Jump to content

The P B S Whitewash Of Clinton's Legacy

Recommended Posts

This definitely deserves to be added to Clinton’s legacy …





How Bill Clinton Sent Manufacturing Jobs to China

By Michael Bargo, Jr.

On May 28, 1993 Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 12850. This improper EO changed the way the U.S. made trade deals with China and led to the loss of tens of millions of American manufacturing jobs. The story of how this was done not only proves that the Clintons are behind the loss of American jobs, but shows how Bill Clinton established a Democratic strategy for manipulating foreign policy that was copied by both Hillary while she was Secretary of State and Obama while he was president.

At the time, U.S.-China trade relations were conditioned upon China’s humanitarian treatment of its own citizens. Americans had seen protesters in Tiananmen Square crushed by Chinese tanks. The brutality of the Chinese toward unarmed protesters had shocked Americans so much that China was required to treat its citizens in a humanitarian way in order to maintain its MFN (Most Favored Nation) status,

China desperately needed to keep its MFN status for one reason: only with MFN status could it get a huge discount on tariffs it had to pay to the U.S. With MFN Chinese manufacturers only had to pay a 6% tariff. Without it they would have had to pay an unprofitable 40%. So without its MFN status China couldn’t as easily compete with American manufacturers. China’s MFN status was suspended during the Korean War, but conditionally reinstated in 1980 under the Jackson-Vanir freedom of emigration amendment to the Trade Act of 1974.

This is where Bill Clinton stepped in. With his 1993 Executive Order, he unconstitutionally seized control of the MFN conditions, removing it from the involvement of Congress, just as Obama seized treaty control away from the Senate with his Iranian nuke deal.

Clinton’s Executive Order was issued at a time when the U.S.-China trade deficit was only $18 billion a year. In 2015 the deficit was $367 billion.

It’s important to understand that at the time China’s MFN status was annually up for review by Congress. The effective law was passed in 1974. What Bill Clinton did, with an unconstitutional Executive Order, was to use “the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States” to rewrite a Congressionally approved treaty and change the terms. The way he changed it is eerily similar to the way Hillary practiced State Department decisions when she was Secretary of State from 2009 to 2012.

Bill Clinton intentionally, with great harm to jobs in the U.S., changed the terms of the law in this way: instead of requiring a vote of Congress to reaffirm China’s MFN status every year, Bill Clinton illegally shifted the decision-making role to the Secretary of State. This eliminated the power of Congress to approve the annual MFN status. President Clinton, in his 1993 statement, said this was necessary to avoid the “annual battles between Congress and the Executive” which was divisive. Of course it was divisive -- the Framers of the Constitution intended it to be so. Without the input of the elected members of Congress the people had no say.

Similarly, Hillary Clinton used her position as Sec. of State to personally approve/disapprove many agreements. President Obama was to emulate this shifting of foreign policy making to bureaucrats in 2015 with his so-called Iranian “deal.” An agreement with a foreign nation is a treaty, not a deal. This is because the authority of the U.S. government is used to both make the treaty and adhere to its terms. The Constitution properly gives the people, working through the Senate, the opportunity to have a voice in the terms of the treaty. Bill Clinton, Hillary, and Obama all stole this input from the voters and placed it under their control.

And just as the Clinton Foundation has been linked to relationships Hillary had to her speech payers and donors, Bill Clinton’s decision to send jobs to China by permanently controlling its MFN status has been linked to campaign donations. Boeing Company wanted the EO. Boeing was the parent company of the Loral Corporation, which donated $100,000 to the Democratic National Committee in June, 1994, according to a Washington Post report at the time. A nice reward to Clinton for his MFN status change.

The Loral Corporation is a major developer of missile flight control software and at the time they wanted to launch satellites from China. Boeing also owned McDonnell-Douglas which in 1994 made an agreement with China to open a parts factory in Beijing. If this all seems oddly similar to the deals Hillary made with foundation campaign donors, well, that’s because it is.

