Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's absolutely a sign of Obama's utter lack of integrity that he's promoting a shameless liar to become his National Security Adviser.

 

Susan Rice went on five tv shows to spread the blatant lie that the Benghazi attack was caused by demonstration, instigated by a video that no one ever watched.

 

The entire world including our enemies must be watching with stunned disbelief.

 

Never mind that it will enrage Repubs.

 

 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Never mind that it will enrage Repubs.

Republicans are enraged if Obama dares to take a breath ot 'their' air.

 

Good for him.

This appointment does not require Senate confirmation.

In your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republicans are enraged if Obama dares to take a breath ot 'their' air.

 

Good for him.

This appointment does not require Senate confirmation.

In your face.

 

There you have it, folks. Little Miss Marxist supports appointing an egregious liar to a top national security position.

 

One leftist liar in support of another leftist liar. :glare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's worse than that, RichClem

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/5/donilon-out-rice-obamas-national-security-adviser/

In a move sure to provoke congressional Republicans, President Obama is nominating embattled U.N. Ambassador Susan E. Rice Wednesday to serve as his national security adviser.

 

The White House also confirmed that Mr. Obama is nominating former aide Samantha Power, who once referred to Hillary Rodham Clinton as a monster in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary, to succeed Ms. Rice as U.N. ambassador.

So Rice, who proved herself either an gullible, ignorant tool or an outright liar is Obama's choice for National Security Adviser.

 

That's sounds like pure Obama.

 

And Samantha Power, a virulent anti-semite socialist is going to be our UN ambassador?

 

Is there no end to the duplicity and chutzpah of Obama?

 

In case you don't remember, Samantha Power called Hillary a "monster" during the 2008 Presidential campaign BECAUSE SHE WASN'T RADICAL ENOUGH.

 

She ended up having to resign from Obama's Campaign because of that.

 

Then she went to work for Socialist Soro's think tank, The International Crisis Group.

 

But once Obama was elected, he brought her back into the Whitehouse where, by all accounts, she was the prime architect of the Libya disaster.

 

Now when I call her a socialist, I mean hardcore socialist.

 

She has willingly associated herself with many hardcore socialists/communists, including her VERY RADICAL husband, Cass Sunstein.

 

Sunstein is so left as to be called FRINGE. For example, in a 2007 speech at Harvard, Sunstein called for banning ALL hunting in the United States. Sunstein has advocated everything from regulating the content of personal e-mail communications to forcing nonprofit groups to publish information on their websites that is counter to their beliefs. He's a major opponent of private gun ownership. In other words, he against both the First or Second Amendments. In 2007 he wrote a University of Chicago Law School paper titled "Climate Change Justice" in which he said that US wealth should be redistributed to poorer nations (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008958 ). He wrote "it is even possible that desirable redistribution is more likely to occur through climate change policy than otherwise, or to be accomplished more effectively through climate policy than through direct foreign aid". In other words, he's a sly and sneaky socialist.

 

In his The Second Bill of Rights book, Sunstein proposed a new bill of rights in which he advanced the notion that "rights" be granted for such items as (1) a job, (2) earning enough to provide adequate food, clothing and recreation, (3) a decent home, (5) medical care, (6) protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment, and (7) a good education. Now doesn't he sound like every other socialist/communist throughout history? And he's Power's spouse. Which tells you a lot about her. She's way LEFT of the American Mainstream.

 

What else qualifies Powers for UN ambassador? Perhaps Obama thinks it's her book "A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide," which implicated the United States in virtually every major genocide of the last century. Or maybe he liked the fact that back in 2002, Power told a University of California at Berkeley interviewer that America should invade Israel to prevent Israeli "human rights abuses." That's how radical her views are, folks. Here, you can listen to her yourself:

 

 

And Obama wants her to be our UN representative.

 

Sounds more like a reason for the US to leave the UN and kick Obama out of office. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's worse than that, RichClem

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/5/donilon-out-rice-obamas-national-security-adviser/

 

So Rice, who proved herself either an gullible, ignorant tool or an outright liar is Obama's choice for National Security Adviser.

 

That's sounds like pure Obama.

 

And Samantha Power, a virulent anti-semite socialist is going to be our UN ambassador?

 

Is there no end to the duplicity and chutzpah of Obama?

 

In case you don't remember, Samantha Power called Hillary a "monster" during the 2008 Presidential campaign BECAUSE SHE WASN'T RADICAL ENOUGH.

