Jump to content
Rebel58

The Theory of Divine Creation Goes Down in Flames!

Recommended Posts

 

 

Thanks for the kind words..

 

 

The science of studying ancient literature and its accuracy of transmission to is called historicity. The Bible is so exceedingly accurate in its transmission from the originals to the present copies, that if you compare it to any other ancient writing, the Bible is light years ahead in terms of number of manuscripts and accuracy. If the Bible were to be discredited as being unreliable, then it would be necessary to discard the writings of Homer, Plato, and Aristotle as also unreliable since they are far far less well preserved than the Bible.

 

The Bible was written by those who were inspired by God, so it is accurate and true, and represents historical occurrences. When we look at the New Testament we realize that it was written by those who either knew Jesus personally, or were under the direction of those who did. They wrote what they saw. They wrote about the resurrection of Christ. They recorded His miracles and His sayings. It comes down to whether or not you believe what it says about Christ. Do you?

 

http://carm.org/is-the-bible-reliable

brainless moron.... you are not capable of even thinking about it.... spout what you have been trained to respond with... you really think this crap hasn't been dismantled loooooooooooooong ago???? YOU DO NOT KNOW!... al all your pretending makes you into a fukkn phony. YOU DO NOT KNOW!... you are a weakling and a coward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Thanks for the kind words..

 

 

The science of studying ancient literature and its accuracy of transmission to is called historicity. The Bible is so exceedingly accurate in its transmission from the originals to the present copies, that if you compare it to any other ancient writing, the Bible is light years ahead in terms of number of manuscripts and accuracy. If the Bible were to be discredited as being unreliable, then it would be necessary to discard the writings of Homer, Plato, and Aristotle as also unreliable since they are far far less well preserved than the Bible.

 

The Bible was written by those who were inspired by God, so it is accurate and true, and represents historical occurrences. When we look at the New Testament we realize that it was written by those who either knew Jesus personally, or were under the direction of those who did. They wrote what they saw. They wrote about the resurrection of Christ. They recorded His miracles and His sayings. It comes down to whether or not you believe what it says about Christ. Do you?

 

http://carm.org/is-the-bible-reliable

The bible is not based on eyewitness accounts, you blithering moron. The gospels were written generations after Jesus was killed. And you know how much taller tall tales grow with each subsequent telling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bible is not based on eyewitness accounts, you blithering moron. The gospels were written generations after Jesus was killed. And you know how much taller tall tales grow with each subsequent telling.

 

Well certainly someone is a blithering moron.

 

The New Testament is the eyewitness account by the Apostles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well certainly someone is a blithering moron.

 

The New Testament is the eyewitness account by the Apostles.

No, it isn't. It's a collection of campfire fables told about some guy who lived generations before the NT was put into words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it isn't. It's a collection of campfire fables told about some guy who lived generations before the NT was put into words.

 

If you are right, we will both be worm food, but if you are wrong, I go to Heaven and you go to Hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well certainly someone is a blithering moron.

 

The New Testament is the eyewitness account by the Apostles.

I wipe my ass with the new testament and the self serving idiots that wrote it, and the death and destruction they caused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it isn't. It's a collection of campfire fables told about some guy who lived generations before the NT was put into words.

The dates I've researched have most, if not all of the New Testament being written in the first century...a few within a decade of the crucifixion.

 

I would be interested in reading the opinions of other sources.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wipe my ass with the new testament and the self serving idiots that wrote it, and the death and destruction they caused.

 

You are the typical Progressive, Liberal, Atheist or Democrat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You are the typical Progressive, Liberal, Atheist or Democrat.

we seek your considered counsel on this subject that hovers in the heart of your wheel house.

Please do tell, what are the qualities that qualify one as typical. on our knees we await your incisive contribution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dates I've researched have most, if not all of the New Testament being written in the first century...a few within a decade of the crucifixion.

 

I would be interested in reading the opinions of other sources.

You need to remember that the gospels were not written by their namesakes, but by those who came after, listening to the tales and fables. And, why do you suppose the gnostic gospels were not merely wantonly excluded during the compilation of campfire stories that became known as the new testament of the holy bible by the religious hierarchy, but they actively sought to destroy them. The human, secular side of Jesus was to be destroyed for unethical reasons. Crowd control is easier if you can get enough people to adhere to superstitious dogma using fear and intimidation.

 

 

You are the typical Progressive, Liberal, Atheist or Democrat.

Coming from you, that's a compliment!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to remember that the gospels were not written by their namesakes

 

I've never read anyone (reputable, like a biblical scholar) who has concluded that the gospels were authored by anyone but who has been given attribution. I would be interested in reading a different opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've never read anyone (reputable, like a biblical scholar) who has concluded that the gospels were authored by anyone but who has been given attribution. I would be interested in reading a different opinion.

Matthew did not write The Gospel of Matthew.

Mark did not write The Gospel of Mark.

Luke did not write The Gospel of Luke.

And, John did not write The Gospel of John.