While Bill Clinton made this deal through an Executive Order, it’s important to note that there are other developments which have evolved from the EO. The Clinton Foundation is legally located in Canada, allowing the Clintons to hide the identities of their donors. They also used the foundation as a method of obtaining payment for delivering unprecedentedly expensive speeches. In return, it appears that Hillary allowed donors access to her office and granted State Department permission on numerous foreign trade deals. Since these agreements and deals were made through email the Clinton email scandal is seen as an effort to hide the pay for play evidence.

In 2001 Boeing got a $63 million dollar incentive “deal” from the Democratic mayor of Chicago to relocate its headquarters there. These incentives will likely be paid for, in typical Democratic Party style, by the middle-class and poor taxpayers who will have to make up that $63 million through their own family’s budgets. Boeing only brought 500 jobs to the city, costing taxpayers $126,000 per job. This, like the Chinese MFN Executive Order, promoted as a good investment for the city.

When all of these actions are thoroughly investigated, these deals will reveal that the Democratic Party’s globalization initiative is mostly a scheme to get rich by trading U.S. governmental authority, and American jobs, to enrich a tiny number of people. As the Clintons and Obama get richer the American people lose jobs and become poorer. Those are facts.

This is primarily done by shifting the authority of government. Bill Clinton bestowed the authority to reauthorize China’s MFN status to the Secretary of State. Hillary Clinton bestowed upon herself the authority to negotiate with companies with foreign interests and the foreign nations themselves. And Barack Obama seized the power of Federal agencies through his 32 czars, bypassing the restraints imposed by the Constitution. The basic strategy is to shift authority, then control that newly created authority, bypassing the role of Congress.  It’s only just begun. Voters can decide if they want to see more unrestrained power brokering by Hillary.




They truly deserve to rot in prison.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think.   This ...




... could have been our President.  


Best Election EVER!!!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites






(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a federal judge granted seven additional depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, unauthorized email server. Hillary Clinton and her former top aide and current lawyer Cheryl Mills were given 30 days to oppose being deposed by Judicial Watch (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)).

The court rejected Justice and State Department arguments to protect Clinton and the agencies from additional discovery and ordered agency lawyers to respond to Judicial Watch’s questions about their knowledge of the Clinton email issue. The court granted all of Judicial Watch’s requested discovery but gave Clinton and Mills 30 days to file any opposition to the requests to question them in person under oath.

The new court-ordered discovery allows Judicial Watch to take testimony and gather evidence of Clinton’s handling of emails, specifically in an “after action memo” drafted by Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s senior advisor at State and White House liaison. The memo was created in December 2014 to memorialize the Clinton team’s processing of the Clinton emails. The discovery also asks for when Justice and State Department attorneys learned about Clinton’s private email use; and what senior records-keeping officials at the State Department knew about Clinton’s emails and when they knew it.

… snip …

On December 6, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

The court ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request.

Judicial Watch’s discovery over the last several months found many more details about the scope of the Clinton email scandal and cover-up:

    •    John Hackett, former Director of Information Programs and Services (IPS) testified under oath that he had raised concerns that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s staff may have “culled out 30,000” of the secretary’s “personal” emails without following strict National Archives standards. He also revealed that he believed there was interference with the formal FOIA review process related to the classification of Clinton’s Benghazi-related emails.

    •    Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s White House liaison at the State Department, and later Clinton’s personal lawyer, admitted under oath that she was granted immunity by the Department of Justice in June 2016.

    •    Justin Cooper, former aide to President Bill Clinton and Clinton Foundation employee who registered the domain name of the unsecure clintonemail.com server that Clinton used while serving as Secretary of State, testified he worked with Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, to create the non-government email system.

    •    In the interrogatory responses of E.W. (Bill) Priestap, assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, he stated that the agency found Clinton email records in the Obama White House, specifically, the Executive Office of the President.

    •    Jacob “Jake” Sullivan, Clinton’s senior advisor and deputy chief of staff when she was secretary of state, testified that both he and Clinton used her unsecure non-government email system to conduct official State Department business.

    •    Eric Boswell, former assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, testified that Clinton was warned twice against using unsecure BlackBerrys and personal emails to transmit classified material.




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BeAChooser said:



It's not though
With a five year statute of limitations, They're  all going to walk.


