Jump to content

Why do libs think the Bundy situation is a party issue?


Recommended Posts

This over stepping the bounds from government is an American citizen issue, not a right wing issue. Just because Reid is involved doesn't mean its an attack on the left. If it was a Republican involved the country should still be pissed off. If it was a Republican, you all know the libs would be all over this.

 

Libs, let me tell you about the courts and the BLM. The BLM are not elected officials, yet they are making laws. Its not like the usual lawmaking process where the elected officials go through a checks and balances before the law is passed through. These are not elected officials. These guys make up the law as they see fit as they go. The BLM have offered the land to the highest bidder. Well, Bundy was not the highest bidder, Reid was the highest bidder. The head of the BLM just happens to be a man who was on Reid's senior staff for 8 years. Are you now seeing why Bundy lost twice in court and will never win? Reid messed with the wrong man. This shouldnt be a party issue. But because Reid is involved, the libs feel they need to come to his rescue by picking and choosing what facts they want to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be quit honest, the republican base believed everything the Cheny administration told them. They still believe in Cheney no matter what. It's cognitive dissonance at it's core. It's the football game mentality.

 

This left v. right paradigm must end. G. Washington did not want a party system. He was right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libs believe in the constitution and the law. Period.

Hahahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahaahhahahahhhahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhhahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USFS(forest service) District Rangers are appointed also, and become one man Ayatollahs in their district, making up regulations as they go.

 

They are the bane of any recreational users, and do the work of enviro extremists, to shut down your enjoyment.

 

Then you have the Calif. Dept of Fish and Game to contend with.

Then there are the State Park Rangers, who are dickheads.

 

BLM has been the nicest of the bunch, in my experience.


Vegas is right!

 

This should not be a party issue!

 

It is the people vs. heavy handed Gestapo Govt.

 

It is that simple!

 

You are either for civil liberties, or for big government oppresion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USFS(forest service) District Rangers are appointed also, and become one man Ayatollahs in their district, making up regulations as they go.

 

They are the bane of any recreational users, and do the work of enviro extremists, to shut down your enjoyment.

 

Then you have the Calif. Dept of Fish and Game to contend with.

Then there are the State Park Rangers, who are dickheads.

 

BLM has been the nicest of the bunch, in my experience.

 

Vegas is right!

 

This should not be a party issue!

 

It is the people vs. heavy handed Gestapo Govt.

 

It is that simple!

 

You are either for civil liberties, or for big government oppresion!

the key is...

 

the libloons are all for big government...

 

what is ACA if not big government...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...