Jump to content

Øbama Electrifies Africa


Recommended Posts

Picture+1.jpg

 

Obama to unveil broad African electrical power initiative

By Mark Felsenthal

JOHANNESBURG | Sun Jun 30, 2013 12:33am EDT

(Reuters) - Pointing to Africa's crippling lack of electrical power, President Barack Obama is due to announce on Sunday a $7 billion initiative over five years to double access to power in sub-Saharan Africa.

...

The private sector will also be involved. Officials said General Electric Co has committed to power generation projects in Tanzania and Ghana, officials added.

 

What a surprise - look who gets more of the taxpayers' money - Øbama's pal Jeff Immelt...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious, did Barry take the time to mention these in stone documented facts?

The Killing Of Whites In South
Africa...And America's Silence



  • The murder and eviction of whites in Zimbabwe has been commented on in the news but in Zimbabwe's southern neighbor, south Africa, whites are being slaughtered at an even higher rate.
  • South Africa has three times the population of Zimbabwe, and 13 times the White population: almost 6 million Whites live there. As with Zimbabwe, the media silence about the murder of Whites there is almost total; and in South Africa's case, even human rights groups are largely silent, perhaps because the Black takeover there was so recent and so many "liberals" have an emotional investment in the ANC/Communist regime they helped to power.
  • In 1994, after decades of propaganda in the media and sentimental whimpering from the churches, South African Whites were finally persuaded to hand power over to Black Communists, who installed an ANC ("African National Congress")/Communist government that, for some strange reason, failed to follow Marxist ideology when it came to expropriating the business interests of the Oppenheimer family, who dominate South Africa's economy. They did succeed, however, in making South Africa into a multiracial sewer with one of the highest violent crime, murder, rape, and AIDS infection rates in the world. The media made a saint of Nelson Mandela, a convicted terrorist who had been imprisoned by the White government there, and when the Whites capitulated he was made President.
  • After the media's announcement that their long campaign of sanctions, boycotts, and intimidation had finally succeeded in bringing "equality" and "democracy" to what had previously been one of the few outposts of White civilization on the African continent, the media coverage of that country almost ceased, and one seldom hears about South Africa today in the mass media. The reason is that South Africa is rapidly descending into crime, disease, filth, and savagery.
  • Since the Black takeover in 1994, 1,368 White farmers have been murdered in farm invasions and attacks that number in the multiple thousands. More than half of the White farmers have given up and left their farms permanently, contributing to the region's looming famine. And yet this is not an issue in the Jewish media. South African farmers now suffer the highest murder rate in the world -- 274 per 100,000. In a study commissioned by a leading South African bank, Nedbank, it was revealed that the Black attackers are
  • "'deliberately targeting specific homesteads to kill the [White] Afrikaner victims': robbery was not the prime motivation, in fact in 85% of last year's farm attacks, nothing had been 'robbed.'"
  • In other words, killing the White man, raping and killing the White woman, raping and killing the White child are the real motivations. And yet this is not an issue in the American media.
  • Let me give you a few examples:
  • On June 15th of this year, sugar farmer Robert Dent and his wife Allison, both 59, were killed in front of their twelve-year-old son Nicholas Dent. A Black invader entered the Dent home between two and three AM that Saturday morning, armed with a military-style rifle. He bludgeoned the unarmed couple, who were surprised in their sleep, and then, in the presence of their son, shot them to death at point-blank range in the farmhouse bathroom. The terrified Nicholas was then forced to drive the killer in his parents' car about three miles away, where both killer and child escaped.
  • I have the figures in front of me for just this month, September 2002, and though the month isn't over, nine farmers have been killed, including four children and an elderly farm couple, George and Albertina Lewis, whose dog was also killed. The police report on the Lewis's murder says "no motive."
  • In August, a farmer's wife was attacked in a firebombing, and Johan Viljoen, a Zevenfontein cheese farmer, was torched to death along with one of his workers. Christo Olivier and Jan Kempdorp of Vryburg were tortured to death and then buried in a shallow grave. The two Blacks who were arrested for this crime were granted bail. On the 7th, the headless torso of what police reports call an "ethnic-European male" was found on Mpumalanga farm. And Johannes Maree, 62, of Randfontein, was found bludgeoned to death on August 1st.
  • In June and July, Johan Steyn, 65, was shot dead in the Cullinan area; smallholder Roy Murley was tortured to death; Johannes Lake and Johnny Scheepers were shot to death; dairy farmer George Siemens, 62, was killed; and Cheryl van Houten, 51, was hacked to death.
  • In April and May, Ben Vorster, 67, was murdered by an armed Black gang; Andre Pienaar, 56, was shot dead; Mona Sawyer, 78, served food to a Black caller at her home in Magaliesberg and was then stabbed to death; Rita Mans, a 31-year-old farmer's wife was shot to death in Ottosdal; 70-year-old Iris du Preez was murdered on her small farm; Dickson Pillay, 36, and his brother Sandy Pillay of Glendale Farm homestead were burned to death when Blacks torched their farm.
