Jump to content

Who are the real extremists?


Recommended Posts

Liberals lie that the Tea Party is extreme; that mainstream conservatives are extreme.

 

Ignoring the fact that they support the Constitution, the Founding Principles, basic Economcis and fiscal sanity.

 

So who are the real extremists? The ones dishonestly labeling the Tea Party and conservatives.

 

 

 

Congressman John Dingell, D—Healthcare Is a Right
John Nichols
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178516/congressman-john-dingell-d-healthcare-right

 

There is not one single actual right in the Constitution that obligates other Americans to pay for someone else's right.

 

And the Founders didn't omit that by oversight, obviously. It goes against the very philosophy on which the country was founded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Five By Five, on 25 Feb 2014 - 3:06 PM, said:

Fox News analyst tells Tea Party group he can lead a military coup against Obama

www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/27/fox-news-analyst-tells-tea-party-group-he-can-lead-a-military-coup-against-obama/

 

discussing a coup is extreme

 

 

One old man makes an outrageous statement and that makes the Tea Party Extreme..lol You liber's have tried your best to distort public perception about the Tea Party and what they stand for. The true enemy of the United States are progressives. They are the architects of the one world government. Tea Party = Death to progressives. The only way progressives can survive is by enslaving the people. Come November we need tp purge our government of these socialist/globalist who's only intent is to destroy America so they can institute their global plan. Progressives cannot create the one world government without bringing America to her knees through destruction of the economy, military, Obamacare, personal rights and freedoms and creating a society that is totally dependent on its government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberals lie that the Tea Party is extreme; that mainstream conservatives are extreme.

 

Ignoring the fact that they support the Constitution, the Founding Principles, basic Economcis and fiscal sanity.

 

So who are the real extremists? The ones dishonestly labeling the Tea Party and conservatives.

 

 

 

 

There is not one single actual right in the Constitution that obligates other Americans to pay for someone else's right.

 

And the Founders didn't omit that by oversight, obviously. It goes against the very philosophy on which the country was founded.

It is easy to see you are not a practicing attorney to ask such a question.

 

The simple answer that includes all citizens leading societal evolutions quest to make reality real and real just a dream state of mind is your answer. It covers all 4 gambits of selling hyperbole as facts of life academically comparing theories against theologies, spiritually separating mind and body, politically dividing ancestors from ancestry over economic issues where symbolism is more important than survival of the species only being lifetimes spaced apart as conceived into this atmosphere.

 

Truth is invented, real is simple compounding inversions of migrating molecular elements self contained to universal locations self maintaining those positions all the time as it happens now eternally, with or without homo sapien ancestry or humanity's societal evoluton distorting real for reality's sake of those in charge staying in power of playing both ends against the middle 7 ways that separate 14 positions of ancestry from the last ancestor added currently with now being adapt or become extinct equally applied to everything universally here individually whole results of half the next generated lifetime..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that certainly sounds like a waste of time

 

Hating government is not healthy for the country.. I wouldn't want to support anyone who prefers no government and anarchy. I know this isn't every tea partiers mantra.. Most want to rationally reform the government which I am OK with...

Damn you stepped into a giant pile of fertilizer here. Do specific lifetimes exist without a name? Can a society exist without a namesake?

 

being civil and social doesn't take a civilization of metaphors directing everyone to ignore the self evident point that separates everything here currently, so why become civilized by vernacular tribalism cultivating orchestrated chaos within organized doubt real exists in plain sight?

 

Government is vocabulary, governance is applying meaning to the words that do NOT discuss a whole of anything completely. Just compare what if against what could, wopuld, or should happen if not complying to trained beliefs cradle to grave.

 

Why does governance create fear from their own government as much as those governed by other hypothetical values wanting the same thing?

 

The enemy of my enemies is me as they ally together to makes sure I don't know or admit what real is to anybody or face crimes against humanity's educated beliefs there is a greater good not knowing what real is equally within the whole population of single lifetimes passing through being now here.SPECIFICALLY AS CONCEIVED..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people call me an extremist due to some of my opinions.

 

My response is always that today's etremist is sometimes tommorrow's national hero (or founding father/mother.)

Yesterday is the left door and tomorrow is the right door while now is the doorway through eternity here now all the time. Founding Fathers of what societal evolution in social justification character's have rights from taking liberties away from lifetimes eternally conceived now.

