Jump to content

Interesting rules at the dot net para-site


Recommended Posts

No liberals allowed

Post respectfully, personal attacks will not be tolerated

No more than five new threads a day

No trash talking about members and their kids

No porn, or links to porn

No gore pictures

No cursing or faking out the profanity filter in thread titles

No, 'outting' of members or their families; names, addresses, phone numbers, SSNs, etc.

No linking to other political forums

No solicitations

 

they look familiar but why the last 2 ?

 

is there something wrong with that ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David R should sue them for copycating his site.

he cant sue the fake copycat para-site unless he "trademarked" the name "liberalforum"

I already said they should file a complaint with the FTC because they hijacked a business.

 

what CockPuffer and the dot net backstabbers did was no different than getting your cracker jacks medical cert in gynecology and then going to a Dr's waiting room and passing out calling cards offering puzzy sniffing at 25% off.

 

its unethical

 

eth·ics

1. moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.

 

in·teg·ri·ty

1. the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.

 

cred·i·bil·i·ty

1. the quality of being trusted and believed in.

 

its sad they dont teach this in your libloon schools

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No liberals allowed

Post respectfully, personal attacks will not be tolerated

No more than five new threads a day

No trash talking about members and their kids

No porn, or links to porn

No gore pictures

No cursing or faking out the profanity filter in thread titles

No, 'outting' of members or their families; names, addresses, phone numbers, SSNs, etc.

No linking to other political forums

No solicitations

 

they look familiar but why the last 2 ?

 

is there something wrong with that ?

Why are you so concerned, Gallows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are you so concerned, Gallows?

of course you, being a libloon wouldnt understand...

 

its unethical

 

eth·ics

1. moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.

 

in·teg·ri·ty

1. the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.

 

cred·i·bil·i·ty

1. the quality of being trusted and believed in.

 

its sad they dont teach this in your libloon schools

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No liberals allowed

Post respectfully, personal attacks will not be tolerated

No more than five new threads a day

No trash talking about members and their kids

No porn, or links to porn

No gore pictures

No cursing or faking out the profanity filter in thread titles

No, 'outting' of members or their families; names, addresses, phone numbers, SSNs, etc.

No linking to other political forums

No solicitations

 

they look familiar but why the last 2 ?

 

is there something wrong with that ?

If "No liberals allowed" is a rule of this site, I think that explains why there are so few liberals on this site.

 

Would you be just as pissed if they hadn't used the name "liberalforum"? For me, that is the only mistake they made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If "No liberals allowed" is a rule of this site, I think that explains why there are so few liberals on this site.

 

Would you be just as pissed if they hadn't used the name "liberalforum"? For me, that is the only mistake they made.

thats the dot net para-site rule book

 

dumbazz....

 

the reason this site has become right leaning is because all the dot net backstabbers at the para-site are libloons

 

my question, that clearly went over your head...

 

was "why" the 2 rules highlighted in red... and the comment that followed

 

dumbazz...

 

now... off with your head

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats the dot net para-site rule book

 

dumbazz....

 

the reason this site has become right leaning is because all the dot net backstabbers at the para-site are libloons

 

my question, that clearly went over your head...

 

was "why" the 2 rules highlighted in red... and the comment that followed

 

dumbazz...

 

now... off with your head

I figured the red ones where the rules you weeded out that were not familiar with this site.

 

If "No liberals allowed" is a rule on the para-site, I find that more interesting than the ones you picked out, and surely should be red, as well as capitalized, bolded, underlinded, italicized and the font size significantly increased.

 

Why might no linking to other forums and solicitations not be allowed? I don't know. Perhaps they want people to think for themselves. Even though I am not one to link to any source, my own words could be taken as soliciting others to change their behaviour or how they think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If "No liberals allowed" is a rule on the para-site,

that looks like a joke to me... unlike you, my brain functions...

 

why you dont see that is a real mystery to me

 

I find that more interesting than the ones you picked out,"

then start your own thread about it

 

this thread is about the hypocrisy of the dot net libloon backstabbers para-site

 

how do you think they got all their members ?

 

you fkn dumbazz...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that looks like a joke to me... unlike you, my brain functions...

 

why you dont see that is a real mystery to me

 

 

then start your own thread about it

 

this thread is about the hypocrisy of the dot net libloon backstabbers para-site

Every thread here narrows down to the "hypocrisy of liberals".

 

 

how do you think they got all their members ?

 

you fkn dumbazz...

Because of that.

 

Question is, why aren't new people who claim to be liberal not signing up on this site?

 

 

I certainly am not one to hold a site, that I don't pay for, responsible for "losing my sh*T". You get what you pay for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every thread here narrows down to the "hypocrisy of liberals".

Because of that.

 

Question is, why aren't new people who claim to be liberal not signing up on this site?

the new members signing up

 

are soks of the dot net backstabbers

those new members are CockSok himself...

