Jump to content

Why don't libs ever blame mass shooters instead of their guns?


Recommended Posts

When we hear a report about a mass shooting somewhere, the libs blame the gun and not the shooter? Why? Do guns have a mind of their own where they can magically hop into the arms of someone and then start randomly shooting itself without the consent of the guy that was holding it? Should we arrest the guns for murder and not worry about the guy who was doing he shooting? I don't get their reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We blame the shooters and the guns.

Why the guns? Guns are useless in themselves. They are only useful when a person does something with them. Otherwise, they are nothing more than piece of metal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We blame the shooters and the guns. Without the guns the shooters would have a much more difficult time doing as much damage as they are able to do with them.

I disagree. It's about their willingness to do as much damage as possible, they use a gun as a means maybe, but their will never goes away. Gun control doesn't squash the will. Think of how easy it is to make a pipe bomb that can do three times more damage, its all on the internet. The supplies are all over the counter. The weapons, themselves. are inconsequential. Its about how far people are willing to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ultraliberals come out of the woodwork when their is a mass shooting, which in most cases is done by a White male. Ultraliberals ignore the day to day, week to week, month to month, year to year gun violence that exist in the Black community, even tho it far out weights all of the mass shootings combined. To portray Black people in a bad light...no matter how true the statement is, is against the agenda.

 

Philadelphia: Tuesday night's shooting in Logan that killed one man, wounded another, and led to a two-hour standoff began with a dispute over a drug debt, police said Thursday.

 

Homicide Unit Capt. James Clark said five men have been arrested in connection with the incident.... Clark said that Roeun and his brother, whose name was not released, had gone to a house on Ruscomb Street to settle a drug debt. It was unclear whether the brothers owed or were owed money, he said.

 

But the brothers got into an argument with several men upon arriving, Clark said, and at one point at least four men pulled out guns and began firing, about 25 shots in total.

 

Roeun and his brother were unarmed, Clark said.

 

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20140314_Five_men_charged_with_murder_in_Logan_standoff.html#kZFIYtfTJFvR3ZrH.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ultraliberals come out of the woodwork when their is a mass shooting, which in most cases is done by a White male. Ultraliberals ignore the day to day, week to week, month to month, year to year gun violence that exist in the Black community, even tho it far out weights all of the mass shootings combined. To portray Black people in a bad light...no matter how true the statement is, is against the agenda.

 

Philadelphia: Tuesday night's shooting in Logan that killed one man, wounded another, and led to a two-hour standoff began with a dispute over a drug debt, police said Thursday.

 

Homicide Unit Capt. James Clark said five men have been arrested in connection with the incident.... Clark said that Roeun and his brother, whose name was not released, had gone to a house on Ruscomb Street to settle a drug debt. It was unclear whether the brothers owed or were owed money, he said.

 

But the brothers got into an argument with several men upon arriving, Clark said, and at one point at least four men pulled out guns and began firing, about 25 shots in total.

 

Roeun and his brother were unarmed, Clark said.

 

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20140314_Five_men_charged_with_murder_in_Logan_standoff.html#kZFIYtfTJFvR3ZrH.99

Good post. Iv'e always said libs are the most racist people alive. They just dont get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the guns?

 

"Without the guns the shooters would have a much more difficult time doing as much damage as they are able to do with them."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I disagree. It's about their willingness to do as much damage as possible, they use a gun as a means maybe, but their will never goes away. Gun control doesn't squash the will. Think of how easy it is to make a pipe bomb that can do three times more damage, its all on the internet.

 

Oh. That would explain all the mall & school bombings we've been having then, I s'pose? :rolleyes: (and all the mall & school bombings in countries where private ownership of guns is prohibited)

 

Sorry Vegas, the evidence doesn't back up your claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shunned again !

 

"Without the guns the shooters would have a much more difficult time doing as much damage as they are able to do with them."

George Bush could walk on water and ultraliberals would knock him for not being able to swim. On the other hand, Barack Obama could get caught getting a car date from a minor White House intern and the ultraliberals would blame the REPUBs...saying the President was set up and forced into it and Fox News was racist for reporting it. And in their ultraliberal minds they would really believe it all ! The ultraliberal agenda driven media is not going to let the first Afro-American President fail...no matter what ! In ultraliberalville GWB was responsible for the Katrina disaster but BHO is not responsible for Benghazi.

 

rwandamachete.jpgtutsi_skulls_dufka2.jpg

 

rwandan-genocide_machetes.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"Without the guns the shooters would have a much more difficult time doing as much damage as they are able to do with them."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh. That would explain all the mall & school bombings we've been having then, I s'pose? :rolleyes: (and all the mall & school bombings in countries where private ownership of guns is prohibited)

 

Sorry Vegas, the evidence doesn't back up your claim.

