Jump to content

Are Conservatives willing to take any abuse you throw at them?


Recommended Posts

I mean, as long as it's not abuse from the Government, especially liberals or that scary black man in the White House, of course.

When have Conservatives ever protested pay cuts from their employer? When have they ever protested mass layoffs? Even if they can't find another job and they're laid off into long term unemployment or they're stuck in a low paying job, when have they ever protested? They will protest only if they can blame a liberal (who might not even be in office anymore).

If a Conservative worker is being abused by their employer, do they even care? They'll tell you "if you don't like it, quit!" but 90% of Conservative workers cannot just up and quit. They'll take being cursed at, cheated out of their pay with unpaid overtime, or anything else a boss throws at them. It's capitalism, they'll say. A lot of Conservatives work in Wal Mart - yes, even adults, you know, the ones whose jobs got outsourced overseas and wound up competing with 5 other people for new openings for jobs that don't pay much. They won't unionize, of course, and they won't protest - and when was the last time you ever saw a Conservative go to the labor board for anything? They are grateful for the abuse and they don't even ask for any chocolates afterwards, thank you very much.

Most Conservatives are just as poor as the poor people they make fun of. Like the population in general, very very very few Conservatives are rich. They die of easily treatable diseases that they couldn't afford to treat, too. But when it happens their families shrug and accept that this is capitalism and move on. If a scary black man is in office or there are any liberals around, of course they'll blame them. When was the last time you ever saw a Conservative complain about their medical insurance company rescinding their coverage out of the blue? When have you ever seen a Conservative complain about their insurance premiums skyrocketing... before Obama got into office, that is?

If you run a coal power plant and spill coal fly ash into a community of Conservatives and destroy homes and screw up the water supply for those that remain, will any right winger complain? Nope. And look how many Conservatives protested over the BP oil spill: ZERO. All those right wing Gulf Coast businesses destroyed and did you see even one lift a finger to point at BP? Instead they blamed Obama for not responding adequately: yes, Conservatives, who hate the very existence of Government, cried about the Government not stepping in to help them out. The number of Conservatives complaining when hydraulic fracking turns their drinking water into a flammable substance? Zero. The number of Conservatives who ever complained about pollution? Zero. Any guess where most of the hydraulic fracking is going on? Near the water supplies of Conservative areas. They can't get these heavy polluter industries in their back yards fast enough.

Choke to death under a blanket of smog? It's better than helping the liberal agenda by cleaning up the air. In fact, the entire history of air pollution control regulations has been one long fight by right wingers to keep the smog levels as high as possible. Conservatives do not complain when their water is polluted by industrial or agricultural run-off.

Pollution? That's a myth to Conservatives. These bastards LOVE the smell of smog in the morning. And don't even bother asking them about global warming.

When have Conservatives ever cared about dying in industrial accidents? Look at the number of Conservatives who protested the Kentucky mine collapse in 2010: ZERO. Despite the fact that the coal mine had legions of recorded safety violations, Conservatives supported the mine owners. Even in light of the Kentucky mine's prior safety violations and the collapse which killed those miners in 2010, Conservatives actively opposed subsequent attempts to pass laws to protect workers. This is why companies like to move to the South - you kill a dozen workers and the mostly Conservative public doesn't care. They'll send a dozen more of their expendable sons to risk death in these unsafe hellholes. Those that don't will make up stories to scapegoat miners' Unions.

Conservative voters, 99% of whom are working class people, have unanimously and fanatically opposed any law that makes their workplaces safer. ANY law. Throughout history, Conservatives have always been on the forefront of any fight to prevent safe workplaces. No matter how many of them died in fires or explosions or needless falls and unfortunate run-ins with broken machinery, they always leave their fate in the hands of their employer. Even the fertilizer plant that exploded in Texas, which was found to be in violation of tons of laws before the explosion, got no protests from Conservatives. And it was mostly their own that died in that blast.

 

NO Conservative protests occurred when Dubya and the GOP were pushing the bank bailouts. This only happened AFTER Obama got into office.

 

NO Conservative protests ever happen about the $100 billion in welfare we give to corporations - unless a Democrat is in office.

 

NO Conservative protests about the USAPATRIOT Act or Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance policy. Conservatives happily lived under this regime of surveillance until AFTER Obama got into office.


