Jump to content

Being completely honest vs reciting accepted truths.


Recommended Posts

Humans don't have consistent access to the phaneron so any discussion regarding reality will necessarily devolve into the "recitation of accepted truths".

ancestors educated to see themselves only as humans will always choose a lesser of two evils to protect truth while given the right to deny real. Paths of least resistance so when ancestors are made to behave according to social narratives or get punished for questioning the authority of invented policy that doesn't add up to all of natural blaancing taking place currently, adapt or become extinct emotions will choose a lesser of two evils rather than be destroyed for being completely honest as it appears nobody cares.

 

I care, but am powerless to change mindsets hell bent on making sure everyone complies with established denial patterns. Now go fix humanity. Cannot be done legally, ethically, morally because no institutions have a complete answer as to what went wrong giving character rights to society's children cradle to grave throughout history of civilizing male and fmeale lifetimes within the same species of the same atmosphere....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complete honesty cannot be accomplished without access to all information, and we as a race or society don't have a consistent way of procuring those goods.

 

 

Now go fix humanity. Cannot be done legally, ethically, morally because no institutions have a complete answer as to what went wrong giving character rights to society's children cradle to grave throughout history of civilizing male and fmeale lifetimes within the same species of the same atmosphere....

 

It cannot be done for the same reason we cannot be completely honest. The tools for doing so outside of our minds haven't existed yet, and have you tried using words to explain that which cannot be observed? It's damn frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complete honesty cannot be accomplished without access to all information, and we as a race or society don't have a consistent way of procuring those goods.

 

 

 

It cannot be done for the same reason we cannot be completely honest. The tools for doing so outside of our minds haven't existed yet, and have you tried using words to explain that which cannot be observed? It's damn frustrating.

Define your interpretation of all information? Content isn't the combined contexts of hypothetical values fictionalized by scientific theory or spiritual fantasy symbolized getting spaced apart happens over and under linear time lines..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Define your interpretation of all information? Content isn't the combined contexts of hypothetical values fictionalized by scientific theory or spiritual fantasy getting spaced apart happens over linear time lines..

 

Being that everything is composed of information, all information implies 'everything'. Since we do not have access to everything (or anything) outside of our minds, we cannot be certain of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Being that everything is composed of information, all information implies 'everything'. Since we do not have access to everything (or anything) outside of our minds, we cannot be certain of anything.

Everything exists being the content of self contained molecular mass migrating into results specifically never the same added details twice as randomly a concieved lifeitme, as an ancestry, as a species, as a food chain, as half of 8 hemispheres of inner connected combinations of inorganic and organic combinations of the same periodic table(alphabet of matter having 118 identified separate characteristics) in three divided categories of gases, liquids, and minerals added into two 4 dimensional existences combined here in plain sight individually spaced apart currently.

 

What all information do you need? Substance functioning as usual or symbolic interpretations getting reinterpreted all the time, but always currently here as the moment never stays the same as before or since connected?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All information, all interpretations of the information, from all observers. In order to have access to all information, one must be all. Because it is impossible to be all in what we perceive as the physical world, we cannot be honest (in the sense of my interpretation of your implication of the definition of the word).

 

If we could, the realization that there are no 'problems' and nothing needs 'fixing' would rear and societal evolution would diverge from its current course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...