Jump to content

Its Not Looking Good For Bengazi Conspiracy Theorist.


Recommended Posts

Bush's lies caused the death of 5,000 American soldiers, wounding of 65,000 and the permanent disability of 300,000 American soldiers.

 

.... And Bush caused the death of over 1 million Iraqi women and children.

 

And we have nothing to show for it except a $4 trillion bill.

 

Nothing ...

 

:(

 

It's just so cute when the trolls play together. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

So now the cons acknowledge that Obama called it an act of terror on sept 12, but not until minute 4 of his speech, so that doesn't count. Un frickin believable. You can't make up that kind of stupid.

So a general sense to you is what? LMAO!!!   Not with a smelly piece of chit like you dumbass!!! Take a bath & we might think about it.

And teachers on the whole...don't want them either. More likely if kids knew there were guns in the school...they'd find a way to get them....someway...somehow. We'd see the OK Corral with kids shoo

that why the next day he said it was a terrorist attack. romney even got it wrong in the debates. proceed governor.

 

Never said it. obama characterized the attack several ways (I didn't count) until he got to 4:19 in the clip when he said "no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation"...never once labeling the attack in Benghazi anything more than 'senseless violence.'

 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/09/12/president-obama-discusses-attack-benghazi-libya

Link to post
Share on other sites

Laffin! regel once again interprets standard english like a martian. The guy lives in his own fantasy world.

 

Again, you don't dispute a word of what I said. obama never described the attack as a terrorist attack but he did describe it multiple times as a 'senseless act of violence.' He never called the attackers an organized terrorist group, either, but he knew they were. As a matter of fact, his administration spiked any reference and instead, made up a story about a video.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of David Corn's ability to detect lies …

http://freebeacon.com/corn-carney-got-caught-saying-something-that-wasnt-completely-true/

MSNBC contributor David Corn admitted that the reason White House Press Secretary Jay Carney’s Benghazi press briefing was so tense was “he got caught saying something that wasn’t completely true” Friday on MSNBC.

Despite Carney’s untruth, Corn said that did not necessarily amount to lying.

American Enterprise Institute’s Danielle Pletka reacted incredulously, suggesting Corn should try that reasoning on his children:

DAVID CORN: Yeah, Jay Carney has got caught saying something that wasn’t completely true.

DANIELLE PLETKA: That’s called a lie, David.

DAVID CORN: We in Washington — everything you say that’s not true may not be a lie, but if you want to accept that premise, I’ll happily accuse you of lying when you get things wrong.

DANIELLE PLETKA: Okay. I’ll let you try that out on your kids.

 


For those interested, here's what Carney said:

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/05/benghazi-not-watergate-white-house

On November 28, White House spokesman Jay Carney said, "Those talking points originated from the intelligence community. They reflect the IC's best assessments of what they thought had happened. The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two institutions were changing the word 'consulate' to 'diplomatic facility because 'consulate' was inaccurate."

Assuming the talking points revisions released by ABC News are accurate—and the White House has not challenged them—Carney's statement was not correct. The State Department did far more than change one word, and it did so in a process involving White House aides. So, White House critics can argue, Carney put out bad information and did not acknowledge that State had massaged the talking points to protect itself from inconvenient questions.


That's clear enough. Either Carney lied or Carney was told a lie.


If the latter, who told him the lie? We want to know.

If he himself lied, then Corn's statement is either dishonest or that of idiot who doesn't know the definition of lying.

 

In either case, consider that in regards to his accusations that Bush lied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the liberal defense. There were attacks under Bush so these 4 dead do not matter. The problem isn't the attack. The problem is the lack of response and cover-up and lying after. The lengths you liberals will go to not even address the issue at hand is amazing.

QFT

Link to post
Share on other sites
The usual troll bulls*** and lies.

 

There's nothing to Benghazi! If a troll says so, it must be true!

 

Uh oh.

 

 

 

 

PRESS CORPS TURNS ON BENGHAZI...

 

NEWYORKER: 'Now there is something to it'...

 

DOWD: 'It's not true, it's not true, it's not true -- it's old news'...

 

KLEIN: Obama 'on the same page as Richard Nixon'...

http://drudgereport.com/

 

 

At least Mo Dowd's still in Full Coverup Mode. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now the cons acknowledge that Obama called it an act of terror on sept 12, but not until minute 4 of his speech, so that doesn't count. Un frickin believable. You can't make up that kind of stupid.

 

He didn't call it an act of terror. He used the term in a general sense.

 

Why did he let his UN Ambassador go on 5 tv shows lying that it was a demonstration caused by a Youtube video?

 

Why were so many lies told for so many months?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now the cons acknowledge that Obama called it an act of terror on sept 12, but not until minute 4 of his speech, so that doesn't count. Un frickin believable. You can't make up that kind of stupid.

Obama admitted on 60 Minutes the day after this speech that he purposely "went out of his way" to avoid calling this terrorism.

Are you lying, or was Obama?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now the cons acknowledge that Obama called it an act of terror on sept 12, but not until minute 4 of his speech, so that doesn't count. Un frickin believable. You can't make up that kind of stupid.