Right wingers have never known a form of worker abuse that they hated... unless they could blame it on a liberal or a communist (see: the USSR). A major corporation that they did not like... except Planned Parenthood. They never saw any polluted stream or smog-choked skies that they felt needed to be cleaned up. right wingers believe that workers are paid too much and, despite having fewer vacation hours than any other civilized nation, worked too little.

Conservatives will deny everything I said. But do not listen to their denials. Go back into history and observe their actions.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your opening is straight on target le jacquelope. It accurately describes how Conservatives are willing to sacrifice themselves to those they perceive as bigger bullies than they are.... And how they re-direct their rage at scapegoats. The most disgusting thing is how they are willing to drag down those close to them.

 

The only retorts will involve feigned boredom, yawns, name calling and the like. But your argument is irrefutable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, as long as it's not abuse from the Government, especially liberals or that scary black man in the White House, of course.

 

When have Conservatives ever protested pay cuts from their employer? When have they ever protested mass layoffs? Even if they can't find another job and they're laid off into long term unemployment or they're stuck in a low paying job, when have they ever protested? They will protest only if they can blame a liberal (who might not even be in office anymore).

 

If a Conservative worker is being abused by their employer, do they even care? They'll tell you "if you don't like it, quit!" but 90% of Conservative workers cannot just up and quit. They'll take being cursed at, cheated out of their pay with unpaid overtime, or anything else a boss throws at them. It's capitalism, they'll say. A lot of Conservatives work in Wal Mart - yes, even adults, you know, the ones whose jobs got outsourced overseas and wound up competing with 5 other people for new openings for jobs that don't pay much. They won't unionize, of course, and they won't protest - and when was the last time you ever saw a Conservative go to the labor board for anything? They are grateful for the abuse and they don't even ask for any chocolates afterwards, thank you very much.

 

Most Conservatives are just as poor as the poor people they make fun of. Like the population in general, very very very few Conservatives are rich. They die of easily treatable diseases that they couldn't afford to treat, too. But when it happens their families shrug and accept that this is capitalism and move on. If a scary black man is in office or there are any liberals around, of course they'll blame them. When was the last time you ever saw a Conservative complain about their medical insurance company rescinding their coverage out of the blue? When have you ever seen a Conservative complain about their insurance premiums skyrocketing... before Obama got into office, that is?

 

If you run a coal power plant and spill coal fly ash into a community of Conservatives and destroy homes and screw up the water supply for those that remain, will any right winger complain? Nope. And look how many Conservatives protested over the BP oil spill: ZERO. All those right wing Gulf Coast businesses destroyed and did you see even one lift a finger to point at BP? Instead they blamed Obama for not responding adequately: yes, Conservatives, who hate the very existence of Government, cried about the Government not stepping in to help them out. The number of Conservatives complaining when hydraulic fracking turns their drinking water into a flammable substance? Zero. The number of Conservatives who ever complained about pollution? Zero. Any guess where most of the hydraulic fracking is going on? Near the water supplies of Conservative areas. They can't get these heavy polluter industries in their back yards fast enough.

 

Choke to death under a blanket of smog? It's better than helping the liberal agenda by cleaning up the air. In fact, the entire history of air pollution control regulations has been one long fight by right wingers to keep the smog levels as high as possible. Conservatives do not complain when their water is polluted by industrial or agricultural run-off.

 

Pollution? That's a myth to Conservatives. These bastards LOVE the smell of smog in the morning. And don't even bother asking them about global warming.

 

When have Conservatives ever cared about dying in industrial accidents? Look at the number of Conservatives who protested the Kentucky mine collapse in 2010: ZERO. Despite the fact that the coal mine had legions of recorded safety violations, Conservatives supported the mine owners. Even in light of the Kentucky mine's prior safety violations and the collapse which killed those miners in 2010, Conservatives actively opposed subsequent attempts to pass laws to protect workers. This is why companies like to move to the South - you kill a dozen workers and the mostly Conservative public doesn't care. They'll send a dozen more of their expendable sons to risk death in these unsafe hellholes. Those that don't will make up stories to scapegoat miners' Unions.

 

Conservative voters, 99% of whom are working class people, have unanimously and fanatically opposed any law that makes their workplaces safer. ANY law. Throughout history, Conservatives have always been on the forefront of any fight to prevent safe workplaces. No matter how many of them died in fires or explosions or needless falls and unfortunate run-ins with broken machinery, they always leave their fate in the hands of their employer. Even the fertilizer plant that exploded in Texas, which was found to be in violation of tons of laws before the explosion, got no protests from Conservatives. And it was mostly their own that died in that blast.

