Jump to content

The Plantation has two sides - Democrat & Republican


Recommended Posts

The Plantation has two sides - Democrat & Republican

 

Once we get off this plantation of voting on the "One Wing" of the same bird, rather than the Constitutional Repulic Concept. No matter what you say that might be fact for one side means you miss the whole point...the whole truth.

 

IT'S BOTH SIDES IDIOT! Ideas and concept wins the day. That ideas is as old as America. The Constitution & Bill of Rights. Your vigilence maintains the day you won! I don't care who the liar is. I want Liberty, freedom and truth. I care not for your braned of political party. Show me you are real! Show me that you uphold this Constitution for this Country. I will follow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Plantation has two sides - Democrat & Republican

 

Once we get off this plantation of voting on the "One Wing" of the same bird, rather than the Constitutional Repulic Concept. No matter what you say that might be fact for one side means you miss the whole point...the whole truth.

 

IT'S BOTH SIDES IDIOT! Ideas and concept wins the day. That ideas is as old as America. The Constitution & Bill of Rights. Your vigilence maintains the day you won! I don't care who the liar is. I want Liberty, freedom and truth. I care not for your braned of political party. Show me you are real! Show me that you uphold this Constitution for this Country. I will follow!

 

i swore an oath to uphold and defend the constitution. not the president, not party, but the constitution. in order to accomplish that oath-to give full fealty to my words back then, i now am familiar-intimately-with that document and its context. context is important.

 

i know i am preaching to the choir, or to other pastors, but only a self governing person truly has liberty, and understands it. just this morning on facebook, i was debating another person about how liberty must be viewed through the lenses of person liberty, and societal liberty. the right to do a thing, or the ability to do a thing, does not necessarily confer the justness of the act. how our actions impact society must be considered as well.

 

society exists for mutual self-preservation, and any act which distorts value so that one group is more valued than another in the eyes of the law or in the social context, attacks the basic premise of mutual self-preservation. most of external, representative government acts-especially at the federal level-regardless of which side of the aisle they come from-distort that equal valuation, and so attack society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Plantation has two sides - Democrat & Republican

 

Once we get off this plantation of voting on the "One Wing" of the same bird, rather than the Constitutional Repulic Concept. No matter what you say that might be fact for one side means you miss the whole point...the whole truth.

 

IT'S BOTH SIDES IDIOT! Ideas and concept wins the day. That ideas is as old as America. The Constitution & Bill of Rights. Your vigilence maintains the day you won! I don't care who the liar is. I want Liberty, freedom and truth. I care not for your braned of political party. Show me you are real! Show me that you uphold this Constitution for this Country. I will follow!

I'm sorry to break this to you. A plantation only has two sides, ruling over and ruled by. 6 halves of the whole playing 8 cornered triangulation against male and female ancestors of the same species.

 

Go play your mental masturbation somewhere else. Like the .net identical twin of every other means to saving educated denial real is just a dream that can only be achieved after death saving an incomplete ideology cradle to grave.

 

Reality requires nobody admits to knowing what separates real and reality by civil contract law of protecting self deception in every social justification character counts and genders are worth less without being [part in orchestrated chaos of organized institutional denial life is self contianed to this moment eternally in physical absolutes only theory and theology are authorized to define reality socially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

i swore an oath to uphold and defend the constitution. not the president, not party, but the constitution. in order to accomplish that oath-to give full fealty to my words back then, i now am familiar-intimately-with that document and its context. context is important.

 

i know i am preaching to the choir, or to other pastors, but only a self governing person truly has liberty, and understands it. just this morning on facebook, i was debating another person about how liberty must be viewed through the lenses of person liberty, and societal liberty. the right to do a thing, or the ability to do a thing, does not necessarily confer the justness of the act. how our actions impact society must be considered as well.

 

society exists for mutual self-preservation, and any act which distorts value so that one group is more valued than another in the eyes of the law or in the social context, attacks the basic premise of mutual self-preservation. most of external, representative government acts-especially at the federal level-regardless of which side of the aisle they come from-distort that equal valuation, and so attack society.

Well said my friend.......well said. My grands deserves true liberty to choose. Ones choice defines the act, but should not condemn the greater society. That's why we have laws in a "free' society. Ones choice is the "Cost" of freedom.

 

To the Good Fight!