  • In the first three months of this year, more than 30 farm murders occurred, including the killing of classical musician Felicity Gale, 58, of Port Jackson -- her husband, Rodney, 67, survived the attack; Marius and Lillian Delport, 50 and 54, of a smallholding near De Deur were shot and nothing was stolen; Rudi Schmidt, 51, of a farm near Pontdrift was stabbed to death; 21-year-old Catherine Watkins of Potchefstroom was found with her windpipe torn out; Estelle Burger, 27, a farmers wife, was kidnapped and then shot; John de Lange, 66, a smallholder in Mount Pleasant was shot to death, his wife, Evelin de Lange, 60, was raped and garroted; and Arthur Smith, 63, and his wife Isobel, were found with their throats slit and their bodies severely beaten on their farm in Sundra.
  • I'm just giving you the highlights here, by the way, and just from the last few months. The grisly details and the horrifying numbers can be found in the reports of Crimebusters South Africa and the excellent data assembled by Adriana Stuijt and her "Journalism During Apartheid" site. These farm massacres are occurring at a reported rate of about one every other day. The horror on these White farms has been steadily climbing since 1994. And yet this is not an issue in the Jewish media.
  • Unlike Zimbabwe, the government in South Africa does not have an officially-announced policy of supporting these farm invasions and massacres. But they do have a policy of looking the other way and doing next to nothing about it, a policy which encourages Black violence against Whites. Their attitude is perhaps best expressed by Peter Mokaba, until recently South Africa's Deputy Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, who whined recently that "The high crime rate is seriously affecting tourism and an alternative image of South Africa needed to be promoted. We want to encourage people to come here and see that crime does not dominate." Really? What Mr. Mokaba did not tell you was that he himself is famous for the slogans he invented and uttered again and again when he was a leader in the ANC/Communist war against the White government of South Africa: "Kill the Boer! Kill the farmer!" and "One settler, one bullet."
  • Kill the Boer, kill the farmer. And it is to such a government that White farmers must appeal for protection.
  • Even that government admits that, under Black rule, crime and murder are out of control. The South African Police Service report entitled Attacks on Farms and Smallholdings 1/99 stated: "Violence seems to have become an endemic feature of South African life. According to the comparative crime statistics for 1996 released by Interpol, the country tops the list internationally as far as the incidence of murder and rape is concerned. the fact that attacks on the residents of farms and smallholdings are escalating at a rate out of proportion to the general increase in crime figures observed in South Africa is indeed cause for serious concern."
  • Such, I suppose, are the wonderful benefits of "multiracial democracy."
  • The murders I've been describing here are just the farm murders. The murder rate in the cities is even higher, for Johannesburg alone it is 500 per month. Many of the victims are White, and the attackers Black and racially motivated, a fact that is never mentioned in the US media.
  • And South Africa is also the rape capital of the world. A woman is reported raped every 23 seconds in South Africa. A small child is reported raped every thirty minutes. And remember, these are the reported and admitted rapes. This dismal record is partly due to the Congoids' innate savagery when released from the control of civilized men, and partly due to the Black folk belief that raping a virgin will cure AIDS, which is rampant in that country. [Jackie Loffell, Johannesburg Child Welfare Society, 13th International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect in Durban.]
  • On May 24, 2000, the beaten, battered and nearly frozen body of a young Polish woman was found, clad only in a soaked t-shirt, along the road to South Africa's Sterkfontein Dam. Her body was so cold it was actually blue. Her hair was wet and she was covered with bruises, open wounds, deep scratches, and mud. She was curled in a fetal position. She was still alive. To students of rape in South Africa she was another digit in the statistics. To Americans and Europeans who get their news from the major media, she didn't even exist.
  • She was a 27-year-old newlywed on her honeymoon, a honeymoon that ended when three Blacks murdered her husband in front of her eyes and then brutally raped her, beat her, attempted to kill her and left her for dead. The bruise marks around her neck indicated that her rapists had tried to strangle her. At the treatment center she was immediately given AZT by Polish Consulate authorities (treatment refused her by the South African government) in the hope that it would prevent the transfer of HIV, since two of her three attackers tested positive for the virus.
  • She testified that after her attackers murdered her husband, they forced her in the trunk of their car, and went to a secluded spot where each of the Blacks raped her in turn. They then attempted to drown her by stamping their feet on her head in an attempt to keep her head underwater. The woman has returned to her native Poland and refuses to set foot in South Africa again, even to testify.
  • As reported by investigator Jack Galt, on November 17th of the same year, a 14-year-old White girl was cruelly raped by a gang of five blacks in her home in Pretoria. According to her counselors, she has been traumatized for the rest of her life. Spokesmen for the White Afrikaner community, who you will not hear on CBS, NBC, or Fox News, state that this attack was a deliberate attempt to terrorize Whites.