If they don't get a move on, all this Crossfire Hurricane stuff is going to expire too

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And you'll be happy when they get away with it, won't you?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Chuck! said:

It's not though
With a five year statute of limitations, They're  all going to walk.


If they don't get a move on, all this Crossfire Hurricane stuff is going to expire too


I agree that Hillary has probably escaped (once again) punishment for many of the crimes for which she could have been charged the last 2 decades.   All I can say is damn Sessions, damn Rosenstein, damn the GOPe, damn all the rest of the Clinton/DNC lackeys in the DOJ and FBI, and damn the mainstream media.   Hopefully, they'll rot in hell some day.   But getting away with crime has always been the modus operandi of the Clinton mafia.   Which is why they made controlling the FBI, DOJ and the media top priorities, all the way from back when they first entered the Federal scene.   And they are very practiced at deny, deny, deny, obfuscate, obfuscate, obfuscate, and delay, delay, delay.  Experts at it, I'd say.

I can certainly point to many instances back in the 90s and last decade where their control over the FBI and DOJ allowed them to escape extremely serious charges over and over and over.   I have a whole thread on that topic, ... THIS THREAD ..., whose content the left on this forum avoid like the plague.   In this thread, I point out many specific examples where the FBI and DOJ protected the Clintons rather than doing their job.    And that behavior has only continued over the years.    But be that as it may,  there are some crimes where there is no statute of limitations ... and if Trump decided to apply those statutes, then Hillary AND Bill could both still see the inside of a jail cell.   I remain hopeful.


For example, there is no statute of limitations for murder or covering up a murder. I think all it would take is for Trump to order the exhumation and forensic examination of Ron Brown's body.  If, as I suspect based on all the reasons given in this thread, there were evidence of a bullet wound in Brown's head, the Clintons (and a bunch of other DemocRATS) would be in huge trouble.   Or Trump could order the release of the photos showing Vince Foster's wounds.   Again, if, as I suspect, they don't match the description in the official autopsy report, the Clintons would be in serious jeopardy.   It would appear that the Clintons used the FBI and DOJ to, at a minimum, to coverup those murders.   

Another crime with no statute of limitations is treason.   A case could arguably be made that the Clintons sold out America to the communist Chinese back in the 90s in exchange for campaign cash.   There is a ton of evidence pointing to that.   The only reason it didn't end up in court is that Clintons controlled the FBI and DOJ ... and the GOPe didn't want to rock the gravy train they were on.  But the evidence that we know of, as outlined in my legacy thread, certainly is enough to suggest they both committed treason with regards to an China.      

And there's the crime of fraud.   That has no statute of limitations either.   And there are many people who think the Clinton Foundation is nothing but a fraud designed to enrich the Clintons and their associations.   And the Clinton Foundation is still being investigated.   So the Clintons may still meet the long arm of the law there as well.    Time will tell.   All Trump needs to do in the coming years is gain enough control of the FBI and DOJ to make it happen.   And feel vindictive.   


Furthermore, more recently, Hillary appears to have engaged in both espionage (the email/server case) and seditious conspiracy ... the latter of which has no statute of limitations or a very long one.   The verdict about what's going to happen with those crimes is still out.    If Trump truly feels threatened, I wouldn't be surprised to see him begin to actually play those cards.    Even if he doesn't feel threatened, the time may still come in the next term when those things get reexamined.  I remain hopeful.


Now as to what you say about the Hillary's Email/Server case, it's true she left government service back in 2013 so at first glance, one might think the statute of limitations has already expired.   But one of her (and her staff's) crimes is retention of information.   There are two laws in regards to that.   One, 18 U.S. Code § 1924, forbids “unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material.” It carries up to five years in prison, with a five-year statute of limitations.  But 18 U.S. Code § 793, which is part of the Espionage Act, restricts possession or retention of information “relating to the national defense" and carries a possible 10 years in prison, with a 10-year statute of limitations.   Much of the classified material in Hillary and her staff's possession certainly met the criteria of relation to national defense, in which case, the statute of limitations won't expire until well into Trump's second term or even after.


