Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Socialism'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Main Rooms at the "Liberal Forum"
    • Liberals Only Room
    • No Holds Barred Political Forum
    • The Water Cooler Chat Room
    • Ninth Circle of Hell/Abandon all hope ye who enter here.
    • Contributors room.
  • Liberal Forum Perspectives On Helping America
    • Jobs for Americans
    • Mod room.
  • Str8tEdge's Video Gaming Club's Post games you're currently playing or all time favorites!
  • The Movie Club's Topics
  • The Movie Club's Topics
  • Music Club's Good vibes
  • Music Club's Topics
  • Music Club's What am I listening to now...
  • The Liberal Council's Topics
  • Great hints from imgreatagain's Household odors
  • Great hints from imgreatagain's A good nights sleep.
  • Great hints from imgreatagain's WD-40
  • SPORTS's Jordon
  • SOBER HOUSE's Topics


  • Kfools blog.
  • Life Beyond Legal Equality
  • 18 wheels and a dozen roses
  • deacon dan
  • LF.Org Card Casino
  • Nightowl
  • Working People Don't Care About Economic Inequality

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start






Anti-Spam Check

Website URL

Found 9 results

  1. "The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it." H.L. Mencken
  2. American capitalism enters a darker new era https://realityanalysisnotes.wordpress.com/2017/06/21/american-capitalism-enters-a-darker-new-era/
  3. Hundreds show solidarity with socialist bookshop targeted in right-wing protest https://metro.co.uk/2018/08/11/hundreds-show-solidarity-socialist-bookshop-targeted-right-wing-protest-7827942/ What particularly grabs me about this is that some of the people carrying out the attack were "wearing Donald Trump masks, shouting pro-Trump and Tommy Robinson chants ...." (Robinson is a far-right British activist and founder of the virulently racist English Defence League.) In other words, the current U.S. president Donald Trump ranks alongside some of the most toxic racists on the planet in inspiring rightwing extremists and their violent escapades on a global scale ...
  4. U.S. workers’ missing weapon: A fighting mass workingclass party https://realityanalysisnotes.wordpress.com/2018/07/18/u-s-workers-missing-weapon-a-fighting-mass-workingclass-party/ This analysis addresses and examines many of the key issues at the top of discussion on the radical left in the USA. Many on the left and within the workers movement recognize that the Trump regime represents a significantly new and ominous stage in the degeneration of American capitalism within the ongoing decay of the global imperialist order. But the ascendancy of Trump & Co. also signals a significant intensification of class war by America's ruling capitalist strata against the nation's working class (and the masses of the dispossessed as a whole). In the face of this onslaught, the working class needs a more effective political weapon to defend itself, turn the tide of class struggle, and advance a revolutionary socialist program.
  5. The title basically says it all. Why don't republican/conservative believe in socialism and government assistance. Why not take from the rich and give to the poor? I don't understand why the rich need all this money. Comments from both sides would be great. -Thanks About me: Female liberal In my 20's Social worker
  6. Why are the Democrats considered socialists? Obviously, Bernie Sanders is a self-described socialist, but he was an independent for years until he decided to run for the presidency. Obamacare isn't really universal health care considering the fact that there are millions of uninsured Americans. Universal would mean that everyone has coverage. Further Obamacare forces Americans to buy their own health care. It is not given to Americans for free like the typical universal health care country. The poorest get Obamacare for free, but that doesn't change anything because they already had free health care through Medicaid before Obamacare. More people qualify for Medicaid since the rules have been changed, so with Obamacare there has been an expansion of Medicaid, but that doesn't mean that Obamacare is suddenly universal health care. Furthermore, Bernie Sanders ran in the primary promising to bring true universal health care to America. That is proof enough that Obamacare is not this gigantic government give-away. As a matter of fact, millions of Americans are stressing out by the large increases in health insurance premiums that they are facing, and that is because Obamacare has been an absolute failure in fixing the system and lowering health care premiums like Obama said it would. Hillary Clinton is in opposition to Bernie's universal health care plan, and Hillary said pretty clearly that America is not Denmark in response to Bernie's ideas. With such a strong contrast between Hillary and Bernie, why are they lumped together? Obviously, the definition of socialism is what matters. Originally communism and socialism meant the same entering the 19th century, where it was a system whereby everyone had a completely equal piece of the pie. No rich people allowed. Then, a distinction happened between the two terms. The end result was the same where everyone shares the wealth equally, but how to get there is what distinguished the two terms. Communism meant armed struggle to get there while socialism meant you got there peacefully. Nowadays many refer to socialism as any redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor. But by that standard, America has been a socialist country for many decades since the rich have been paying for the education of poor schoolchildren. What it comes down to is that historically, the Democrats will say just about anything to get votes, and this means that they constantly do not live up to what they preach when they are running for office. See TheDemocratPartyIsAFraud.com for many, many examples of this. Thus, the reality is that while there are some who think like Bernie in the Democrat Party, the Democrat Party's embrace of Obamacare in opposition to the true universal health care Bernie proposed demonstrates that the labeling of the Democrat Party as a socialist party is wrong. What justification is there for labeling the Democrat Party as a socialist party at this point?