  • Five heavily-armed Blacks invaded the home, and proceeded to tie up the girl's mother, father, six-year-old sister and ten-year-old brother with barbed wire in the living room.
  • They then grabbed the 14-year-old girl and took her to the bathroom, where they brutally gang-raped her, each of the five Blacks in turn, with the family listening nearby, helpless. Then the Blacks returned to the living room where they beat and kicked the White father in the face while he was still tied up, ransacked the home, and fled in the family's car.
  • South African mother Ame Brown of Elliot in the Eastern Cape recently stated: "On the 8th of October, 1998 my two children and I were overpowered by four Black men. We were robbed of everything, and before leaving the men took turns raping me in front of my two boys aged 8 and 12. They forced my boys to watch. I have since then been tested for HIV of which my tests at five months showed positive. It has not been easy coping with being raped and having HIV. But I have a fantastic husband who has stood by me through all my depression and down days and all my sleepless nights. He has been my backbone and tower of strength."
  • The rape situation is so bad in South Africa -- the worst in the world -- that British and American doctors are now advising female travelers to carry anti-AIDS drugs in their bags because of the high risk of infection from HIV-carrying rapists there. The British security magazine Intersec reports "The high number of reported rapes in the country is already a deterrent for prospective visitors -- and the South African government's decision not to provide AZT to victims of rape means they are unlikely to get the drugs at local clinics." Dr. Andrew Jamieson, medical director of the British Airways Travel Clinic, said "the academic travel medicine community had discussed the issue for a number of years."
  • "About six months ago, it was decided that this would be a reasonable thing to do ... it's all about risk management. There is a real risk for travelers to this country and other countries in Africa. We do have a high HIV rate and a high incidence of rape so we cannot pretend it is not there," he said. Predictably, the South African government, which fails to protect White women from rapists, is furious at the doctors, fearing a further loss of tourism dollars.
  • White ingenuity and inventiveness have come up with an experimental deterrent to the Black rapist problem, however. Seventy-two-year-old Jaap Haumann, a retired anesthetist in the Free State, South Africa, has invented what he calls a "mutilator tampon" designed to lop off the end of a rapist's penis. Haumann says he designed the device after talking to rape victims, and he thinks that at least a million South African women will flock to buy it. "It became clear to me that rape has a devastating impact on the lives of women, physically and especially mentally. We all know that South Africa has the highest rape statistics in the world. With this device I believe would-be rapists would think twice before attacking any woman in this country." Unfortunately, Dr. Haumann's invention would not solve the problem of HIV transmission.
  • Cape Town, South Africa has become the world capital of what is called the "sex tourism" trade. Press reports have described it as the "sleaze capital of the world," and these days that's really saying something. Perverts from all over the world go there (bringing "needed tourist dollars" to be sure) to have sex with children, many of them White sex slaves, but others imported from brothels as far away as Thailand. "Sex with children," of course, is just a euphemism for rape of the innocent. "Child Sex Tours" are even sponsored by some "entrepreneurs" while the government looks the other way.
  • In the bad old days of White rule and apartheid, such things weren't tolerated. But in the new "rainbow" South Africa, where can the innocent victims look for protection? The mayor of Cape Town, a Black named William Bantom, was recently discovered to be enjoying his huge personal collection of child pornography in his office while on the job. And he wasn't ousted as mayor. Perhaps the Church will help them? Bantom is also a noted clergyman, known for his liberal views on "human rights," "democracy," and "equality."
  • A listener in New York has written this week to ask what he and others can do to help the embattled Whites of Southern Africa. He rightly points out that even though our first priority is to build the National Alliance into a powerhouse to secure the future of our people, these White farmers need help now in their local communities, in their own countries. I can't tell you how you should help, but I can put you in touch with those who are on the front lines in those countries, and they can tell you more.
  • Two of the best sources of news about Zimbabwe and South Africa on the Internet are Southern Cross Africa News, http://www.scafrica.com; and also the South African Exiles Site, http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~springbk. If you weren't able to copy the URL's as you listened to the radio, don't worry; they'll be present in the text version of this broadcast at our natvan.com and natall.com Web sites, and all subscribers to our monthly Free Speech newsletter will get them, too. There's also a publication from South Africa entitled The Boer, which is charting a path for eventual self-determination and national freedom for Whites in a White state. The publishers also operate a White history museum in South Africa, the Balmoral Genocide Museum, to preserve for future generations the true history of that land which the present Black government is trying to erase from our memories. They may be reached via the Southern Cross Africa site just mentioned, or you may write to them at their postal address of:
  • Balmoral Museum. PO Box 30 Balmoral 1037 South Africa


