Jump to content

Why do the non-liberal MSM hate the Tea Party?


Recommended Posts

There's absolutely, positively NO BIAS in the MSM, claim liberals.

It's pro-corporate bias, they insist.

 

Why does the "Corporate MSM" hate the Tea Party then? As well as everything conservative?

 

 

 

Tea Party birthday -- movement survives 5 years of outlandish, offensive media attacks
By Dan Gainor

“Terrorists!” “Racists!” “Mass murderers!” For five years, the Tea Party has been the American media’s favorite target. The crime? Pushing back against ObamaCare, the $787 billion stimulus and Big Government. Tea Partiers attacked so many decaying liberal beliefs that it looked like a “Walking Dead” episode.

From the Feb. 27, 2009, launch, Tea Party protests grew from more than 40 cities to a political force around the nation and in Washington. Journalists labeled the Tea Party “homophobic,” “wingnuts” and many things far worse. The media tried to link Tea Partiers to the attack on then-Rep. Gabrielle “Gabby” Giffords, D-Ariz., and the Aurora theater shooting.

On Tax Day, April 15, 2009, CNN’s Susan Roesgen flipped out and called the Tea Party: “anti-tax,” “anti-CNN” and “not really family viewing,” and she said the event was “highly promoted by the right-wing conservative network Fox.”

There is no other group in America that journalists fear more than the Tea Party.

One Washington Post headline went so far as to claim: “Tea Party has roots in the Dallas of 1963” – yes, 46 years before the Tea Party was even born, it was helping kill JFK. Oliver Stone where are you?

Both CNN and MSNBC made sport of the fact that “teabag” has a street sexual meaning.

On Tax Day 2009, CNN’s Anderson Cooper snarked about the GOP finding its voice: “It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging.”

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow and her guest, then-Air America radio contributor Ana Marie Cox, teamed up to use the word “teabag” at least 51 times in a 13-minute-long segment of bad “teabag” puns.

By contrast, the media lionized the Occupy Wall Street movement, though Occupiers openly called for revolution. They even marched down the street carrying banners with that battle cry, or sometimes communist flags or the black flags of anarchy.

According to OccupyArrests.com, there have been 7,765 arrests of that group, ranging from rape to assaults on police, vandalism, rioting and arson. Five Cleveland Occupiers were even arrested in a bombing plot.

The Tea Party events that were almost universally peaceful never received the same kind of positive coverage. Instead, Tea Partiers were often treated like Hezbollah by a media embracing liberal talking points at every turn.

Take, for example, ABC’s irresponsible attack on the Tea Party following the July 20, 2012, massacre in Aurora, Colo. Gunman James Holmes killed 12 people and injured 58, but ABC investigative reporter Brian Ross used the tragedy to score points against the Tea Party.

The very next day, “Good Morning America” host George Stephanopoulos enticed viewers by saying Ross had “found something that might be significant.” According to Ross, a Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colo., had joined the Tea Party. He added that “we don’t know if this is the same Jim Holmes.”

“Don’t know” was a horrific understatement. In his zeal to bash the right, it turned out Ross was completely wrong. ABC had to release an apology, but it never did so on air. And the Tea Party got blamed on national TV for mass murder.

Ross wasn’t alone. New York Times Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman had tried a similarly irresponsible tactic back in 2011, when he blamed the attack on Rep. Gabby Giffords on … the Tea Party.

“We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was. She’s been the target of violence before,” Krugman wrote, adding that Giffords had been “on Sarah Palin’s infamous ‘crosshairs’ list.” Krugman’s Nobel clearly wasn’t the Peace Prize.

Naturally, if Tea Party people were potential mass murderers, they had to be “terrorists.”

A pair of New York Times columnists deployed the term just two weeks apart in 2011. Joe Nocera said: “You know what they say: Never negotiate with terrorists.” In his piece on Aug. 2, he went on to accuse the Tea Party of having “waged jihad on the American people” and having worn “suicide vests.”

That comment merely refined the far-worse attack by Thomas Friedman on July 26. “If sane Republicans do not stand up to this Hezbollah faction in their midst, the Tea Party will take the GOP on a suicide mission.”

The New York Times doesn’t even call Hezbollah a terrorist group. On Feb. 19, 2014, it used the phrase, “Iranian-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.” This is the very same Hezbollah that killed “220 Marines and 21 other service personnel” with a truck bomb in 1983, according to CNN. To many journalists, the only way to get called a “terrorist” in the U.S. is to be a Tea Partier.

