Jump to content

The P B S Whitewash Of Clinton's Legacy


Recommended Posts

 

No, I was told right away when I would be allowed to return.

 

 

Nice try, Sixteen. But dishonest as usual.

 

Is that a class you're taking? Dishonesty 101. Errr ... I mean LIbEraliSm 101.

I stand corrected. I did not see the notification in the thread.

As I told you before, I'm only here to learn

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/01/this-wikileaks-email-proves-cheryl-mills-and-hillary-clinton-lied-to-the-fbi/

This WikiLeaks Email Proves Cheryl Mills And Hillary Clinton Lied To The FBI

… snip …

WikiLeaks Email 31077 is even more important than the 650,000 emails found on Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin’s computers. The Wall Street Journal reports thousands of messages found on their laptop originated from Clinton’s private server, which is why the FBI decided upon yet another Clinton email probe before Election Day. However, one of the biggest questions pertaining to Comey’s first attempt at investigating Clinton has yet to be answered: Why were Cheryl Mills and Hillary Clinton granted attorney-client privilege?

Before explaining why this WikiLeaks email destroys the rationale for Clinton’s bizarre legal arrangement, let’s address why the FBI allowed the subject of a criminal investigation to evade questions. According to a Law Newz piece by Chris White, Cheryl Mills claimed she learned about Clinton’s server only after defending Clinton during the legal struggle:

… snip excerpt from that article …

However, Cheryl Mills didn’t “product documents to the State Department” until after March 18, 2015.

Nobody knew the existence of classified intelligence on Clinton’s server until July 24, 2015.

Hillary Clinton didn’t even turn over her server to the FBI until August 12, 2015.

Therefore, if Mills wasn’t asked to turn over documents before March 18, then how on Earth was she able to state the following on March 2, 2015? Here’s the WikiLeaks email with the subject reading “Fwd: POTUS on HRC emails”:

From: cheryl.mills@gmail.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2015-03-07 21:41 Subject:
Fwd: POTUS on HRC emails
we need to clean this up – he has emails from her – they do not say state.gov


While attempting to cover up the fact President Obama had to have known about Clinton’s server (since there was no stat.gov on Clinton’s email) Mills also undermines any claim at attorney-client privilege.

Cheryl Mills clearly states her concerns about Clinton’s private server on March 7, 2015.

Mills isn’t asked to turn over any documents and there weren’t legal battles before March 18, 2015; eleven days after the email was written.

Not only does this WikiLeaks email prove both Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills lied to the FBI, but it also highlights the questions they maned to evade. Citing a Weekly Standard piece, the Law Newz article above explains the most vital question that Mills and Clinton managed to evade:

For example, during the FOIA deposition, Mills was asked a question about why Clinton started using the clintonemail.com system. Her attorney objected to question, saying that was also covered by attorney-client privilege.

“[Mills] — she learned this — refreshed her recollection — when she was acting as the Secretary’s lawyer, producing documents to the State Department,” Wilkinson said.


Thus, the FBI and State Department allowed Clinton and Mills to utilize this arrangement, without knowing Mill’s expressed concern before any legal battle regarding Clinton’s server.

While the WikiLeaks email also implicates President Obama, an issue of even greater importance, it shows Mills knew of Clinton’s server. With the FBI’s second criminal probe underway, the latest investigation is likely evidence of a botched cover-up. The FBI’s first probe relied on the belief that Mills didn’t know of Clinton’s server; an outlandish notion even without the WikiLeaks revelation. With the evidence of a March 7, 2015 email, it’s important the FBI ask the questions of Clinton and Mills their fabricated attorney-client privilege shielded them from answering. The issue of lying to the FBI, as proven by the timeline, is yet another concern for Clinton’s campaign.


ALL OF THEM … PRISON. NOT THE WHITE HOUSE. Don't be stupid, America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

If you were, you'd listen. Probably just as poor a student at school. Flipping burgers your future, Sixteen?

Or even worse, She could be wasting her life obsessing over Hilary Clinton in a political forum on the Internet. :D

 

Just Sayin'...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or even worse, She could be wasting her life obsessing over Hilary Clinton in a political forum on the Internet. :D

 

Just Sayin'...

