fishhead Posted March 11, 2014 she was guilty as sin... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neue regel Posted March 11, 2014 Because law enforcement deemed an accident, not reckless behavior, Matlock. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Mack Posted March 11, 2014 fishhead and his friends have a get together to talk about Rush Limbaugh ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted March 11, 2014 Because she is just like Ted Kennedy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bgr39 Posted March 11, 2014 she was guilty as sin... LMFAO Why isn't Hillary and "H" on death-row for premeditated murder? They both knew that Benghazi was undermaned, security-wise. "H" and Hillary were directly responsible for the health and well-being of all four. BOTH "H" and Hillary had direct knowledge of a possible attack on the unsecured facility and both are responsible for the death of our Ambassador and the three other personel. BOTH OF THEM ARE GUILTY AS SIN.............. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Isabel Posted March 11, 2014 Because law enforcement deemed an accident, not reckless behavior, Matlock. Yeah - she ran a stop sign in her immediate neighborhood going at a very high rate of speed and managed to T-bone the car of the guy who had just dumped her. Â Completely accidental. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dano bivins Posted March 11, 2014 ..at exactly the right unstant..on a lonely, sparsely trVeled stretch of road. And she was wealthy. What? Pure coincidence! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
a777pilot Posted March 11, 2014 Why didn't BHO go to jail for being a drug dealer? He has admitted to being a drug dealer. That's about as guilty as one can get....confessing to a crime. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neue regel Posted March 11, 2014 Yeah - she ran a stop sign in her immediate neighborhood going at a very high rate of speed and managed to T-bone the car of the guy who had just dumped her.  Completely accidental.  Well, not exactly. She wasn't in her neighborhood but on a stretch of road described as "the middle of nowhere."   Then...  There are those who want to believe the future First Lady deliberately and with malice aforethought murdered her (ex-)boyfriend over some now forgotten teen tiff and who point to what they view as the suspicious circumstances of the accident and the subsequent lack of prosecution as proofs of their supposition. Yet to entertain such a hypothesis is to believe the young woman would have attempted to kill another by doing away with herself. (As the driver of what was intended to be a murder weapon, she would have had no reason to believe she would survive a collision severe enough to be fatal to her prey — that events turned out that way doesn't mean that outcome could have been reasonably foreseen.) Although the theory of "I'll kill you even though I have to kill myself to do it" might still play in a person sufficiently vengeance-minded (e.g., a suicide bomber), it is far better discounted in cases where an innocent life would also be taken (e.g., a passenger in the car). Those intent upon acts of revenge are generally impelled by a misguided sense of justice, and there is precious little justice (misguided or otherwise) in causing the death of innocent parties. Then there are the circumstances of the crash. It was 8 p.m. on a November night in Texas on roads far removed from any town, so it was dark. With no stop sign facing him, the doomed young man would have had no reason to slow his vehicle even if he had seen another car approaching the intersection. He therefore would have been traveling at least 50 mph. Laura Welch ran the stop sign facing her, so there is reason to assume she too was going approximately 50 mph, the speed she would have been doing if she'd had the right of way.  Consider two cars traveling in the dark at right angles to each other, each going approximately 50 mph. The span of time available in which to form murderous intent would have amounted to mere seconds, given the speed at which the event was unfolding and how close the two vehicles had to be to one another before the ill-intentioned would recognize the vehicle of her target. It doesn't add up. One e-mailed version of the rumor tries to supply an answer to that inconsistency, saying, "She knew it was her boyfriend's car driving south, because of the unique headlight configuration of his 1962 Corvair Sedan." The vehicles were traveling at right angles to one another, so an unusual headlight array on one wouldn't necessarily have been easily visible to the other.  http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.asp    I guess that's how rumors get started. Also explains why she was never charged with anything. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Isabel Posted March 11, 2014 ..at exactly the right unstant..on a lonely, sparsely trVeled stretch of road. And she was wealthy. What? Pure coincidence! Absolutely! Â What's wrong with you? Â Racist! Â Why didn't BHO go to jail for being a drug dealer? He has admitted to being a drug dealer. That's about as guilty as one can get....confessing to a crime. Cite? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mandrew002008 Posted March 11, 2014 It's obvious liber's have given up on Obama.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FivebyFive Posted March 11, 2014 How come there is nothing about this on the news??? Â can anyone provide a link to the story?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
