William1444 Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 The supreme court judges like scalia are a bunch of morons if they are slicing and dicing the Constitution to make it say whatever the republican activist judges want it to say instead of the explicit words in the document. Repukes are too lazy and too corrupt with their LIES to go through the effort to change the Constitution as provided by law. So, like the cat in Alice in Wonderland, they say the Constitution means whatever they want it to mean. LIke the Fourth Amendment or the Second Amendment, they subdivide the text into parts instead of construing the paragraph in one connotation. The Fourth Amendment says: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. For two hundred years, that Amendment meant that to search and seize anything, police and govt had to get a warrant from a judge. Now, the azzhole republicans like scalia and a yale professor are saying that warrants are not necessary because they divide the Amendment into two parts. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, (this part they say is nice and the only thing necessary is to decide whether the search or seizure is reasonable or not, but it doesn't relate to the second part, IE:) and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (The morons leave this hanging out there instead of comprehending the explicit wording to relate, as it did for two hundred years, that warrants are necessary as well as the search or seizure must be reasonable.) The same with the second amendment, scalia can not comprehend that to keep and bear arms, they have to be within the context of a person being in the militia, IE, the National Guard. republicans have done more to fugg up the US Constitution in one decade than in the previous two hundred years, IE: cheney used torture, bush, cheney, and republicans started two wars with NO declaration of war, republicans give tax dollars to the jews in Palestine and to their faith based religions, republicans enacted searches and sexual assaults in airports and govt buildings. The harm done by republicans is irreversible. And you azzholes who voted for any republican are responsible for trashing the US Constitution, just like you are responsible for killing every soldier killed by bush, cheney, and you repukes in their wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8tEdge Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Hey DUMBASS? Scalia ruled AGAINST it you f_cking moron...... :lol: :lol: :lol: http://wtkr.com/2013/06/03/supreme-court-rules-police-can-collect-dna-from-suspects-without-obtaining-warrant/ In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia said the majority’s reasoning established a “terrifying principle.” “The court’s opinion barely mentions the crucial fact about this case: the search here was entirely suspicionless. The police had no reason to believe King’s DNA would link him to any crime.” Scalia added the state law “manages to burden uniquely the sole group for whom the Fourth Amendment’s protections ought to be most jealously guarded: people who are innocent of the state’s accusations,” describing of the legal concept of innocent until proven guilty. But guess who DOES support it!!!!!! Yep Obama!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: The Obama administration has signaled its support. Back to the drawing board RETARD..... :lol: :lol: :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8tEdge Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Man... that's going to leave a mark..... :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William1444 Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 Gee, dumbazzes, the repukes are the ones who have said it is okay to search people at airports and govt buildings without any warrants and without any suspicions nor reasonable cause to believe a crime has been committed. Like DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. repukes have said it is okay for a cop to stop and sexually assault a woman without cause and then, arrest her in front of her young children with NO cause. simply because she was not wearing a seatbelt, instead of just giving her a ticket. repukes are all about sexual assaulting women. and repukes are the morons who have upheld all of the other constitutional violations by republicans during the bush years as mentioned in the OP, azzholes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 William has his ass handed him, and all he can do is say "Like DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH", and relaunch his usual "I hate Republicans" rant. Amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indago Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 But guess who DOES support it!!!!!! Yep Obama!!!!!! "Grovel, my minions!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William1444 Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 what a bunch of azzhole neo cons on this site. All they can do is post insults and blame obama instead of addressing the substantive issues and contacting azzhole republican congressmen to demand republican judges be impeached for perjury in swearing to uphold the Constitution and then, breaching the Constitution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 what a bunch of azzhole neo cons on this site. All they can do is post insults and blame obama instead of addressing the substantive issues and contacting azzhole republican congressmen to demand republican judges be impeached for perjury in swearing to uphold the Constitution and then, breaching the Constitution. Yes, it's our fault you were blaming the wrong guy, and had your stupidity shoved up your ass. If you had any dignity, you'd walk way, but we all know you can't do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8tEdge Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 I Almost forgot about this thread....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William1444 Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 Too bad that neo cons can not address the substantive issues that repukes are morons about the US Constitution as has been proven every day since bush took office and since repukes were appointing federal republican stooges to judgships. Just like in the republican manufactured scandals lately and the clinton impeachment, repukes will do anything to LIE, obfuscate, spin, confuse their stupid, mutha fugging voters, get them stirred up on guns, religions, gays while rich repukes pick the pockets of the middle class. Come on azzholes, are you really that stupid or do you get paid a penny a post for posting insults and stupidity?????. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyFenix Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 I told him to try and find another hobby but I guess in his old age all he has is this site. Poor poor bastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.