 

No. I acknowledge what I said, that he said "no acts of terror will never shake the resolve of this great nation." Had he said 'this act of terror will never...' - your point would be made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Curveball" did the job for Bush ... and provided the best faked intelligence Bush asked for.

 

Bush's lies and faked intelligence caused the death of 5,000 American soldiers, wounding of 65,000 and the permanent disability of 300,000 American soldiers.

 

.... and caused the death of over 1 million Iraqi women and children.

 

And we have nothing to show for it except a $4 trillion bill.

 

Nothing ....

 

Where is "Curveball" now when Republicans need him so badly?

 

 

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

He didn't call it an act of terror. He used the term in a general sense.

 

Why did he let his UN Ambassador go on 5 tv shows lying that it was a demonstration caused by a Youtube video?

 

Why were so many lies told for so many months?

The speach in the Rosegarden was to address the Benghazi attack and the Benghazi attack alone.

 

What the f**k did you think he was talking about, Pearl frickin Harbour?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's frustrating for the GOP 'war nuts' like Graham and McCain, that Obama doesn't shoot from the hip first, and ask questions later

 

They ask "how can American run the world this way?

 

This habit of asking questions first - is ruining our image as the toughest kids on the block that Cheney and Rumsfeld worked so hard to polish.

 

 

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The speach in the Rosegarden was to address the Benghazi attack and the Benghazi attack alone.

 

What the f**k did you think he was talking about, Pearl frickin Harbour?

Right, an "act of terror"; so it's conceivable the attack was carried out by a pack of geriatrics who slipped out of some nursing home, right? I would like you to answer this simple question: Have you ever heard Obama utter the words: Islamic - Muslim Terrorists, Islamic - Muslim Radicals, Islamic - Muslim Extremists? EVER? We are and have been at war with Islam for decades. Your telling me , the only person on the face of the planet who doesn't know , is the president of the USA? The more - longer he deliberately ignores the in stone documented facts & continues to lie at every turn, the less credible he becomes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, an "act of terror"; so it's conceivable the attack was carried out by a pack of geriatrics who slipped out of some nursing home, right? I would like you to answer this simple question: Have you ever heard Obama utter the words: Islamic - Muslim Terrorists, Islamic - Muslim Radicals, Islamic - Muslim Extremists? EVER? We are and have been at war with Islam for decades. Your telling me , the only person on the face of the planet who doesn't know , is the president of the USA? The more - longer he deliberately ignores the in stone documented facts & continues to lie at every turn, the less credible he becomes.

Hey dumb f**k. Suppose you tell us who perpetrated the attack. Since the FBI, the CIA and Libyan officials can't.

 

You know who those 3 suspects the FBI released photos on are, or who they work for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What lies and fake intelligence....where??

 

It's a waste of time to try and engage PA.

 

He's no different that dano bivens in that regard.

 

So just point out when he specifically lies and leave it at that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's a waste of time to try and engage PA.

 

He's no different that dano bivens in that regard.

 

So just point out when he specifically lies and leave it at that.

 

Is there a single liberal on the board who's worth engaging? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

He didn't call it an act of terror. He used the term in a general sense.

 

So a general sense to you is what? LMAO!!!

 

 

Is there a single liberal on the board who's worth engaging? :D

Not with a smelly piece of chit like you dumbass!!! Take a bath & we might think about it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey dumb f**k. Suppose you tell us who perpetrated the attack. Since the FBI, the CIA and Libyan officials can't.

 

You know who those 3 suspects the FBI released photos on are, or who they work for?

And who butt fked Stevens? Thats a sex crime. How come the GOP didn't even bother looking at this crime? How come they didn't tell us that it was Hicks failure to protect Benghazi with more security, and Stevens failure to insure the turnstile was locked on the 911 anniversery that caused his own demise to begin with?? HOW COME CONS!!!!?????? Where is McCain & Issa when we need him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And who butt fked Stevens? Thats a sex crime. How come the GOP didn't even bother looking at this crime? How come they didn't tell us that it was Hicks failure to protect Benghazi with more security, and Stevens failure to insure the turnstile was locked on the 911 anniversery that caused his own demise to begin with?? HOW COME CONS!!!!?????? Where is McCain & Issa when we need him?

Stevens was gay, how do you know he didn't ask for it?

 

 

You know who those 3 suspects the FBI released photos on are, or who they work for?

The government had 2 of them in custody, one in Libya and one in Yemen. We weren't allow to talk to either of them, and they've both been set free.

 

Besides, the FBI couldn't find their asses in the dark with both hands. They couldn't identify the Marathon bombers even though they had them on the terror watch list and had interviewed them.

 

 

The speach in the Rosegarden was to address the Benghazi attack and the Benghazi attack alone.

 

What the f**k did you think he was talking about, Pearl frickin Harbour?

Let me re-quote the President since you seem unable to read or listen to him talk:

Obama admitted on 60 Minutes the day after this speech that he purposely "went out of his way" to avoid calling this terrorism.

Are you lying, or was Obama?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...