 

NO Conservative protests occurred when Dubya and the GOP were pushing the bank bailouts. This only happened AFTER Obama got into office.

 

NO Conservative protests ever happen about the $100 billion in welfare we give to corporations - unless a Democrat is in office.

 

NO Conservative protests about the USAPATRIOT Act or Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance policy. Conservatives happily lived under this regime of surveillance until AFTER Obama got into office.

 

Right wingers have never known a form of worker abuse that they hated... unless they could blame it on a liberal or a communist (see: the USSR). A major corporation that they did not like... except Planned Parenthood. They never saw any polluted stream or smog-choked skies that they felt needed to be cleaned up. right wingers believe that workers are paid too much and, despite having fewer vacation hours than any other civilized nation, worked too little.

 

Conservatives will deny everything I said. But do not listen to their denials. Go back into history and observe their actions.

 

 

Solid post. That's why the cons are just laughing at you. No response, because there isn't one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservatives can't contradict the content of the OP without blithering. All they can do yuk it up, act bored or make false claims. Everything in the OP is fact that can't be denied.

Context, not content. You need to understand self containment of the content that forms the shape of everything existing in this atmosphere. That is content, what is typed into this message board is context and that is opinion by content occupying space as a lifetime within this atmosphere..

 

The opinions arriving here are generated by lifetimes of ancestry replacing their own ancestors loathing the idea they were never asked to be born, just thrown into the moment here to be directed by vocabulary and philosophy nobody can know everything about now being here all the time.

 

So since nobody can know everything about now, there needs to be team efforts to protect ignoring the self evident. Hence humanity saving the theater of the mind the vocabulary because instincts are stupid and wordplay is for geniuses making fools of those happy to be alive making the best of what now offers all the time.

 

Deniers are the worst kind of lifetimes because they don't even know what real is by choice in acting like society's child saving humanity cradle to grave, just as their ancestry did.

 

Want to play devil's advocate in debate, discuss the trickster of words being the devil of Satan ruling humanity by laws that rule social behavior to ignore now is eternity by measuring life with clocks and calendars.

 

Not specific ancestors passing through this specific atmosphere during the specific time they existed randomly conceived yet naturally balanced because of self containment and self evident results taking place currently.

 

Go ahead and try to verbally abuse me, words are shallow imitiations of recognizing real. shadow of instincts is intellect. A trained brain to recite vernacular tribalism is a mind wasting away in reality thinking they have no way out of living a lie.

 

Honesty is the best policy even when no good deed goes unpunished and corruption pays character roles with symbolic power, wealth, and fame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOLZ!!!!

 

Dunno what you're talking about. I just leave and get another 10% raise from the next employer. Doesn't everyone?

So you are a lobbyist working for a marketing firm selling incomplete philosophies to candidates needing to make promises gendered ancestors are willing to die saving their character roles staging societal evolution.

 

So much for higher education.

the more they learn, the more ignorant of real they become practicing the art of denying the self evident being self contained...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solid post. That's why the cons are just laughing at you. No response, because there isn't one.

They'll all come back by declaring that they're rich and don't need to be worried about being laid off, screwed over, etc.

 

Just watch, every last one of these guys suddenly own car elevators hahah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't defending him at all. I was making fun of your willingness to take it up the ass as long as you can't blame it on him.

This from the party that continues to blame Bush for everything bad that happens while tripping over each other to bow in the presence of The Dahli Bama whenever there is some shred of a positive indicator at all. Not to mention that everything you said in the OP is just complete and utter bull shit. Seriously, get your head out of Madcow's ass and think for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Context, not content.

Context without content is like style without substance. It's form without function and serves a shallow purpose.

 

 

You need to understand self containment of the content that forms the shape of everything existing in this atmosphere. That is content, what is typed into this message board is context and that is opinion by content occupying space as a lifetime within this atmosphere..

 

The opinions arriving here are generated by lifetimes of ancestry replacing their own ancestors loathing the idea they were never asked to be born, just thrown into the moment here to be directed by vocabulary and philosophy nobody can know everything about now being here all the time.

You need to understand that everything existing within the shimmering ether of this atmosphere; self-contained yet cosmic-dependent spheroid are often generated by lifetimes of ancestry.... Experience and observation of one entity in a synthesis of perception, thought-formation and questioned reality.... Capishe?

 

No one knows everything all the time, part of the time or ever. The totality of the all-conscious whole composes the end-result of ancestry. Why don't they see it?

