Jump to content
BeAChooser

A Challenge To Cant Decide

Recommended Posts

What communist policy has Obama signed in to law?

 

Scott Walker wanted to implement Communist policy and y'll are loving him for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps the reason that Cant Decide (and LF's other liberals or whatever they like to call themselves) won't accept my Challenge is the knowledge that I could easily offer a name a day till the election and they can't.

 

That certainly would intimidate if I were in their shoes. :D

 

And speaking of names, why don't I add the name William Ayers to my list. It's not like CD or LF's other Obama sycophants don't already know he'll be on my list. So call it practice for if I have to get serious about the challenge. :)

 

Now I wonder if they'll try to argue he's not a socialist/communist or that he's not been in Obama's inner circle?

 

Maybe CD has an unnamed friend of Ayers that he'd like to claim knows I'm wrong in claiming Ayers is a socialist or communist or in claiming Ayers and Obama have a long, intimate history together? :P

 

In any case, here goes ...

 

William Ayers is a hardcore far left radical and anarchist. He was a member of the SDS (a very radical organization filled with self-proclaimed socialists and communists) and a founder of the Weatherman Underground (an even more radical group). Between 1970 and 1974, the Weatherman took credit for 12 bombings (others are suspected), including one at the United States Capitol and another at the Pentagon. In April of 2002, Ayers said "I considered myself partly an anarchist then and I consider myself partly an anarchist now. I mean I'm as much an anarchist as I am a Marxist which is to say I find a lot of the ideas in anarchism appealing." He sounds as confused as he did back then.

 

Now he calls himself a "small c" communist, but back then the SDS and Weatherman Underground openly proclaimed their goal was world Communism (and not the "small c" variety). Back then Ayers wrote a manifesto titled "Prairie Fire" (http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/ ) in which he said "We are a guerrilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years." He wrote "We need a revolutionary communist party in order to lead the struggle, give coherence and direction to the fight, seize power and build the new society." In 2001 he summed up the Weatherman philosophy for a friendly journalist as follows "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents—that's where it's really at." So it sounds like he was pretty radical back then and very much a "big C" communist.

 

But Obama's and Ayers' defenders say he's changed since then. Now he is just a simple professor at a university doing good deeds for America. But has he really changed?

 

What if I told you Ayers still openly calls for the end of capitalism and American imperialism ... which just happen to be the same things the "big C" communists wanted?

 

What if I told you Ayers had "Prairie Fire" republished as a book in 2006, coinciding with the start of Obama's run for President? Was he just an opportunist or is he still pushing his philosophy on a new generation?

 

What if I told you that he told the press in a 2001 interview that "I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough” (http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/index.php?cp=2&si=1 ).

 

What if I told you that when asked in that same interview (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25166 ) if he would set more bombs today, his response was, "I don't want to discount the possibility"?

 

What if I told you in March of 2012, Ayers spoke to a group of Occupiers and said “I Get Up Every Morning And Think… Today I’m Going To End Capitalism” (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2d4_1333223471 )?

 

Comments like those, and many others, lead me to believe that Ayers hasn't really changed.

 

I think, like Van Jones, he has merely changed his spots … changed the tactics he is using to see the same radical ends become reality. Disguising himself to make himself more presentable to a gullible public.

 

After his teacher girlfriend, Diana Oughton, in the Weather Underground died (while making a bomb to kill soldiers at a party, which is what put Ayers and rest of the WU on the run), he decided to become an *educator* himself. That can be honorable profession … but I think the thought of teaching radicalism and communist notions to the children of the very parents he advocated killing was his idea of the ultimate joke.

 

So, with degrees in hand, he began working as chair of the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools (ABCs), a lobbying group started by his dad that was pushing for the reform of Chicago schools … in leftist ways, of course. That effort succeeded so that in 1994, he was put in charge of organizing and running a 5 year, 100-150 million dollar program to reform education in Chicago, called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC). It was an effort that focused on teaching "social justice" in the classroom.