 

She ended up having to resign from Obama's Campaign because of that.

 

Then she went to work for Socialist Soro's think tank, The International Crisis Group.

 

But once Obama was elected, he brought her back into the Whitehouse where, by all accounts, she was the prime architect of the Libya disaster.

 

Now when I call her a socialist, I mean hardcore socialist.

 

She has willingly associated herself with many hardcore socialists/communists, including her VERY RADICAL husband, Cass Sunstein.

 

Sunstein is so left as to be called FRINGE. For example, in a 2007 speech at Harvard, Sunstein called for banning ALL hunting in the United States. Sunstein has advocated everything from regulating the content of personal e-mail communications to forcing nonprofit groups to publish information on their websites that is counter to their beliefs. He's a major opponent of private gun ownership. In other words, he against both the First or Second Amendments. In 2007 he wrote a University of Chicago Law School paper titled "Climate Change Justice" in which he said that US wealth should be redistributed to poorer nations (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008958 ). He wrote "it is even possible that desirable redistribution is more likely to occur through climate change policy than otherwise, or to be accomplished more effectively through climate policy than through direct foreign aid". In other words, he's a sly and sneaky socialist.

 

In his The Second Bill of Rights book, Sunstein proposed a new bill of rights in which he advanced the notion that "rights" be granted for such items as (1) a job, (2) earning enough to provide adequate food, clothing and recreation, (3) a decent home, (5) medical care, (6) protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment, and (7) a good education. Now doesn't he sound like every other socialist/communist throughout history? And he's Power's spouse. Which tells you a lot about her. She's way LEFT of the American Mainstream.

 

What else qualifies Powers for UN ambassador? Perhaps Obama thinks it's her book "A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide," which implicated the United States in virtually every major genocide of the last century. Or maybe he liked the fact that back in 2002, Power told a University of California at Berkeley interviewer that America should invade Israel to prevent Israeli "human rights abuses." That's how radical her views are, folks. Here, you can listen to her yourself:

 

 

And Obama wants her to be our UN representative.

 

Sounds more like a reason for the US to leave the UN and kick Obama out of office. :D

 

Yup, Obama has appointed many, many radical left wackjobs to important position.

 

But the same MSM that bleats in outrage when Repubs pass popular policies that are slightly to the right of center is dead silent about Obama's radical left appointees and his own leftist political philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There you have it, folks. Little Miss Marxist supports appointing an egregious liar to a top national security position.

 

One leftist liar in support of another leftist liar. :glare:

 

 

I guess David Petraeus is a leftist liar too.

Petraeus: Susan Rice/Obama Did NOT Lie, CIA Wanted Info On Terrorists Kept Secret

 

"Coffee Cup Democrat?" There's a well known credible source. :D

 

Then why did Petraeus's CIA put out an entirely different set of Talking Points that did call it a terror attack?

 

That did mention the groups behind it?

 

Why did Petraeus fight to maintain that?

 

Why did he call the final version "useless?"

 

Can't you ever get beyond Democrat Talking Point Lies and bulls***?

 

 

Mr. Grand Theft Auto and Suspected Arsonist/ Insurance Swindler

 

Now you're trying to smear Issa on the basis of almost nothing. What happened to that High Standard you always used to dishonestly defend Clinton; innocent until proven guilty?

 

You're nothing but a liar and dishonest smear artist for corrupt Democrats. :glare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samantha Power a anti-semite? Not exactly.

 

http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/short-decade-old-youtube-clip-likely-to-dog-power-confirmation-as-u-s-ambassador-to-un.premium-1.528003

 

A 2002 YouTube video that is less than 3-minutes long is likely to play a prominent role in any campaign launched by right-wing Republican andJewish groups against the appointment of Samantha Power as America’s next ambassador to the United Nations.

In the clip, which she has since disavowed, Power appears to refer to the pro-Israel lobby as “a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial support,” indicate hostility toward U.S. aid to Israel, and sound as if she supports an American-imposed solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that would be backed by a “meaningful military presence.” In the clip, she also appears to describe both Ariel Sharon and Yasser Arafat as “terribly irresponsible.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Why did you cut out most of my post?

 

Troll.

 

What cars did Issa steal? What happened to that High Standard you always used to dishonestly defend Clinton; innocent until proven guilty?

 

You're nothing but a liar and dishonest smear artist for corrupt Democrats. :glare:

 

Clinton was impeached, a hugely difficult thing to do, and would have been charged, yet you dishonestly defended him and still do.