 

the same moment they die in is now. Hell of a bubble, this atmosphere, and the contents inside never adding into the same results as before here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaker at a tea party rally:

 

"How many of you have watched the movie Lonesome Dove?," asked an unidentified female speaker from the podium. "What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd? What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd. He got hung. And that's what I want to do with Democrat Patty Murray."

 

Glory Hole meet extremist!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaker at a tea party rally:

 

"How many of you have watched the movie Lonesome Dove?," asked an unidentified female speaker from the podium. "What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd? What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd. He got hung. And that's what I want to do with Democrat Patty Murray."

 

Glory Hole meet extremist!

 

 

Hoffa at Union rally:

 

Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa had some profane, combative words for Republicans while warming up the crowd for President Obama in Detroit, Michigan on Monday.

 

"We got to keep an eye on the battle that we face: The war on workers. And you see it everywhere, it is the Tea Party. And you know, there is only one way to beat and win that war. The one thing about working people is we like a good fight. And you know what? They've got a war, they got a war with us and there's only going to be one winner. It's going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We're going to win that war," Jimmy Hoffa said to a heavily union crowd.

 

"President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. Let's take these son of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong," Hoffa added.

 

 

Come take us out Skeppy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaker at a tea party rally:

 

"How many of you have watched the movie Lonesome Dove?," asked an unidentified female speaker from the podium. "What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd? What happened to Jake when he ran with the wrong crowd. He got hung. And that's what I want to do with Democrat Patty Murray."

 

Glory Hole meet extremist!

 

More bulls*** from a shameless liar.

 

Yeah, sure, the Tea Party wants to literally hang people. :D

 

Imbecile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

More bulls*** from a shameless liar.

 

Yeah, sure, the Tea Party wants to literally hang people. :D

 

Imbecile.

Genius forgets there is video and documentation of what they said. Lmao

Liberals lie that the Tea Party is extreme; .[/i][/b]

 

.

Whenever extremists blurt out extreme things online or elsewhere, there's always a concurrent sub-debate about whether we should pay attention to these people. The most recent case, of course, is Ted Nugent's meltdown in which he reacted to criticism by CNN with an epic Twitter tirade that included word-salad tweets like this one: "CNN Joseph Goebbells Saul Alinsky propaganda ministry mongrels."

 

Of course, the remarks that touched off this latest pandemic of Nugent gibberish began when he called President Obama a "subhuman mongrel" and, within the same rant, a "chimpanzee" (the chimpanzee part is often overlooked). Last week, CNN's Wolf Blitzer hosted a guest who, while admittedly violating Godwin's Law, noted that Nazis referred to Jews as subhumans. Following the CNN segment, even conservative leaders like Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) condemned Nugent.

 

Reacting to all of this, Nugent went full berzerker on Twitter, and then only offered a half-assed, excessively whistly apology -- "not necessarily to the president" -- for his clearly racist statements about Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever extremists blurt out extreme things online or elsewhere, there's always a concurrent sub-debate about whether we should pay attention to these people. The most recent case, of course, is Ted Nugent's meltdown....

 

 

It was over the top and he rightly apologized.

However, here's a prominent Democrat Senator who's clearly a Communist sympathizer, and his remarks were thought out, not an intemperate outburst.

 

Among many who adulate a mass murdering dictator and his Totalitarian system of government.

 

See anything wrong there?

 

 

 

Sen. Marco Rubio assails Sen. Tom Harkin for praising the Cuban government.

A few moments ago, the body was treated to a report from the senator from Iowa [ Tom Harkin ] about his recent trip to Cuba. Sounded like he had a wonderful trip visiting, what he described as, a real paradise. He bragged about a number of things that he learned on his trip to Cuba that I'd like to address briefly. He bragged about their health care system, medical school is free, doctors are free, clinics are free, their infant mortality rate may be even lower than ours.

 

I wonder if the senator, however, was informed, number one, that the infant mortality rate of Cuba is completely calculated on figures provided by the Cuban government. And, by the way, totalitarian communist regimes don't have the best history of accurately reporting things. I wonder if he was informed that before Castro, Cuba, by the way, was 13th in the whole world in infant mortality. I wonder if the government officials who hosted him informed him that in Cuba there are instances reported, including by defectors, that if a child only lives a few hours after birth, they're not counted as a person who ever lived and therefore don't count against the mortality rate.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304255604579407540659173248?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion&mg=reno64-wsj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...