 

Now long before Glen Beck entered the TV world, the "social justice" philosophy was being identified for what it is … a code word for communism. Long before Beck got his Fox News show, Ayers and his associates were promoting "social justice" in our schools. It has it's foundations in the writings of Brazilian Marxist/socialist, Paolo Freire. Read these articles to learn more Ayers and others have used the concept to make communist notions appealing to our children: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/guides/Z-Social%20Justice-Code%20for%20Communism.htm "Social Justice: Code for Communism" and http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/bill_ayers_and_the_subversion.html "Bill Ayers and the Subversion of Education".

 

A name that will eventually be added to my list is Mike Klonksy. His father was a communist who was convicted in the 1950s of advocating the forcible overthrow of the United States government. Well, like father, like son. Mike was and is a marxist who was one of the few allowed to visit Red China before it opened it's doors to the world. That's how hardcore he was. Well during the Chicago Anneburg Challenge, Klonsky was awarded a big grant to teach Chicago's children about "social justice". It was and still is his number one issue. In fact, Klonsky had a webpage on Obama's Presidential campaign website devoted primarily to "social justice". And the Obama's must has agreed that was inportant since it was one of the few webpages that Michelle Obama's web page linked. Only when Klonsky's communist affiliations were finally noticed by conservatives did his webpage and Michelle's link to it disappear.

 

Now are you folks still not convinced about Ayers use of "social justice" being a watch word for communism? Well, here's how Van Jones defined the term:

 

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/01/van-jones-defin.html

 

Here is how you know if you live in a society where there is social justice.

 

Would you be willing to take your life, write it on a card, throw it in a big pot with everybody else, reach in at random and pull out another life with total confidence that it would be a good life?

Now if that isn't the ideology espoused by communists, what is?

 

Or why don't I just quote a communist who isn't in Obama's inner circle to help you understand the relationship between the "social justice" and communism:

 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-07-11-castro-address_N.htm

 

7/11/2008

 

HAVANA (AP) — President Raul Castro warned Cubans on Friday to prepare for a "realistic" brand of communism that is economically viable and does away with excessive state subsidies designed to promote equality on the island.

 

… snip ...

 

"Socialism means social justice and equality, but equality of rights, of opportunities, not of income," the 77-year-old president said in a speech that was taped and later aired on national television. "Equality is not egalitarianism."

Or how about this from the National Association of Scholars (NAS):

 

http://209.123.244.94/polArticles.cfm?Keyword_Desc=The%20Scandal%20of%20Social%20Work%20Education

 

Social justice, NAS noted, is generally interpreted as advocacy of more egalitarian access to income through state-sponsored redistribution.

Gee, isn't that what socialists and communists want … state-sponsored redistribution of income? ;)

 

Why even the Communist Party USA lists "social justice" as it's goal:

 

http://www.cpusa.org/article/static/511/

 

The Communist Party USA is an organization of revolutionaries working to bring about social change in a conscious, progressive direction. ... snip ... We see it as our job to use all available methods and means to fight for peace, democracy, economic and social justice, and other progressive causes.

Does anyone really believe the Communist party is interested in "peace" or "democracy". So what's left in what they fight for but the pursuit of economic and "social justice". Isn't that just saying that "social justice" is a code word for Communism?

 

Satisfied?

 

Now in addition to "social justice", Ayers was explicit about the need to teach children that America is racist and militaristic, and that the capitalist system is unfair and oppressive. Again, these were/are all themes of "big C" Communists.

 

Indeed it wasn't long ago (2006) that Ayers attended an education forum in Venezuala and stood on a stage before a large crowd with communist dictator Hugo Chavez by his side. He gave a rousing speech in which he said he supported “the profound educational reforms under way here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chávez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution. . . . I look forward to seeing how you continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane.” Ayers concluded his speech by raising his fist and shouting “Viva Presidente Chávez! Viva la Revolucion Bolivariana! Hasta la Victoria Siempre!”