Also, one can argue that retention is a continuing offense ... that for every moment after Hillary and company left government where they didn't surrender all the classified information in their control, they committed the retention offense all over again, extending crime well beyond 2013.    In fact, recall that it was late March 2015 when Paul Combetta had is “oh crap” moment and deleted stored classified emails using the software BleachBit, after forgetting to do so months earlier.  Even by the 5 year clock, the statute of limitations has not expired.


Also, Clinton and her staff insisted that they needed to retain their security clearances long after 2013 and apparently did until quite recently.   Why would they need security clearances, if they weren't looking at materials that shouldn't have been in their possession at that point?   Hmmmmm?    Also, any lies that Hillary or her staff made regarding their handling of the materials after 2013 might be viewed as affirmative acts in furtherance of those original crimes.  That too might be deemed to start the statute of limitations clock running anew.    


So put all this together, Chuck, and I think a good prosecutor could make the case that Hillary and friends are still vulnerable to prosecution, and will be for many years to come.


Just saying ...




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

So put all this together, Chuck, and I think a good prosecutor could make the case that Hillary and friends are still vulnerable to prosecution, and will be for many years to come.


I agree, a good prosecutor COULD make a case, but I'm afraid the truth is going to be that no one will.

If anything was going to happen, someone would have been in handcuffs by now


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chuck! said:

I agree, a good prosecutor COULD make a case, but I'm afraid the truth is going to be that no one will.


But those are two separate things.   Sure, Barr and his DOJ may not do it but that does not exonerate Hillary and her crew.   What it does is prove Barr and the rest of the DOJ are corrupt to the core.  What it does is prove what I've said for months ... that the FBI, DOJ and judicial system is so broken that the military needs to be brought in to arrest, charge and try these criminals ... including the ones (like Barr) still revealing themselves.   I'm talking military tribunals, which the Supreme Court has already ruled can be used when the legal system is broken.   And whether that happens rests solely on Trump, as commander and chief of the armed forces.   If he want's a legacy that doesn't involve these vindictive leftists continuing to try to destroy him, his family, his friends, and America for the rest of his life, he needs to make those who broke laws accountable.    He has no other choice ... which is why I suspect he may just do it. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites





Federal Judge Blasts State Department Lawyers in Hillary Email Case – Warns ‘No FOIA Exemption For Political Expedience’

Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch on Friday released transcript from their hearing on August 22 where Judge Royce Lamberth granted new discovery and witnesses on Hillary Clinton’s email case.

Judge Lamberth, a Reagan appointee blasted State Department lawyers defending Hillary Clinton who were working to cover up her email scandal.

‘There is no FOIA exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence,’ Judge Lamberth said warning the government lawyers.

Judge Lamberth also lambasted the State Department lawyers when they tried to stop Judicial Watch from gathering more evidence in Hillary’s case.

Via Judicial Watch:




Judge Lamberth also criticized the State Department’s handling and production of Clinton’s emails in this case stating, “There is no FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence.”

In the beginning of their oral arguments, lawyers for the State Department wrongfully stated that Judicial Watch could no longer continue their discovery. The court stopped their arguments saying that Judicial Watch can continue to find more evidence in this case:

STATE DEPARTMENT: … it is, of course, Judicial Watch’s burden to explain to Your Honor why there has been good cause to reopen discovery now that discovery has closed in this case.

THE COURT: Well, I didn’t close discovery. So your premise is wrong.

STATE DEPARTMENT: Fair enough, Your Honor. Whether you want to call it closed or not, it is still —

THE COURT: I didn’t close it. I said I would have a status after they took this initial discovery, and that’s what I’m doing today. I didn’t close discovery.

STATE DEPARTMENT: That’s right, Your Honor, but it is still Judicial Watch’s —

THE COURT: So they don’t need any good cause —


THE COURT: — Today the good cause continues from whether or not State was acting in good faith, and I’ll tell you everything they’ve discovered in this period raises serious questions about what the hell the State Department’s doing here.


Judge Lamberth detailed how the State Department “spent three months from November 2014 trying to make this case disappear,” and that after discovering the State Department’s actions and omissions, “Now we know more, but we have even more questions than answers. So I won’t hold it against Judicial Watch for expanding their initial discovery request now.”