I suppose not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious, did Barry take the time to mention these in stone documented facts?

The Killing Of Whites In South

Africa...And America's Silence

 

 

 

  • The murder and eviction of whites in Zimbabwe has been commented on in the news but in Zimbabwe's southern neighbor, south Africa, whites are being slaughtered at an even higher rate.
  • South Africa has three times the population of Zimbabwe, and 13 times the White population: almost 6 million Whites live there. As with Zimbabwe, the media silence about the murder of Whites there is almost total; and in South Africa's case, even human rights groups are largely silent, perhaps because the Black takeover there was so recent and so many "liberals" have an emotional investment in the ANC/Communist regime they helped to power.
  • In 1994, after decades of propaganda in the media and sentimental whimpering from the churches, South African Whites were finally persuaded to hand power over to Black Communists, who installed an ANC ("African National Congress")/Communist government that, for some strange reason, failed to follow Marxist ideology when it came to expropriating the business interests of the Oppenheimer family, who dominate South Africa's economy. They did succeed, however, in making South Africa into a multiracial sewer with one of the highest violent crime, murder, rape, and AIDS infection rates in the world. The media made a saint of Nelson Mandela, a convicted terrorist who had been imprisoned by the White government there, and when the Whites capitulated he was made President.
  • After the media's announcement that their long campaign of sanctions, boycotts, and intimidation had finally succeeded in bringing "equality" and "democracy" to what had previously been one of the few outposts of White civilization on the African continent, the media coverage of that country almost ceased, and one seldom hears about South Africa today in the mass media. The reason is that South Africa is rapidly descending into crime, disease, filth, and savagery.
  • Since the Black takeover in 1994, 1,368 White farmers have been murdered in farm invasions and attacks that number in the multiple thousands. More than half of the White farmers have given up and left their farms permanently, contributing to the region's looming famine. And yet this is not an issue in the Jewish media. South African farmers now suffer the highest murder rate in the world -- 274 per 100,000. In a study commissioned by a leading South African bank, Nedbank, it was revealed that the Black attackers are
  • "'deliberately targeting specific homesteads to kill the [White] Afrikaner victims': robbery was not the prime motivation, in fact in 85% of last year's farm attacks, nothing had been 'robbed.'"
  • In other words, killing the White man, raping and killing the White woman, raping and killing the White child are the real motivations. And yet this is not an issue in the American media.
  • Let me give you a few examples:
  • On June 15th of this year, sugar farmer Robert Dent and his wife Allison, both 59, were killed in front of their twelve-year-old son Nicholas Dent. A Black invader entered the Dent home between two and three AM that Saturday morning, armed with a military-style rifle. He bludgeoned the unarmed couple, who were surprised in their sleep, and then, in the presence of their son, shot them to death at point-blank range in the farmhouse bathroom. The terrified Nicholas was then forced to drive the killer in his parents' car about three miles away, where both killer and child escaped.
  • I have the figures in front of me for just this month, September 2002, and though the month isn't over, nine farmers have been killed, including four children and an elderly farm couple, George and Albertina Lewis, whose dog was also killed. The police report on the Lewis's murder says "no motive."
  • In August, a farmer's wife was attacked in a firebombing, and Johan Viljoen, a Zevenfontein cheese farmer, was torched to death along with one of his workers. Christo Olivier and Jan Kempdorp of Vryburg were tortured to death and then buried in a shallow grave. The two Blacks who were arrested for this crime were granted bail. On the 7th, the headless torso of what police reports call an "ethnic-European male" was found on Mpumalanga farm. And Johannes Maree, 62, of Randfontein, was found bludgeoned to death on August 1st.
  • In June and July, Johan Steyn, 65, was shot dead in the Cullinan area; smallholder Roy Murley was tortured to death; Johannes Lake and Johnny Scheepers were shot to death; dairy farmer George Siemens, 62, was killed; and Cheryl van Houten, 51, was hacked to death.
  • In April and May, Ben Vorster, 67, was murdered by an armed Black gang; Andre Pienaar, 56, was shot dead; Mona Sawyer, 78, served food to a Black caller at her home in Magaliesberg and was then stabbed to death; Rita Mans, a 31-year-old farmer's wife was shot to death in Ottosdal; 70-year-old Iris du Preez was murdered on her small farm; Dickson Pillay, 36, and his brother Sandy Pillay of Glendale Farm homestead were burned to death when Blacks torched their farm.
  • In the first three months of this year, more than 30 farm murders occurred, including the killing of classical musician Felicity Gale, 58, of Port Jackson -- her husband, Rodney, 67, survived the attack; Marius and Lillian Delport, 50 and 54, of a smallholding near De Deur were shot and nothing was stolen; Rudi Schmidt, 51, of a farm near Pontdrift was stabbed to death; 21-year-old Catherine Watkins of Potchefstroom was found with her windpipe torn out; Estelle Burger, 27, a farmers wife, was kidnapped and then shot; John de Lange, 66, a smallholder in Mount Pleasant was shot to death, his wife, Evelin de Lange, 60, was raped and garroted; and Arthur Smith, 63, and his wife Isobel, were found with their throats slit and their bodies severely beaten on their farm in Sundra.
  • I'm just giving you the highlights here, by the way, and just from the last few months. The grisly details and the horrifying numbers can be found in the reports of Crimebusters South Africa and the excellent data assembled by Adriana Stuijt and her "Journalism During Apartheid" site. These farm massacres are occurring at a reported rate of about one every other day. The horror on these White farms has been steadily climbing since 1994. And yet this is not an issue in the Jewish media.
  • Unlike Zimbabwe, the government in South Africa does not have an officially-announced policy of supporting these farm invasions and massacres. But they do have a policy of looking the other way and doing next to nothing about it, a policy which encourages Black violence against Whites. Their attitude is perhaps best expressed by Peter Mokaba, until recently South Africa's Deputy Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, who whined recently that "The high crime rate is seriously affecting tourism and an alternative image of South Africa needed to be promoted. We want to encourage people to come here and see that crime does not dominate." Really? What Mr. Mokaba did not tell you was that he himself is famous for the slogans he invented and uttered again and again when he was a leader in the ANC/Communist war against the White government of South Africa: "Kill the Boer! Kill the farmer!" and "One settler, one bullet."
  • Kill the Boer, kill the farmer. And it is to such a government that White farmers must appeal for protection.
  • Even that government admits that, under Black rule, crime and murder are out of control. The South African Police Service report entitled Attacks on Farms and Smallholdings 1/99 stated: "Violence seems to have become an endemic feature of South African life. According to the comparative crime statistics for 1996 released by Interpol, the country tops the list internationally as far as the incidence of murder and rape is concerned. the fact that attacks on the residents of farms and smallholdings are escalating at a rate out of proportion to the general increase in crime figures observed in South Africa is indeed cause for serious concern."
  • Such, I suppose, are the wonderful benefits of "multiracial democracy."
  • The murders I've been describing here are just the farm murders. The murder rate in the cities is even higher, for Johannesburg alone it is 500 per month. Many of the victims are White, and the attackers Black and racially motivated, a fact that is never mentioned in the US media.
