Jump to content

I've swung to the dark side


Recommended Posts

I have become a right winger. After years of experience in the workplace, I have found that the human soul is comprised of utter dog[excrement], and that is why liberalism and socialism simply do not work. Let me explain.

 

In any social situation, just under the thin veneer of friendliness and professionalism, lurks the uglier emotions - hate, lust, jealousy, envy, fear - like a bubbling cauldron of slime. This is human nature. In a socialist economy, the ones who can exploit this undercurrent of tension and greed rise to the top, despite how inefficient and incompetent they are.

 

In a capitalist economy, people are free to find what they are good at and find their niche, and succeed. If they are good at nothing, they sink or swim, and fail on their own merits. Because of this, capitalism is much closer to a true meritocracy. It allows people to rise on their own merits, rather than who they play golf with.

 

Liberalism, and socialism, depend on nobler human traits just to function. The nobler traits, such as love, camaraderie, loyalty and integrity, are so rare that a brief glimpse of such human behavior is astonishing to most people. And no system can function with its lifeblood of fairplay being so scarce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

crony capitalism and socialism cannot exist, one without the other. both are crude, materialist philosophies based and dependent upon a certain soullessness, which ultimately renders society devoid of anything except parasitical behaviors. what the liberal generally cannot or will not accept is that all human progress is based upon conflict. without conflict, society and culture will stagnate and become meaningless. whether this conflict is engaged individually or as a group really doesn't matter, in this context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

crony capitalism and socialism cannot exist, one without the other. both are crude, materialist philosophies based and dependent upon a certain soullessness, which ultimately renders society devoid of anything except parasitical behaviors. what the liberal generally cannot or will not accept is that all human progress is based upon conflict. without conflict, society and culture will stagnate and become meaningless. whether this conflict is engaged individually or as a group really doesn't matter, in this context.

 

 

I disagree with that. Even though conflict drove us to the moon (to compete with Russia), it took tremendous cooperation among individuals to develop the needed technology to reach the moon. The progress of humanity depends upon unity, not conflict. It took us five thousand years just to reach space flight, due to the human nature to instantly be in conflict. If we had harmony and unity for all that time, we would have already colonized distant galaxies by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I disagree with that. Even though conflict drove us to the moon (to compete with Russia), it took tremendous cooperation among individuals to develop the needed technology to reach the moon. The progress of humanity depends upon unity, not conflict. It took us five thousand years just to reach space flight, due to the human nature to instantly be in conflict. If we had harmony and unity for all that time, we would have already colonized distant galaxies by now.

that's absolute nonsense. as soon as the technology was developed to enter space, we were there in a very short time. and what has driven

the quest for technology far more than any other factor has been warfare, plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's absolute nonsense. as soon as the technology was developed to enter space, we were there in a very short time. and what has driven

the quest for technology far more than any other factor has been warfare, plain and simple.

 

 

That goes back to my original point. The species always has been selfish, greedy and violent. Hence, liberalism, with it's demand for equality, is totally unrealistic. Since we are in agreement on that, the only question remaining is, are we doomed to go the way of the dinosaur? With such a clear understanding of human nature that only right wingers seem to have, it should be obvious that all talk of social systems and progress is simply re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That goes back to my original point. The species always has been selfish, greedy and violent. Hence, liberalism, with it's demand for equality, is totally unrealistic. Since we are in agreement on that, the only question remaining is, are we doomed to go the way of the dinosaur? With such a clear understanding of human nature that only right wingers seem to have, it should be obvious that all talk of social systems and progress is simply re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

equality is a made up word that has no real meaning. kind of like freedom. and if man does go the way of the dinosaur, it will be for some

greater species to take his place. that's how evolutionary progress happens. always has been that way. your philosophy has the full intention

of rendering man to a stagnate state of being, which is an absolute impossibility, given the nature of time itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

equality is a made up word that has no real meaning. kind of like freedom. and if man does go the way of the dinosaur, it will be for some

greater species to take his place. that's how evolutionary progress happens. always has been that way. your philosophy has the full intention

of rendering man to a stagnate state of being, which is an absolute impossibility, given the nature of time itself.

 

 

How do I intend to render man to stagnation? i never expressed that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia is a republic. China is a republic. Germany is a republic.

and all technically have elections. you might make the claim that some of these elections in certain countries calling themselves "republics" are

rigged, but so are america's, at this point.

 

 

How do I intend to render man to stagnation? i never expressed that.

because fictional constructs of "equality" render man doomed to the lowest common denominator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have become a right winger. After years of experience in the workplace, I have found that the human soul is comprised of utter dog[excrement], and that is why liberalism and socialism simply do not work. Let me explain.

