Jump to content

RED LINE II: KERRY GIVES ASSAD 'ONE WEEK'


Recommended Posts

John Kerry gives Syria week to hand over chemical weapons or face attack

US secretary of state tells London press conference with William Hague that US intelligence blames Assad regime for gas attack

Link to video: John Kerry on military strikes against Syria

 

The US secretary of state has said that President Bashar al-Assad has one week to hand over his entire stock of chemical weapons to avoid a military attack. But John Kerry added that he had no expectation that the Syrian leader would comply.

 

Kerry also said he had no doubt that Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack in east Damascus on 21 August, saying that only three people are responsible for the chemical weapons inside Syria – Assad, one of his brothers and a senior general. He said the entire US intelligence community was united in believing Assad was responsible.

 

Kerry was speaking on Monday alongside the UK foreign secretary, William Hague, who was forced to deny that he had been pushed to the sidelines by the House of Commons decision 10 days ago to reject the use of UK force in Syria.

 

The US Senate is due to vote this week on whether to approve an attack and Kerry was ambivalent over whether Barack Obama would use his powers to ignore the legislative chamber, if it were to reject an attack.

 

The US state department stressed that Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the one-week deadline and unlikelihood of Assad turning over Syria's chemical weapons stockpile. In a statement, the department added: "His point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."

 

Kerry said the US had tracked the Syrian chemical weapons stock for many years, adding that it "was controlled in a very tight manner by the Assad regime … Bashar al-Assad and his brother Maher al-Assad, and a general are the three people that have the control over the movement and use of chemical weapons.

 

"But under any circumstances, the Assad regime is the Assad regime, and the regime issues orders, and we have regime members giving these instructions and engaging in these preparations with results going directly to President Assad.

 

"We are aware of that so we have no issue here about responsibility. They have a very threatening level of stocks remaining."

Kerry said Assad might avoid an attack if he handed every bit of his chemical weapons stock, but added that the Syrian president was not going to do that. He warned that if other nations were not prepared to act on the issue of chemical weapons, "you are giving people complete licence to do whatever they want and to feel so they can do with impunity".

 

Kerry said the Americans were planning an "unbelievably small" attack on Syria. "We will be able to hold Bashar al-Assad accountable without engaging in troops on the ground or any other prolonged kind of effort in a very limited, very targeted, short-term effort that degrades his capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for Syria's civil war. That is exactly what we are talking about doing – unbelievably small, limited kind of effort."

 

The secretary of state repeatedly referred to genocides in eastern Europe and Rwanda in putting forward his case for taking military action. "We need to hear an appropriate outcry as we think back on those moments of history when large numbers of people have been killed because the world was silent," he said. "The Holocaust, Rwanda, other moments, are lessons to all of us today.

 

"So let me be clear," he continued. "The United States of America, President Obama, myself, others are in full agreement that the end of the conflict in Syria requires a political solution."

 

But he insisted such a solution was currently impossible if "one party believes that he can rub out countless numbers of his own citizens with impunity using chemicals that have been banned for 100 years".

 

Hague was forced to emphasise that the UK was engaged in the Syrian crisis through its call for greater action on humanitarian aid, as well as support for the Geneva II peace process.

 

He pointed out that David Cameron had convened a meeting of countries at the G20 summit in Saint Petersburg to ramp up the humanitarian effort.

 

Hague met members of the Syrian opposition last Friday and described its leaders as democratic and non-sectarian. On Monday, he avoided questions on why he was not providing lethal equipment to the Syrian opposition.

 

He said it was for the US to decide whether to attack Syria without congressional endorsement. "These are the two greatest homes of democracy and we work in slightly different ways and we each have to respect how each other's democracies work."

 

Kerry said he did not know if Obama would release further intelligence proving the culpability of Assad in the chemical weapons attack, saying the administration had already released an unprecedented amount of information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This farce started 2 YEARS ago when we did not support the rebels. Now we don't know who the rebels are and chemical weapons are being used by someone. Obama and his team have botched the situation further by making statements like the RED LINE crossing and this latest statement by the fall guy Kerry. In the last week Obama has said the red line was issued by the world and he has sent Kerry to beat the drums for war. The day after Kerry's beating the drums for war statements Obama decided to put the issue to congress. Leading from behind has gotten us into this mess. Libya, Egypt, and now Syria. This administration has NO FOREIGN POLICY. This is the most incompetent administration in my lifetime and I was born in the 40's. This comic buffoonery is rightfully making the USA look as impotent as we truly are. 3 more years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read the post except for the first line, but could it be condensed down to "Kerry says that if Assad doesn't turn over all his chemical weapons then Syria faces an incredibly small military strike?

