Jump to content
smrose1990

Conservatives ONLY thread

Recommended Posts

 

first - thank you, smrose and warden and teacher. great idea (hopefully it becomes it's own contained room one day.)

 

i'd like to start a specific topic (since i don't think any real issues have been brought up yet)...

 

we are all for small government. all of us can't wait until the wasteful and pointless spending stops. it would free up trillions of dollars a year and bring efficiency to the system.

 

however, we still need government to enforce some areas of society (like law enforcement). and i don't think the republican party (specifically Ron Paul since i followed his campaign closest) has a sufficient stance on this that would make Americans feel (specifically liberal conservatives or left-leaning undecideds) that an economically and financially sound "small government" would still ensure their freedom and liberty is being protected.

 

i think a lot of undecideds and left-leaning conservatives end up voting democrat because they don't trust small government will ensure their well being.

 

case in point:

 

every time incidences like this happen, there is a HUGE public outcry, and subsequent push to strengthen regulations in the private sector. we need to STOP these incidences before they become public outrage. once they are public outrage, there is little stopping more and more regulations.

 

so, my question to the conservative form: what regulations do you propose be implemented to PREVENT things like this from happening in the future?

 

(no regulation will never happen, so let's drop that stance right off the bat. we need simple and smart regulation that is easily implemented, easily managed, and poses a very small footprint on the path of free market.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cricket boy

Really? 12 hours? Five(5) seconds wouldn't make the point... ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its nice not having to deal with libs at least in one thread woo hoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its nice not having to deal with libs at least in one thread

There's libs in The Mighty Horse Thread? Perish the thought. Where they at? Oh, wait, you said "at least."

 

My bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're hearing this, you are the resistance....

And about the small government, a strong local government can make the best informed and most efficient decisions on their days 100 times better than a federal government ever would. Promote self sufficiency (other than in urban areas obviously) to locals governments in an attempt to break the dependency of the feds. Something short and sweet along those lines with a few different companies I have some ideas about and it could be a super efficient system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's libs in The Mighty Horse Thread? Perish the thought. Where they at? Oh, wait, you said "at least."

 

My bad.

You have an uncanny way of dealing with unruly libs in your thread,,,,,,,, The Die of Suspension

Excellent mack,,, can i use this

 

?

If you're hearing this, you are the resistance....

 

And about the small government, a strong local government can make the best informed and most efficient decisions on their days 100 times better than a federal government ever would. Promote self sufficiency (other than in urban areas obviously) to locals governments in an attempt to break the dependency of the feds. Something short and sweet along those lines with a few different companies I have some ideas about and it could be a super efficient system.

amen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're hearing this, you are the resistance....

 

And about the small government, a strong local government can make the best informed and most efficient decisions on their days 100 times better than a federal government ever would. Promote self sufficiency (other than in urban areas obviously) to locals governments in an attempt to break the dependency of the feds. Something short and sweet along those lines with a few different companies I have some ideas about and it could be a super efficient system.

 

Yes, local gov't should be nearly the only gov't.

 

The Feds are so screwed up by the screwing up of the constitution.

 

If it were 'relieved' or edited of it's flaws like the 14th amdt (anchor babies), 16th (Marxist income tax), 17th (whores vote for senate should be governor appointed instead), and several others, many of the bigger problems would work themselves out of the system because the system would be improved.

 

Balanced budget amdt based on no more revenues than the previous congress (2 years ago), the reinstatement of congress to run our treasury (repeal the Fed Reserve Cartel), and the 'Ward of the State' program where gov't money receivers sign to recieve gov't monies AND to suspend their vote ... at the same time ... until they are in the black (is that racist?) again.

 

Unfuck the system and shift as much responsibility to local gov't.

 

That my thoughts for now.

 

give-me-control-of-a-nations-money.gif

Yeah, his son owns the Federal Reserve.

 

KJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yes, local gov't should be nearly the only gov't.

 

The Feds are so screwed up by the screwing up of the constitution.

 

If it were 'relieved' or edited of it's flaws like the 14th amdt (anchor babies), 16th (Marxist income tax), 17th (whores vote for senate should be governor appointed instead), and several others, many of the bigger problems would work themselves out of the system because the system would be improved.

