Jump to content

Rachel Maddow Tears Jim DeMint A New Butt Opening


Recommended Posts

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/06/30/rachel-maddow-obliterates-jim-demints-gay-hate-meet-press.html

 

 

 

 

In a moment that has been years in the making, Jim DeMint was absolutely destroyed by Rachel Maddow for trying to spread his hate filled anti-same sex marriage propaganda.

 

Video via Think Progress:

 

 

 

Transcript:

Jim DeMint: He is denying dignity to the millions of Americans who for moral or religious reasons believe that gay marriage is wrong. As you just said, you’ve got 37 states where the people have decided that they want to protect marriage between a man and a woman, because they know that that’s the environment where children can thrive and succeed. I mean that’s been proven. So it’s not about the desires of adults, it’s really about the best environment for children. We’re talking all about politics, but the reason why governments at the state level at the federal level have recognized marriage between a man and woman is because it is better for our country, and it is better for children.

 

Rachel Maddow: Justice Kennedy addressed that issue specifically in his ruling. He says that by denying marriage rights to same-sex couples who have kids, you’re humiliating and demeaning those kids. By denying their families equal protection under the law, by the parents who are raising, them and who love them and who make their family. So we can put it in the interests of children, but I think that cuts both ways. And the ruling cuts against that argument. I mean, gay people exist. There’s nothing we can do in public policy can do to make more of us exist or less of us exist. And you guys for a generation have argued that public policy ought to essentially demean gay people as a way of expressing disapproval of the fact that we exist. But you don’t make any less of us exist. You are just arguing for more discrimination. And more discrimination doesn’t make straight people’s lives any better.

Jim DeMint was relying on that old standard Republican refrain, “What about the children?” DeMint was making the same argument that social conservatives have been making for decades that it is bad for kids to be around gay people, because homosexuality is wrong.

 

This argument was dealt with directly by Justice Kennedy in the DOMA decision, but it hasn’t stopped those who have embraced discrimination from trying to advance it. DeMint was basing his claim that heterosexual marriage is better for children on a widely debunked Regnerus paper that was bought and paid for with millions of dollars from anti-gay marriage groups.

 

Rachel Maddow absolutely went to town on DeMint’s completely bogus claims. She was correct. Real academic research has found that children benefit from stable two parent homes, but it doesn’t matter if the parents are gay or straight. Maddow called out DeMint for wanting to use public policy to discriminate against gay people.

People like DeMint refuse to appear on Maddow’s MSNBC show, so this confrontation was literally years in the making. Maddow has been flatly turned down by most of the right. They won’t come on her show, so Meet The Press provides one of the few chances for her to talk directly to the Jim DeMints of the political world.

 

Same sex marriage opponents are arguing in favor of legalized federal discrimination. More discrimination doesn’t make straight people’s lives better, but it makes those who are doing the discriminating feel superior.

 

The belief that homosexuality can be legislated out existence is ancient and forever destined to fail. It isn’t just political momentum that is on the side of same sex marriage advocates. They also hold the moral argument.

 

Maddow was able to obliterate DeMint because discrimination is wrong. Opponents of same sex marriage can cook up all the bogus research that can afford to buy, but at the end of the day the marriage question is all about discrimination.

 

Rachel Maddow demonstrated the force and power of having both legal and moral truth on her side.

Jim DeMint, and his hate filled talking points, never stood a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain to us how a man sticking his penis into another man's hairy asshole is "dignity". Is that how they teach "dignity" in prison?

sure - just as soon as you explain how a man sticking his penis into a womans vigina is "dignity". it ain't all about fucking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

go live your life however you see fit.

 

Duh! That is exactly what they are trying to do dimwitt! It is conservatives who keep bringing attention to this issue!

 

A man sticking his penis into another man's hairy asshole is "dignity"? Well whaddya know, Ethel.

 

Beats doin' a goat! Oh . . . . . sorry if I just forced you out of the closet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain to us how a man sticking his penis into another man's hairy asshole is "dignity". Is that how they teach "dignity" in prison?

If that's your narrow minded focus of what a marriage is, then you have justified every member here who has accurately labeled you as the freak that you are. I wouldn't speak about dignity if I were you, because you obviously don't have any. Apparently those who have made the insinuation that conservatives brains are narrowly focused on sexual acts that they themselves fanaticize about are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Duh! That is exactly what they are trying to do dimwitt! It is conservatives who keep bringing attention to this issue!