 

And don't underestimate Ayers' influence in the education area in general. He wasn't just a professor teaching small groups in his classes. He became the Vice President of Curriculum Studies for the American Education Research Association (AERA) … the nation's leading School of Education professional association. It's an organization that pushes the "social justice" agenda in it's publications. Ayers has written book after book pushing the concept to teachers, and through them vast numbers of our children.

 

Here's a good article that shows the sort of impact that the social justice movement, via Ayers ("the pedagogy’s best known popularizer" as it describes him), has had on school curriculums around the country ...

 

http://ednews.org/articles/30304/1/The-Social-Justice-doctrine-preached-by-radical-educators-such-as-William-Ayers-has-infiltrated-North-Carolinas-flagship-education-school/Page1.html

 

And if you don't like that source, then try this ... from the Voice of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA. In Ayers' own words:

 

http://rwor.org/a/063/ayers-en.html

 

That’s one of the things that’s actually annoyed me for about 40 years of being a progressive educator: the separation of the concept of progressive education from the concept of politics and political change. You can’t separate them … snip … John Dewey was one of the brilliant, brilliant writers about what democratic education would look like and was himself an independent socialist. But he never resolved a central contradiction in our work, the contradiction between trying to change the school and being embedded in society that has the exact opposite values culturally and politically and socially from the values you’re trying to build in a classroom.

Did you folks get that? He just said schools are embedded in a society that has "the exact opposite values culturally and politically and socially from the values" people like him are "trying to build in a classroom." And what is the exact opposite of a competitive, free market, liberty-loving, capitalist society like ours? A communist one, that's what. Ayers has been trying to build the values of a communist society in our children's classrooms.

 

So considering all the above, I think I'm safe in concluding that William Ayers was and is a hardcore socialist and communist … and a dangerous one at that. Any of you liberals (or your friends who know Ayers personally) want to disagree?

 

If not, then I'm only left with the task of proving that he and Obama have had a close relationship … one that is inner circle as I defined it in my Challenge to you liberals.

 

I should start by noting the Obama Presidential campaign denied any close ties between Obama and Bill Ayers. During the Philadelphia Democratic Primary debate, George Stephanopoulos asked Obama to explain his relationship to Ayers and all Obama would say is:

 

This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.

He was just "some guy in the neighborhood." But that claim quickly fell apart when the campaign had to admit that they first met in late 1995 … when Ayers and his terrorist wife, Bernardine Dohrn, hosted, in their own home, a campaign event in support of Obama’s campaign for the Illinois State Senate … i.e., his first political office. Here's a CBSNews story (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/20/politics/politico/main4029480.shtml ) stating that "Obama first met Ayers in 1995, during Obama's first state Senate campaign, and the two met with a small group of local liberal activists at Ayers' house."

 

The dishonesty in both Obama's disclaimer and the reporting by the mainstream media is stunning. First, the group that gathered in the home of the Ayers' wasn't just a group of "liberal activists". They were hardcore socialists and communists. The extreme left. One of those who was present was Dr. Quentin Young, an admitted Communist. And he is on record saying Obama and Ayers were "friends". Another was Alice Palmer. Nine years before she joined Obama in the Ayers' home, Palmer was the only African-American journalist to travel to the Soviet Union to attend the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. After that visit, she openly praised the Soviet Union in an article that she wrote. Yet another attendee was Maria Warren. She's blogged that she thought Obama was "too conservative". Care to guess her politics? Hint: she goes by "red rabbit" on her blog. ;)

 

But an even more glaring dishonesty is that Obama and Ayers' history goes back to when Obama was still in college at Columbia University ... in the early 1980s. According to Allen Hulton, the letter carrier who delivered mail to the Ayers’ home at that time, Obama visited the home of Ayer's parents back then (http://02ce1ab.netsolhost.com/KingHarvest/?p=1245 ). Hulton has stated under oathhttp://www.wnd.com/files/2012/03/HultonDocumentsREDACTED.pdf … that he met Obama outside the Ayers' house and that Obama told him that he was there to thank the Ayers for supporting his education. He says that Mrs. Ayers told him that her family had been helping out a "foreign, black student.” A foreign student? Hmmm … but that's a topic for another thread.

