species of Homo sapiens, we were able to successfully interbreed with. There was also Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Denisova hominins and Sima hominins. Because they were so different, I doubt if we could have successfully interbred with Homo Floesiensis.

 

In zoology, every type of creature is given it's own unique zoological classification. No matter how small the difference is between them and a slightly different kind of creature. I don't know of any that exist for the different kinds of humans. So I created some. The zoological classification for Whites is now Homo aryanus. For those that are nearly White, they are Homo caucaisis. For Orientals, their zoological classification is now Homo mongolis. For negroes, their zoological classification now is Homo negrosis.

 

For all you misguided people out there who think that we're all the same species, I also have some photographs for you to consider.

648OgDv.jpg

 

hrAMBXp.jpg

 

FmpN5iA.jpg

lions and tigers get bred so are the offspring ligers to tions?

 

cults-masher, here is where you get lost in translating real into a social reality, context and content are two hemispheres. Inorganic and organic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to classify people so you can bring order to your small PATHETIC mind , maybe your problem is Obsessive compulsive behavior more so than racism .Do you really think most blacks are stupid or whites can't play basketball or all Asians are good at math ? In the real world these things can't be put in a box and get labeled just to suite your simple little mind . Wake up go see the world for what it is , not what you think it should be .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they are tigons and Ligers.

 

Depends on which is the male and which is the female.

Ok, are the offspring fertile. I ask because when horses and donkeys are bred mules exist and mules are sterile from what I was told. Does the same apply to the cat species?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to classify people so you can bring order to your small PATHETIC mind , maybe your problem is Obsessive compulsive behavior more so than racism .Do you really think most blacks are stupid or whites can't play basketball or all Asians are good at math ? In the real world these things can't be put in a box and get labeled just to suite your simple little mind . Wake up go see the world for what it is , not what you think it should be .

Is bullshit the best you can come up with? Tell me anything in my thread that you think is wrong. I'm mot interested in your opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is bullshit the best you can come up with? Tell me anything in my thread that you think is wrong. I'm mot interested in your opinions.

your opinion is inaccurate when comparing it to time as a singularity of now and kinetic molecular migration reach a natural perpetual balancing point universally to everything displaced here as specific as it happens currently. Like me posting this reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. They cannot reproduce.

thank you, I was just trying to show cults-masher it isn't political correctness that separates a species, it is genetic continuation within one adapting to the specific environment generation after generation creates variations due to the molecular makeup of the region's food chain and weather.

 

Same thing applies to instinctive homosexuality in humans, natural balance provides remedies to things that got misaligned genetically. Homosexuality is natural balancing sterilizing fertile lifetimes when living now. It happens often enough those having that still have the ability to have personal relationships with those having the same instinctive response.

 

Now acting gay just to be accepted by others is something else entirely as that is an intellectual decision. My constant referring to now being eternity has a purpose of trying to deprogram minds while not destroying brains.

 

Real rules reality until those directing reality think they have become larger than self contained by the moment here. The point absolute power of choice gets corrupted absolutely by everyone saving humanity soul interpretation, not rescuing being human soles getting interpreted..

 

the simple solution never tried for the last 2,000 years or more.

 

have a good evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cultsmasher is using Nazi genetics and phrenology as a basis for his diatribe and the reality is that genetics has progressed a long way since them due to the Human Genome Project. He might as well be a flat earther.

 

What we call "races" are not separate species, and the vast majority of human beings have ancestors from a variety of gene pools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cultsmasher is using Nazi genetics and phrenology as a basis for his diatribe and the reality is that genetics has progressed a long way since them due to the Human Genome Project. He might as well be a flat earther.

 

What we call "races" are not separate species, and the vast majority of human beings have ancestors from a variety of gene pools.

O'm not talking about genetics or phrenology. I'm talking about anthropology and zoology. Also, "race" is just a politically correct way to say "species." Deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O'm not talking about genetics or phrenology. I'm talking about anthropology and zoology. Also, "race" is just a politically correct way to say "species." Deal with it.

speaking of race , did you know in many areas on the west coast 25 % of all relationships are interracial and they will be producing mixed race children . WHERE DO MIXED RACE PEOPLE FIT IN YOUR COMPLETELY UNSCIENTIFIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which two individuals are capable of reproducing fertile offspring, typically using sexual reproduction. While in many cases this definition is adequate, the difficulty of defining species is known as the species problem.

There is no longer any problem in defining "species." I have done so.

speaking of race , did you know in many areas on the west coast 25 % of all relationships are interracial and they will be producing mixed race children . WHERE DO MIXED RACE PEOPLE FIT IN YOUR COMPLETELY UNSCIENTIFIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ?

Mutts. Mongrels. Abominations. That's where they "fit in." Also, they have had scientists studying the Galapagos finches for decades. On that point alone, you couldn't get any more scientific. Also, I have as much right to give creatures zoological classifications if they don't have one. Just like all of the named creatures on the planet have. Why do you think different kinds of human should be exempt from the way that the rest of the animal kingdom is classified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, they have had scientists studying the Galapagos finches for decades. On that point alone, you couldn't get any more scientific.

 

That is just absurd. Far more information would be found out by creating ans using a Galapagos Finch genome schematic.