  • And South Africa is also the rape capital of the world. A woman is reported raped every 23 seconds in South Africa. A small child is reported raped every thirty minutes. And remember, these are the reported and admitted rapes. This dismal record is partly due to the Congoids' innate savagery when released from the control of civilized men, and partly due to the Black folk belief that raping a virgin will cure AIDS, which is rampant in that country. [Jackie Loffell, Johannesburg Child Welfare Society, 13th International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect in Durban.]
  • On May 24, 2000, the beaten, battered and nearly frozen body of a young Polish woman was found, clad only in a soaked t-shirt, along the road to South Africa's Sterkfontein Dam. Her body was so cold it was actually blue. Her hair was wet and she was covered with bruises, open wounds, deep scratches, and mud. She was curled in a fetal position. She was still alive. To students of rape in South Africa she was another digit in the statistics. To Americans and Europeans who get their news from the major media, she didn't even exist.
  • She was a 27-year-old newlywed on her honeymoon, a honeymoon that ended when three Blacks murdered her husband in front of her eyes and then brutally raped her, beat her, attempted to kill her and left her for dead. The bruise marks around her neck indicated that her rapists had tried to strangle her. At the treatment center she was immediately given AZT by Polish Consulate authorities (treatment refused her by the South African government) in the hope that it would prevent the transfer of HIV, since two of her three attackers tested positive for the virus.
  • She testified that after her attackers murdered her husband, they forced her in the trunk of their car, and went to a secluded spot where each of the Blacks raped her in turn. They then attempted to drown her by stamping their feet on her head in an attempt to keep her head underwater. The woman has returned to her native Poland and refuses to set foot in South Africa again, even to testify.
  • As reported by investigator Jack Galt, on November 17th of the same year, a 14-year-old White girl was cruelly raped by a gang of five blacks in her home in Pretoria. According to her counselors, she has been traumatized for the rest of her life. Spokesmen for the White Afrikaner community, who you will not hear on CBS, NBC, or Fox News, state that this attack was a deliberate attempt to terrorize Whites.
  • Five heavily-armed Blacks invaded the home, and proceeded to tie up the girl's mother, father, six-year-old sister and ten-year-old brother with barbed wire in the living room.
  • They then grabbed the 14-year-old girl and took her to the bathroom, where they brutally gang-raped her, each of the five Blacks in turn, with the family listening nearby, helpless. Then the Blacks returned to the living room where they beat and kicked the White father in the face while he was still tied up, ransacked the home, and fled in the family's car.
  • South African mother Ame Brown of Elliot in the Eastern Cape recently stated: "On the 8th of October, 1998 my two children and I were overpowered by four Black men. We were robbed of everything, and before leaving the men took turns raping me in front of my two boys aged 8 and 12. They forced my boys to watch. I have since then been tested for HIV of which my tests at five months showed positive. It has not been easy coping with being raped and having HIV. But I have a fantastic husband who has stood by me through all my depression and down days and all my sleepless nights. He has been my backbone and tower of strength."
  • The rape situation is so bad in South Africa -- the worst in the world -- that British and American doctors are now advising female travelers to carry anti-AIDS drugs in their bags because of the high risk of infection from HIV-carrying rapists there. The British security magazine Intersec reports "The high number of reported rapes in the country is already a deterrent for prospective visitors -- and the South African government's decision not to provide AZT to victims of rape means they are unlikely to get the drugs at local clinics." Dr. Andrew Jamieson, medical director of the British Airways Travel Clinic, said "the academic travel medicine community had discussed the issue for a number of years."
  • "About six months ago, it was decided that this would be a reasonable thing to do ... it's all about risk management. There is a real risk for travelers to this country and other countries in Africa. We do have a high HIV rate and a high incidence of rape so we cannot pretend it is not there," he said. Predictably, the South African government, which fails to protect White women from rapists, is furious at the doctors, fearing a further loss of tourism dollars.
  • White ingenuity and inventiveness have come up with an experimental deterrent to the Black rapist problem, however. Seventy-two-year-old Jaap Haumann, a retired anesthetist in the Free State, South Africa, has invented what he calls a "mutilator tampon" designed to lop off the end of a rapist's penis. Haumann says he designed the device after talking to rape victims, and he thinks that at least a million South African women will flock to buy it. "It became clear to me that rape has a devastating impact on the lives of women, physically and especially mentally. We all know that South Africa has the highest rape statistics in the world. With this device I believe would-be rapists would think twice before attacking any woman in this country." Unfortunately, Dr. Haumann's invention would not solve the problem of HIV transmission.
  • Cape Town, South Africa has become the world capital of what is called the "sex tourism" trade. Press reports have described it as the "sleaze capital of the world," and these days that's really saying something. Perverts from all over the world go there (bringing "needed tourist dollars" to be sure) to have sex with children, many of them White sex slaves, but others imported from brothels as far away as Thailand. "Sex with children," of course, is just a euphemism for rape of the innocent. "Child Sex Tours" are even sponsored by some "entrepreneurs" while the government looks the other way.
  • In the bad old days of White rule and apartheid, such things weren't tolerated. But in the new "rainbow" South Africa, where can the innocent victims look for protection? The mayor of Cape Town, a Black named William Bantom, was recently discovered to be enjoying his huge personal collection of child pornography in his office while on the job. And he wasn't ousted as mayor. Perhaps the Church will help them? Bantom is also a noted clergyman, known for his liberal views on "human rights," "democracy," and "equality."
  • A listener in New York has written this week to ask what he and others can do to help the embattled Whites of Southern Africa. He rightly points out that even though our first priority is to build the National Alliance into a powerhouse to secure the future of our people, these White farmers need help now in their local communities, in their own countries. I can't tell you how you should help, but I can put you in touch with those who are on the front lines in those countries, and they can tell you more.
  • Two of the best sources of news about Zimbabwe and South Africa on the Internet are Southern Cross Africa News, http://www.scafrica.com; and also the South African Exiles Site, http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~springbk. If you weren't able to copy the URL's as you listened to the radio, don't worry; they'll be present in the text version of this broadcast at our natvan.com and natall.com Web sites, and all subscribers to our monthly Free Speech newsletter will get them, too. There's also a publication from South Africa entitled The Boer, which is charting a path for eventual self-determination and national freedom for Whites in a White state. The publishers also operate a White history museum in South Africa, the Balmoral Genocide Museum, to preserve for future generations the true history of that land which the present Black government is trying to erase from our memories. They may be reached via the Southern Cross Africa site just mentioned, or you may write to them at their postal address of:
  • Balmoral Museum. PO Box 30 Balmoral 1037 South Africa