 

 

Bingo.....LMAO

 

and Uncle Beachy has been doing it and getting banned since at least 2007, and nada.......just sayin'...... :D

 

 

Banned

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,716
33616841.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-02/more-collusion-between-clinton-campaign-and-doj-kadzik-provides-heads-podesta

DOJ's Peter Kadzik Exposed Colluding With Clinton Campaign

On Monday we were the first to note that Podesta's friend Peter Kadzik was the DOJ representative chosen to head up a "thorough" review of the new Huma Abedin emails as revealed by a letter he wrote to Congress. Given Kadzik's personal relationship with Podesta, it seemed like a "convenient" choice for the Clinton campaign.

In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.

"Ironically", that is the same Peter Kadzik who has proven his "impartiality" in multiple WikiLeaks emails including this newly released bombshell in which Kadzik provides a very helpful "heads up" about Hillary's email server investigation. This is what Kadzik emailed to John Podesta (via gmail) on May 19, 2015:

There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails.

Perhaps Mr. Kadzik could explain to our readers - and the American public - why this particular message was delivered via his private, gmail account rather than his official DOJ email account?

2016.11.02%20-%20Kadzik.jpg

Sure, who needs an independent investigator, this guy will do just fine.

* * *

And for readers who missed our original report on the long-running relationship between John Podesta and his close friend Peter Kadzik, here is an excerpt from our most recent article on the topic:

In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.

https://twitter.com/JTF_News/status/793189989370720257/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

So far so good, even if one wonders just how active the DOJ will be in a case that has shown an unprecedented schism between the politically influenced Department of Justice and the FBI.

And yet, something felt odd about this.

Kadzik... Kadzik... where have we heard that name?

Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, "Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary's Benghazi Hearing" in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton's Benghazi testimony?

It was Peter Kadzik.

posto%20email.jpg

In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton's Campaign chair, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.

For those who missed it, this is what we reported previously:

The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, Hillary's campaign chairman met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, who is currently a top official at the US Justice Department serving as Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs.

The post-Benghazi dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures. The first mention of personal contact between Podesta and Kadzik in the Wikileaks dump is in an Oct. 23, 2015 email sent out by Vincent Roberti, a lobbyist who is close to Podesta and his superlobbyist brother, Tony Podesta. In it, Roberti refers to a dinner reservation at Posto, a Washington D.C. restaurant. The dinner was set for 7:30 that evening, just one day after Clinton gave 11 hours of testimony to the Benghazi Committee.

Podesta and Kadzik met several months later for dinner at Podesta’s home, another email shows. Another email sent on May 5, 2015, Kadzik’s son asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign.


As the Daily Caller noted, the dinner arrangement "is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices." As one former U.S. Attorney tells told the DC, the exchanges are another example of the Clinton campaign’s “cozy relationship” with the Obama Justice Department.

The hacked emails confirm that Podesta and Kadzik were in frequent contact. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podesta’s birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik’s son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.

“The political appointees in the Obama administration, especially in the Department of Justice, appear to be very partisan in nature and I don’t think had clean hands when it comes to the investigation of the private email server,” says Matthew Whitaker, the executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a government watchdog group.

“It’s the kind of thing the American people are frustrated about is that the politically powerful have insider access and have these kind of relationships that ultimately appear to always break to the benefit of Hillary Clinton,” he added, comparing the Podesta-Kadzik meetings to the revelation that Attorney General Loretta Lynch met in private with Bill Clinton at the airport in Phoenix days before the FBI and DOJ investigating Hillary Clinton.

Kadzik's role at the DOJ, where he started in 2013, is particularly notable Kadzik, as helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.

It gets better because, as we further revealed, if there is one person in the DOJ who is John Podesta's, and thus the Clinton Foundation's inside man, it is Peter Kadjik.

Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office. That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account. In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon flagged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign. Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House transition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.”

Podesta was caught in a sticky situation in both the Lewinsky affair and the Rich pardon scandal. As deputy chief of staff to Clinton in 1996, Podesta asked then-United Nations ambassador Bill Richardson to hire the 23-year-old Lewinsky. In April 1996, the White House transferred Lewinsky from her job as a White House intern to the Pentagon in order to keep her and Bill Clinton separate. But the Clinton team also wanted to keep Lewinsky happy so that she would not spill the beans about her sexual relationship with Clinton.