Judicial Watch was recently granted 7 additional depositions and three interrogatories related to Hillary’s email scandal.

Hillary Clinton and her aide-turned-lawyer Cheryl Mills were given 30 days to respond to Judicial Watch’s request for a deposition.

“Judicial Watch uncovered new information about the Clinton email scandal that a federal court agrees requires more answers. We share the court’s annoyance with DOJ lawyers who continue to defend the indefensible. It is beyond disturbing that the State and Justice Departments would continue to try to protect Hillary Clinton and cover up her email scandal. President Trump should order the agencies to cooperate in uncovering the truth,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.



Ouch.  Hillary sure left the State Department a dishonest mess.  Part of her legacy.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites





NEW: Hillary Clinton Seeks to Withhold 6-Page Memo Describing Her Lawyer’s Review and Deletion of Her Emails

Judicial Watch previously sought a deposition from Hillary Clinton, and last month the Court gave the watchdog group additional discovery and witnesses on the Clinton email case.

The judge wanted Judicial Watch to “shake the tree” on a newly uncovered potential Clinton email trove and gave Hillary 30 days to oppose their request to question her under oath.

Hillary Clinton’s lawyers responded to Judicial Watch late Monday evening and sought to withhold a 6-page memo describing her attorney’s deletion of her emails.

“Mrs. Clinton’s attorneys filed opposition to our deposition tonight. She also seeks to withhold a 6 page memo describing her lawyer’s review and deletion of her emails,” Tom Fitton said on Monday night.

Tom Fitton also said that Judicial Watch will “respond to her deposition opposition in 10 days and may file motion to compel on email doc.”


... snip ...


Last December, Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, ordered senior Obama administration officials, including lawyers and aides from the Clinton State Department to be deposed and or answer written questions under oath.



The court ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s email use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. Judicial Watch deposed nearly a dozen witnesses and will seek addition witnesses and documents from the court, including the deposition of Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff at State and personal lawyer who directed the destruction of 33,000 State Department Clinton emails. Lawyers for Clinton and Mills are expected at the hearing Thursday.




Keep in mind that her lawyer, Mills, was actually involved in this violation of law, folks.  


Hillary post-facto made her a personal lawyer to keep her from having to testify in this matter.  


And the FBI (may they rot in Hell) went along with that ruse.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a perfect article for the Clinton Legacy thread …





Hillary set womankind back a century



They propped Hillary up beside her idiot daughter for a Jane Pauley interview. It was taped in case she had "the flu" again. Maybe she did and CBS did not air it.

Flu or not, Hillary continued her sore loser act. It has been nearly 3 years now. At some point even her diehard supporters have to be embarrassed.

President Donald John Trump carried 10 more states than she won. That was the worst shellacking [o]f a Democrat since Dukakis 28 years earlier.

But old and embittered, Hillary disgraced herself and her country by calling him an illegitimate president. No presidential candidate has been as angry at America as she believes she was entitled to win because she is a woman and she put up with decades of public humiliation by her philandering husband.

Her actual words (as opposed to press quotes) were, "I believe he knows he's an illegitimate president. He knows. He knows that there were a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out the way it did and I take responsibility for those parts of it I should.

"But Jane, it's like applying for a job and getting 66 million of letters of recommendation and losing to a corrupt human tornado. And so, I know that he knows that this wasn’t on the level. I don’t know if we'll ever know everything that happened but clearly we know a lot and are learning more every day and history will probably sort it all out. So, of course he's obsessed with me and I believe that it's a guilty conscience in so much as he has a conscience."

President Donald John Trump thinks of her only when he needs a good laugh. He sized her up early when he invited her to his last wedding. He saw her flu firsthand.

Four years ago, Chris Wallace asked him about that invitation.

Donald Trump said, "I’ll tell you what, with Hillary Clinton, I said, ‘Be at my wedding,’ and she came to my wedding. You know why? She had no choice, because I gave."

He knew he could beat her because he knew her.

Americans hate losers. They stink. The complaints about McCain and Romney from those of who voted for him are largely because those two became turncoats on their party. However, it also stems from their loser campaigns.