 

Hulton also had an encounter with Tom Ayers (Bill's dad) that he said left him thinking the senior Ayers was a marxist himself. Gee, perhaps I should add Tom Ayers to my list? Nah, I won't need his name to win my Challenge. :)

 

In 1983, when Obama graduated from Columbia University, he moved to Chicago to head up the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a fledgling community organization modeled after similar groups started by Saul Alinsky (who was a socialist/communist, by the way). The DCP had secured a grant from the Woods Fund to finance the hiring of Obama.

 

Then, in 1988, in response to a summit on the poor quality of education in Chicago, Ayers' father founded the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools (ABC). Tom Ayers included Obama in the coalition as the DCP’s organizer, and made his son Obama's contact in ABC. Obviously, Obama began working with Bill Ayers much, much earlier than the Obama campaign and liberal mainstream media ever admitted to the public.

 

What better explanation for how, starting in 1994, Obama and Ayers ended up working side by side as co-chairs of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, after ABC succeeded in getting it funded?

 

Of course they knew one another before that 1995 campaign meeting in the home of the Bill Ayers. Now how many of you Obama sycophants can face this demonstrable fact?

 

If you can't, I say your belief in him is no less silly than the belief of 911 Truthers about what caused the collapse of the Twin Towers. :D

 

In fact, there is considerable evidence to suggest that in this same time frame Bill Ayers was involved in writing Obama's memoir Dreams From My Father. To see that evidence, read these: http://www.cashill.com/intellect_fraud/yavelow.htm , http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/breakthrough_on_the_authorship_1.html , http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/ayers_admits_writing_dreams_1.html , http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/09/andersen_claimstwo_sources_for.html , and http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/ayers_affirms_he_wrote_dreams.html .

 

In any case, from 1994 to 1999, Obama and Ayers, as co-chairs of CAC, made grants to all sorts of left-leaning educational organizations. A marxist, Mike Klonsky, was one of the biggest recipients of their largess. And as noted earlier, these were grants designed to contaminate our children with anti-capitalist and "social justice" (i.e., communist) notions.

 

Another sign of just how tight Ayers and Obama were is that in late 1995, Obama began(!) his political career by holding a campaign event in the Hyde Park home of Ayers and Dohrn. The Obama camp at least admitted this event occurred, but since then has tried to diminish it's importance to Obama. But I think one could fairly say that Ayers was *instrumental* in introducing Obama into the world of politics. Which would makes him … what? … inner circle?

 

After CAC, Obama and Ayers continued serving together on the board of directors of the Woods Fund into the early 2000's. While they did, Ayers posed standing on an American flag for an article in Chicago Magazine titled "No Regrets" (http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/index.php?cp=1&si=0#artanc ). Are we to believe Obama didn't subscribe to that magazine even though he represented a district in that city? That he didn't know about this incident? Do you liberals really expect us to believe such nonsense?

 

What other connections did the Obamas and Ayers have that would suggest they had a close, inner-circle relationship … one that would influence Obama's thoughts? Here's a few:

 

- In 1987 Michelle Robinson was hired as a summer associate by the law firm of Sidley and Austin in Chicago. From 1988 to 1991, she worked as an associate at the firm. In 1989, while Barack was attending Harvard, Michelle first met Barack when she was assigned to mentor him when he was a summer associate at Sidley and Austin. Sidley and Austin's managing partner was a well known personal friend of Ayers' father, Thomas Ayers. Bernadine Dohrn worked at this firm as well ... as a para-legal. So Obama met his wife while she was an intern at the firm which simultaneously employed Ayers' wife. What a coincidence. :rolleyes:

 

- In 1991, Michelle quit the law firm to work for Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley. Mayor Daley said he knew Ayers well, and that Obama and Ayers were "friends". And why wouldn't they be friends, since they lived in the same neighborhood just a few blocks from each other, shared the same politics (social justice, pro-Palestinian, etc), their wives worked at the same law firm, they hung out in the same liberal/progressive circles, and they worked together on numerous related projects? Of course they were friends … and anyone who asks you to believe otherwise is simply blowing smoke to try and hide their relationship.