Richardson later recounted in his autobiography that he offered Lewinsky the position but that she declined it.

Podesta made false statements to a grand jury impaneled by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr for the investigation. But he defended the falsehoods, saying later that he was merely relaying false information from Clinton that he did not know was inaccurate at the time. “He did lie to me,” Podesta said about Clinton in a National Public Radio interview in 1998. Clinton was acquitted by the Senate in Feb. 1999 of perjury and obstruction of justice charges related to the Lewinsky probe. Kadzik, then a lawyer with the firm Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky, represented Podesta through the fiasco.

Podesta had been promoted to Clinton’s chief of staff when he and Kadzik became embroiled in another scandal.

Kadzik was then representing Marc Rich, a billionaire financier who was wanted by the U.S. government for evading a $48 million tax bill. The fugitive, who was also implicated in illegal trading activity with nations that sponsored terrorism, had been living in Switzerland for 17 years when he sought the pardon. To help Rich, Kadzik lobbied Podesta heavily in the weeks before Clinton left office on Jan. 20, 2001. A House Oversight Committee report released in May 2002 stated that “Kadzik was recruited into Marc Rich’s lobbying campaign because he was a long-time friend of White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.”

The report noted that Kadzik contacted Podesta at least seven times regarding Rich’s pardon. On top of the all-hands-on-deck lobbying effort, Rich’s ex-wife, Denise Rich, had doled out more than $1 million to the Clintons and other Democrats prior to the pardon. She gave $100,000 to Hillary Clinton’s New York Senate campaign and another $450,000 to the Clinton presidential library.

Kadzik's current role

In his current role as head of the Office of Legislative Affairs, Kadzik handles inquiries from Congress on a variety of issues. In that role he was not in the direct chain of command on the Clinton investigation. The Justice Department and FBI have insisted that career investigators oversaw the investigation, which concluded in July with no charges filed against Clinton.

But Kadzik worked on other Clinton email issues in his dealings with Congress. Last November, he denied a request from Republican lawmakers to appoint a special counsel to lead the investigation.

In a Feb. 1, 2016 letter in response to Kadzik, Florida Rep. Ron DeSantis noted that Kadzik had explained “that special counsel may be appointed at the discretion of the Attorney General when an investigation or prosecution by the Department of Justice would create a potential conflict of interest.”

DeSantis, a Republican, suggested that Lynch’s appointment by Bill Clinton in 1999 as U.S. Attorney in New York may be considered a conflict of interest. He also asserted that Obama’s political appointees — a list which includes Kadzik — “are being asked to impartially execute their respective duties as Department of Justice officials that may involve an investigation into the activities of the forerunner for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.”

It is unknown if Kadzik responded to DeSantis’ questions.

Kadzik’s first involvement in the Clinton email brouhaha came in a Sept. 24, 2015 response letter to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley in which he declined to confirm or deny whether the DOJ was investigating Clinton. Last month, Politico reported that Kadzik angered Republican lawmakers when, in a classified briefing, he declined to say whether Clinton aides who received DOJ immunity were required to cooperate with congressional probes.

Kadzik also testified at a House Oversight Committee hearing last month on the issue of classifications and redactions in the FBI’s files of the Clinton email investigation.

Finally, it is also worth noting that Kadzik's wife, Amy Weiss, currently at Weiss Public Affairs worked on the 1992 Clinton/Gore Campaign as a Press Secretary, and Communications Director for the Democratic National Committee, and a White House Deputy Assistant to the President/Deputy Press Secretary to President Bill Clinton.

* * *

And now it seems that Kadzik will be in charge of the DOJ's "probe" into Huma Abedin's emails. Which is why we are a little skeptical the DOJ will find "anything" of note.

podesta%20kadjik_0.jpg

 


Impeach this one, too.

 

Or lose the country.

 

That's the choice this election.

Drain the swamp, America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Clinton Gave China Chip Technology For Nuclear Warfare

...declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat.

...Judicial Watch obtained the documents through the Freedom of Information Act, a Washington-based political watchdog group.