 

because he likes "the cool site"

 

better than the "para-site"

 

basically they keep coming here telling us how great their site is

 

but when you go to the para-site all they are talking about is how gallows destroyed their pitiful lives

 

all the para-site is made of is,

all the people chuck had already banned.

 

I dont blame them, they had no choice, I have nothing against them, like karl littlehawk etc..

 

the dot net backstabbers are the sen mods from this site, who used their position of trust and recruited, hijacked, mutiny what ever you want to call it

 

AL admitted she PM'd members here and invited them to the para-site

 

Cannon (CockSok), AL, Misty, all the libloons, they are the dot net backstabbers

 

when they play innocent, ask them "how did you hear about the para-site"

 

ask them why they have ZERO,

 

eth·ics

1. moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.

 

in·teg·ri·ty

1. the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.

 

cred·i·bil·i·ty

1. the quality of being trusted and believed in.

 

 

 

its sad they dont teach this in your libloon schools

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the new members signing up

 

are soks of the dot net backstabbers

those new members are CockSok himself...

 

because he likes "the cool site"

 

better than the "para-site"

 

basically they keep coming here telling us how great their site is

 

but when you go to the para-site all they are talking about is how gallows destroyed their pitiful lives

 

all the para-site is made of is,

all the people chuck had already banned.

 

I dont blame them, they had no choice, I have nothing against them, like karl littlehawk etc..

 

the dot net backstabbers are the sen mods from this site, who used their position of trust and recruited, hijacked, mutiny what ever you want to call it

 

AL admitted she PM'd members here and invited them to the para-site

 

Cannon (CockSok), AL, Misty, all the libloons, they are the dot net backstabbers

 

when they play innocent, ask them "how did you hear about the para-site"

 

ask them why they have ZERO,

 

eth·ics

1. moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.

 

in·teg·ri·ty

1. the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.

 

cred·i·bil·i·ty

1. the quality of being trusted and believed in.

 

 

 

its sad they dont teach this in your libloon schools

Oh no, not AL...... I'm going to miss her.

 

Exactly why do you want the mutineers back? Excluding soks of mutineers, why are new people not signing up?

 

I think you are preaching to the choir about the ethics, integrity, credibility of the liberal mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no, not AL...... I'm going to miss her.

she was raised by a poacher, thats why she has no ethics

 

Exactly why do you want the mutineers back?

exactly where do you get the idea I want the low lifes back ?

 

didnt you see my thread thanking CockPuffer for weeding out the dot net backstabbers ?

 

you need to do some readin boy

 

you need to catch up with the times...

 

Now I dont want to see you again until next year

 

get to readin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

she was raised by a poacher, thats why she has no ethics

No way. She is a confused conservative. As are they all.

 

 

exactly where do you get the idea I want the low lifes back ?

 

didnt you see my thread thanking CockPuffer for weeding out the dot net backstabbers ?

I was just sensing that. I guess I was wrong.

 

I saw the thread title.

 

you need to do some readin boy

 

you need to catch up with the times...

 

Now I dont want to see you again until next year

 

get to readin

Aye, aye sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If "No liberals allowed" is a rule of this site, I think that explains why there are so few liberals on this site.

You are very wrong

Liberals are quite welcome here

In fact, they are our preferred demographic

 

 

Would you be just as pissed if they hadn't used the name "liberalforum"? For me, that is the only mistake they made.

It may be the most glaring mistake, but certainly not the "only" one

Every couple years, some malcontents run off and start a new site and try to steal our members

This is just one of those times, a little stronger than most, but still, just another spinoff attempt

 

And I don't think anyone is "pissed", except for Misty,,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are very wrong

Liberals are quite welcome here

In fact, they are our preferred demographic

I wasn't "wrong". I used the word "if". Turns out, "No liberals allowed" is not a rule of this site according to G420, but "if" it was......

 

At least you didn't call me a "lier" like Isabel would.

 

 

It may be the most glaring mistake, but certainly not the "only" one

Every couple years, some malcontents run off and start a new site and try to steal our members

This is just one of those times, a little stronger than most, but still, just another spinoff attempt

 

And I don't think anyone is "pissed", except for Misty,,,,

It is stronger this time because they copied the name, something I'm fairly confident is the truth. And they copied the layout, as far as I have been told.

 

Haven't been there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't "wrong". I used the word "if". Turns out, "No liberals allowed" is not a rule of this site according to G420, but "if" it was......

 

At least you didn't call me a "lier" like Isabel would.

 

 

 

No, She would have called you a liar

 

And LOLed at your spelling,,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope they are all here under sok names

do you notice none of the dot net backstabbers can even try to argue with one word I say ?

 

lol

 

thats because everything I say is true

 

lol

 

eth·ics

1. moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.

 

in·teg·ri·ty

1. the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.

 

cred·i·bil·i·ty

1. the quality of being trusted and believed in.

 

 

 

its sad they dont teach this in libloon schools

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...