That level of venom is reserved for those you fear the most. There is no other group in America that journalists fear more than the Tea Party. Five years later, the movement stands strong. That’s a reason to party – tea or not.

Dan Gainor is the Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center’s Vice President for Business and Culture
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/02/27/tea-party-birthday-movement-survives-five-years-outlandish-offensive-media/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They remember 2010. They know there are three senators and many in the house who were backed by the tea party. They understand some of their RINO friends are not going to be elected. They fear that if the GOP takes the senate their hero oblameo will be neutered. All oblameo will be able to do is veto. The president of NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same reason the liberal media doesn't like them. they want their own lifetimes back.

Exactly...no one on the left and many on the right don't want reform cause they have it too good now.

 

And the corps want access to the current corrupt system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone hates the tea party and with experienced politicians retiring from the summit over 60% of the politicians in both houses will have 1term experience and many one year experience .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does the "Corporate MSM" hate the Tea Party then? As well as everything conservative?

 

the tea party on its own has no chance of survival. all they can do is bring the GOP down. that why they are hated by non-lib MSM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If everyone hates them then why are they so popular and powerful now? DUH.

 

 

Liber's campiagn of deceit has fallen on death ears. The liber's have been exposed for the liars they are. November starts a permanent vacation for many Dems and Rino Republicans.

the tea party on its own has no chance of survival. all they can do is bring the GOP down. that why they are hated by non-lib MSM

 

 

Have to laugh my ass off...says who you? lol The GOP Rino's need to go down along with the rest of the progressive socialist. The Tea Party will be making a loud statement along with the American voters this Fall. Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liber's campiagn of deceit has fallen on death ears. The liber's have been exposed for the liars they are. November starts a permanent vacation for many Dems and Rino Republicans.

 

 

 

Have to laugh my ass off...says who you? lol The GOP Rino's need to go down along with the rest of the progressive socialist. The Tea Party will be making a loud statement along with the American voters this Fall. Good luck

Man I can't wait!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

November starts a permanent vacation for many Dems and Rino Republicans.

 

 

Have to laugh my ass off...says who you? lol The GOP Rino's need to go down along with the rest of the progressive socialist. The Tea Party will be making a loud statement along with the American voters this Fall. Good luck

 

 

 

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-paul-ryan-poverty-20140303,0,11560.story

 

Paul Ryan calls for cuts to anti-poverty programs in GOP budget

By Lisa Mascaro

March 3, 2014, 10:07 a.m.

 

WASHINGTON--House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan is taking aim at the nation's poverty programs, unveiling an ambitious report Monday that will underpin Republican budget priorities this election year.

 

The former Republican presidential nominee is long on criticism of the nearly $800 billion in government spending on more than 90 different poverty programs in 2012 that provided food, housing, education and other assistance for low-income Americans.

 

But the report is short on policy prescriptions, which are coming later from the budget chairman.

 

The conservative budget guru intends to rally House Republicans around an overhaul of the federal safety net, posing a direct election year confrontation with the White House over the growing issue of income inequality.

 

I can already hear the noise

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Liar. :glare:

But Rich, you always say that the MSM is all liberal! How can there be any non-liberal MSM?

 

Its all corporate owned....not very liberal actually. More like NWO controlled, like Fox.

 

 

 

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-paul-ryan-poverty-20140303,0,11560.story

 

Paul Ryan calls for cuts to anti-poverty programs in GOP budget

By Lisa Mascaro

March 3, 2014, 10:07 a.m.

 

WASHINGTON--House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan is taking aim at the nation's poverty programs, unveiling an ambitious report Monday that will underpin Republican budget priorities this election year.

 

The former Republican presidential nominee is long on criticism of the nearly $800 billion in government spending on more than 90 different poverty programs in 2012 that provided food, housing, education and other assistance for low-income Americans.

 

But the report is short on policy prescriptions, which are coming later from the budget chairman.

 

The conservative budget guru intends to rally House Republicans around an overhaul of the federal safety net, posing a direct election year confrontation with the White House over the growing issue of income inequality.

 

I can already hear the noise

 

I can already envision cities burning to the ground, and the gestapo enforcing martial law if Ryan gets his way!

 

This is what the NWO wants! Martial law, and complete fascist corporate control!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...