 

Balanced budget amdt based on no more revenues than the previous congress (2 years ago), the reinstatement of congress to run our treasury (repeal the Fed Reserve Cartel), and the 'Ward of the State' program where gov't money receivers sign to recieve gov't monies AND to suspend their vote ... at the same time ... until they are in the black (is that racist?) again.

 

Unfuck the system and shift as much responsibility to local gov't.

 

That my thoughts for now.

 

give-me-control-of-a-nations-money.gif

Yeah, his son owns the Federal Reserve.

 

 

AMEN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So here is the question:

 

A woman and a man are in a relationship. Originally the woman and man both decided they wanted to have a child together. After about 18 weeks the woman has decided she doesn't want the child anymore and wants to have an abortion but the man on the other hand is very adamant about keeping the child. He still wants to keep the child even if she doesn't want to be with him anymore. The woman's life is not in danger by harboring the baby and the baby is also 100% healthy. So should the man be able to have some veto power in deciding whether the baby should be kept or should the woman have 100% authority to abort the child even after consenting to the pregnancy earlier on?

 

The man should say, "That's my baby, too. You harm that baby in any way... the same will happen to you... in Spades."

 

And then back it up.

 

 

And then he can go to prison, with the rest of the social rejects who can't function in society.

 

Protecting children is the right thing to do.

 

Ridding the World of a murder would just be a consequence of that.

 

Your choice.

 

 

Then you can explain your theories about the sanctity of male sperm while Bubba fucks you in the ass each night.

 

No one ever said being a parent would be easy...

 

Protecting children is the right thing to do.

 

Ridding the World of a murder would just be a consequence of that.

 

Your choice.

 

 

It isn't "murder", liar.

 

Hope you never have to defend that opinion against a Parent.

 

 

see they truly think men own a woman after they fuck her

 

You think that because you own the motel, you can murder the guests.

 

 

It isn't an "opinion", liar.

 

You think that because you own the motel, you can murder the guests.

 

It isn't "murder", liar.

 

Of course it's an opinion.

 

The crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought... is not in dispute.

 

So it's semantics...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

am I allowed to post here ?

 

Do you celebrate your menstrual-cycle w/ a parade...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about the word murder? It was not illegal to kills black salves, that is it was not the crime of murder, but it was still murder. Nor was it illegal, under German law for the state to exterminate millions of Jews, homosexuals, and the mentally retarded, but we would all call this murder, perhaps not Isabel, but the rest of us would call this murder, well... perhaps not Mr. Sherman or evince.

 

More unique human individuals have been murdered at the direction of their own mothers in these United States than the Nazis murdered in WWII.

 

Almost 1/3 of all black Americans are murdered before they are born.

 

Why? Because people like Isabel are unwilling to extend to these unique, innocent, human lives the status of a person.

 

For loving these precious, individual, unique, human lives, people are vilified as hating women. For wanting to protect these innocent human lives, men and women of conscious are attacked and hated by those with oceans of blood on their hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why is eTard such a racist liar ?

 

Over 16,000 posts.

 

How come you don't have your Conservative cookie?

 

You a slacker...?

 

 

(I think he/she has issues... maybe of a pharmaceutical nature.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've personally decided to stop replying to dontllooknow's posts. Clearly this child doesn't have the mental capacity to get beyond calling everyone liars and idiots.

 

Tommy is one of these:

 

http://time.com/8265/internet-trolls-are-actually-sadists-study-finds/

 

Canadian psychologists Erin Buckels, Paul Trapnell, and Delroy Paulhus set up a survey of personality inventories matched with “Internet commenting styles”—in other words, they attempted to psychoanalyze commenters, which should be cause for a Nobel prize (and hazard pay) in itself. What came from the study will likely surprise no one: people who like to troll are also likely to show signs of “sadism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism.”

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html

 

The researchers defined online trolling as “the practice of behaving in a deceptive, destructive, or disruptive manner in a social setting on the Internet” for no purpose other than their pleasure.

