TheAmerican Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 National Security Advisor Susan Rice says she has no regrets about appearing on five Sunday talk shows following the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi and blaming it on an anti-Islamic YouTube video. Rice was a guest on “Meet The Press” this Sunday. When asked by host David Gregory if she regretted her claim, she replied, “David, no.” Here’s a short excerpt from the video: GREGORY: “When you were last here, Ambassador Rice, it was an eventful morning on a story of Benghazi and the horrible attack on our compound there. We haven’t seen you in a while. As you look back at your involvement in all of that, do you have any regrets?” RICE: “David, no. Because what I said to you that morning and what I did every day since was to share the best information that we had at the time. … And that information turned out in some respects not to be 100 percent correct.” Not 100% correct,” Ms. Rice? How about, 100% false? On the Sunday after the attack, Rice appeared on all five major talk shows and repeated the Obama administration’s talking point that the attack was a “spontaneous” response to the obscure video. A now-declassified document shows that top civilian and military leaders were told minutes after the attack began that it was a “terrorist attack,” and not the result of a video. Nor was it a “spontaneous attack,” as the administration also claimed at the time. For Susan Rice to say she has no regrets about misleading the American people on a terrorist attack that resulted in the brutal killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other brave Americans, particularly as she was still misleading them today, is the height of arrogance. http://www.ijreview.com/2014/02/117214-susan-rice-regrets-going-five-sunday-talk-shows-pushing-false-talking-points/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewstherin Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 benghazi doesn't matter. some bridge in new jersey does. get with the program. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAmerican Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 benghazi doesn't matter. some bridge in new jersey does. get with the program. ...sorry, you're right!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackdog Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Got another clown over at State too: U.N. Ambassador: Daniel Pearl’s Murder Reminder that ‘Reconciliation Required to Break Cycles of Violence’ By Patrick Brennan February 24, 2014 9:39 AM The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, delivered the twelfth annual Daniel Pearl Memorial Lecture at UCLA on Sunday. She took the occasion to offer her thoughts on the 2002 death of Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was kidnapped by an Islamist militant group in Karachi, Pakistan, and beheaded by 9/11 conspirator Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Before his murder, Pearl’s captors forced him to detail on videotape the nature of his Jewish ancestry: “My father’s Jewish, my mother’s Jewish, I’m Jewish. My family follows Judaism,” he said. The video also shows Pearl’s severed head and his body, which was hacked to pieces. His captors demanded the release of all Muslim prisoners from Guantanamo Bay, warning that if the United States refused their demands, they would continue to kidnap and murder American Jews. Power said that Pearl’s death is a “reminder that individual accountability and reconciliation are required to break cycles of violence.” UPDATE: Ambassador Power issued the following correction to her tweet, noting that she intended to say that the work of the Daniel Pearl Foundation, which was founded by his family to address the “root causes” of his death, is “a reminder that individual accountability are required to break cycles of violence.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndnorth Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Rice is lying because she does not want to believe or admit that oblameo played her for the big patsy. She has been rewarded for her naiveté. If she still believes in oblameo she is well beyond naiveté and into the the realm of a person without any pride or dignity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 And she married to a whitie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAmerican Posted February 24, 2014 Author Share Posted February 24, 2014 Rice is lying because she does not want to believe or admit that oblameo played her for the big patsy. She has been rewarded for her naiveté. If she still believes in oblameo she is well beyond naiveté and into the the realm of a person without any pride or dignity. ...maybe she'll tell the truth when her boss retires in 2016? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgr39 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 National Security Advisor Susan Rice says she has no regrets about appearing on five Sunday talk shows following the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi and blaming it on an anti-Islamic YouTube video. Rice was a guest on “Meet The Press” this Sunday. When asked by host David Gregory if she regretted her claim, she replied, “David, no.” Here’s a short excerpt from the video: Not 100% correct,” Ms. Rice? How about, 100% false? GREGORY: “When you were last here, Ambassador Rice, it was an eventful morning on a story of Benghazi and the horrible attack on our compound there. We haven’t seen you in a while. As you look back at your involvement in all of that, do you have any regrets?” RICE: “David, no. Because what I said to you that morning and what I did every day since was to share the best information that we had at the time. … And that information turned out in some respects not to be 100 percent correct.” On the Sunday after the attack, Rice appeared on all five major talk shows and repeated the Obama administration’s talking point that the attack was a “spontaneous” response to the obscure video. A now-declassified document shows that top civilian and military leaders were told minutes after the attack began that it was a “terrorist attack,” and not the result of a video. Nor was it a “spontaneous attack,” as the administration also claimed at the time. For Susan Rice to say she has no regrets about misleading the American people on a terrorist attack that resulted in the brutal killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other brave Americans, particularly as she was still misleading them today, is the height of arrogance. http://www.ijreview.com/2014/02/117214-susan-rice-regrets-going-five-sunday-talk-shows-pushing-false-talking-points/ Susan Rice is as big of a liar now, as she was whem she was puting out the "video did it" talking points. Lying is what liberals do best. If a liberal EVER told the truth, their lips would fall off! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeAChooser Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 We know what Rice is and why. The real question is why the GOP has done nothing about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTZilla Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 rice lies people die Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mandrew002008 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 There's been so much lying, they can't deny their lying... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neue regel Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 We know what Rice is and why. The real question is why the GOP has done nothing about it. For the o'barry admin, lying isn't that big a head turner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isabel Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Why does everyone say Rice is lying? Her statements about the events have been consistent and have not changed Because, since they don't have any legitimate criticism, cons have to try to lie one into existence with the Con Lie Machine. The intentionally vile and insulting video made by a RIGHT-WING CON triggered that attack. CONS caused that attack, and the resulting deaths are on their hands. You know cons, though - they never take personal responsibility for anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cartoonbogeyman Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Who cares about Benghazi. US terrorists have killed 100 000s since the false flag 911 attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neue regel Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Why does everyone say Rice is lying? Her statements about the events have been consistent and have not changed Because we know the WH was briefed on the attacks 15 minutes after it started...and not that a video upset our terrorist friends. Rice was given a false story, and off she went. The fact her story never changed only proves she is partial to this particular lie. She was promoted for playing ball, so what does she care?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Who cares about Benghazi. US terrorists have killed 100 000s since the false flag 911 attack. Cbm exposed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mandrew002008 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Why does everyone say Rice is lying? Her statements about the events have been consistent and have not changed Consistent lying...geez if you liber's still believe that a youtube video is the reason our embassy was attacked your hopeless. The lie is so bad its ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAmerican Posted February 25, 2014 Author Share Posted February 25, 2014 Among all the lies... HERE is the $MILLION question!!! Who told obama it was a terrorist attack?? Panetta? Did the libturds change the story to protect obama's campaign in 2012? IF Panetta testify the libturds knew it was a terrorist attack... obama is toast! http://video.foxnews.com/v/3251768119001/some-new-stuff-out-of-benghazi-that-pertains-directly-to-you/#sp=show-clips Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slowmotion426 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 barry had the two Generals that were still going to send troops to help those at Benghazi removed from their commands. He made a point of making sure our people were murdered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeAChooser Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Why does everyone say Rice is lying? LOL! You don't think Rice was aware of what the attack was really all about? You think she really believed it was prompted by a video for the days and days she spread that lie? She was NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, 5X5. Of course she knew. The exchange of emails of which she was a part show US intelligence knew it was a terrorist attack. That information was shared at a classified level to which Rice, a member of the Cabinet, had access. And she knew that the talking points were being altered to hide that fact. Just the other day it was revealed: http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-cover-cont_782749.html Those emails, which the White House gave reporters in May 2013, showed Morell had been a key player in rewriting the talking points. In fact, a September 15 email to Susan Rice described a secure video teleconference in which Morell told others on the call that he had rewritten the talking points and would be happy to revise them further in consultation with top advisers to President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton. Now just so you know, Michael Morell was then acting director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Rice knew it. Ergo, she lied … and then continued to lie. Hence the consistency of her statements. She's a consistent liar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Obama is toast? Rice is secretive that's why Obama keeps her around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 She's Lyin to herself screwing a white dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huntfishlib Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 She turns out to be 100% honest at every turn and in nutjob land it's proof she's lying. It must be fun to be conservative! Lol. It's been investigated. The results proved that was the info we had at the time. It was also determined that there was a spontaneous element. The conservative movement in 2014 is bankrupt. This is more proof. The video prompted the start of the riot dumdums. Try reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 She turns out to be 100% honest at every turn and in nutjob land it's proof she's lying. It must be fun to be conservative! Lol. It's been investigated. The results proved that was the info we had at the time. It was also determined that there was a spontaneous element. The conservative movement in 2014 is bankrupt. This is more proof. The video prompted the start of the riot dumdums. Try reading. Oh my God...you still believe that? LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huntfishlib Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Oh my God...you still believe that? LOL It's in the investigation report. Did you read it? Do you think it was a well planned terrorist attack only? And nothing spontaneous? No chance, and the facts and investigation results are clearly on my side. Try reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.