Jump to content

freeman

Member
  • Posts

    1,389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    Conservative

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    M
  • Location
    U.S.
  • Interests
    Freedom, liberty, self-determination and truth.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

freeman's Achievements

  • Great Content Rare

Recent Badges

141

Reputation

  1. While Obama's preferred method was NLP or neuro-linguistic programming. While an obvious idiot since he was a communist like his father, he did acquire a masterful skill at "conversational hypnosis". One article suggested that Obama deliberately used techniques of neuro-linguistic programming or NLP, which is a covert form of hypnosis. https://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama's_Use_of_Hidden_Hypnosis_techniques_in_His_Speeches.pdf
  2. Yet what was the real record of Joseph McCarthy? And when you add to brainwashing, instilling fear to sheer terror in people by killing them through a relentless campaign of propaganda lies, phony stats and fraudulent trials, it makes it all the more easy to turn them into victims of COVID Derangement Syndrome.
  3. Isn't it interesting that it took our liberal courts a couple hundred years to finally figure out that a woman has the right to kill a baby. Another human being. Then decades more before Hillary and her ilk championed the "right" to kill that child right up until the day before birth. The right to destroy another person's God-given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, by killing them. So what is the back story behind those that it was supposedly litigated on behalf of? The popular media spiked the news that Norma McCorvey, who was "Jane Roe" of Roe vs. Wade, and Sandra Cano who was "Mary Doe" in Doe vs. Bolton of the companion case, both filed motions in Federal court to set aside the landmark U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 ruling in their cases. "1. Sandra Cano did not want an abortion. Cano did not actually want an abortion, but was seeking legal help to get custody of her children in foster care while she was pregnant with her fourth child and divorcing her husband, as detailed by EndRoe.org. Cano believed: … [H]er lawyer, Margie Pitts Hames, tricked her into signing the affidavit that formed the basis of the plaintiff’s charges in Doe. “I do not believe it is my signature on the affidavit, and Margie either forged my signature or slipped this document in with other papers while I was signing divorce papers. I never told Margie that I wanted an abortion. The facts stated in the affidavit in Doe v. Bolton are not true.” https://www.liveaction.org/news/woman-behind-doe-v-bolton/ And the other: https://www.leaderu.com/common/roev.html
  4. May be a blessing in disguise. When the little guys with weak hands get their tails burned by Wall Street again, it might set the proper mood for patriots to get out and do something about Big Pharma, government and media profiteering at the expense of the deaths of Americans.
  5. And then as I reported previously there's Moderna. While not as criminal as Pfizer, they haven't really had time to commit more than their current crime against humanity, since during their first ten years of operation they never received an FDA approval, much less successfully brought a product to market. Moderna raised 3.2 billion dollars in equity beginning in 2010, yet by year-end 2019 they had accumulated 1.5 billion dollars in losses. Then they took on the NIH as a heavily conflicted patent holder and voila thanks to the bailout are selling their first commercially viable product! Their COVID-19 jab. So what's not to trust when the regulator is a patent holder, in a previously unsuccessful upstart company, that enjoys absolute exemption from liability for their product! Well perhaps...... I noticed this interesting tidbit from 2017: "They found, inter alia, that "mRNA is a labile biological molecule and therefore requires the use of protective delivery systems to effectively harness its potential," as the mRNA spread beyond the injection site and was found in the liver, spleen, bone marrow and heart.[27] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderna Which is exactly what this recent generation of COVID vaccine makers claimed would not happen, but a bio-distribution study from Japan found that the spike proteins travel throughout the vascular system and are found not only in all of the above listed organs, but in large volume in the ovaries. The inflammatory reaction to the spike proteins may be plugging up and killing off recipient's capillaries as they sit reading this. https://rumble.com/vlqdpo-dr-peter-mccullough-lecture-on-the-state-of-covid-treatment..html So McRocket can bleed for Moderna's shareholders along with Pfizer's since the stock price on 1-2-20 was $19.23, with current share price around $430.00. What is that, an over 2,200% increase? Not bad for business when you take Fauci and his interests on as a partner. Though not so good for the thousands of dead AIDS sufferers he killed back in 1987, or the 600,000 dead Americans (and millions more around the world) that Fauci killed in his most recent genocide. Let alone the tens or at least soon hundreds of thousands of dead vaccine victims around the world, with several million more suffering serious adverse events. But that's great biz for the Illness Industry! So should it be any surprise that an amoral reprobate like Fauci and the NIH would do anything and everything in their power to sink 99+% successful, $20 early treatment protocols?
  6. What an intelligent response! Indeed, what would a coroner know about about the cause of someone's death.