 

I suppose not.

i guess everyone feels that the whites got what was coming to them for yrs of apartheid (sp)....sad as it is.....just like todays whites here are blamed for slavery 300 yrs ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess everyone feels that the whites got what was coming to them for yrs of apartheid (sp)....sad as it is.....just like todays whites here are blamed for slavery 300 yrs ago

 

Right, slavery - apartheid - genocide. Does that mean England owes me for the atrocities the British committed against my Irish ancestors? Allow me to post an article by Fred Reed. I keep it handy - an oldie but a goodie: Says it all.

Maybe Some Things Aren't Somebody Else's Fault by Fred Reed

 

 

I discovered recently in the Washington Post that a group of black lawyers, to include with the predictability of gravitation Johnny Cochran, is planning to sue for reparations for, sigh, slavery. Blacks want more money (I could stop the sentence here) from me and my children. Sometimes I feel like an udder.

The case for reparations relies on acceptance of what has become the public bedrock of American politics: That blacks have been terribly damaged by slavery, which has led to their generally sorry state, and that I did it. Therefore I should give them money.

Permit me a revisionist view of slavery.

I suggest that blacks ought to be grateful that their faster ancestors caught their slower ancestors -- which is exactly what happened -- and sold them to the slavers. American blacks would otherwise be somewhere on the Slave Coast of Africa, barefoot, illiterate, blankly ignorant, wearing loincloths, living in stick huts that would give Eeyore the willies, and shuddering with malaria. That's what Africa is: primitive, hopeless, godawful. I've been in Masai hutments, spent time in the outback of Cuando Cubango. It's not Stone Age. It's more like Stick Age. No country in Africa today comes close, or ever has, to the culture of Fifth Century Athens, 2500 years ago.

Yes, slavery was brutal and ugly. It was, however, hard on the slaves, not on today's blacks. Slavery brought our blacks into contact with a vastly superior civilization from which they benefit enormously, and without the slightest gratitude. Everything blacks enjoy in this country today -- air-conditioning, writing, automobiles, television, medicine, welfare, medicine, everything -- they enjoy only because they were brought here. Further, they have contributed almost nothing to the industrial and technological flowering that has provided the benefits they enjoy.

I begrudge them none of this. I am, however, tired of endlessly being blamed for their problems.

Whites, it seems to me, and not blacks, suffer the deleterious effects of slavery. The crime, AFDC, Section Eight housing, the other costs of supporting illegitimate children, the burned cities, the enormous hidden cost of affirmative action, the constant lowering of standards for blacks, the cost of police forces: Whites bear this burden. It is not light.

And there is the unmentioned cost of fear. Something seldom explicitly stated is that whites are afraid of blacks. Racial watchfulness circumscribes our lives. Whites cannot just take a convenient exit from an urban freeway to find a hamburger: If it goes into the ghetto, we may not get back out. A white woman (and FBI figures bear this out) has good reason not to get into an elevator after hours with a black man, unless he is clearly of the middle class. Always, whites make the calculation: Where are the blacks, can I walk here, live there, have an apartment on the ground floor? And what happens when the children reach the age to go to school?

I wish things weren't this way. If I could cause blacks to prosper and become middle-class wage wonks with Volvos, I'd do it. I don't want them to be unhappy. I don't want it partly because I don't like seeing people miserable, as blacks in the ghetto seem to be, and partly because I don't like living in . . . not quite fear, but alertness. Thing is, there's nothing I can do for blacks.

However, if they are going to accuse me of racism and oppression and worse, in defense I will suggest another explanation. Maybe the problem isn't whites. What if blacks don't succeed because they can't succeed? On every known test of intellectual capacity, blacks score about a standard deviation below whites. While they can't be blamed for this, as neither can whites, in a technoindustrial society those fifteen IQ points are a killer, absolute death. The difference is altogether enough to account for the inability of blacks to progress despite almost frantic efforts by whites to jump-start them.

Putting it otherwise, is there any reason to believe that blacks now in this country would be materially better off if slavery hadn't occurred? That if they had arrived as free citizens they wouldn't be exactly where they are today?

The zeitgeist notwithstanding, differences of intelligence exist between both individuals and groups. The differences are real. They've been carefully studied at great length by very smart people who are perfectly aware of the pitfalls of testing. For example, Jews score a standard deviation above other whites. That is, their advantage over other whites almost exactly equals the advantage of whites over blacks. In any physics laboratory with a statistically significant number of physicists, a (very) disproportionate number will be Jews. Why? Because physics requires a high level of analytical intelligence. They've got it.