Decade of Betrayal

U.S. Chips for PRC Nukes

Stolen U.S. Chips

1996 Illegal Campaign Donations

PRC Stole U.S. Nuclear Warhead Designs

treason-hang.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3898754/Attorney-General-SUED-come-clean-secret-meeting-Bill-Clinton-days-decide-charging-wife-server-scandal.html

Attorney General Loretta Lynch is facing a federal lawsuit to give details of a meeting she had with Bill Clinton days before she was to decide on his wife's fate.

The meeting in June was barely a week before the Justice Department which she heads dropped its probe into Hillary Clinton's private email server.

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed the lawsuit against the Department of Justice in Washington on Wednesday demanding more information about the meeting, which led to Lynch stepping aside from the server investigation.

As head of the Department of Justice, Lynch was supposed to be deciding whether to proceed with charging Hillary Clinton over her unauthorized server arrangements while she was secretary of state.

But she met with the Democrat's husband on June 27 on the tarmac of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International airport, Arizona. Bill Clinton delayed his flight's departure in order to grab face time with Lynch.

'Don't take off!' the former president shouted after a Secret Service agent told him Lynch was about to land, according to Ed Klein in his book Guilty as Sin, who writes that Clinton wanted to 'bushwhack' Lynch in order to discredit the server investigation.

Lynch was subsequently spotted leaving her jet and local media, who knew Clinton was at the airport, put two and two together. Despite Lynch's insistence that the half-hour meeting was a social call, a political firestorm ensued in which the DOJ's independence was questioned.

'Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix,' she told CNN affiliate KNXV/ABC15 shortly afterwards.

But the ACLJ is demanding more information about the meeting and is suing the Obama administration, which it slammed for its 'arrogance and inappropriate actions'.

'This Administration has gone out of its way to hide information from the American public – information that is extremely troubling,' said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ in a statement.

'The stakes are high. The American people deserve a Justice Department with integrity.'

It is the conservative group's fourth major federal lawsuit against the Obama administration.

Back in the summer Lynch said she 'would not do it again' because the tete-a-tete 'cast this shadow' over the investigation - and four days after the meeting she finally said she would accept whatever recommendations the FBI made about the case.

The effective recusal came only after pressure mounted when the meeting was disclosed.

The following week, on July 5, FBI director James Comey said the agency recommended no charges against Clinton for her actions - despite her and her team's 'extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information'.

That was until last Friday when Comey sent an explosive letter to Congress saying the agency had discovered new emails that might be relevant to the investigation.

The ACLJ said it had already filed freedom of information requests to the Obama Justice Department and the FBI asking for details on the meeting. It said the FBI had acknowledged the request and agreed to expedite its processing, but the Justice Department had remained silent.

Lynch's department said July 7 that it was formally closing its Clinton probe - largely a formality after Comey said the FBI was not pressing charges.

But now the ACLJ is demanding all messages that Lynch or her coworkers may have reviewed mentioning the rendezvous, names of everyone at the DOJ who has discussed the meeting, and any discussions about the press in relation to it, among other details.

Comey's letter to Congress has left Clinton facing a political hullabaloo in the final days of the presidential race and dented her position in the polls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/breaking-fbi-now-99-certain-least-5-foreign-services-hacked-hillarys-server/

BREAKING: FBI Now 99% Certain at Least 5 Foreign Agencies Hacked Into Hillary’s Server


Now the question is ... was this exposure deliberate on Hillary's or any of her aide's part?

 

In other words, did they receive any money from these governments or their intermediaries?

 

​Because this wouldn't be the first time the Clintons have sold US secrets and access to restricted technology for cash.

 

And even if they didn't this time, Hillary is now very vulnerable to blackmail.

 

If the government is keeping anything from the public because it's so damaging, Hillary can now be blackmailed should she become President.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

Fox News Channel's Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI. He reveals five important new pieces of information in these two short clips:

1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.

2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.

3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.

4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it.


And if Mills and the rest lied about anything, their immunity agreements are moot.

Go FBI. Don't disappoint. Push to indict the whole lot of them ... including Hillary.

 

Force Lynch and Obama between a rock and a hard place.

 

Drain the swamp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Secret Recordings Fueled FBI Feud in Clinton Probe
Agents thought they had enough material to merit aggressively pursuing investigation into Clinton Foundation
And even then, the DOJ was trying to stop the investigation.
Obama had to be aware of all this.