I'm sorry to break this to you. A plantation only has two sides, ruling over and ruled by. 6 halves of the whole playing 8 cornered triangulation against male and female ancestors of the same species.

 

Go play your mental masturbation somewhere else. Like the .net identical twin of every other means to saving educated denial real is just a dream that can only be achieved after death saving an incomplete ideology cradle to grave.

 

Reality requires nobody admits to knowing what separates real and reality by civil contract law of protecting self deception in every social justification character counts and genders are worth less without being [part in orchestrated chaos of organized institutional denial life is self contianed to this moment eternally in physical absolutes only theory and theology are authorized to define reality socially.

S.R. we are dealing with the here and now. We must address in this reality that is in view of most of this country. Ascension and understanding comes after Liberty and Freedom to contemplate come into being for the most of us. When we get there. Let's talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Plantation has two sides - Democrat & Republican

 

Once we get off this plantation of voting on the "One Wing" of the same bird, rather than the Constitutional Repulic Concept. No matter what you say that might be fact for one side means you miss the whole point...the whole truth.

 

IT'S BOTH SIDES IDIOT! Ideas and concept wins the day. That ideas is as old as America. The Constitution & Bill of Rights. Your vigilence maintains the day you won! I don't care who the liar is. I want Liberty, freedom and truth. I care not for your braned of political party. Show me you are real! Show me that you uphold this Constitution for this Country. I will follow!

 

There are two interpretations of the Constitution.

 

One interpretation (Democrats) say the Constitution requires Socialism.

 

The other interpretation (Republican) says the Constitution does not require Socialism thus Socialism should not exit because of the economic dangers to the nation of Socialism.

 

Now, which do you follow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There are two interpretations of the Constitution.

 

One interpretation (Democrats) say the Constitution requires Socialism.

 

The other interpretation (Republican) says the Constitution does not require Socialism thus Socialism should not exit because of the economic dangers to the nation of Socialism.

 

Now, which do you follow?

You can be a Socialist in your own time with whom you chose. The Constitution does not recognize socialistic principles. The constitution recognizes contracts and upholding those contracts between entities. You are speculating something not written. You are giving your opinion about something previously written that does not recognize "democracy", Communism, or Socialism. Read the Constitution and lets define the words using Mariams dictionary. It is not a document to be mis-interpreted. Anyone that does should not be in office or deciding this countries direction.

 

The answer to your question should been obvious from the Post. Your question I do not believe is sincere. Correct me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S.R. we are dealing with the here and now. We must address in this reality that is in view of most of this country. Ascension and understanding comes after Liberty and Freedom to contemplate come into being for the most of us. When we get there. Let's talk.

Ha ha ha ha ha, you are implying I am not? I describe how and why everything is spaced apart physically and you still want to unite ancestors under a common bond of sharing denial.

 

You have ascended to being becoming corruptable as achieving absolutely corrupted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha ha ha ha ha, you are implying I am not? I describe how and why everything is spaced apart physically and you still want to unite ancestors under a common bond of sharing denial.

 

You have ascended to being becoming corruptable as achieving absolutely corrupted.

I know and agree my friend. Yes I am corruptable and struggle daily. Of course not absolutely corrupted. I know how to win that battle.

 

One more thing. You're talking top to bottom, when I'm talking left to right. Both are degrees of the same. I'm only addressing one angle that has to be dealt with first. The other come automatically. Conflict of interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I know and agree my friend. Yes I am corruptable and struggle daily. Of course not absolutely corrupted. I know how to win that battle.

 

 

 

What is the final conflict that has been ever present throughout history of societal evolution dictating how genetic continuation will behave now according to the measurement standards of hypothetical calculations that time changes details here?

 

Results never add outside of now. No lifetime wins eternal life. Life is eternally self contained to now spacing lifetime apart all the time.

 

You are a progressive denier. Doesn't matter what level of consciousness you want to debate academically pitting religion against politics to control the economic trade of susbstance understood inside out for character's right to deny life outside in.

 

Intellect only view life one way, living works between the ttoal sum additions of contracting results expanding the details arriving now as they happen individually. One of a kind understanding the oneness of being here now.

 

serenity, only those fooled again and again never feel it cradle to grave passing through this atmosphere self contained as themselves regardless what they believe..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can be a Socialist in your own time with whom you chose. The Constitution does not recognize socialistic principles. The constitution recognizes contracts and upholding those contracts between entities. You are speculating something not written. You are giving your opinion about something previously written that does not recognize "democracy", Communism, or Socialism. Read the Constitution and lets define the words using Mariams dictionary. It is not a document to be mis-interpreted. Anyone that does should not be in office or deciding this countries direction.