Permit me to enunciate a principle, the recognition of which would transform sociology: Brains have consequences. This luminous thought explains why affirmative action doesn't work, why Head Start doesn't work, why efforts to compensate for the effects of slavery don't work, why black students perform badly in school systems controlled by blacks, why blacks stubbornly remain almost nonexistent in fields such as high-energy physics. It also seems to explain (the differences are smaller and the evidence scantier) why certain Asians are so prominent in the mathematical professions.

Now, if blacks can't succeed, the moral landscape shifts. The usual basis for racial policy is that, the debilities of blacks being the result of oppression by whites, whites must therefore be punished and blacks compensated. Here is the guilt model, endlessly purveyed in politics. But if the problem is inherent, the moral element vanishes, and so does any hope that remedial programs will ever work. Then what?

I wish I knew. So far, we have established, without talking about it too explicitly, what amounts to a custodial state, in which blacks of the ghetto are supported by a patchwork of public assistance with no expectation that they will ever achieve civic responsibility. Affirmative action, a form of charity, provides jobs and artificial entry into the economic middle class for the more advantaged who nonetheless could not have been hired on their merits. (If they could be, they wouldn't need affirmative action.) Will this go on forever, with its concomitant resentments and hostility on both sides? Probably.

Meanwhile, I for one weary of being blamed for the inadequacies of others.

 

Yes, slavery was brutal and ugly. It was, however, hard on the slaves, not on today's blacks. Slavery brought our blacks into contact with a vastly superior civilization from which they benefit enormously, and without the slightest gratitude. Everything blacks enjoy in this country today -- air-conditioning, writing, automobiles, television, medicine, welfare, medicine, everything -- they enjoy only because they were brought here. Further, they have contributed almost nothing to the industrial and technological flowering that has provided the benefits they enjoy.

I begrudge them none of this. I am, however, tired of endlessly being blamed for their problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Right, slavery - apartheid - genocide. Does that mean England owes me for the atrocities the British committed against my Irish ancestors? Allow me to post an article by Fred Reed. I keep it handy - an oldie but a goodie: Says it all.

Maybe Some Things Aren't Somebody Else's Fault by Fred Reed

 

 

I discovered recently in the Washington Post that a group of black lawyers, to include with the predictability of gravitation Johnny Cochran, is planning to sue for reparations for, sigh, slavery. Blacks want more money (I could stop the sentence here) from me and my children. Sometimes I feel like an udder.

The case for reparations relies on acceptance of what has become the public bedrock of American politics: That blacks have been terribly damaged by slavery, which has led to their generally sorry state, and that I did it. Therefore I should give them money.

Permit me a revisionist view of slavery.

I suggest that blacks ought to be grateful that their faster ancestors caught their slower ancestors -- which is exactly what happened -- and sold them to the slavers. American blacks would otherwise be somewhere on the Slave Coast of Africa, barefoot, illiterate, blankly ignorant, wearing loincloths, living in stick huts that would give Eeyore the willies, and shuddering with malaria. That's what Africa is: primitive, hopeless, godawful. I've been in Masai hutments, spent time in the outback of Cuando Cubango. It's not Stone Age. It's more like Stick Age. No country in Africa today comes close, or ever has, to the culture of Fifth Century Athens, 2500 years ago.

Yes, slavery was brutal and ugly. It was, however, hard on the slaves, not on today's blacks. Slavery brought our blacks into contact with a vastly superior civilization from which they benefit enormously, and without the slightest gratitude. Everything blacks enjoy in this country today -- air-conditioning, writing, automobiles, television, medicine, welfare, medicine, everything -- they enjoy only because they were brought here. Further, they have contributed almost nothing to the industrial and technological flowering that has provided the benefits they enjoy.

I begrudge them none of this. I am, however, tired of endlessly being blamed for their problems.

Whites, it seems to me, and not blacks, suffer the deleterious effects of slavery. The crime, AFDC, Section Eight housing, the other costs of supporting illegitimate children, the burned cities, the enormous hidden cost of affirmative action, the constant lowering of standards for blacks, the cost of police forces: Whites bear this burden. It is not light.

And there is the unmentioned cost of fear. Something seldom explicitly stated is that whites are afraid of blacks. Racial watchfulness circumscribes our lives. Whites cannot just take a convenient exit from an urban freeway to find a hamburger: If it goes into the ghetto, we may not get back out. A white woman (and FBI figures bear this out) has good reason not to get into an elevator after hours with a black man, unless he is clearly of the middle class. Always, whites make the calculation: Where are the blacks, can I walk here, live there, have an apartment on the ground floor? And what happens when the children reach the age to go to school?

I wish things weren't this way. If I could cause blacks to prosper and become middle-class wage wonks with Volvos, I'd do it. I don't want them to be unhappy. I don't want it partly because I don't like seeing people miserable, as blacks in the ghetto seem to be, and partly because I don't like living in . . . not quite fear, but alertness. Thing is, there's nothing I can do for blacks.

However, if they are going to accuse me of racism and oppression and worse, in defense I will suggest another explanation. Maybe the problem isn't whites. What if blacks don't succeed because they can't succeed? On every known test of intellectual capacity, blacks score about a standard deviation below whites. While they can't be blamed for this, as neither can whites, in a technoindustrial society those fifteen IQ points are a killer, absolute death. The difference is altogether enough to account for the inability of blacks to progress despite almost frantic efforts by whites to jump-start them.

Putting it otherwise, is there any reason to believe that blacks now in this country would be materially better off if slavery hadn't occurred? That if they had arrived as free citizens they wouldn't be exactly where they are today?

