Jump to content

Another Botched Execution


Recommended Posts

http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/30/oklahomas-horrific-botched-execution-cou

 

 

Last night, a horrific scene played out at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary as prison officials attempted to carry out the first of what was supposed to have been a double execution.

At 6:23 p.m., the execution began for Clayton Lockett, convicted in 1999 of killing 19-year-old Stephanie Neiman.

Five minutes after a cocktail of lethal drugs was injected, Lockett began shivering, breathing deep, blinking, and gritting his teeth. Seven minutes into the execution, Lockett alerted prison officials that he was still conscious. Ten minutes into the execution, prison officials announced that he was finally unconscious. Thirteen minutes in, Lockett moved his head from side to side and then lifted it off of the bed. Fifteen minutes in, Lockett was mumbling, breathing heavily, and appeared to be struggling. Sixteen minutes in, Lockett said “man” out loud, and tried to get up. Following this, a female prison official told horrified eyewitnesses, “We are going to lower the blinds temporarily." The blinds were never lifted.

Minutes after the blinds went down, the director of prisons told eyewitnesses there had been a “vein failure” and that he was using his authority to issue a stay of execution. Less than a half hour later, after the director of prisons admitted the execution had been botched, Lockett was pronounced dead from what officials said was a heart attack.

Shortly after Lockett’s grisly death, Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin ® issued an executive order granting a 14-day stay for stay of execution for Charles Warner, the inmate who was scheduled to be executed two hours after Lockett. Warner’s execution is now scheduled for May 13.

In her press release, Governor Fallin said that she had asked the Oklahoma Department of Corrections “to conduct a full review of Oklahoma’s execution procedures to determine what happened and why” during Lockett’s botched execution.

Executions in other states have been botched before, but what makes what happened in Oklahoma last night so particularly grotesque is that it could have, and should have, been prevented.

Over the past several months, questions had been raised over the constitutionality of the state’s lethal injection secrecy law, which allowed state officials to prevent the disclosure of any information about the drugs used in lethal injections. Lawyers for condemned inmates argued that without being able to know even the most basic information about these drugs, it would be impossible to verify whether or not the executions carried out would comport with the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

On April 21, the Oklahoma Supreme Court stayed the executions of Lockett and Warner, which were scheduled to take place on April 22 and April 29, so that the justices could evaluate the legality of Oklahoma’s secrecy law.

In an unprecedented move, Gov. Mary Fallin proclaimed on April 22 that Oklahoma’s executive branch would not honor the state Supreme Court’s stays of execution, and issued an executive order that granted a seven-day stay of execution for Clayton Lockett.

Even more shocking, a Republican state representative, Mike Christian, introduced impeachment proceedings on April 23 against the five state Oklahoma Supreme Court justices who had voted for the stays of execution, stating that the justices had used “unsupportable arguments regarding constitutional rights.”

On April 24, the Oklahoma Supreme Court caved to political pressure, and declared that the state’s injection secrecy law was constitutional, allowing the botched execution to proceed on April 29 as Governor Fallin ordered.

Besides the questions over the constitutionality of the state’s secrecy law, concerns had also been raised over the state’s essentially experimental three-drug execution cocktail, which included the drugs midazolam, vecuronium bromide, and potassium chloride.

This drug combination has only been used once before—in Florida. However, Florida’s protocol called for five times more midazolam than Oklahoma’s, which led some to predict the execution might not be effective. Because these drugs were obtained through secret means and information about them was protected under the state’s secrecy law, there was no oversight from experts on the quality of the drugs.

Medical experts warned Oklahoma officials of the possibility of a botched execution, and defense attorneys asked them to open up the lethal injection process to review by the courts, doctors, and the public because of the dangers of this untested drug combination. It really should come as no surprise that this execution played out as it did.

If the state wasn’t obsessed with killing these inmates so quickly and recklessly, and instead allowed the process to be transparent and open for review, Clayton Lockett’s botched execution could have been prevented.

Instead, the state elevated an unsympathetic killer to a symbol of what the death penalty has become in states that are adopting secretive and experimental execution methods: a reckless abandonment of the rule of law.

