Jump to content

It's Time To Go Nuclear In The Senate


skews13
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/11/13/its-time-to-go-nuclear-in-the-senate/

 

 

It’s pretty simple to see what’s happening in the Senate right now with judges. Republicans are blockading three seats on the DC Court of Appeals with no other real excuse than “because we can.” Majority Democrats really have no other choice than to tell them: No, they cannot.

 

That’s not what many Democrats want. They probably prefer a situation in which both parties, even when they’re in the minority, can exercise a veto on the occasional judicial nomination who they believe is far out of the mainstream. The Senate as an institution is stronger when it can use its “advise and consent” role fairly aggressively, even to the extent that the minority party can have considerable influence.

 

It’s not just judicial filibusters. Many Democrats surely believe, correctly, that after majority-imposed elimination of judicial filibusters, it’s only a matter of time before future majority parties eliminate all forms of filibusters. The likely result will be reduced influence for individual senators, and (they may believe, and probably correctly) overall reduced capacity for the Senate.

 

And yet…there’s really no choice here. Republicans are demanding something entirely unprecedented and unjustified: that Democrats, despite winning the White House and a comfortable majority in the Senate, cannot fill three seats on this crucial federal bench. It is, as Brian Beutler pointed out earlier today, exactly parallel to the executive branch’s “nullification” fight over the summer.

 

If Democrats back down from this, they can expect Republicans to expand their blockade; why wouldn’t they? Once they’ve redefined “court packing” to mean filling vacant judicial spots, why wouldn’t that apply to any empty seat on the federal bench? Once they’ve supported a principle that preserving the current partisan balance on a court is worthy of a filibuster, why wouldn’t that apply to any court? Including, of course, the Supreme Court.

 

All of which means that sooner or later, Democrats will have to draw a line. Indeed, the only way to save the filibuster is to threaten, right now, to get rid of it. And if Republicans don’t back down, as they did this summer? Then the filibuster is going to die, so might as well get it over with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Screws doubles down on stupid.

Why would the Senate confirm President Lame Duck's appointees?

Personally, I'd love to see Reid abolish the filibuster, considering he's going to lose the Senate in November.

Talk about disarming yourself... are liberals really this stupid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Time To Go Nuclear In The Senate

 

Great, just in time for Repubs to take the Senate next year and the presidency in 2016.

 

We could pull the plug on most of Liberal Welfare State while liberals whine and bleat in rage.

 

And defund their entire federally funded political machine. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skews13, what is the first action within a nuclear explosion? Implosion. Economic implosion already ignited human passionate explosions. Societal evolution fulfilling self prophecy through conflicting policy wonking playing two sides against the silent middle majority of lifetimes just wanting a civil existence without dying to save civic prides saving societal evolution of denial is virtuous and honesty cannot go unpunished by law, morals, and ethics academically interpreted through all mediums of entertaining what if scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/11/13/its-time-to-go-nuclear-in-the-senate/

 

 

It’s pretty simple to see what’s happening in the Senate right now with judges. Republicans are blockading three seats on the DC Court of Appeals with no other real excuse than “because we can.” Majority Democrats really have no other choice than to tell them: No, they cannot.

 

That’s not what many Democrats want. They probably prefer a situation in which both parties, even when they’re in the minority, can exercise a veto on the occasional judicial nomination who they believe is far out of the mainstream. The Senate as an institution is stronger when it can use its “advise and consent” role fairly aggressively, even to the extent that the minority party can have considerable influence.

 

It’s not just judicial filibusters. Many Democrats surely believe, correctly, that after majority-imposed elimination of judicial filibusters, it’s only a matter of time before future majority parties eliminate all forms of filibusters. The likely result will be reduced influence for individual senators, and (they may believe, and probably correctly) overall reduced capacity for the Senate.

 

And yet…there’s really no choice here. Republicans are demanding something entirely unprecedented and unjustified: that Democrats, despite winning the White House and a comfortable majority in the Senate, cannot fill three seats on this crucial federal bench. It is, as Brian Beutler pointed out earlier today, exactly parallel to the executive branch’s “nullification” fight over the summer.

 

If Democrats back down from this, they can expect Republicans to expand their blockade; why wouldn’t they? Once they’ve redefined “court packing” to mean filling vacant judicial spots, why wouldn’t that apply to any empty seat on the federal bench? Once they’ve supported a principle that preserving the current partisan balance on a court is worthy of a filibuster, why wouldn’t that apply to any court? Including, of course, the Supreme Court.

 

All of which means that sooner or later, Democrats will have to draw a line. Indeed, the only way to save the filibuster is to threaten, right now, to get rid of it. And if Republicans don’t back down, as they did this summer? Then the filibuster is going to die, so might as well get it over with.

 

stop crying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...