The zeitgeist notwithstanding, differences of intelligence exist between both individuals and groups. The differences are real. They've been carefully studied at great length by very smart people who are perfectly aware of the pitfalls of testing. For example, Jews score a standard deviation above other whites. That is, their advantage over other whites almost exactly equals the advantage of whites over blacks. In any physics laboratory with a statistically significant number of physicists, a (very) disproportionate number will be Jews. Why? Because physics requires a high level of analytical intelligence. They've got it.

Permit me to enunciate a principle, the recognition of which would transform sociology: Brains have consequences. This luminous thought explains why affirmative action doesn't work, why Head Start doesn't work, why efforts to compensate for the effects of slavery don't work, why black students perform badly in school systems controlled by blacks, why blacks stubbornly remain almost nonexistent in fields such as high-energy physics. It also seems to explain (the differences are smaller and the evidence scantier) why certain Asians are so prominent in the mathematical professions.

Now, if blacks can't succeed, the moral landscape shifts. The usual basis for racial policy is that, the debilities of blacks being the result of oppression by whites, whites must therefore be punished and blacks compensated. Here is the guilt model, endlessly purveyed in politics. But if the problem is inherent, the moral element vanishes, and so does any hope that remedial programs will ever work. Then what?

I wish I knew. So far, we have established, without talking about it too explicitly, what amounts to a custodial state, in which blacks of the ghetto are supported by a patchwork of public assistance with no expectation that they will ever achieve civic responsibility. Affirmative action, a form of charity, provides jobs and artificial entry into the economic middle class for the more advantaged who nonetheless could not have been hired on their merits. (If they could be, they wouldn't need affirmative action.) Will this go on forever, with its concomitant resentments and hostility on both sides? Probably.

Meanwhile, I for one weary of being blamed for the inadequacies of others.

 

Yes, slavery was brutal and ugly. It was, however, hard on the slaves, not on today's blacks. Slavery brought our blacks into contact with a vastly superior civilization from which they benefit enormously, and without the slightest gratitude. Everything blacks enjoy in this country today -- air-conditioning, writing, automobiles, television, medicine, welfare, medicine, everything -- they enjoy only because they were brought here. Further, they have contributed almost nothing to the industrial and technological flowering that has provided the benefits they enjoy.

I begrudge them none of this. I am, however, tired of endlessly being blamed for their problems.

Yawn. Stupid, long-winded posts make me yawn :blink:

 

Why was it not wrong for African slaves to be treated with cruelty, but it is wrong for White South Africans to be treated that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn. Stupid, long-winded posts make me yawn :blink:

 

Why was it not wrong for African slaves to be treated with cruelty, but it is wrong for White South Africans to be treated that way?

And again, out of pure curiosity, just where did most African slaves come from? I'll tell you where; African kings - chiefs sold there own people to Arab slavers. But we won't mention that. Shhhhhh. Slavery still exists to this very moment in Africa & the Middle East; but I'll keep that fact quiet. Another Shhhhhhhh. Mook

 

Yawn. Stupid, long-winded posts make me yawn :blink:

Actually, I posted this documented information for the benefit of members capable of comprehension & rational thought. What, too deep - too much truth ? I have noticed, when liberals are cornered, they usually resort to changing the subject, making light of the truth, going off on tangents; but never addressing the in stone facts. Liberals are effortlessly befuddled by truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And again, out of pure curiosity, just where did most African slaves come from? I'll tell you where; African kings - chiefs sold there own people to Arab slavers. But we won't mention that. Shhhhhh. Slavery still exists to this very moment in Africa & the Middle East; but I'll keep that fact quiet. Another Shhhhhhhh. Mook

 

Actually, I posted this documented information for the benefit of members capable of comprehension & rational thought. What, too deep - too much truth ? I have noticed, when liberals are cornered, they usually resort to changing the subject, making light of the truth, going off on tangents; but never addressing the in stone facts. Liberals are effortlessly befuddled by truth.

Yes, sshhhh. Be quiet if you can't say anything intelligent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

And again, out of pure curiosity, just where did most African slaves come from? I'll tell you where; African kings - chiefs sold there own people to Arab slavers. But we won't mention that. Shhhhhh. Slavery still exists to this very moment in Africa & the Middle East; but I'll keep that fact quiet. Another Shhhhhhhh. Mook

 

Actually, I posted this documented information for the benefit of members capable of comprehension & rational thought. What, too deep - too much truth ? I have noticed, when liberals are cornered, they usually resort to changing the subject, making light of the truth, going off on tangents; but never addressing the in stone facts. Liberals are effortlessly befuddled by truth.

 

 

You didn't answer my question.

 

 

 

 

 

 

JimSouth, you wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you in the (Y)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK, I'm going to go read my Sunday newspaper. Have a nice day, Mother Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn. Stupid, long-winded posts make me yawn :blink:

 

Why was it not wrong for African slaves to be treated with cruelty, but it is wrong for White South Africans to be treated that way?

Man's inhumanity to man has existed from day one; and no doubt, will continue to exist. You figure, now that South Africa has returned to the Stone Age, more slaughter is the answer. In 20+ years, under the new regime, South Africa has regressed , from the most modern - most productive - wealthiest country in the recorded history of the continent, to little more than a festering cesspool. All the slaughter being carried out will do nothing more than steel the already existing hatreds. What did Gandhi say: "an eye for an eye, until the whole world is blind".

 

Oh yeah; and it's very true that African kings - chiefs did sell their own people to Arab slavers; and slavery continues to exist in Africa & the Middle East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...