 

- Ayers called himself a "family friend" of the Obamas in an education book Ayers wrote in 1997. And when Ayers needed a glowing recommendation for that book, Obama happily provided one. Has Obama done that for anyone else? In fact, Obama appeared with Ayers on numerous academic panels, including one organized by Michelle Obama to discuss that Ayers' book.

 

- Even in 2002, just seven days after Ayers made the statement I quoted earlier about being an anarchist, Obama joined Ayers in a panel discussion at a gathering at the University of Illinois-Chicago on working toward social change and an extremely liberal agenda. And despite all these various contacts, we're asked to believe that Obama had no clue about Ayers' radical background until 2008 when it became an issue in the Presidential campaign? :rolleyes:

 

- Contrary to what Obama's statement right after Ayers surfaced as an issue in the 2008 campaign implies, Obama did get "official endorsement" from Ayers several times in his earlier campaigns for political office. Does Ayers endorse people he doesn't know or trust? I rather doubt it. To me, that too suggests a close, influential friendship.

 

- Indeed, Ayers has stated that he and Obama emailed one another and spoke on the phone often prior to their relationship being exposed in 2008. They claim they don't now. But who would know? Who really believes that two men who were clearly close and spoke often have had no contact since their public break? Especially when their lies about not knowing each other are so obvious? Read all the above and try to tell us with a straight face that Ayers was being honest when in November 2008 he told an interviewer that he knew Obama "only slightly" … that his "relationship with Obama was probably like that of thousands of others in Chicago"? Me thinks they protest too much.

 

- After Obama took office, there were two entries in the White House visitor logs that were released with the name "William Ayers". Of course, the Whitehouse claimed these were "other" William Ayers, without actually identifying which "other" Ayers. However, the WH later had to admit that those logs are incomplete (

). They don't include a half million visitors in the first 9 months, nor all visitors to the First Family quarters. And some of the visits by important people are disguised by using their underlings names. And it was reported that the White House often met with "lobbyists" outside the White House in places where the Secret Service keeps no records. So seriously, folks, do you liberals really believe that Obama hasn't continued his long-standing relationship with William Ayers after entering the WhiteHouse? Does your gullibility have no limits whatsoever?

 

The truth is that the ONLY reason Obama publically divorced himself from Ayers during the campaign (and since) is because Ayers' relationship suddenly became problematic. Then, Obama's chief strategist David Axelrod claimed (while on CNN) that Obama didn't even know about Ayers' radical past. And then Obama communications Chief Robert Gibbs confirmed that. But do rank and file Democrats still really buy that transparent lie?

 

Are you Obama supporters so gullible to think that Obama, with all the connections I noted above, and all his supposed intelligence, didn't know about Ayers' past until the middle of the Presidential campaign? Especially when this "I didn't really know him" claim is the same claim made about Wright and Tony Rezko and Van Jones when their pasts came to light?

 

We might buy that excuse once ... but do you really expect us to believe it over and over and over? If Obama really is this clueless about those closest to him, or has lied so transparently about his relationship with Ayers, perhaps you folks have made a serious mistake putting him into the Oval Office? Perhaps you should reconsider that support now?

 

Finally, what evidence do we have that Ayers actually has influenced Obama once he was elected to Oval Office?

 

For starters, Obama talks about "social justice" and many of the other issues that Ayers championed (and still champions) all the time. Do liberals actually believe that Obama could have worked side by side as co-chair with Ayers for 5 years on a project promoting social justice and not have had a lot of Ayers' radicalism rub off on him? Do liberals actually believe they could have worked and conversed together for over a decade and Ayers radical agenda not have influenced Obama?