 

The answer to your question should been obvious from the Post. Your question I do not believe is sincere. Correct me.

 

Then I would presume you are a Republican.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Then I would presume you are a Republican.

 

 

Like so many other of your leaps of faith, your opinion is as usual incomplete by design so your instincts will remain obedient to your trained intellect to think out of the box eternity keeps everything eternally now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Plantation has two sides - Democrat & Republican

 

Once we get off this plantation of voting on the "One Wing" of the same bird, rather than the Constitutional Repulic Concept. No matter what you say that might be fact for one side means you miss the whole point...the whole truth.

 

IT'S BOTH SIDES IDIOT! Ideas and concept wins the day. That ideas is as old as America. The Constitution & Bill of Rights. Your vigilence maintains the day you won! I don't care who the liar is. I want Liberty, freedom and truth. I care not for your braned of political party. Show me you are real! Show me that you uphold this Constitution for this Country. I will follow!

OK...I uphold the Constitution. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK...I uphold the Constitution. :)

Show me! Then demand it from your Congress with no exception.

We go the Constitution party folks ??????????????????????

Yeah if we could get someone inside like the people. I'm all for it......

Did you see my post about how I heard in a movie how our votes has become a joke.

 

It also included in the statement...who do you wanta vote for, the puppet on the left or the puppet on the right ?

Yep!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

When is the time for change though. When do the people stand up greater than the vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

White House Wants to Turn Interstates Into Toll Roads

Plan would damage the economy and allow the government to track motorists using toll tags

Kit Daniels

Infowars.com

April 30, 2014

 

The White House sent a transportation plan to Congress yesterday encouraging states to turn existing interstates into toll roads, which would allow the government to easily track motorists while damaging the economy even more.

 

042914tollroad.jpg

 

 

States are currently barred from tolling federal interstates except if the tolls are used to pay for the construction of additional lanes, which rarely happens, or for specific turnpikes which existed prior to the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956.

But if Congress enacts the White House plan into law, states could implement tolls on interstates throughout America, a nightmare scenario that’s already raising concerns.

“Tolling has proven to be an inefficient mechanism for collecting transportation revenue, consuming up to 20 percent of revenue generated, and those paying the toll may not even see that road improved because the president’s plan would allow toll revenue to go to other projects in the state,” the spokesman for the Alliance for Toll-Free Interstates, Miles Morin, said. “The option for states to place tolls on existing interstate capacity has existed for 23 years and not a single state has used tolls in this way – not just because the idea is unpopular, but because it’s bad policy.”

“Tolling existing interstates is inefficient, causes traffic diversion and increases supply chain costs that hurt businesses and consumers.”

And it would also allow the government to easily track motorists by connecting to their toll tags, which is already happening in New York.

Both the New York City Department of Transportation and Transcom, a traffic management agency, admitted that for nearly 20 years they have been using antennas to connect to E-ZPass toll tags in vehicles traveling not just in New York but neighboring states as well.

“We’re being watched in ways that I think none of us would have imagined,” the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, Donna Lieberman, told WBGO.org. “It’s happening without any public scrutiny, without any decision that’s consistent with checks and balances.”

And sure enough, the idea to start charging tolls on existing interstates originated at the federal level.

Back in 1998, Congress created the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Program which offered states the option to generate road maintenance revenue by tolling sections of existing interstate.

But due to strong public opposition, none of the states ever joined the program.

“All efforts to place tolls on existing interstate lanes under the ISRRPP have been unsuccessful,” the Vice President of Government Relations and Public Policy for the International Franchise Association, Jay Perron, said. “Numerous states, as well as the federal government, have wasted time and squandered millions of dollars through both the application process and studies conducted to analyze the impacts of tolls on area communities.”

“It defies logic to extend an initiative that failed at the pilot level to the entire country.”

Yet that’s exactly what the White House is trying to do now, and considering the Obama administration’s long history of top-down decisions which have only exacerbated both the loss of privacy rights and America’s economic decline, it comes as no surprise.

“If you bought it, a truck brought it,” states an old adage by the trucking industry, so expect to pay more for everything you buy while also giving up more of your privacy if interstate tolling is implemented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...