 

In any social situation, just under the thin veneer of friendliness and professionalism, lurks the uglier emotions - hate, lust, jealousy, envy, fear - like a bubbling cauldron of slime. This is human nature. In a socialist economy, the ones who can exploit this undercurrent of tension and greed rise to the top, despite how inefficient and incompetent they are.

 

In a capitalist economy, people are free to find what they are good at and find their niche, and succeed. If they are good at nothing, they sink or swim, and fail on their own merits. Because of this, capitalism is much closer to a true meritocracy. It allows people to rise on their own merits, rather than who they play golf with.

 

Liberalism, and socialism, depend on nobler human traits just to function. The nobler traits, such as love, camaraderie, loyalty and integrity, are so rare that a brief glimpse of such human behavior is astonishing to most people. And no system can function with its lifeblood of fairplay being so scarce.

What a line of crap. Human nature is being predatory and self reliant. Trick those instincts to protect symbolic values and natural balance is destroyed taking everything humans hunt with it, including ruling eternity, eternally using symbolism to measure space all the time from within the same moment every generated ancestor passes through as added into this atmosphere.

 

Instincts know now is eternity but intellect has been trained to ignore instincts and rely upon vocabulary as being the only knowledge necessary to keep humanity governing human genetic continuation.

 

Devotion to denying isn't love of life, but detesting how life functions for the living within a self contained moment.one ancestor at a time.

 

What is a star? Sun or son of a b and b. Female canine its owner doesn't know which male impregnated her from the pack hanging around the home since menstration started.

 

With instincts, old enough to bleed is old enough to breed for males with no self control over their own emotional responses. This is where the excuse of nature of the beast comes to play in denying it is one's own fault their intellect couldn't out perform their instinctive involuntary reaction to natural balancing here now.

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and all technically have elections. you might make the claim that some of these elections in certain countries calling themselves "republics" are

rigged, but so are america's, at this point.

because fictional constructs of "equality" render man doomed to the lowest common denominator.

There is no equality! There never can be, that's the point! Where did I ever say there was?

What a line of crap. Human nature is being predatory and self reliant. Trick those instincts to protect symbolic values and natural balance is destroyed taking everything humans hunt with it, including ruling eternity, eternally using symbolism to measure space all the time from within the same moment every generated ancestor passes through as added into this atmosphere.

 

Instincts know now is eternity but intellect has been trained to ignore instincts and rely upon vocabulary as being the only knowledge necessary to keep humanity governing human genetic continuation.

 

Devotion to denying isn't love of life, but detesting how life functions for the living within a self contained moment.one ancestor at a time.

 

What is a star? Sun or son of a b and b. Female canine its owner doesn't know which male impregnated her from the pack hanging around the home since menstration started.

 

With instincts, old enough to bleed is old enough to breed for males with no self control over their own emotional responses. This is where the excuse of nature of the beast comes to play in denying it is one's own fault their intellect couldn't out perform their instinctive involuntary reaction to natural balancing here now.

 

.

 

 

Giraffe that fly hung is no batwing outward oceans of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They all claim to be republics. they got you guys fooled. lol the former soviet union was a republic.

How much freedom did they really have??

 

We are a Constitutional Republic. Period. We were NEVER meant to be a pure democracy. Ben Franklin himself stated that "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

 

Other nations might well declare themselves Republics, but so long as we demand our government remain within the constraints imposed by the Constitution we will maintain liberty and freedom. When we allow the government to ignore the Constitution is when our freedom is endangered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been pointed out, the US is a Constitutional REPUBLIC. The Founding Fathers saw a democracy as nothing more than mob rule and considered it one of the worst forms of government. This effort by modern day liberals (socialist/communists) to relabel the US a "democracy" is only another effort to try and weaken it's Constitutional foundations. It's why we over and over see liberals trashing and ignoring the Constitution and calling for majority votes in all things. As Obama has been doing lately, with their full approval in most cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look up liberal democracy. just look it up. don't listen to these guys. their poor.

 

Then "liberal democracy" is somewhat of a misnomer, dln.

 

Because a country can't be both a republic and a democracy.

 

They mean two distinct things.

 

We might be a liberal republic, but we NOT a liberal democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the majority of people elect the government??

a true democracy doesn't elect representatives to make laws for them. a true democracy is more like a commune where the people themselves

vote on the individual laws and pass them themselves through the majority vote. america is not a true democracy. it would be even more hellish than it already is, were that the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...