But whatever pain they had over losing they kept to themselves. They did not say Obama was illegitimate. They did not call the people who voted for him deplorable. They did not write books making excuse after excuse after excuse for their failures.

The first woman nominee for president did and still does. If one cannot handle defeat, one cannot handle victory.



Let me just add that Trump has exposed McCain and Romney for what they really are ... members of the UNIPARTY ... the same party that Hillary and Obama belong to ... which is why they didn't complain when Obama won.   But no doubt about it ... the article is right that that Hillary is well past her sell date and has hurt the future of women in politics.   Not that it will stop DemocRATS from nominating her again if their desperation grows even more than it currently is ... in an effort led by the likes of several other DemocRAT women who are past their sell dates.   :lol:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

And THIS may be the ultimate legacy of the Clintons ...



In that tweet today, Hillary is referring to the impeachment of Trump.

She's suggesting that if Trump isn't impeached, the founding document of our nation should be shredded.


You think about that for a moment, folks.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL!   This is so snarky it deserves to be on this thread …






by Daniel Greenfield

They say that Disneyland is the happiest place on earth, but Hillaryland must be the saddest. 

What is Hillaryland? It’s a social network “aiming to connect all the people who’ve worked for Hillary Rodham Clinton during her more than 40 years of public service.” It’s run by “volunteers” and offers a plain white $15 Hillaryland tote bag which it claims that it’s selling “at cost” and “not for profit”. 

How the might have fallen. 

Once upon a time, Hillary and her people gaslit the country on the big issues. Now they’ve gone from Benghazi to trying to convince a declining handful of suckers that $15 is the cost price for a tote bag.

Hillaryland is the sad successor to Clintonworld networks like the Clinton Foundation which connected world leaders, foreign criminals and a prospective president. The alumni network is now a joke. The Clintons will never hold public office again. Hillaryland isn’t an alumni network, it’s a political leper colony run by “volunteers” too dumb to realize that the S.S. Slick Willy will never rise again. 

Hillaryland promotes such promising ventures as Nasty Women Serve which holds an annual Hillary Rodham Clinton Day of Service. The highest level of service in Hillaryland is hosting a “house party” on November 8, which is National Hillary Day, also known as the day of Hillary’s downfall and defeat. The party will have, “in the true spirit of HRC — some Chardonnay” and will go on “until the wine runs out”. 

Only Nazi war criminals in Argentina have sadder and more pathetic reunions than Hillary minions. 

Nazis and potheads have 4/20 to get high. Hillary fans have 11/8 to get drunk on white wine. And both of them even blame the Russians for the defeat of their miserably corrupt murderous regimes. 

And where’s Madame Fuhrer? 

Hillary stopped by the Venice Biennale, the umbrella organization that includes the Venice Film Festival, allegedly a favorite stalking ground of old Clinton pal, Harvey Weinstein, to attend the exhibit of “HILLARY: The Hillary Clinton Emails." 

For an hour, Hillary sat in a replica of the Oval Office pretending to read her own emails as part of an art project. To make her humiliation more complete, HILLARY was staged at the Despar Teatro Italia, a former theater turned into a supermarket. Confused shoppers watched a former American presidential contender pretending to be the President of the United States in an Italian supermarket. 

There’s your chicken, your canned tomatoes and your pasta. Upstairs is a crazy lady who thinks she’s the President of the United States. Go easy on the chardonnay, you don’t want to end up like her. 

Even Lady Macbeth went mad with more dignity than Hillary Clinton. 

The Oval Office recreated in an Italian supermarket is only the second most famous piece of eponymous Hillary art. The National Museum of Women in the Arts also features a 6-foot-tall painting of a black fabric swatch named Hillary gifted to it by Heather and Tony Podesta. Heather and Tony have since split up. And Tony, a Hillarylander, got caught up in the Russia scandal and shut down his lobbying operation. 

Sic transit gloria clintonmundi. 

Hillaryland and the Italian supermarket presidency cast a dim light on Hillary’s prospects. What do you do when you run out of Chardonnay and ways to market yourself to an audience that no longer cares? 