 

Issa was never even charged, yet you discard the standard you bleated about regarding Clinton and smear him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Why did you cut out most of my post?

 

Troll.

 

What cars did Issa steal? What happened to that High Standard you always used to dishonestly defend Clinton; innocent until proven guilty?

 

You're nothing but a liar and dishonest smear artist for corrupt Democrats. :glare:

 

Clinton was impeached, a hugely difficult thing to do, and would have been charged, yet you dishonestly defended him and still do.

 

Issa was never even charged, yet you discard the standard you bleated about regarding Clinton and smear him.

HAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH DANCE TROLL... and learn the definition of that word little turd scum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, condi SLEEZ rice giving blow jobs to W and dick head cheney

while the WTC towers were falling,

or Susan Rice, par excellence? Wow, tough choice there.

 

If I were obama, from here on out, I would look for ways to piss off republicans.

Hell, I would even hold contests and seek suggestions from other great Americans

on how to drive crazy the right wing moron nuts, take away their guns, close

their phony christian churches and turn them into mosques, target republican

tax evaders like romney, beef up the IRS to go after repukes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"Coffee Cup Democrat?" There's a well known credible source. :D

 

How about this source Puss?

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has admitted that the CIA and intelligence community approved U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice's talking points before she made her much-derided Sept. 16 appearance on several Sunday news shows to discuss the attacks in Benghazi.

King, one of the most outspoken critics of the Obama administration's response to the attack, came to his conclusion following testimony from former CIA Director David Petraeus.

 

GOP Rep Admits CIA Approved U.N. Ambassadors Talking Points On Libya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you lie for Obama and do his bidding...You shall be rewarded! The devil incarnate..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


Let's see, condi SLEEZ rice giving blow jobs to W and dick head cheney

while the WTC towers were falling,

or Susan Rice, par excellence? Wow, tough choice there.

 

If I were obama, from here on out, I would look for ways to piss off republicans.

Hell, I would even hold contests and seek suggestions from other great Americans

on how to drive crazy the right wing moron nuts, take away their guns, close

their phony christian churches and turn them into mosques, target republican

tax evaders like romney, beef up the IRS to go after repukes.

 

 

 

 

That's because your a stupid dumb shit lunatic....you should really be committed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samantha Power a anti-semite? Not exactly.

 

It's remarkable how often TR comes to the defense of hardcore socialists and liars.

 

And now he wants to defend an anti-semite as well.

 

Sorry TR, but someone who in 2002 said we should invade Israel doesn't have the best interests of either Israel or Jews at heart.

 

You can try to spin that any way you want, but that's the truth.

 

And the behavior of the Obama regime towards Israel, which is clearly been guided by her advice, has proven it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's remarkable how often TR comes to the defense of hardcore socialists and liars.

 

And now he wants to defend an anti-semite as well.

 

Sorry TR, but someone who in 2002 said we should invade Israel doesn't have the best interests of either Israel or Jews at heart.

 

You can try to spin that any way you want, but that's the truth.

 

And the behavior of the Obama regime towards Israel, which is clearly been guided by her advice, has proven it.

 

 

You ignored the fact that she denounced those comments. And frankly, I'm glad we have a president who's standing up to Israel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about this source Puss?

 

 

As I have reported previously through sources, yes, Petraeus finally caved to demands of Obama officials. Given that he was vulnerable to blackmail, I'm hardly surprised.

 

You typically used an extremely truncated quote from Peter King, who I'll bet 99:1 said a lot more than that.

 

Why did you cut out the rest of my post?

 

 

 

Why did Petraeus's CIA put out an entirely different set of Talking Points that did call it a terror attack?

 

That did mention the groups behind it?

 

Why did Petraeus fight to maintain that?

 

Why did he call the final version "useless?"

 

Can't you ever get beyond Democrat Talking Point Lies and bulls***?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republicans are enraged if Obama dares to take a breath ot 'their' air.

 

Good for him.

This appointment does not require Senate confirmation.

In your face.

A childish act by this President, and a childish response from you Misty.

It's sad we don't expect more from our elected leaders than this type of petty "in your face" actions.

 

Once more we see an example of liberals rewarding failure.

 

You ignored the fact that she denounced those comments. And frankly, I'm glad we have a president who's standing up to Israel.

 

 

Yes, exposing the defense secrets of an ally is exactly what we should expect from this Administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...