Jump to content

Democrat Party Founded the KKK


Recommended Posts

History Of The Democrats And The KKK.....(Why the Democrats started the KKK)

 

" "The Klan terrorized black Americans through murders and public floggings; relief was granted only if individuals promised not to vote for Republican tickets, and violation of this oath was punishable by death," he said. "Since the Klan targeted Republicans in general, it did not limit its violence simply to black Republicans; white Republicans were also included." "

 

" "The records of Congress reveal that not one Democrat � either in the House or the Senate � voted for the 14th Amendment," Barton wrote. "Three years after the Civil War, and the Democrats from the North as well as the South were still refusing to recognize any rights of citizenship for black Americans." "

 

 

"Further, three years later, Eisenhower signed the GOP's 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats, and in 1964, Democrat President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after former Klansman Robert Byrd's 14-hour filibuster, and the votes of 22 other Senate Democrats, including Tennessee's Al Gore Sr., failed to scuttle the plan."

 

" "Why would Democrats skip over their own history from 1848 to 1900?" Barton asked. "Perhaps because it's not the kind of civil rights history they want to talk about � perhaps because it is not the kind of civil rights history they want to have on their website." "

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Democrat Party has always attacked and smeared any Black Americans that don't adhere to their liberal ideology.

 

Still happening to this day.

 

"Uncle Tom" is still the favored liberal smear against Black Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG, you are still bringing up that old 1800's crap.

 

Who cares! People only care about what the political parties mean today:

 

And to support my position:

 

Why Did the Democratic and Republican Parties Switch Platforms?

by Natalie Wolchover | September 24, 2012 01:39pm ET
check-big.png
repub-dems.jpg?1348531262

Abraham Lincoln, the 16th U.S. President and a Republican (left), and Franklin Roosevelt, the 32nd U.S. President and a Democrat. The Republican and Democratic parties effectively switched platforms between their presidencies.

 

 

 

 

Credit: Public domain

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fundicon1.png the transcontinental railroad, the state university systemicon1.png and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

 

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutionsicon1.png, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

So, sometime between the 1860s and 1936, the (Democratic) party of small government became the party of big government, and the (Republican) party of big government became rhetorically committed to curbing federal power. How did this switch happen?

 

Eric Rauchway, professor of American history at the University of California, Davis, pins the transition to the turn of the 20th century, when a highly influential Democrat named William Jennings Bryan blurred party lines by emphasizing the government's role in ensuring social justice through expansions of federal power — traditionally, a Republican stance. [How Have Tax Rates Changed Over Time?]

 

Republicans didn't immediately adopt the opposite position of favoring limited government. "Instead, for a couple of decades, both parties are promising an augmented federal government devoted in various ways to the cause of social justice," Rauchway wrote in a 2010 blog post for the Chronicles of Higher Education. Only gradually did Republican rhetoric drift to the counterarguments. The party's small-government platform cemented in the 1930s with its heated opposition to the New Deal.

 

But why did Bryan and other turn-of-the-century Democrats start advocating for big government? According to Rauchway, they, like Republicans, were trying to win the West. The admission of new western states to the union in the post-Civil War era created a new voting bloc, and both parties were vying for its attention.

Democrats seized upon a way of ingratiating themselves to western voters: Republican federal expansions in the 1860s and 1870s had turned out favorable to big businesses based in the northeast, such as banks, railroads and manufacturers, while small-time farmers like those who had gone west received very little. Both parties tried to exploit the discontent this generated, by promising the little guy some of the federal largesse that had hitherto gone to the business sector. From this point on, Democrats stuck with this stance — favoring federally funded social programs and benefits — while Republicans were gradually driven to the counterposition of hands-off government.

 

From a business perspective, Rauchway pointed out, the loyalties of the parties did not really switch. "Although the rhetoric and to a degree the policies of the parties do switch places," he wrote, "their core supporters don't — which is to say, the Republicans remain, throughout, the party of bigger businesses; it's just that in the earlier era bigger businesses want bigger government and in the later era they don't."

 

In other words, earlier on, businesses needed things that only a bigger government could provide, such as infrastructure development, a currency and tariffs. Once these things were in place, a small, hands-off government became better for business.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"OMG, you are still bringing up that old 1800's crap."

 

Then why do Democrats still use the term "Uncle Tom" against Black Americans that don't adhere to the liberal ideology?


Why do Democrats still act like the KKK? Cause they are the KKK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History Of The Democrats And The KKK.....(Why the Democrats started the KKK)

 

" "The Klan terrorized black Americans through murders and public floggings; relief was granted only if individuals promised not to vote for Republican tickets, and violation of this oath was punishable by death," he said. "Since the Klan targeted Republicans in general, it did not limit its violence simply to black Republicans; white Republicans were also included." "

 

" "The records of Congress reveal that not one Democrat � either in the House or the Senate � voted for the 14th Amendment," Barton wrote. "Three years after the Civil War, and the Democrats from the North as well as the South were still refusing to recognize any rights of citizenship for black Americans." "

 

 

"Further, three years later, Eisenhower signed the GOP's 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats, and in 1964, Democrat President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after former Klansman Robert Byrd's 14-hour filibuster, and the votes of 22 other Senate Democrats, including Tennessee's Al Gore Sr., failed to scuttle the plan."