 

See http://www.academia.edu/5975837/Online_Trolls_Sadists_of_the_Internet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I propose a Rules Amendment:

 

Veteran Posters to this Thread should have their Conservative cookie:

 

Cut down on lost Communists and Socialist Adolescents, wandering in and headin' for the fridge.

 

So go earn one.

 

photo-19161.jpeg?_r=1412009621

non-Liberal

5,726 posts

 

Gender:Male

Location:United Socialist States of America

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How come you don't have your Conservative cookie?

 

You a slacker...?

no one ever invites me over for cookies because I demand ice cream

 

noncons need to be tagged like lo forum does...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one ever invites me over for cookies because I demand ice cream

 

noncons need to be tagged like lo forum does...

 

Be proud of your cookie.

 

Just go down to the:

 

Basement of Leftest Horrors and Communist Retardation

 

Won't take long. Just respond honestly and truthfully to a coupla threads down there... engage the local vermin in a lively debate about mundane issues such as the Second Amendment, Private Property Rights, or Welfare Sloth/Wealth Redistribution...

 

...and the Communists will howl like muthafuckers, and The Stasi Commandant LoreD will give you your "cookie" and bounce you for life.

 

That's how I got mine...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I propose a Rules Amendment:

 

Veteran Posters to this Thread should have their Conservative cookie:

 

Cut down on lost Communists and Socialist Adolescents, wandering in and headin' for the fridge.

 

So go earn one.

 

photo-19161.jpeg?_r=1412009621

non-Liberal

5,726 posts

 

Gender:Male

Location:United Socialist States of America

I agree.

Discrimination is like not drinking sour wine.

Non-Liberal Thread.

 

cs_may05b.jpg

Non-Liberal

3411 Posts

Gender: Male

Location: Seeking Truth from Fact

 

 

 

KJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skip Andrews ◄ DECLARED

• Kerry Bowers ◄ DECLARED

• Jeb Bush ◄ EXPLORING

• Dr. Ben Carson ◄ DECLARED

• Dale Christensen ◄ DECLARED

• Chris Christie ◄ EXPLORING

• Ted Cruz ◄ DECLARED

• John Dummett, Jr. ◄ DECLARED

• Bob Ehrlich

• Mark Everson ◄ DECLARED

• Carly Fiorina ◄ DECLARED

• Lindsey Graham ◄ EXPLORING

• Chris Hill ◄ DECLARED

• Mike Huckabee ◄ DECLARED

• Bobby Jindal ◄ EXPLORING

• John Kasich

• Peter King

• Michael Kinlaw ◄ DECLARED

• Dennis Michael Lynch ◄ EXPLORING

• George Pataki ◄ EXPLORING

• Rand Paul ◄ DECLARED

• Rick Perry ◄ EXPLORING

• Michael Petyo ◄ DECLARED

• Marco Rubio ◄ DECLARED

• Brian Russell ◄ DECLARED

• Rick Santorum ◄ EXPLORING

• Rick Snyder

• Donald Trump ◄ EXPLORING

• Scott Walker ◄ EXPLORING

who do you like of these candidates

Skip Andrews ◄ DECLARED

• Kerry Bowers ◄ DECLARED

• Jeb Bush ◄ EXPLORING

• Dr. Ben Carson ◄ DECLARED

• Dale Christensen ◄ DECLARED

• Chris Christie ◄ EXPLORING

• Ted Cruz ◄ DECLARED

• John Dummett, Jr. ◄ DECLARED

• Bob Ehrlich

• Mark Everson ◄ DECLARED

• Carly Fiorina ◄ DECLARED

• Lindsey Graham ◄ EXPLORING

• Chris Hill ◄ DECLARED

• Mike Huckabee ◄ DECLARED

• Bobby Jindal ◄ EXPLORING

• John Kasich

• Peter King

• Michael Kinlaw ◄ DECLARED

• Dennis Michael Lynch ◄ EXPLORING

• George Pataki ◄ EXPLORING

• Rand Paul ◄ DECLARED

• Rick Perry ◄ EXPLORING

• Michael Petyo ◄ DECLARED

• Marco Rubio ◄ DECLARED

• Brian Russell ◄ DECLARED

• Rick Santorum ◄ EXPLORING

• Rick Snyder

• Donald Trump ◄ EXPLORING

• Scott Walker ◄ EXPLORING

who do you like of these candidates

 