THIS IS IMPEACHABLE FOLKS.

An it's time to apply RICO.

 

Break up the Clinton Foundation.

 

Seize its assets and put it's management in jail.

 

P.S. ... latest rumor ... Weiner is not in rehab ... he's in witness protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS IMPEACHABLE FOLKS.

.

Sure it is... just like the Clinton's killed Vince Foster and a host of others.

Just like Hillary is too sick to be president.

Just like Benghazi is going to bring down Hillary..

Just like...

Oh wait. It's too late.

You lose and the Clinton's win again.

Damn that must be frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure it is... just like the Clinton's killed Vince Foster and a host of others.

Just like Hillary is too sick to be president.

Just like Benghazi is going to bring down Hillary..

Just like...

Oh wait. It's too late.

You lose and the Clinton's win again.

Damn that must be frustrating.

LIBERAL MOONBAT,,,,,HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE MYSTERIOUSLY DIED THAT SURROUND THE CLINTONS? LIKE ALMOST 100 NOW....LIBERALS.......BLIND AS A BAT.

 

 

composite_14708556955454-620x320.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/3/michael-mccaul-hillary-clinton-server-hacks-its-tr/

Rep. Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, on Thursday said Hillary Clinton’s exposing sensitive information to potentially multiple hacks from foreign actors amounts to treason.

“This is why you have security protocols — to protect classified information,” Mr. McCaul said on “Fox and Friends.” “She exposed it to our enemies, and now … our adversaries have this very sensitive information that not only jeopardizes her and national security at home, but the men and women serving overseas.”

“In my opinion, quite frankly, it’s treason,” said Mr. McCaul, Texas Republican.

“The concern I’ve had all along is she has had seven special access programs on these devices. Those are the most classified, sensitive secrets in the federal government — many of them covert operations,” he said.

“She took those devices overseas against the State Department’s wishes, and now we find out — and James Comey told me previously — that it’s very likely that foreign adversary nations got into her private server,” Mr. McCaul said.


TREASON.

 

And not the first time in the Clinton’s long and sorbid history.

 

ALL OF THIS could have been prevented if the Republicans had vigorously pursued Chinagate, where the Clintons also committed treason ... for campaign cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/breaking-fbi-now-99-certain-least-5-foreign-services-hacked-hillarys-server/

 

 

Now the question is ... was this exposure deliberate on Hillary's or any of her aide's part?

 

In other words, did they receive any money from these governments or their intermediaries?

 

​Because this wouldn't be the first time the Clintons have sold US secrets and access to restricted technology for cash.

 

And even if they didn't this time, Hillary is now very vulnerable to blackmail.

 

If the government is keeping anything from the public because it's so damaging, Hillary can now be blackmailed should she become President.

 

BREAKING: FBI Now 99% Certain at Least 5 Foreign Agencies Hacked Into Hillary’s Server

 

 

Sooooo.......then you must have the actual quote from the FBI "sources'......right ??? post it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooooo.......then you must have the actual quote from the FBI "sources'......right ??? post it

This is why Comey reopened his investigations, because his agents were flipping him the middle finger, and talking to the press.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

 

(1) The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.

 

(2) The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.

 

(3) Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.

 

(4) Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

 

(5) FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I suggest you email Brett Baier, Cad, and ask him that. He might be more than happy to provide it. :D

 

 

Soooooo......I'll take it that you don't have any official statement from anybody at the FBI........correct yes or no ???

 

 

 

 

 

This is why Comey reopened his investigations, because his agents were flipping him the middle finger, and talking to the press.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

 

 

 

Sooooo......you have nothing concrete either like an official statement from an actual FBI agent........correct yes or no ???

 

 

put up or shut up.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/3/michael-mccaul-hillary-clinton-server-hacks-its-tr/

 

 

TREASON.

 

And not the first time in the Clinton’s long and sorbid history.

 

ALL OF THIS could have been prevented if the Republicans had vigorously pursued Chinagate, where the Clintons also committed treason ... for campaign cash.

It was investigated you dimwit...:D No one could prove that the President received a penny from China but Republicans were more than happy to pretend otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...