 

In fact, I think the fact that Obama chose as his Secretary of Education a man named Arne Duncan, who ran the same school district that Obama/Ayers' Chicago Annenberg Challenge sought to reform, is proof of Ayers' influence. Because Duncan is a fan of "social justice" and socialism. Recently he said "This is a fight to me that's about a lot more than education. It's really a fight for social justice." That sounds just like Ayers. And one of Duncan's key efforts to enact "social justice" since then involves a push for IB (International Baccalaureate) schools (http://royalheir.blogspot.com/2010/08/un-moves-into-public-schools.html ). Take a real close look at IB schools and ask yourself if Duncan isn't indeed pushing the socialist agenda that Ayers championed.

 

I probably could list a few more facts to convince, but if the above hasn't done so already, I'd probably be wasting my time. So let me just close by asking …

 

Do any of you leftists want to claim I haven't proven my case that Ayers was an inner circle associate of Obama's?

 

Because unless you do, and you offer sourced material to prove he wasn't, I think you now owe me three names of hardcore socialists/communists for whichever President you finally decide to put up against my choice of Obama.

 

And if you won't do that, I can only conclude you are scaredy cats … like this one:

 

scaredy-cat.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, this is one of BAC's more demented thread.

LGU and the rest of LF's leftists:

 

chickens1.jpg

 

:P

 

BAC, You didn't answer my question.

Accept my Challenge, then we can discuss your question. Or are you CHICKEN? Cluck, cluck, cluck ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Accept my Challenge, then we can discuss your question. Or are you CHICKEN? Cluck, cluck, cluck ...

 

Why can't you answer my question? What communist policy has Obama signed in to law?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't you answer my question?

Why won't you accept my Challenge? Are you CHICKEN or a scaredy cat? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, this is all simply about irrational RACISM, which is the foundation of conservatism.

 

RACISM has caused the cons to become so mentally unhinged that they are actually ending their own country in order to get the Black Man out of the White House.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought about this idiotic thread, this person who actually believes Obama is a socialist or communist, and then i looked at the polls in Wisconsin where a known criminal will likely retain his job, and his job is to destroy all working americans

 

then i looked at polls that show that horrific oligarchical romney only 3 points behind the great President Obama

 

and I knew, I knew we were doomed...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why won't you accept my Challenge? Are you CHICKEN or a scaredy cat? :D

 

No, more like a stubborn old goat. I ask for proof of him being an active communist while serving as president and get lame insults.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line:

 

The Black Man in the White House is driving the racists out of their already crazed minds.

 

The racists (read GOP) are going absolutely batchit CRAZEEEEE!

 

 

 

That is of course it, but did you know there were so many of them? I know, you think they are only 25% of the population, and the rabid ones sure, most of them are on this board :lol: but there is another 25% who while moderately racist are just plain stupid, who have bought the nonsense that unions are bad, govts should be small ,etc

 

They are victims of amazing brainwashing propaganda, what do we do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this Cant Decide or Totally Rad?

 

chicken.JPG

 

Hard to tell. BECAUSE LIBERAL CHICKENS ALL LOOK ALIKE. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is of course it, but did you know there were so many of them? I know, you think they are only 25% of the population, and the rabid ones sure, most of them are on this board :lol: but there is another 25% who while moderately racist are just plain stupid, who have bought the nonsense that unions are bad, govts should be small ,etc

 

They are victims of amazing brainwashing propaganda, what do we do?

 

Well, You could PROVE OBAMA IS AN ACTIVE COMMUNIST while serving as president. You know, substantiating your rhetoric with info that could actually change minds.

 

Is this Cant Decide or Totally Rad?

 

Hard to tell. BECAUSE LIBERAL CHICKENS ALL LOOK ALIKE. :D

 

And you're sounding like a idiot who cries out because everyone believes he's full of BS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LGU and the rest of LF's leftists:

 

 

Honestly, you're so incoherent and steeped in tea bagger memes, I can't even tell what your challenge is. It appears to be that Obama is a marxist. Is that the meme you're peddling?

