Jump to content
eclectic skeptic

McCain: Rand Paul Is Wrong

Recommended Posts

John McCain: Rand Paul Already Proved Wrong On Terrorism By Boston Bombings

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/09/john-mccain-rand-paul-terrorism_n_3411659.html



WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday suggested that Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has lost his credibility in fighting global terrorism.

McCain argued on CNN's "State of the Union" that the government's vast surveillance program is not "necessarily wrong" because it operates under court oversight. Paul, who appeared on "Fox News Sunday," has taken the opposite position, calling the government's phone records monitoring program an "extraordinary invasion of privacy."

Asked to square the two positions by CNN host Candy Crowley, McCain said that Paul was wrong about the terrorism threat in the days before the Boston Marathon bombings. "Just prior to the Boston bombing, he said the battlefield was no longer in America," McCain told Crowley.



WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday suggested that Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has lost his credibility in fighting global terrorism.

McCain argued on CNN's "State of the Union" that the government's vast surveillance program is not "necessarily wrong" because it operates under court oversight. Paul, who appeared on "Fox News Sunday," has taken the opposite position, calling the government's phone records monitoring program an "extraordinary invasion of privacy."

Asked to square the two positions by CNN host Candy Crowley, McCain said that Paul was wrong about the terrorism threat in the days before the Boston Marathon bombings. "Just prior to the Boston bombing, he said the battlefield was no longer in America," McCain told Crowley.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McCain is way overdue to check out the nearest pasture.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McCain is way overdue to check out the nearest pasture.......

 

because whenever he makes sense and is right, he's too old.

Whenever you agree with him, it's just peachy fine.

 

mccain wants to be hillarys running mate in 2016

 

Do you have cable in Montana...or still using rabbit ears?

 

ok, whoopeeedoodaday.

 

The typical Hick debating skill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. McCain. Thank you for your service. Now get up, get out, and go home and enjoy your retirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. McCain. Thank you for your service. Now get up, get out, and go home and enjoy your retirement.

 

You hate it when one of your own is dead right and goes against Fox news talking points.

 

McCain argued on CNN's "State of the Union" that the government's vast surveillance program is not "necessarily wrong" because it operates under court oversight.

That would be correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

because whenever he makes sense and is right, he's too old.

Whenever you agree with him, it's just peachy fine.

 

 

Actually I don't ever remember agreeing with him. I know I didn't vote for him,

in Arizona nor in the presidential race.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Actually I don't ever remember agreeing with him. I know I didn't vote for him,

in Arizona nor in the presidential race.

 

 

So you voted for the winner. was that a first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McCain said that Paul was wrong about the terrorism threat in the days before the Boston Marathon bombings. "Just prior to the Boston bombing, he said the battlefield was no longer in America,"

 

Paul is wrong...as are all the wingnuts.



Politico was right; 52% of republican statements are lies. Believing the pale face from Kentucky will never happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So you voted for the winner. was that a first?

Ok....my mistake. I didn't vote for him in the primary.

But I am one to always perform my civic duty..... so I held my nose in the general.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John McCain: Rand Paul Already Proved Wrong On Terrorism By Boston Bombings

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/09/john-mccain-rand-paul-terrorism_n_3411659.html

 

WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday suggested that Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has lost his credibility in fighting global terrorism.

McCain argued on CNN's "State of the Union" that the government's vast surveillance program is not "necessarily wrong" because it operates under court oversight. Paul, who appeared on "Fox News Sunday," has taken the opposite position, calling the government's phone records monitoring program an "extraordinary invasion of privacy."

Asked to square the two positions by CNN host Candy Crowley, McCain said that Paul was wrong about the terrorism threat in the days before the Boston Marathon bombings. "Just prior to the Boston bombing, he said the battlefield was no longer in America," McCain told Crowley.

 

WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday suggested that Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has lost his credibility in fighting global terrorism.

