Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ah, young and stupid. Now you know why the jobs and wage situation is what it is today.

 

With numb nuts like this guy making decisions, it's never going to get any better.

 

They always have an answer for why they need to fix something that isn't broke in the first place.

 

Because as you can see it works so much better.

 

You are a liar. That's all I've seen you post here. Mostly someone's else's lies though. It appears you're so stupid you can't even make up your own bullshit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:

Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.

Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.

Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.

Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.

Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.

Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

 

1.What changes would be made to make more jobs? I see nothing there about more jobs, and part time jobs at best.

2.What changes would be made to produce living wages & benefits? ie. retirement, health care? You say it is for limited purposes, so how does that help a guys pension in the long term? I see nothing there about living wages.

3.Who would profit from National Resources? Not answered.

4.Would this end Corporate & foreign aid? Not answered.

5.Would this prevent a standing military, and reduce its size to defending American soil? Not answered, yet.

6.Would this end corporate protectionism outside America? By protectionism, I meant (thought you meant) sending the US military off US soil to protect corporations.

no none of this prevents standing army thats different subject but socialism sure doesnt stop a standing army. But i do think if we could get a righteous gov that cracks down on corporatism and globalism then yea the militarism would stop
Link to post
Share on other sites

no none of this prevents standing army thats different subject but socialism sure doesnt stop a standing army. But i do think if we could get a righteous gov that cracks down on corporatism and globalism then yea the militarism would stop

So what is going to happen to the national resources? oil, ore, wood, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know why the standard of living was higher for white people at least?

 

A 90% effective tax rate on the wealthy.

 

Strong unions that allowed one paycheck that afforded the average family a house, a car, a vacation, college for the kids, a decent retirement.

 

So I can count on your advocacy for a return to those things right?

You're dreaming. The war had more to do with it. Countries that were war torn had to buy from us. The dollar became the world's reserve currency. And so on. You're an idiot if you think it was a 90% tax rate that made America the world powerhouse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one paid 90% ever. Stop pushing that lie. And the 50s were prosperous because after two wars our competitors were all but wiped off the map.

oh my! seems you don't know what you are talking about. how embarrassing..........

 

 

technical-view-of-Highest-marginal-rates

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if i could show you guys a better way to end poverty?

 

 

You are wasting your breath. Those on the far-left are not interested in proven methods of success that do not involve government butt-fucking everyone.

 

-NW

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

You are wasting your breath. Those on the far-left are not interested in proven methods of success that do not involve government butt-fucking everyone.

 

-NW

hey player you would be suprised at how many socialists actually have a change of heart when presented with an alternative. Many socialists are well meaning and do see things different if we get to having a conversation without getting all weird. I think its a lack of a real alternative that keeps socialist communists fascists basically any collectivist believing in whatever form of collectivism they believe in.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommy, why don't you just admit it's you. It's pretty obvious.

my name aint tommy player. Dude i try to discuss stuff with you but you get all weird and call names toss around labels say im somebody else. You try to be this pseudo intellectual but then cant take it when somebody disagrees with your "truth" there is somebody like you in every chat room. Left and right versions of you. I do like to discuss stuff with you but talk like you are an adult. Calling names and shit is fun, ill do it every now and then but its not a debate tactic of mine like it is yours
Link to post
Share on other sites

my name aint tommy player. Dude i try to discuss stuff with you but you get all weird and call names toss around labels say im somebody else. You try to be this pseudo intellectual but then cant take it when somebody disagrees with your "truth" there is somebody like you in every chat room. Left and right versions of you. I do like to discuss stuff with you but talk like you are an adult. Calling names and shit is fun, ill do it every now and then but its not a debate tactic of mine like it is yours

 

Classic Tommy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for proving my point player. Too bad though cuz you have the good talking points

 

Tommy, we're not going to make this any more fun for you than your last reincarnation found it.

 

No one's going to debate you if I can help it.

 

I'd like them just to identify you as a troll and then ignore you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Tommy, we're not going to make this any more fun for you than your last reincarnation found it.

 

No one's going to debate you if I can help it.

 

I'd like them just to identify you as a troll and then ignore you.

staying true to your Trotsky roots with that behavior, at least you are consistent
Link to post
Share on other sites

staying true to your Trotsky roots with that behavior, at least you are consistent

You guys can attack each other all you want to...but don't ever attack Hillary...she's a woman and it's her turn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see, we had a high tax rate on upper incomes and capital gains, strong unions, a huge government infrastructure spending bill for the interstate highway system, a strong middleclass of families that could afford a house, car, vacation, college tuition, and retirement, on a single paycheck.

 

Now we have not so wyze system, and what we have today.

I see you are still stuck on stupid. The top marginal rates were higher in those days, but the evil rich actually paid a LOWER percent of the overall federal income tax burden than today, dumbass. Are you claiming that you want the rich to pay less and thus the middle class & poor to pay more today so we can return to the supposed glory days of the 50's, dipshit? Lol..

 

 

 

This is why you don't vote for, or let shit for brains like this make any decisions on the economy.

 

If you're going to say really stupid shit, make sure you're only talking to really stupid people such as yourself

FYI, you should really refrain from insulting the intelligence of someone who just easily humiliated you by exposing your abject stupidity, moron. It only makes you look even worse. Hope this helps.

 

 

Now, go cowardly run away like you always do after I spank your ass, you little sniveling pussy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you gave no proof that what you said is FACT asshole

 

 

your fucking lying your ass off

It is common knowledge to anyone with a brain, dumbass. But here is a link you can use to educate yourself for a change- Link.

 

In 1958, the top 3% of taxpayers earned 14.7% of all adjusted gross income and paid 29.2% of all federal income taxes. In 2010, the top 3% earned 27.2% of adjusted gross income and their share of all federal taxes rose proportionally, to 51%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...