I think you are missing the point. The point is that it isn't the means that is relevant, its the will and intent of the person behind it. If guns were banned, criminals would step it up and probably use bombs. What's preventing them? No, I am being serious. Its cheap, easy, and more effective. Why do you think suicide bombers use that method? Because it does more damage than guns. Honestly, I cant figure out why they haven't used this method yet. I hate to give anyone ideas, but seriously. Making bombs is easy and more effective. I don't know, maybe they just havent figured it out yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are missing the point. The point is that it isn't the means that is relevant, its the will and intent of the person behind it.

All of Gacy's known murders were committed inside his Norwood Park Township home; his victims would typically be lured to this address by force or deception and all but one victim were murdered by either asphyxiation or strangulation with a tourniquet (his first victim was stabbed to death)

 

Johnwaynegacymug.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shunned again !

 

 

George Bush could walk on water and ultraliberals would knock him for not being able to swim. On the other hand, Barack Obama could get caught getting a car date from a minor White House intern and the ultraliberals would blame the REPUBs...saying the President was set up and forced into it and Fox News was racist for reporting it. And in their ultraliberal minds they would really believe it all ! The ultraliberal agenda driven media is not going to let the first Afro-American President fail...no matter what ! In ultraliberalville GWB was responsible for the Katrina disaster but BHO is not responsible for Benghazi.

 

rwandamachete.jpgtutsi_skulls_dufka2.jpg

 

rwandan-genocide_machetes.jpg

 

The phenomenom of genocide in Rwanda is not even comparable to the phenomenom of shootings by lone or two mentally disturbed gunmen we are experiencing in America today. Few of these "shooters" would choose to use machetes because they are basically cowards. Same thing with people robbing convenience stores & other gun crimes.

 

As to pipe bombs ... well, we don't see that happening in England, Australia, or any other civilized country where guns are banned or heavily restricted, now do we?

 

So, both of those arguments just do not compute. They are not even close to relevant to the issue of banning the widespread possession & easy buy/sell of guns in America today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we hear a report about a mass shooting somewhere, the libs blame the gun and not the shooter? Why? Do guns have a mind of their own where they can magically hop into the arms of someone and then start randomly shooting itself without the consent of the guy that was holding it? Should we arrest the guns for murder and not worry about the guy who was doing he shooting? I don't get their reasoning.

Libs blame guns because the Dem Party tells them to. It all politics.

 

Most of the mass shooters are leftist. That's why libs focus on the gun and not the perpetrator!

 

The highest gun crime areas have the toughest gun laws.

 

 

Here are some gun control statistics...

 

*Click on a country in the chart in order to learn about what occurred in that country.

GOVERNMENT GENOCIDE CAMPAIGNS AND THE

"GUN CONTROL" LAWS THAT HELPED SLAUGHTER 56 MILLION PEOPLE

 

PERPETRATOR GOVERNMENT DATE TARGET # MURDERED (ESTIMATED) DATE OF GUN CONTROL LAW SOURCE DOCUMENT Ottoman Turkey 1915-1917 Armenians 1-1.5 million 1886-1911 Art. 166, Penal Code

Art. 166 Penal Code Soviet Union* 1929-1953 Anti-Communists / Anti-Stalinists 20 million 1929 Art. 182 Penal Code Nazi Germany** & Occupied Europe 1933-1945 Jews, Gypsies, Anti-Nazis 13 million 1928-1938 Law on Firearms & Ammunition, April 12 Weapons Law, March 18 China* 1949-1952 1957-1960 1966-1976 Anti- Communists Rural Populations Pro-Reform Grou 20 million 1935-1957 Arts. 186-7, Penal Code Art. 9, Security Law, Oct. 22 Guatemala 1960-1981 Maya Indians 100,000 1871-1964 Decree 36, Nov 25 Decree 283, Oct 27 Uganda 1971-1979 Christians Political Rivals 300,000 1955-1970 Firearms Ordinance Firearms Act Cambodia 1975-1979 Educated Persons 1 million 1956 Arts. 322-8, Penal Code

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Libs blame guns because the Dem Party tells them to. It all politics.

 

 

You've got it sort of backwards ... the Dem Party supports gun restrictions (to some degree or other) because it's constituency (liberals) tells it to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You've got it sort of backwards ... the Dem Party supports gun restrictions (to some degree or other) because it's constituency (liberals) tells it to.

You've got it backwards...the Dems constituents take their lead from the politicians...always have.