I highlighted my favorites of this list that i like for president

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skip Andrews ◄ DECLARED
• Kerry Bowers ◄ DECLARED
• Jeb Bush ◄ EXPLORING
Dr. Ben Carson ◄ DECLARED
• Dale Christensen ◄ DECLARED
• Chris Christie ◄ EXPLORING
• Ted Cruz ◄ DECLARED
• John Dummett, Jr. ◄ DECLARED
• Bob Ehrlich
• Mark Everson ◄ DECLARED
Carly Fiorina ◄ DECLARED
• Lindsey Graham ◄ EXPLORING
• Chris Hill ◄ DECLARED
• Mike Huckabee ◄ DECLARED
Bobby Jindal ◄ EXPLORING
• John Kasich
• Peter King
• Michael Kinlaw ◄ DECLARED
• Dennis Michael Lynch ◄ EXPLORING
• George Pataki ◄ EXPLORING
• Rand Paul ◄ DECLARED
Rick Perry ◄ EXPLORING
• Michael Petyo ◄ DECLARED
• Marco Rubio ◄ DECLARED
• Brian Russell ◄ DECLARED
• Rick Santorum ◄ EXPLORING
• Rick Snyder
• Donald Trump ◄ EXPLORING
• Scott Walker ◄ EXPLORING

who do you like of these candidates

 

I Bolded my additions and Subdued my retractions of your list

No order or emphasis. At this point, would take any Two of'em.

 

 

photo-19161.jpeg?_r=1412009621

non-Liberal

5,726 posts

Gender:Male

Location:United Socialist

States of America

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Skip Andrews ◄ DECLARED

• Kerry Bowers ◄ DECLARED

• Jeb Bush ◄ EXPLORING

Dr. Ben Carson ◄ DECLARED

• Dale Christensen ◄ DECLARED

• Chris Christie ◄ EXPLORING

• Ted Cruz ◄ DECLARED

• John Dummett, Jr. ◄ DECLARED

• Bob Ehrlich

• Mark Everson ◄ DECLARED

Carly Fiorina ◄ DECLARED

• Lindsey Graham ◄ EXPLORING

• Chris Hill ◄ DECLARED

• Mike Huckabee ◄ DECLARED

Bobby Jindal ◄ EXPLORING

• John Kasich

• Peter King

• Michael Kinlaw ◄ DECLARED

• Dennis Michael Lynch ◄ EXPLORING

• George Pataki ◄ EXPLORING

• Rand Paul ◄ DECLARED

Rick Perry ◄ EXPLORING

• Michael Petyo ◄ DECLARED

• Marco Rubio ◄ DECLARED

• Brian Russell ◄ DECLARED

• Rick Santorum ◄ EXPLORING

• Rick Snyder

• Donald Trump ◄ EXPLORING

• Scott Walker ◄ EXPLORING

who do you like of these candidates

 

I Bolded my additions and Subdued my retractions of your list

No order or emphasis. At this point, would take any Two of'em.

 

 

photo-19161.jpeg?_r=1412009621

non-Liberal

5,726 posts

Gender:Male

Location:United Socialist

States of America

 

 

i like your list as well, i love carson and florina, and Jindahl i just feel they dont stand much of a chance, just like cruz

I do see Rubio and Walker in the end and thats your possible line up,, Walker/rubio or rubio/ walker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... if common sense prevails, you're in. If not, you're a liberal.

 

Sounds like my kind of room

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i like your list as well, i love carson and florina, and Jindahl i just feel they dont stand much of a chance, just like cruz

I do see Rubio and Walker in the end and thats your possible line up,, Walker/rubio or rubio/ walker

 

Cruz is goin' to come on Strong, bet on it. He will be solid in the debates.

 

Jindal will also be good in the debates, and he is a successful Governor.

 

As stated, I would take any Two of'em...

 

 

photo-19161.jpeg?_r=1412009621

non-Liberal

5,726 posts

Gender:Male

Location:United Socialist

States of America

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×