 

 

So since nobody can know everything about now, there needs to be team efforts to protect ignoring the self evident. Hence humanity saving the theater of the mind the vocabulary because instincts are stupid and wordplay is for geniuses making fools of those happy to be alive making the best of what now offers all the time.

The geniuses making fools of those happy to be alive are as convoluted ash is to a slag heap. The fools making geniuses of those unable to control the trajectory of their birth become celestial luminaries in their own time. Can it not be more self-evident?

 

 

Deniers are the worst kind of lifetimes because they don't even know what real is by choice in acting like society's child saving humanity cradle to grave, just as their ancestry did.

If geniuses making fools of those happy to be alive, deniers with the worst kind of lifetimes can never be fools in the eyes society's child and her ancestry. So few comprehend?

 

 

 

Want to play devil's advocate in debate, discuss the trickster of words being the devil of Satan ruling humanity by laws that rule social behavior to ignore now is eternity by measuring life with clocks and calendars.

 

Not specific ancestors passing through this specific atmosphere during the specific time they existed randomly conceived yet naturally balanced because of self containment and self evident results taking place currently.

The ballistic trajectory of geometric patterns connecting the seven atomic clocks on this sphere. Interconnecting lines of origin in space and time. Results of subatomic clashes within the infinite. Event horizons ever beckoning.

 

 

Go ahead and try to verbally abuse me,

No, no. Not that.!!!!#$T%Y&^$&%9)(*&)%^^&(^&_()_*(^&%^%$##)+++y7^

 

words are shallow imitiations of recognizing real. shadow of instincts is intellect. A trained brain to recite vernacular tribalism is a mind wasting away in reality thinking they have no way out of living a lie.

 

Honesty is the best policy even when no good deed goes unpunished and corruption pays character roles with symbolic power, wealth, and fame.

Ephemeral coatings of enteric varnish. Why forsake the uncorrupted surfaces that now lie vulnerable? Compassion has no wealth corresponding with the eternal verities. Symbolic power wealth and fame, some of the best kind. Can never be stolen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Symbolic power wealth and fame, some of the best kind. Can never be stolen.

Why????? Simple, it doesn't exist for real. Just in reality where hope and faith now isn't real means everything to saving character roles played by ancestors unsuspecting their leadership's embezzlement of other ancestry's lifetimes.

 

You got some deep sh!t there in your vocabulary art collection of metaphors.

 

again, other than natural selection of ancestors compounding DNA, what separates us is you represent symbolism over substance, I represent genetic continuation within self contained space leaving self evident results of contracting results expanding the details never duplicated now all the time.

 

You protect reality by any means necessary existentially through divide and conquer philosophies, I adapt to the moment any means is applied exponentially attempting to survive the moment my lifetime cannot exist without said attempts to remain balanced between contracting results and expanding details only happening now.

 

Know your opposition inside out better than they define yourself hypothetically outside in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solid post. That's why the cons are just laughing at you. No response, because there isn't one.

No, it displays the difference between government loving libs and small government cons. No, I am not willing to take abuse. But I don't turn to government to solve every issue. That is what you guys do. Don't make enough? Libs complain to government. Cons work to find a different job or talk to their boss. Just an example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, other than natural selection of ancestors compounding DNA, what separates us is you represent symbolism over substance, I represent genetic continuation within self contained space leaving self evident results of contracting results expanding the details never duplicated now all the time.

 

You protect reality by any means necessary existentially through divide and conquer philosophies, I adapt to the moment any means is applied exponentially attempting to survive the moment my lifetime cannot exist without said attempts to remain balanced between contracting results and expanding details only happening now.

 

Know your opposition inside out better than they define yourself hypothetically outside in...

And yet again.... "Context without content is like style without substance. It's form without function and serves a shallow purpose."

 

=======================================================================

 

To define oneself is folly. There is no inside out or outside in. You are what you are. A self-contained entity, bound by the law of subjectivity can successfully define itself only by rare accident. Convenience and self-delusion being the usual parameters of self-definition. The more inflexible the stance, the more brittle the notion.

 

I let others define me if they want. I take it into consideration and often discard some, most or all of it as beside the point. In the end I keep my own council.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't defending him at all. I was making fun of your willingness to take it up the ass as long as you can't blame it on him.

It's not me taking it up the ass you moron.

If you got up off your knees, perhaps your view of the world would improve.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...