 

Whenever the lib politicians state something as a problem almost every lib in the country starts chanting that issue.

 

Including the liberal media!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got it backwards...the Dems constituents take their lead from the politicians...always have.

 

Whenever the lib politicians state something as a problem almost every lib in the country starts chanting that issue.

 

Including the liberal media!

 

Yawn ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We blame the shooters and the guns. Without the guns the shooters would have a much more difficult time doing as much damage as they are able to do with them.

LMFAO

(1)?? Would it be OK with you IF the father killed him with a kitchen knife???

(2).......... Or would you be wanting to ban kitchen knives too???

(3) Are you just a liberal hypocrite?? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yawn ....

Why do you ignore the tendencies of ideology? Why did the Occupy Wall Street protests turn violent and not the Tea Party protests?

 

It was the same early in our country's history too.

 

After the repubs welcomed Black Americans in politics the dems murdered many black and white repubs.

 

The dems also started the KKK.

 

Back in those days, Dems didn't harm blacks that went along with their political view.

 

Same today...dems attack conservative blacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you ignore the tendencies of ideology? Why did the Occupy Wall Street protests turn violent and not the Tea Party protests?

 

It was the same early in our country's history too.

 

After the repubs welcomed Black Americans in politics the dems murdered many black and white repubs.

 

The dems also started the KKK.

 

Back in those days, Dems didn't harm blacks that went along with their political view.

 

Same today...dems attack conservative blacks.

Libs can't have uppity blacks going off the plantation and speaking their minds.

BLACK PEOPLE HAVE TO STAY ON THE PLANTATION AND VOTE DEMO.

They used to lynch uppity black people that voiced an opinion other than the demo's.

IF they could get away with it, they would jail them now-days. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no - Mass Stabbings - those feckin knives !!!!

China mass stabbing: Deadly knife attack in Kunming

 

_73307868_73305574.jpg

 

An attack by knife-wielding men at a railway station in Kunming in south-west China has left at least 29 dead, the state news agency Xinhua says.

Another 130 people were wounded in what authorities said was a "premeditated, violent terrorist attack".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personreal:

 

Here are some gun control statistics...

 

*Click on a country in the chart in order to learn about what occurred in that country.

GOVERNMENT GENOCIDE CAMPAIGNS AND THE
"GUN CONTROL" LAWS THAT HELPED SLAUGHTER 56 MILLION PEOPLE


PERPETRATOR GOVERNMENT DATE TARGET # MURDERED (ESTIMATED) DATE OF GUN CONTROL LAW SOURCE DOCUMENT Ottoman Turkey 1915-1917 Armenians 1-1.5 million 1886-1911 Art. 166, Penal Code
Art. 166 Penal Code Soviet Union* 1929-1953 Anti-Communists / Anti-Stalinists 20 million 1929 Art. 182 Penal Code Nazi Germany** & Occupied Europe 1933-1945 Jews, Gypsies, Anti-Nazis 13 million 1928-1938 Law on Firearms & Ammunition, April 12 Weapons Law, March 18 China* 1949-1952 1957-1960 1966-1976 Anti- Communists Rural Populations Pro-Reform Grou 20 million 1935-1957 Arts. 186-7, Penal Code Art. 9, Security Law, Oct. 22 Guatemala 1960-1981 Maya Indians 100,000 1871-1964 Decree 36, Nov 25 Decree 283, Oct 27 Uganda 1971-1979 Christians Political Rivals 300,000 1955-1970 Firearms Ordinance Firearms Act Cambodia 1975-1979 Educated Persons 1 million 1956 Arts. 322-8, Penal Cod

jimsouth: Well, if your gonna resort to truth - what can I say - ya gots me. Do liberals actually work at stupidity?


Killings have been going on since the dawn of man, it will never stop

Grandma Lula always said: "There was War in Heaven - how can we expect Peace of Earth".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cars should be banned because car accidents kill 50,000 people every year.

 

army and air farce general should be banned because those fuggups kill and

maim tens of thousands of our servicemen every year.

 

all religions should be banned because those frauds and con men of all religions

kill and maim hundreds of thousands of women and children each year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guns are easy targets for banning because they are objects without feelings. It is much more difficult to change the mindset of society to one where everyone values human life. It is easier to ban an object than to get your voting base to put them down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we hear a report about a mass shooting somewhere, the libs blame the gun and not the shooter? Why?

maybe the libloons are right,

maybe we should just put the shooters gun in jail and let the poor shooter go...

 

afterall... he probably had a traumatic episode sometime during his childhood

 

most likely because of bush...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...