 

 

Beats doin' a goat! Oh . . . . . sorry if I just forced you out of the closet!

 

You'd only know that if you've done a goat. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What two consenting adults do with themselves is their business, and no one else's. For some reason, the conservative's keep thinking it's their business.......

 

Just another reason in a long list of reasons why the majority of Americans don't much like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Duh! That is exactly what they are trying to do dimwitt! It is conservatives who keep bringing attention to this issue!

 

How?

 

Look at your own post! Look at what every other con on this site writes about gay marriage! You all simply will not drop the issue! I think all of the airport mens room dwellers in the republican party are keeping this one alive in hopes that maybe SOMEDAY they can come out of the closet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain to us how a man sticking his penis into another man's hairy asshole is "dignity". Is that how they teach "dignity" in prison?

 

Explain to us why the flies continually hang around you.....insect3.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Look at your own post! Look at what every other con on this site writes about gay marriage! You all simply will not drop the issue! I think all of the airport mens room dwellers in the republican party are keeping this one alive in hopes that maybe SOMEDAY they can come out of the closet!

 

What about my post? marriage is between a man and a woman don't Change definition of words you want same sex to be together call it something else union hookup joint ness whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. The number of americans that watch Madcow could be put in a VW microbus. Outside of this site and a few Gay blogs no one knows or cares about Madcow's comments on De Mint. I do watch Madcow once in a while when i need a few good laughs. I am sorry i missed that particular show. I talk with a lefty teacher at the local pub and i need to know what crackpot arguments he is going to come up with. Other than finding info about my political opposition, Madcow and MSNBC is a total waste of time. The rest of the country seems to agree. No one watches MSNBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain to us how a man sticking his penis into another man's hairy asshole is "dignity". Is that how they teach "dignity" in prison?

 

What about heterosexual couples who engage in and enjoy anal sex?. Would you deny them the right to raise children? I've asked you this question before and never got an answer from you.

 

Dignity has nothing to do with gender, sexual preference, material wealth, physical appearance, race, religion or circumstances.

 

If you don't know what personal dignity is, Mildred, you either don't have any or mistake it for your morality driven self-righteousness..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about my post? marriage is between a man and a woman don't Change definition of words you want same sex to be together call it something else union hookup joint ness whatever

HAHAHAHAHAHAA.... LMAO..... the only question here is, is it possibly to fairly characterize just how fukken stupid this subhuman twit is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure - just as soon as you explain how a man sticking his penis into a womans vigina is "dignity". it ain't all about fucking

A vagina is designed to accept a penis. Dignity is doing what you're designed for. Sticking your penis into another man's waste chute is unhealthy and undignified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What about heterosexual couples who engage in and enjoy anal sex?. Would you deny them the right to raise children? I've asked you this question before and never got an answer from you.

 

Dignity has nothing to do with gender, sexual preference, material wealth, physical appearance, race, religion or circumstances.

 

If you don't know what personal dignity is, Mildred, you either don't have any or mistake it for your morality driven self-righteousness..

seems that its the "hairiness" that has it all hung up... or rather that is the hook it is trying to use to hang a weak foray into that complicated arena of childish humor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A vagina is designed to accept a penis. Dignity is doing what you're designed for. Sticking your penis into another man's waste chute is unhealthy and undignified.

then do the dignified thing and get your penis hole stuffed. that's what you are designed for, breeder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. The number of americans that watch Madcow could be put in a VW microbus. Outside of this site and a few Gay blogs no one knows or cares about Madcow's comments on De Mint. I do watch Madcow once in a while when i need a few good laughs. I am sorry i missed that particular show. I talk with a lefty teacher at the local pub and i need to know what crackpot arguments he is going to come up with. Other than finding info about my political opposition, Madcow and MSNBC is a total waste of time. The rest of the country seems to agree. No one watches MSNBC.

The comment was made on Meet the Press. Fail. So you admit you're one of those "few" watchers that tunes into her show? Interesting. Maddow has the best research team on cable news bar none. The fact you laugh at facts that you cannot dispute shows you're an intellectual midget. I notice on everyother internet site I have an account with posts her facts, and not Fox News for some reason. The Simpsons have a highly rated show also but nobody on any site that has serious discussions about politics and current events uses their dialogue either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...