McCain argued on CNN's "State of the Union" that the government's vast surveillance program is not "necessarily wrong" because it operates under court oversight. Paul, who appeared on "Fox News Sunday," has taken the opposite position, calling the government's phone records monitoring program an "extraordinary invasion of privacy."

Asked to square the two positions by CNN host Candy Crowley, McCain said that Paul was wrong about the terrorism threat in the days before the Boston Marathon bombings. "Just prior to the Boston bombing, he said the battlefield was no longer in America," McCain told Crowley.

McCain lost any credibility in 2008 when he couldn't beat Obama. Which really doesn't say mush because Hillary didn't beat him either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McCain lost any credibility in 2008 when he couldn't beat Obama. Which really doesn't say mush because Hillary didn't beat him either.

 

So losing an election makes one lose credibility?

That's just bizarre thinking.

Look up the word credibility in the dictionary. But thanks for writing two complete sentences that we can all read for the very first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am shocked and befuddled. Politicians disagreeing about something. Is the world coming to an end????

 

Also anything on Huffington Post must be absolutely true and free from bias.

 

Do you want to buy a waterfront home in Sarasota. I have a friend that is willing to sell his 3 story house on the Gulf at a low price. The house was featured in a Steven King novel and has been written up in the papers a few times. All of this is absolutely true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am shocked and befuddled. Politicians disagreeing about something. Is the world coming to an end????

Who do you think you're fooling? Democrats disagree with one another. It's expected. But when a Republican disagrees with Tea Party views, he is an instant outcast. The Republican Party does not allow disagreement.

 

You know this. Nice try pretending it's all business as usual, because it's not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So losing an election makes one lose credibility?

That's just bizarre thinking.

Look up the word credibility in the dictionary. But thanks for writing two complete sentences that we can all read for the very first time.

How he lost it, not just because he lost. Seems you look at things, I look beyond the reflecting surface. Details are never duplicated unless written about in theory or theology where once written the idea can never alter from the original concept as a take it or leave it policy.

 

Kind of like social identity, because one is always the lifetime changing their mind, or following orders without question reciting everything they were trained to repeat since birth.

 

What is the one journey every lifetime makes equally regardless species and within the homo sapien species regardless societal evolutions trademarks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How he lost it, not just because he lost. Seems you look at things, I look beyond the reflecting surface. Details are never duplicated unless written about in theory or theology where once written the idea can never alter from the original concept as a take it or leave it policy.

 

Kind of like social identity, because one is always the lifetime changing their mind, or following orders without question reciting everything they were trained to repeat since birth.

 

What is the one journey every lifetime makes equally regardless species and within the homo sapien species regardless societal evolutions trademarks?

 

There you go...back to your gibberish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that McCain is coming to the end of his service it is nice to see him becoming honest again, John welcome back to the human race

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am shocked and befuddled. Politicians disagreeing about something. Is the world coming to an end????

 

You haven't noticed that republicans vote and agree in lockstep 99% of the time. they have no other choice, or they'll be railroaded out of the party,....if they don't. Mccain is too old to care about that.

 

Also anything on Huffington Post must be absolutely true and free from bias.

 

Huffpo uses our two best new wire services: The AP and Reuters.

You didn't know this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There you go...back to your gibberish.

How is speaking in physical absolutes gobbledegook and ruling in metaphors is larger than life? it is obvious you have never had an honest look at yourself as an ancestor of ancestry limited to passing through a single atmosphere using the same periodic elements that never leave the planet's location without technology pushing it beyond the atmosphere.

 

Now explain the universal constant about energy not being created and destroyed as everything changes in shape and form as formed and shaped by ancestry passing through this moment captured between contracting results expanding details never duplicated genetically within one's skin or thoughout life within this atmosphere?

 

Use physical self evident absolutes, not what others believe in science or spirituality?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • By nuckin futz

    How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • By nuckin futz

    How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • By nuckin futz

    Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • By XavierOnassis

    diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...