 

" "Why would Democrats skip over their own history from 1848 to 1900?" Barton asked. "Perhaps because it's not the kind of civil rights history they want to talk about � perhaps because it is not the kind of civil rights history they want to have on their website." "

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts

 

 

Fact is that the 14th amendment never officially passed. Two of the states that originally voted for the 14th amendment later withdrew their votes because of all the northern corruption involved in getting that particular amendment passed. The north claimed that the two states could not withdraw votes and thus counted those votes even though the states protested & withdrew their votes. Do you know the names of the states? A bit of history that the lying leftist academia does not want to impart to the american people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"OMG, you are still bringing up that old 1800's crap."

 

Then why do Democrats still use the term "Uncle Tom" against Black Americans that don't adhere to the liberal ideology?

 

And why do Republicans post racist pictures of Barack Obama:

 

There are entire websites of Republican officials posting racist pictures and comments.

 

Do you think African Americans will vote for a party that has used the n-word for the president.

 

 

http://www.dailydot.com/politics/virginia-gop-facebook-obama-photos/

 

The Virginia Republican Party has ordered a county affiliate to remove “offensive, tasteless” photos of President Barack Obama from its Facebook page—but the county affiliate isn’t budging.

 

For months, members of the Mecklenburg County GOP in southern Virginia have posted Photoshopped images of President Obama in compromising situations. One shows him with Vice President Joe Biden as if they’re staring at the gay drama Brokeback Mountain. In another, Obama sneers, wears a wife beater T-shirt, carries a bouquet of flowers, and says “c’mon baby gimmie one more chance.” A third depicts him wearing his Nobel Peace Prize on an enormous gold chain. (The pictures have since been removed from Facebook.)

obamawitchdoctor.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former Fallbrook Klansman involved in town takeover attempt

 

Tom Metzger and fellow white supremacists want to occupy tiny North Dakota town

 

By Don Bauder, September 23, 2013

.

Tom Metzger, former Fallbrook white supremacist and losing Congressional candidate, is involved in an attempt by neo-Nazis to establish an all-white beachhead in Leith, North Dakota, population 24. The town is resisting. The group intends to "plant the seeds of National Socialism in North Dakota," according to its commander.

 

Some properties already purchased by the white supremacist group have been transferred to Metzger, 75, a (former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard, according to press reports. Local groups including Native Americans are vigorously opposing the effort.

 

(for the reading challanged, this is some background)

In 1979, Metzger organized a patrol, the Klan Border Watch, to capture illegal Mexican immigrants. The next year, he won the Democratic Party nomination for the House of Representatives in the North County district, but was swamped in the general election. In 1983, he changed the name of his group to "White Aryan Resistance (WAR)."

 

The group eventually went bankrupt after a civil suit was filed contending it was involved in the murder of an Ethiopian student. Metzger claimed the white power skinheads affiliated with WAR had done a "civic duty" by killing the student, according to Wikipedia. Recently, he has lived in Indiana.

 

you libloons should be proud of your heritage

 

please select one

 

#1 (_) huh-uh

#2 (_) bush

 

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And why do Republicans post racist pictures of Barack Obama:

 

There are entire websites of Republican officials posting racist pictures and comments.

 

Do you think African Americans will vote for a party that has used the n-word for the president.

 

 

http://www.dailydot.com/politics/virginia-gop-facebook-obama-photos/

 

The Virginia Republican Party has ordered a county affiliate to remove “offensive, tasteless” photos of President Barack Obama from its Facebook page—but the county affiliate isn’t budging.

 

For months, members of the Mecklenburg County GOP in southern Virginia have posted Photoshopped images of President Obama in compromising situations. One shows him with Vice President Joe Biden as if they’re staring at the gay drama Brokeback Mountain. In another, Obama sneers, wears a wife beater T-shirt, carries a bouquet of flowers, and says “c’mon baby gimmie one more chance.” A third depicts him wearing his Nobel Peace Prize on an enormous gold chain. (The pictures have since been removed from Facebook.)

obamawitchdoctor.jpg

 

 

It's called FREE SPEECH, idiot! The 1st amendment guarantees that you will be offended...it is a promise of the 1st amendment that you will be offended...get over it or get the hell out of my country. First amendment says americans can expresss racism, hatred, anger or any other human emotion. You leftist bastards have burned the american flag, dipped the christian cross in a glasses of urine during NEA stage performances, etc all in the name of protected speech. Racism is protected speech...get over it. We don't care about your politically correct cows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It's called FREE SPEECH, idiot! The 1st amendment guarantees that you will be offended...it is a promise of the 1st amendment that you will be offended...get over it or get the hell out of my country. First amendment says americans can expresss racism, hatred, anger or any other human emotion. You leftist bastards have burned the american flag, dipped the christian cross in a glasses of urine during NEA stage performances, etc all in the name of protected speech. Racism is protected speech...get over it. We don't care about your politically correct cows.