The science of genetics that you refer to is ancient history, you silly Nazi. Genetics that ignore DNA and RNA are backward and antiquated. Like the NSDAP. Naziism is defunked and debunked and you deserve to be flunked and skunked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's to bad cultsmasher couldn't be forced into a scientific debate with African American astrophysicist NEIL de GRASSE TYSON , since his brain is so primitive compared to yours !! Lol loser you would get embarrassed beyond belief ( I dare you to say otherwise )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to classify people so you can bring order to your small PATHETIC mind , maybe your problem is Obsessive compulsive behavior more so than racism .Do you really think most blacks are stupid or whites can't play basketball or all Asians are good at math ? In the real world these things can't be put in a box and get labeled just to suite your simple little mind . Wake up go see the world for what it is , not what you think it should be .

Our pet NAZI is here to try to sell OLD crap Nazis had claimed . It was garbage science then and even more so now. NAZI crap? Mostly now is assholes in prison with 50 tattoos and no brains.

Tyson would rip him to shreds and do it with a smile.

Oh.. I thought you meant Mike Tyson.......and I'd LIKE to see that.

There is no longer any problem in defining "species." I have done so.

Mutts. Mongrels. Abominations. That's where they "fit in." Also, they have had scientists studying the Galapagos finches for decades. On that point alone, you couldn't get any more scientific. Also, I have as much right to give creatures zoological classifications if they don't have one. Just like all of the named creatures on the planet have. Why do you think different kinds of human should be exempt from the way that the rest of the animal kingdom is classified.

Hitlerr, a damn fool, thought he was 100% smarter than he was. Cult boy...... is a parrot trying to recycle junk from 80 yr ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our pet NAZI is here to try to sell OLD crap Nazis had claimed . It was garbage science then and even more so now. NAZI crap? Mostly now is assholes in prison with 50 tattoos and no brains.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh.. I thought you meant Mike Tyson.......and I'd LIKE to

see that. Any TYSON NEIL OR MIKE EQUALS TYSON CHICKEN VS LEGENDARY PUSSY CULTSMASHER !!!

 

Hitlerr, a damn fool, thought he was 100% smarter than he was. Cult boy...... is a parrot trying to recycle junk from 80 yr ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, they have had scientists studying the Galapagos finches for decades. On that point alone, you couldn't get any more scientific.

 

That is just absurd. Far more information would be found out by creating ans using a Galapagos Finch genome schematic.

The science of genetics that you refer to is ancient history, you silly Nazi. Genetics that ignore DNA and RNA are backward and antiquated. Like the NSDAP. Naziism is defunked and debunked and you deserve to be flunked and skunked.

Well maybe I was wrong. Using genetics would be more "scientific." But do you know what it would show? Basically, what was observed. Different species! Next, national socialism might have succeeded if capitalists and their jewish masters weren't so keen on destroying it. Also, if you are young enough to live 50 years from now, I wouldn't make any plans for then if I were you. Because most likely most of the life on earth will be extinct by then. Before then, it is you who will be flunked and skunked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's to bad cultsmasher couldn't be forced into a scientific debate with African American astrophysicist NEIL de GRASSE TYSON , since his brain is so primitive compared to yours !! Lol loser you would get embarrassed beyond belief ( I dare you to say otherwise )

I would mentally spank his monkey ass if it came to the topics that I brought up. As in all my threads here. That he may have a better education and could smoke me in mathematics doesn't mean anything. For example, let him try to refute that different kinds of human should have unique zoological classifications just like every slightly different kind of creature on the planet has. Or let him refute my thread, "Listen to the children scream."

Tyson would rip him to shreds and do it with a smile.

Not with anything in my threads he couldn't. For example, the pictures of human skulls I showed. Anthropology is a real science. I doubt if he would try to go up against that.

UNFORTUNATELY CULTSMASHER COULD NEVER ADMIT THAT HE IS WAY TO FULL OF FALSE PRIDE AND BULLSHIT

Instead of me admitting anything, how about you prove something. Point out how anything I said in this thread or any of the others that I've written is false. I'm not greedy. Just one thing! Though feel free to comment on as many things as you want. Might I recommend an early thread of mine. "The cost of not backing Hitler." I made many different points in that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not with anything in my threads he couldn't. For example, the pictures of human skulls I showed. Anthropology is a real science. I doubt if he would try to go up against that.

 

Anthropology is indeed a real science. It is a real science that you do not know diddly about because your assumptions about it are based on eighty year old interpretations of what the skulls indicate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our pet NAZI is here to try to sell OLD crap Nazis had claimed . It was garbage science then and even more so now. NAZI crap? Mostly now is assholes in prison with 50 tattoos and no brains.

Oh.. I thought you meant Mike Tyson.......and I'd LIKE to see that.

Hitlerr, a damn fool, thought he was 100% smarter than he was. Cult boy...... is a parrot trying to recycle junk from 80 yr ago.

Talk is cheap. Just tell me anything I said that you think is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not with anything in my threads he couldn't. For example, the pictures of human skulls I showed. Anthropology is a real science. I doubt if he would try to go up against that.

 

 

========================================================================

Anthropology is indeed a science, but your assumptions about it are based on eighty years old speculations about what those skulls indicate.

It is rather like you presume to construct a computer and have decided to do it with a pound of gravel and a hammer.


Talk is cheap. Just tell me anything I said that you think is wrong.

 

What are called "races" are not different species. You claim that Blacks, Whites and Chinese are different species. That is not true, they are all members of the same species.

 

Homo sapiens (Latin: "wise man") is the binomial nomenclature (also known as the scientific name) for the only extant human species. Homo is the human genus, which also includes Neanderthals and many other extinct species of hominid; H. sapiens is the only surviving species of the genus Homo. Modern humans are the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...