a777pilot Posted March 11, 2014 Â Â Cite? Read his books. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FivebyFive Posted March 11, 2014 How come there is nothing about this on the news???  can anyone provide a link to the story?? Never mind.. I didin't realize we were talking about a 60 year old story  I had never heard of it before 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neue regel Posted March 11, 2014 Never mind.. I didin't realize we were talking about a 60 year old story  I had never heard of it before Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bgr39 Posted March 11, 2014 she was guilty as sin... ROTFLMFAO It must be a bad day for liberal talking points if the best you can do is go back 50 years to a terrible accident where no alcohol or drugs were involved. Absolutely! Â What's wrong with you? Â Racist! Â Â Cite? LMFAO Â LMFAOGee, you posted THIS, and I am STILL waiting for you proof that it ACTUALLY happened. ...................... Moderator 17,670 posts Gender:Female Location:NYC area Posted Yesterday, 08:24 AM Chuck!, on 22 Feb 2014 - 10:12 PM, said: Chuck!, on 22 Feb 2014 - 10:12 PM, said: Wanna make a wild guess what "the community", in their monthly newsletter, said about Zimmerman? Are you including the complaints members of the "community" made about him prior to the incident? The complaints that were made against him for his "aggressive" behavior? Â Or are we ignoring those? 0 Republicans - Party of the Pathological Cite? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaydublu Posted March 11, 2014 she was guilty as sin... She could have shared a jail cell with (adult) Sen. Ted Kennedy! Yeah - she ran a stop sign in her immediate neighborhood going at a very high rate of speed and managed to T-bone the car of the guy who had just dumped her. Â Completely accidental. Â Now driving off a bridge in an area you grew up in with an intern by your side....coinkeedinkee! But then, he was a U.S. Senator! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Mack Posted March 12, 2014 She could have shared a jail cell with (adult) Sen. Ted Kennedy! Â ...But then, he was a U.S. Senator! Ultraliberals don't care that Senator Kennedy left a woman to die. Ultraliberals only care about the agenda ! Â Â Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bgr39 Posted March 12, 2014 Mary Jo Kopechne dead of what cause?Drowning and suffocation. it has been estimated she was struggling for breath up to four hours after the fatal plunge. The body was found in the back seat of the car which suggests something fishy going on! If Mary Jo Kopechne was still alive then why wasn't she able to escape like Kennedy did?This is one of the many grave questions concerning the Chappaquidick affair. Why did Kennedy escape relatively unscathed, while Mary Jo died an agonizing death of a combination of drowning and suffocation that the Medical examiners estimate could have taken up to four hours before she actually expired- Drowning is a barbaric thing and it has never been used as a capital punishment mode by any civilized country-though barges full of religious heretics were ( Dumped) in the period of the Edict of Nantes. ( prisoners were c hained or otherwise secured before the ballast vents were opened- yeccch!) it is so barbarous it has never been used as an execution technique despite a lack of violence to body parts- no shocks, flame scars, burns or gas fumes. still its an agonizing and not rapid way to die. How Teddy was able to rapidly escape unharmed, and why he waited an estimated nine hours (again agonizing) before notifying the authorities, it is beyond belief in a sense, but it happened. why was he not required to ( chuck up his commission) as a minimum sanction- that is resign from politics- STAT! How long was was Mary Jo Kopechne alive in the air pocket after the car submerged?Long enough for ted to panic, save himself and stumble to his hotel! ....................................... Â Ole' Ted Kennedy allowed Mary Jo Kopechne to die, so he could continue his political career. IF Ted had called for help instead of sobering up before he went to the police station 9 hours later, with hiis lawyer beside him. Mary Jo Kopechne would've lived. Ted cared more about his political career than he cared about the girls life. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sole result Posted March 12, 2014 she was guilty as sin... What is a sin that isn't open to interpretation of might makes right? Â Damn there are legal, ethical, moral codes to interpret right and wrong where each can blame the other two for everything gone wrong. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zaro Posted March 12, 2014 she got her punishment. married to Dubya Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roadkill Posted March 12, 2014 she was guilty as sin... Desperation and hatred on your part. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Isabel Posted March 12, 2014 Read his books. So you can't support your con crap, and are just lying out of your ass. Â Got it. Â Now driving off a bridge in an area you grew up in with an intern by your side....coinkeedinkee! But then, he was a U.S. Senator! No, no - you're RIGHT - he drove HIMSELF off a bridge ON PURPOSE! Yes, he DID! Â LOLOL. What clowns you cons are. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heretic Posted March 12, 2014 Why didn't BHO go to jail for being a drug dealer? He has admitted to being a drug dealer. That's about as guilty as one can get....confessing to a crime. Â You may be confusing him with Dubya: Â In Fortunate Son, Bush biographer Hatfield quoted several anonymous sources regarding allegations of Bush's cocaine use. Hatfield reported that Bush had been arrested for cocaine possession in 1972 and that his father pulled strings to have records of the arrest expunged.[12] Bush campaign spokesperson Mindy Tucker called the allegation "absolutely untrue".[13] Bush repeatedly refused to state whether he had ever used cocaine.[14] Bush did say in 1999 that he could truthfully answer "no" to the then-standard FBI background check question of whether he had used any illegal drug in the last seven years. He later stated that he could have passed a background check under a policy that his father had instituted as President in 1989 that extended the background check to 15 years. This would have checked back to 1974, two years after the alleged 1972 arrest.[15 Â http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_substance_abuse_controversy#Cocaine Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mandrew002008 Posted March 12, 2014 Why aren't liber's giving us all the feel good threads about Obama...lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