 

I thought about this idiotic thread, this person who actually believes Obama is a socialist or communist, and then i looked at the polls in Wisconsin where a known criminal will likely retain his job, and his job is to destroy all working americans

 

then i looked at polls that show that horrific oligarchical romney only 3 points behind the great President Obama

 

and I knew, I knew we were doomed...

 

The real issue is why is BAC so intellectually dishonest that he'd actually post such a counterfactual thread, which even contradicts his other threads that claim Obama is a Wall Street Insider.

 

Which discredited meme should I debunk first?

 

In case you folks missed it, I've offered Cant Decide a challenge.

 

Because he seems to think Obama is not the most socialist/communist we've ever had in the Whitehouse ... while I contend that Obama is ... by far.

 

milhouse_failed_meme.jpg?w=720

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it every time a liberal is challenged into a corner, they pull out the race card?

 

And Van Jones not a communist? LOL! Even Van Jones has admitted numerous times that he is a communist, and was proud of it lol.gif

 

As far as challenges go, CD will always crawl back into her corner crying raciss. Thats the way of a true communist warrior rofl.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it every time a liberal is challenged into a corner, they pull out the race card?

 

Because tea baggers like you are racists who post dishonest threads about Obama being a communist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it every time a liberal is challenged into a corner, they pull out the race card?

 

And Van Jones not a communist? LOL! Even Van Jones has admitted numerous times that he is a communist, and was proud of it lol.gif

 

As far as challenges go, CD will always crawl back into her corner crying raciss. Thats the way of a true communist warrior rofl.gif

 

And why is when I ask for proof of Obama's communist policies, I get diversionary BS like this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it every time a liberal is challenged into a corner, they pull out the race card?

 

 

 

 

Because, CONSERVATISM = RACISM.

 

Proven time and time again.

 

the foundation of the GOP is:

 

RACISM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"They don't want the whole pie," she told the women. "There are some who do, but most Americans feel blessed just being able to thrive a little bit. But that is becoming even more out of reach. If we don't wake up as a nation with a new kind of leadership, for how we want this country to work, then we won't get universal health care. The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more."

- Michelle Obama

 

"I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets." - Barack Obama (Dreams of My Father)

 

"Political discussions, the kind at Occidental had once seemed so intense and purposeful, came to take on the flavor of the socialist conferences I sometimes attended at Cooper Union" - Barack Obama (Dreams of My Father)

 

"Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness." - Barack Obama

 

"The great task before our founders was putting into practice the ideal that government could simultaneously serve liberty and advance the common good. and Government, he believed, had an important role to play in advancing our common prosperity." - Barack Obama

 

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," - Barack Obama

 

Socialism_by_miniamericanflags.jpg

 

Because, CONSERVATISM = RACISM.

 

Proven time and time again.

 

the foundation of the GOP is:

 

RACISM.

 

rofl.gif

 

I love it! Moar please! :D

Edited by The One And Only

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"So we're going to provide a $4,000 tuition credit, every student, every year, but, students, you're going to have to give back something in return. You're going to have to participate in community service. You're going to have to work in a homeless shelter, or a veteran's home, or an underserved school, or join the Peace Corps." - Barack Obama

 

 

No cookie for you. Expecting people to earn their student loans isn't Communist policy.

 

I've asked this several times and have not received a single answer.

 

What Communist policies has Obama signed in to law since taking office? Any takers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you're sounding like a idiot who cries out because everyone believes he's full of BS.

I'm the only one presenting sourced facts to support his arguments on this thread.

 

Seems to me that, by definition, means you folks must be the ones pushing "BS".

 

So don't be CHICKEN, TR.

 

Step up to the plate and accept my challenge ... if you really are convinced what I'm noting about Obama is "BS".

 

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm the only one presenting sourced facts to support his arguments on this thread.

 

Seems to me that, by definition, means you folks must be the ones pushing "BS".

 

So don't be CHICKEN, TR.

 

Step up to the plate and accept my challenge ... if you really are convinced what I'm noting about Obama is "BS".

 

:D

 

 

The Black Man in the White House is driving them CRAZEEEEE.

 

It's all about RACISM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×