 

The gospels are not first-person eye witness accounts of the life and death of Jesus. Did you know that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were most likely husband and wife with kids of their own? Can you imagine the upheaval within the christian hierarchy if this became widely acknowledged?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Matthew did not write The Gospel of Matthew.

Mark did not write The Gospel of Mark.

Luke did not write The Gospel of Luke.

And, John did not write The Gospel of John.

 

The gospels are not first-person eye witness accounts of the life and death of Jesus. Did you know that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were most likely husband and wife with kids of their own? Can you imagine the upheaval within the christian hierarchy if this became widely acknowledged?

I've heard various theories. I've never read a reputable bible scholar who thought the gospels were written centuries later and, obviously, by someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard various theories. I've never read a reputable bible scholar who thought the gospels were written centuries later and, obviously, by someone else.

The gospels were written about 100 years after Jesus' death, and long after their namesakes were dead as well. They are no eyewitness accounts of the life of Jesus. They are a retelling of fables and campfire stories.

And, why do you think the gnostic gospels, that focused on the secular, human side of Jesus, were excluded from the bible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The gospels were written about 100 years after Jesus' death, and long after their namesakes were dead as well. They are no eyewitness accounts of the life of Jesus. They are a retelling of fables and campfire stories.

And, why do you think the gnostic gospels, that focused on the secular, human side of Jesus, were excluded from the bible?

 

The dates I've seen from the scholars and experts have the dates a few decades after the crucifixion....not 100 years.

 

Can you point to a reputable source that believes the gospels to be dated 100-200 ad??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dates I've seen from the scholars and experts have the dates a few decades after the crucifixion....not 100 years.

 

Can you point to a reputable source that believes the gospels to be dated 100-200 ad??

OK, so you don't want to make a serious response. I guess I can't blame you. But I've got to work on buffing the dining room floor, and I'm done with your circular denial and bullshit.

Believe what you want to, I really don't care. You cannot refute the fact that the gospels are the work of others, and not of their namesakes. It is what it is.

 

And Jesus is still dead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so you don't want to make a serious response. I guess I can't blame you. But I've got to work on buffing the dining room floor, and I'm done with your circular denial and bullshit.

Believe what you want to, I really don't care. You cannot refute the fact that the gospels are the work of others, and not of their namesakes. It is what it is.

 

And Jesus is still dead.

I thought you were going to name a bible scholar who supports the position that the gospels were authored by someone other that who they are attributed to or that they date 100AD or later.

 

Clearly, that is something you don't want to do....or can't.

 

Asking for scholarly verification seems like a perfectly reasonable request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I realized science couldn't answer the really interesting questions, so I turned to philosophy. Been searching for God ever since". Terrence Stamp - Dr. Chantillas - Red Planet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pull your head out of your ass and pay attention:

The theory of creation is based on humans being central to the universe because of their supposedly divine origins. The science has thoroughly debunked this nonsense and proven that our origin can be traced back to the naturally occurring forces that shape the rest of the universe. Not hard to understand, really, if your not afraid of knowledge.

Make this easy - just show IN THE BIBLE where God said He only created life on Earth...

 

(Gets popcorn and coke and gets ready for the show about to follow of a man with his tail between his legs running from the truth...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many different versions of the Bible - many missing books have begun to turn up - probably more books that have yet to be discovered.



Are we ( earth ) the only planet with intelligent life; not likely. Even if all this is an accident, the odds are intelligent life has evolved many many times across the universe. Also odds, we may be very primitive. We are a pack of arrogant fukers, ain't we? "A small planet of a minor star, on the edge of an inconsiderable galaxy".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many different versions of the Bible - many missing books have begun to turn up - probably more books that have yet to be discovered.

 

Are we ( earth ) the only planet with intelligent life; not likely. Even if all this is an accident, the odds are intelligent life has evolved many many times across the universe. Also odds, we may be very primitive. We are a pack of arrogant fukers, ain't we? "A small planet of a minor star, on the edge of an inconsiderable galaxy".

Yes - I always watch with amusement how there are "errors" "missing books" etc etc etc...

 

Ever think about it this way: The all powerful creator of the Universe has given you a book - it has just the right message for you. No power is greater than He- so how is it wrong? Who defeated God? Who stopped His book?

 

There have been many times even the possession of a bible was a death sentence...yet the book still exist.

 

You can trust the bible. I have looked at all the so called "errors" and missing books etc etc and none of it ever amounts to a hill of beans

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many different versions of the Bible - many missing books have begun to turn up - probably more books that have yet to be discovered.

 

Are we ( earth ) the only planet with intelligent life; not likely. Even if all this is an accident, the odds are intelligent life has evolved many many times across the universe. Also odds, we may be very primitive. We are a pack of arrogant fukers, ain't we? "A small planet of a minor star, on the edge of an inconsiderable galaxy".

 

Keep on hoping, but if you are wrong there is Hell to pay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • By nuckin futz

    How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • By nuckin futz

    How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • By nuckin futz

    Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • By XavierOnassis

    diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...