Audiences turned up their noses at Bill and Hillary’s theatrical appearances. The real Bill and Hillary flopped and so did fictional versions of them played by John Lithgow and Laurie Metcalf in Hillary and Clinton. Everyone, including Italian supermarket shoppers, want Hillary to go away. But she won’t go. 

After churning out way too many books, Hillary is back with The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience. This one is supposedly co-written with Chelsea, but just sounds like a revamp of Chelsea’s collection of She Persisted books which seem to have the same premise and theme. 

This just means another Hillary Clinton book tour that nobody asked for and nobody actually wants. 

Nevertheless, Hillary's desperation tour will still be coming to such world-renowned locations as the Women's Club of Ridgewood, NJ (no books will be signed), the United Methodist Church in Denver, CO, and the San Ramon Valley High School gym. Next stop, a random Appleby’s in Great Forks. 

What’s the point of all this? 

Jeffrey Epstein is dead, Ed Buck is in jail, and Harvey Weinstein is tapped out. The money has to come from somewhere. Even if it means sitting dead-eyed and drunk in a high school gym while Chelsea launches into an enthusiastic explanation of how Rachel Carson made the world safe for malaria. 

But it’s not as if the Clintons really need the money. Their greed is as compulsive as all their vices. 

Hillary Clinton loathes other people, but is incapable of existing without them. She can’t do what every other contender did and go away because she has nowhere to go. There’s a mansion in New York, but it has too many mirrors. And at night, she might start wandering and muttering, “Out, damned spot.” 

And she won’t be talking about the neighbor’s dog who committed suicide in a local park. 

Desperate and malicious, Hillary’s restless spirt wanders the nation and the world, haunting random supermarkets, gyms and colleges. To paraphrase her inspiration, Karl, a specter is wandering D.C. That’s where Hillary showed up to George Washington U to claim that she only lost Wisconsin because of Republican voter suppression. It had nothing to do with her failure to campaign in Wisconsin. 

Meanwhile, only 300 people turned out to hear her latest set of pathetic excuses and lies. 

“I was the first person who ran for president in more than 50 years without the protection of the Voting Rights Act,” she whined. 

The Voting Rights Act had been put into place to stop Democrat voter suppression in segregated states in 1965. Not to protect Hillary. It had nothing to do with why a rich white Democrat lost Wisconsin. 

Who actually invited Hillary to rant at GWU? Who else? Hillary Clinton. In Defense of American Democracy, the conference at which Hillary spoke was sponsored by Onward Together. Her own group. 

Hillary told attendees that the crisis caused by her defeat requires "national soul searching." 

Would you have "risked arrest to demand votes for women or bled on the Edmund Pettus Bridge to demand voting rights for all?" she demanded. 

Why would anyone get arrested or bleed for Hillary? They’re not even coming to hear her speak. 

Just like they didn’t bother turning out to vote for her. 

Hillary wants to fight a war until the last Hillarylander, but nobody would sacrifice a bunion for her, let alone their life and liberty to see that the flag of Hillandia flies proudly over a burning White House. 

That’s what happens when you live in your own imaginary echo chamber of wealth and power. 

Hillary claimed that Republicans had prevented American Indians on reservations from voting for her. But maybe they were just saving their votes for Elizabeth Warren, the first Cherokee president. 

The only thing democracy needs defending from is Hillary Clinton. 

The 2016 election was not hijacked by the Russians, Facebook or UFOs. It was nearly hijacked by Clinton operatives who spread false claims that Trump was a Russian agent that her campaign manufactured and paid for, and then passed along to government officials who used it as a pretext to spy on the opposition. Hillary began her rise with Watergate and ended her career by trying to recreate Watergate. 

And now it’ll be on to the next stop in her endless self-humiliation world tour. 

Hillary’s election hijacking failed and the only way she’ll ever be president is in an Italian supermarket.


Priceless ...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  Hey did you hear?

 Trump is getting impeached!

 Now start deflecting with a made up Clinton crime if you can think of something new.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Squatchman said:

 Hey did you hear?

 Trump is getting impeached!

 Now start deflecting with a made up Clinton crime if you can think of something new.