 

And right back at you!

 

Uncle Tom

 

It's called FREE SPEECH, idiot! The 1st amendment guarantees that you will be offended...it is a promise of the 1st amendment that you will be offended...get over it or get the hell out of my country.. Calling someone an Uncle Tom is protected speech...get over it. We don't care about your politically correct cows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And right back at you!

 

Uncle Tom

 

It's called FREE SPEECH, idiot! The 1st amendment guarantees that you will be offended...it is a promise of the 1st amendment that you will be offended...get over it or get the hell out of my country.. Calling someone an Uncle Tom is protected speech...get over it. We don't care about your politically correct cows

 

Ha,ha,ha...in today's black racist vernacular an uncle tom is a black person who supports small government, low taxes and personal accountability. In other words it is a black person who knows that the american left and the thorougly corrupt democrat party stands for everything thta is NOT the constittution and is not personal freedoms and rights...I ain't black and I am a conservative so uncle tom doesn't fit for me.

Democrats are forced to use different strategies to enslave the Black vote...but the Democrat are still the KKK!

 

The democrat party is the new slave plantation for the darkies...the darkies chose handouts & welfare instead of freedom & accountability...they now live on lefty's plantation...their choice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncle Tom

the ngrs in africa were kidnapping their own and selling them into slavery when this country started,

 

the ngrs in africa are still kidnapping their own and selling them into slavery

 

thats how it was and thats how it is, some things never change

 

 

The first legal SLAVE owner in America was BLACK!

 

"Antonio a Negro" was among the very first Angola-African people to arrive in America. He came by boat on "The James" to Virginia in 1619, with other blacks and whites, as an indentured servant.

 

Indentured servant- A person who signs and is bound by indentures to work for another for a specified time especially in return for payment of travel expenses and maintenance.

 

For nearly 12 years he worked on a plantation for the Bennetts, a wealthy white family. The Bennetts owned Antonio, but allowed him to farm a small plot of land for himself, in addition to the work he did on the Bennett plantation. There he grew tobacco and corn. He was also able to own several head of cattle while still a slave.

 

Antonio married a black woman named Mary and had four children. Antonio was praised for his hard work and good service, and he eventually became free. One of the first things he did was change his name to Anthony Johnson. Most servants did not have last names, or else they used the name of their master. By creating a new name for himself, Anthony Johnson was announcing that he was no longer an indentured servant.

 

Anthony Johnson worked hard to become a landowner, acquiring a patent for 250 acres of land. He eventually made enough money to buy an African slave of his own, John Casor.

 

Casor had also been imported as an indentured servant and attempted to transfer his remaining time of service to Robert Parker, a white colonist. However, Anthony Johnson brought suit in Northampton County court against Robert Parker in 1654 for detaining his servant, saying "hee had ye Negro for his life". In the case of Johnson vs Parker, the court of Northampton County upheld Johnson's right to hold Casor as a slave, saying:

 

"Seriously consideringe and maturely weighing the premisses, doe fynde that the saide Mr. Robert Parker most unjustly keepeth the said Negro from Anthony Johnson his master… It is therefore the Judgement of the Court and ordered That the said John Casor Negro forthwith returne unto the service of the said master Anthony Johnson, And that Mr. Robert Parker make payment of all charges in the suit."

 

In other words, the court gave judicial sanction to the right of Negroes to own slaves of their own race. Indeed no earlier record has been found of judicial support given to slavery in Virginia except as a punishment for crime.

 

The defendant, John Casor, thus became the first individual known to be declared a "slave" in what later became the United States.

 

And there you have it, folks. Before this court case, there was no such thing as a "slave". There were only indentured servants. Therefore, The first legal SLAVE owner in America was BLACK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the ngrs in africa were kidnapping their own and selling them into slavery when this country started,

 

the ngrs in africa are still kidnapping their own and selling them into slavery

 

Shhhh...the "dumbass left" actually believes that a bunch of white dudes ran around the interior of Africa during the international slave trade of the 1600s -1800s) and chased down all them darkies. Let them wallow in their ignorance. Don't tell them that less than 5% of all African slave even reached our shores. Don't tell them that more than 90% of all trans-atlantic slave trade went to the carribean, central-south america.

 

Above all don't tell the dumb mindless left that any one of them can take a flight to Africa today and buy all the humans they want in mother africa...Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia, etc....shhhh...help the lying leftist mainstream media keep this secret...lefties are nothing more than ignorant spoiled brat children walking around in adult bodies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"OMG, you are still bringing up that old 1800's crap."

 

Then why do Democrats still use the term "Uncle Tom" against Black Americans that don't adhere to the liberal ideology?

Why do Democrats still act like the KKK? Cause they are the KKK!

Now, this is some serious projection!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...