 

That's.....motivating.

Yep. Symbolism over substance.

It doesn't matter WHAT we do, as long as we "do something".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you fkkking serious?

 

This would be a big win for Kerry and Obama and the world! It saves face all the way around, and solves a big crisis!

 

And it would mean Putin is agreeing with the uS position, you idiot!

 

Read the other thread about this same thing, dolt!

 

Its like Kennedy backing down Kruschev, and averting WW III !

 

It took BALLS for Kerry to say this. Something you will never have!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read the post except for the first line, but could it be condensed down to "Kerry says that if Assad doesn't turn over all his chemical weapons then Syria faces an incredibly small military strike?

 

That's.....motivating.

 

I didn't read the op either, but this sounds right to me. Even if Kerry's posturing has no effect on Assad, of course, there's the solace that innocent people will almost certainly be wounded and killed in the end.

 

Are you fkkking serious?

 

This would be a big win for Kerry and Obama and the world! It saves face all the way around, and solves a big crisis!

 

And it would mean Putin is agreeing with the uS position, you idiot!

 

Read the other thread about this same thing, dolt!

 

Its like Kennedy backing down Kruschev, and averting WW III !

 

It took BALLS for Kerry to say this. Something you will never have!

 

Christ, don't tell me I'm going to have to read the op to form an opinion about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you fkkking serious?

 

This would be a big win for Kerry and Obama and the world! It saves face all the way around, and solves a big crisis!

 

And it would mean Putin is agreeing with the uS position, you idiot!

 

Read the other thread about this same thing, dolt!

 

Its like Kennedy backing down Kruschev, and averting WW III !

 

It took BALLS for Kerry to say this. Something you will never have!

 

Putin protected Russian interests... They have lucrative business dealings with Assad, and have a Navy base there as well. They will not let Assad's regime fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

barry and his entire cabinet...inept, inadequate, incompetent and impotent.

Look in the mirror doughboy!! LMAO!!

 

 

I didn't read the op either, but this sounds right to me. Even if Kerry's posturing has no effect on Assad, of course, there's the solace that innocent people will almost certainly be wounded and killed in the end.

 

 

Assad has already jumped through his ass at the kerry threat. Its over.

 

WASHINGTON (AP) - Confronted by the threat of U.S. air strikes, Syria swiftly welcomed the idea of turning over all of its chemical weapons for destruction on Monday, capping a remarkable chain of events that started with a suggestion from Secretary of State John Kerry, followed by a public proposal from Russia and immediate endorsement by the U.N. secretary-general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assad has already jumped through his ass at the kerry threat. Its over.

Kerry threat lol-049.gif

Yea, it was such a threat that the State Department tried to immediately walk it back.

RED LINE REVERSAL: State Dept dismisses ultimatum as 'rhetorical argument'...

 

Putin is laughing his ass off at Obama right now.

 

I wonder if Kerry and Obama are even on the same page.... It's total amateur hour.

It really is. How much more embarrassing can these idiots be?

And the obamatrons like Shintao are trying to portray this as a win... amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerry threat lol-049.gif

Yea, it was such a threat that the State Department tried to immediately walk it back.

RED LINE REVERSAL: State Dept dismisses ultimatum as 'rhetorical argument'...

 

Putin is laughing his ass off at Obama right now.

 

 

It really is. How much more embarrassing can these idiots be?

And the obamatrons like Shintao are trying to portray this as a win... amazing.

and you love that putins find this amusing. don't you gb.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Kerry gives Syria week to hand over chemical weapons or face attack

Absolutely not true.

When asked by a reporter if there was anything Syria could do to prevent an attack Kerry said, "Sure, he could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week - turn it over, all of it without delay and allow the full and total accounting, but he isn't about to do it and it can't be done."

 

It was just rhetoric, not a red line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...