Let me guess, you voted for Hillary ... LOSER.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could this be the fat lady getting ready to sing her swan song …





Who should run against Trump? How about Hillary Clinton?

by Willie Brown 

It’s time for Hillary Clinton to come out of retirement, lace up the gloves and get back in the ring with President Trump for what would be the biggest political rematch ever.

Call me crazy, but from what I’ve seen so far, Clinton is the only candidate short of Barack Obama who has the brains, the battle-tested brawn and the national presence to take out Trump. And Obama can’t run.



Who do you think is behind the destruction of Biden, folks?   Who else but Hillary could get the NYTimes to throw him under the bus?  B)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BeAChooser said:




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another good reason for Trump to begin The Big Ugly before the 2020 election …




Top officials in the Westchester County Democratic Party were pitching Chelsea Clinton Wednesday on launching a 2020 bid for Nita Lowey’s seat in light of the longtime congresswoman’s retirement announcement, according to a party source familiar with the matter.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites



Ouch.  Maybe Gabbard is *finally* waking up to what the Clintons are?    Wonder if she wishes he hadn't voted for the witch after the rigged DemocRAT"ic" primary?



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to make light of the threat the Clintons still pose to this country, but this is funny ...






Asylum Orderlies Return Hillary Clinton To Padded Cell Disguised As Oval Office



WASHINGTON, D.C.—According to sources close to Hillary Clinton, the failed presidential candidate was gently returned to her padded cell disguised as the Oval Office over the weekend.

After the failed presidential candidate had escaped from the premises again and accused thousands of people of being Russian agents, orderlies were finally able to catch her and guide her back to her cell. She had escaped through the ventilation ducts, apparently, and quickly gave deranged interviews in which she seemed not to understand that she hadn't won the 2016 election. She also found a smartphone and tweeted troubling things, causing asylum personnel to put out a call for her safe return.

"If anyone sees a crazy-looking old woman running around saying she's the president, do not approach her. She is very dangerous," the mental institution said in a statement. "Please phone the authorities right away so we can get her back to safety."

Finally, someone spotted her screaming at a Costco sample lady, accusing the poor woman of being a Russian asset, and authorities arrived to haul her back to her cell.

"Come on, Hill, right this way," said one medical assistant, tenderly guiding her down a hallway to her custom cell. "Time to go back to your ce---err, your office."

Clinton tried to resist, insisting that she couldn't go back to the Oval Office right now as she had a trip scheduled to meet with some foreign leaders. "Yes, OK, dear, that's fine. That's just great. Why don't we have a little nap and then we'll meet with the foreign delegates later, OK, hon?"



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/20/2012 at 4:18 PM, BeAChooser said:

The P B S Whitewash Of Clinton's Legacy

PBS will begin showing a 2 part series on Bill Clinton tonight, a liberal icon. The only question is how big a whitewash it will be. That will depend on whether the following topics are properly and fairly covered … but I suspect most will be ignored:


- his corrupting the election system (CampaignFinancegate)

- his selling out America to potential foreign enemies for campaign contributions (Chinagate)

- his illegally acquiring blackmail material on political opponents (Filegate)

- his attempts to hide the misdeeds (Emailgate, etc)

- his sexual assaults (including the rape of Juanita Broaddrick)

- sexual harassment (of many women, including Monica)

- Monicagate (how Ken Starr used this scandal to help Clinton escape justice)

- the incriminating circumstances in Vince Foster's death (murder)

- the incriminating circumstances in Ron Brown's death (murder)

- Travelgate

- Pardongate

- perjury (actually, he lied to virtually everyone he could possibly lie to)

- obstruction of justice (too many examples to list)

- blackmail

- intimidation of witnesses

- evidence tampering

- witness tampering

- bribery

- abuse of the IRS

- abuse of the military

- abuse of the FBI

- abuse of the DOJ

- violation of drug laws

- national security violations

- his role in the collapse of the mortgage market

- his role in 9/11 occuring

- who really was responsible for balancing the budget in the 90s

- who really was responsible for the economic boom in the 90s


And I would happy to discuss ANY of those topics on this thread. :)







It's TOO LATE, for you.....and, BEEN THAT WAY!!!!!









Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...