roadkill Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 bogey...what is your view of global warming and who's behind it? FWIW...Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" was banned in England's school unless they provided the opposing view. My view is that the man-made global warming campaign is simply another attempt at a power-grab. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 Penn...why they changed from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change"...to cover their azz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 Tried to get bogey-pawn to respond but he seems to be on a mission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mandrew002008 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Tried to get bogey-pawn to respond but he seems to be on a mission. SOK's have to be careful to not expose themselves as the idiot they were before.....lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 Can't get bogey-ganda to respond...maybe I can flush him out. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=SNPJMk2fgJU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cartoonbogeyman Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 bogey...what is your view of global warming and who's behind it? FWIW...Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" was banned in England's school unless they provided the opposing view. My view is that the man-made global warming campaign is simply another attempt at a power-grab. Hello peasant I have no interest or opinion on the subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 Hello peasant I have no interest or opinion on the subject. LOLOL... The hell you don't! You just don't want to expose your ignorance. While you're mustering up some courage, let's have some more fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 So there you have it folks...bogey-pawn ran from the topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckin futz Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 You sure are desparate for attention, while everyone has you on IGNOR! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndnorth Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Patrick Moore. Co-founder of Greenpeace 'There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years. If there were such a proof it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists. 'The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states: “It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.” (My emphasis)“Extremely likely” is not a scientific term but rather a judgment, as in a court of law. The IPCC defines “extremely likely” as a “95-100% probability”. 'But upon further examination it is clear that these numbers are not the result of any mathematical calculation or statistical analysis. They have been “invented” as a construct within the IPCC report to express “expert judgment”, as determined by the IPCC contributors. 'When modern life evolved over 500 million years ago, CO2 was more than 10 times higher than today, yet life flourished at this time. Then an Ice Age occurred 450 million years ago when CO2 was 10 times higherthan today. 'There is some correlation, but little evidence, to support a direct causal relationship between CO2 and global temperature through the millennia. The fact that we had both higher temperatures and an ice age at a time when CO2 emissions were 10 times higher than they are today fundamentally contradicts the certainty that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming. 'Today, we live in an unusually cold period in the history of life on earth and there is no reason to believe that a warmer climate would be anything but beneficial for humans and the majority of other species. There is ample reason to believe that a sharp cooling of the climate would bring disastrous results for human civilization. 'The IPCC states that humans are the dominant cause of warming “since the mid-20th century”, which is 1950. From 1910 to 1940 there was an increase in global average temperature of 0.5C over that 30-year period. Then there was a 30-year “pause” until 1970. 'This was followed by an increase of 0.57C during the 30-year period from 1970 to 2000. Since then there has been no increase, perhaps a slight decrease, in average global temperature. This in itself tends to negate the validity of the computer models, as CO2 emissions have continued to accelerate during this time. 'The increase in temperature between 1910-1940 was virtually identical to the increase between 1970-2000. Yet the IPCC does not attribute the increase from 1910-1940 to “human influence.”' Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2569215/Humans-not-blame-global-warming-says-Greenpeace-founder-Patrick-Moore.html#ixzz2uaEKz4zI Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclectic skeptic Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 FWIW...Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" was banned in England's school unless they provided the opposing view. . Just like the creationists want equal time in the schools along side real science. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeAChooser Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Can't get bogey-ganda to respond...maybe I can flush him out. I think you are wasting your time. I couldn't even get Cbm to debate the details of his favorite topic. You know, the bombs that brought down the WTC towers and damaged the Pentagon. All he wanted to do was regurgitate his meme without proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.