  7. Why would that be weirder than the counting of deaths from gunshot wounds as COVID-19 deaths? "The coroner, Brenda Bock, says two of their five deaths related to COVID-19 were people who died of gunshot wounds." https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gunshot+wound+covid+death&t=hy&va=g&ia=web
  8. Nobody could have ever made up this whole story since February of 2020! And the way they're going to change it, is by forcing only U.S. data to be used, since they haven't been counting vaccine breakthrough cases since May 1st!
  9. Why let the fact that a vaccine is so worthless it would never be allowed even EUA, to get in the way! Could Pfizer's vaccine's effectiveness be as low as 19% to 29%?
  10. I certainly didn't move my goalposts. It includes a year and a half to June 1. Which wouldn't surprise me was about the time the rats started leaving the sinking ship, particularly now that they are not only failing the vaxxed, but can't even get a booster approved. And just wait until vaccine-enhanced disease kicks in! They've known it was crap all along. Not only reflected in their only allowing younger, healthy people into the trial, but also by throwing out massive numbers of COVID suspicious but not tested: Could Pfizer's vaccine's effectiveness be as low as 19% to 29%? I see. So then the Covid-19 vaccine only accounting for 41% of Pfizer’s $19 billion Q2 revenue indicates that it didn't have a positive effect on their profit. Sorry, I'm still not going to bleed for them. And I'm sorry your employee stock options apparently haven't performed as you had hoped they would! But then your off-subject bluster was obviously only intended to continue to help you run and hide from the question I have repeatedly posed: "So rather than recommend nothing, until an individual needs oxygen in a hospital - and even then only next to worthless Remdesivir - what should Fauci and the NIH have recommended? What would you recommend? NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals
  11. And gee, once again you need to try to claim that you are so much smarter than the scientists/treating physician that designed and ran the study (cited a hundred times) and the peer reviewers that reviewed it. And as such I suppose it is you that should have been nominated for the Nobel Prize rather than Zelenko, eigh?
  12. I see, so we SHOULD be bleeding for Pfizer's profits: https://finbold.com/covid-19-vaccine-accounts-for-41-of-pfizers-19-billion-q2-revenue/ Covid-19 vaccine accounts for 41% of Pfizer’s $19 billion Q2 revenue The company reported a net profit of $5.56 billion with revenues of $18.98 billion for the second quarter. The vaccines scientifically identified as BNT162b2 contributed a share of 41% of the company’s revenue. Notably, between 2016 and 2020, Pfizer’s revenue remained relatively flat, growing by 8.2%. The growth in revenue during the quarter comes after Pfizer signed more deals to supply the vaccine to other countries. The revenue will surge further, considering that the company expects to deliver 2.1 billion doses of the mRNA vaccine this year. Therefore, Pfizer will raise its revenue guidance to $33.5 billion from $26 billion." It would be funny if not downright homicidal, with them peddling a crap fake vaxx offshore, that they couldn't even get approval for a booster for in the U.S.
  13. But what was your point? Mine is that from the beginning it has only ever been about Big Pharma profits. That's why they had to sink 99% effective, $20, generic, early treatment protocols. Yours is that 30% annualized isn't enough profit? https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/347146-how-big-pharma-and-the-psyops-of-the-global-deep-state-have-broken-so-many-minds-through-fear-and-who-big-pharmas-money-buys/ We should be bleeding for Big Pharma not performing better, rather than deposing the criminals and hanging whichever CEOs and board members are guilty - for being responsible for the unnecessary deaths of 600,000 Americans - during Nuremburg 2.0?
  14. And just look at all the bluster! What's the matter? Aren't your employee stock options performing as you had hoped? Or did they only hire you recently to be one of their internet sluth propagandist deluded liars? I offered to teach you how to read graphs previously (or "pretty pictures" as you referred to them). Let's click on the link and scroll down to the chart and select "max" to see what a Yahoo chart tells us: Stock price December 1, 2019 right about at the actual beginning of the pandemic, $31.71 Stock price June 1, 2021 - six quarters in - $46.07 I see an increase of $14.36 Or an increase of about 45.2% in a year and a half. Times 2 divided by 3 that's over 30% annualized. Are you going to try to convince us now that investors should expect 30% annualized returns from a giant, bloated, stodgy old corporations? What, did they gyp you out of your employee bonus?
  15. If you are over 50 or so, that should be grounds for medical malpractice. Here is how competent clinicians have been treating it since March of 2020 compared to the Fauci/NIH "standard of care". NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals Doctors say Zinc has a tough time being transported through the cell wall, without a zinc ionophore like quercetin, ECGC or HCQ. The first two are available over the counter. https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Alliance-I-MASKplus-Protocol-ENGLISH.pdf But now that you have natural immunity you can probably relax a bit more. 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated VS 1% who had been infected previously
×
×
  • Create New...