  7. Cuba's in the news, and Liberal Forum members may want to become better informed about the place. I've recently been there for a short holiday (three weeks), and it inspired me to start reading up about the country, which is undergoing important changes. Here are my recommendations so far: Number one: Cuban Revelations, by Marc Frank. Frank is the grandson of Waldo Frank, whom older members may recall as the left-wing and somewhat mystical author of various books on Latin America in the fifties. His grandson is the Financial Times correspondent for Cuba, who has lived there (his wife is Cuban) for several decades. He is an excellent reporter, with lots of contacts at all levels, from Communist Party officials, to ordinary people (including his extended Cuban family). He travels around the island and talk to street vendors as well as government officials, and has written a fascinating book. Highly recommended. Number two: The Contemporary Cuban Reader, second edition, edited by Philip Brenner and Marguerite Rose Jimenez. Lots of informed academic articles on everything from the Cuban economy, to Cuban culture, to race in Cuba today, and more.. Number three: Cuba: a New History, by Richard Gott. A bit dated (published in 2005) but a pretty good history of the place up to ten years ago. Number four: My Life by Fidel Castro and Ignacio Ramonet. A little over ten years ago, Fidel Castro was extensively interviewed by the Spanish editor of Le Monde Diplomatique (despite its title, it's a left-wing publication that doesn't think much of the USA). Ramonet is an admirer of the Cuban Revolution and its leader, but not an uncritical one, so, while the questioning could have been more vigorous, it's not all softballs either. In any case, it gives you a good insight into Castro's thinking. There were, for me, lots of surprises too, and some information which many Americans might find relevant (such as: if you're planning to storm a military barracks, and presumably any other building, .22 rifles and shotguns are perfectly adequate close-quarter weapons -- no reason to splash out on an assault rifle. Also: you should have a Plan B in case things go wrong.). The Inevitable Battle: From the Bay of Pigs to Playa Giron, by Juan Carlos Rodriguez. This is by a government supporter, and I bought and read it while in Cuba. To be honest, I expected a hack job, but it seems pretty honest to me, albeit written from the viewpoint of a partisan of one side. (But a lot of war literature is like that.) I've reviewed it in much more detail on Amazon.com for anyone interested. These are just the books I've read which I would recommend others to read. I've also read a couple of terrible books, and some which are interesting but rather specialized (eg on Cuban youth culture). I might write short descriptions of these later. I'll mention three others which seem to be well-recommended by others, and which I have but haven't read yet. Perhaps someone who has read one or more of them would like to comment (or, of course, comment on the ones above, or mention others). Cuba, a History, by Hugh Thomas. I've hesitated to start this immense book, but it appears to be unique in the amount of detail it holds, and the author is a well-known historian. Che Guevara: a Revolutionary Life by Jon Lee Anderson. A quick skim of this book, which I have not properly read yet, convinced me that it was a 'fair and balanced' account of a man who makes some people froth at the mouth. (You can't go anywhere in Cuba without seeing his iconic picture, and you'll have many many opportunities to buy a Che T-shirt. What he would think of Cuba today is interesting to speculate about.) Origins of the Cuban Revolution Reconsidered, by Sam Farber. Farber is a Cuban-American, but unlike almost all others in that category, is a Marxist. He is, however, not at all a regime apologist, and doesn't consider Cuba socialist. I have seen this book well-reviewed, and i would like to get and read it (but it's prohibitively expensive -- anyone want to sell me a copy?) Note: almost all of these books, except perhaps the one by Hugh Thomas, are by people who are definitely left-of-centre, and thus sympathetic to many of the stated goals, and some of the achievements, of the Revolution. However, they are not regime apologists. I'm definitely right-of-center and am pretty allergic to Leftist apologies for tyranny. But the most important quality in politics is personal integrity, devotion to the truth, not formal political beliefs, and this quality (or its lack) seems to be well-distributed over the whole poltical spectrum. In any case, I believe these authors pass the test, and the reader can correct for any bias in the authors. Now, a question to the moderator: there are several people who have written excellent articles on Cuba today, such as Emily Morris in New Left Review, various Cubans in The Havana TImes, and several others. This forum is supposed to be about books only, but it might be useful to post some relevant web links here also. Is that permitted, or is this site for book reviews only?
  8. Sweden Democrats' supporters are the ones that look most bleak future - 93 percent of them believe that Sweden is going the wrong direction.The corresponding figure among Alliance voters, 64 percent and 49 percent for the red-green voters. Source: Sex av tio svenskar har tappat framtidstron Fria Tider Translation: English Translation I'll start by saying that I think there are some things that Sweden does right and should be praised for, but the extreme political correctness and unwillingness to allow any criticism of the status quo (unrestricted immigration, lack of integration, etc.) is destroying the country. What do you guys think about this news?
  • Create New...