UPDATE (2:07 p.m. ET): At roughly 1:00 p.m. ET, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney stated that Lockett’s botched execution fell short of the humane standards required when capital punishment is carried out. Carney also relayed that Obama believes evidence shows the death penalty doesn't effectively deter crime, but the crimes in Lockett’s case were indisputably heinous and merited the death penalty. As CBS reporter Andrew Cohen notes on his twitter feed, the Justice Department has remained mostly silent as challenges to injection secrecy have failed in federal courts across the country in recent months.

UPDATE (3:21 p.m. ET): In a statement given before the press, Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin said there will be an independent review of the state's execution protocols following last night's botched execution. Fallin said the review will be led by Oklahoma Department of Safety Commissioner Michael Thompson.

According to journalists present, Fallin walked off the stage after her statement and did not take questions from the press.

Questions still remain over how this review will address the lack of transparency over the execution drugs as well as whether or not Warner's execution will be delayed beyond the current 14-day stay.

Lauren Galik is a policy analyst at the Reason Foun

As if I needed another reason to end this barbaric, ineffective, and costly practice.

The fact that the State feels it needs any secrecy surrounding it's execution program wails in decibels.

I wonder who goes to jail and gets executed when the State perpetrates the very crime it is out to "punish"?

 

-NW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Light em up with some electricity

 

 

a shot to the back of the head . small caliber 22 maybe cheap effective quick .

 

 

Who cares besides some cry me a river lib. Does anyone care about the people that these scum killed? Keep executing. Eventually they will get it right.

 

 

Who cares about the silly 8th amendment and rule of law? Any other parts of the Constitution you three are willing to blithely ignore?

 

-NW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes with the victims family...

 

I am against the death penalty, too many innocent people convicted of crime, it is better to let 100 guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man.

 

there is no reason to execute..

 

it is NOT a deterrent to crime,

 

100% of the convicts on death row were not deterred...

 

now a deterrent would be...

 

issue full auto ak-47's to everyone with unlimited free ammo paid for by the ASPCA and PETA

 

the time for the death penalty is at the time the crime is "attempted"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have real mixed emotions with the death penalty...since there was a guy from my old neighborhood who was on death row for years and was completely innocent. He was railroaded on the filmiest evidence. I remember people saying...yeah he is a real POS BUT not capable of kidnap, rape and murder. And they were all right.

 

On September 3rd, 2003, based on Dr. Blake’s results, the court vacated Yarris’s conviction and he became the 140th person in the United States to be exonerated by postconviction DNA testing - the 13th DNA exoneration from death row.

 

http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Nicholas_Yarris.php

 

On the other hand...when there is no disputing the vertic (?) and the offender wants it, I say let them have it.

 

No one was ever put on Death Row for singing to loud in church.

 

BTW: here are some Yarris's words that I keep close to me: The act of finding sanity in the house of insanity is humility. You have to let go of all the ego; it gets stripped away from you and then you try and resurrect something from whatever you find, whatever you have left. You have to try and find that one good thing inside yourself that is everything to you, and try and build on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You forgot to include pertinent details:

 

Lockett was convicted of shooting a teenager and watching as she was buried alive; Warner was convicted of raping and murdering his girlfriend’s 11-month-old baby.

 

 

 

 

 

That is irrelevant, what is relevant is the state violated the 8th Amendment and you are willing to give the State a pass on violating the US Constitution and the Rule of Law.

 

 

Why is it you pro-death people are almost arbitrary in what Constitutional Amendment violations you'll give a pass on but will be up in arms (pun intended) on 2nd Amendment violations?

 

-NW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in Virginia city NV they have a prison museum.

 

it has a suffocation chamber,an airtight room, where the victims/families could watch the condemned suffer a very slow death using up the air in the chamber...

 

there is a window so you can flip the guy off, point and laugh..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

naughty word , the victims are irrelevant? then why waist the time and money arresting them? or a trial?

 

Yes they are quite irrelevant in context of the States following the Rule of Law and the US Constitution.

 

The thing about laws is you don't get to arbitrarily decide which you are going to follow and which ones you aren't.

 

-NW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...