Jump to content

JaySolo

Member
  • Content Count

    1,069
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    No Party/Other

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    none

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    A Mythical City--Maybe Yours
  • Interests
    Guess

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. That's not what your post says. It says swift brutal action to punish (on unverified intel) and you complained that he invited Putin to G7 (again, on unverified intel). Like i said, what kind of naval officer suggests the president go off half cocked (making swift brutal action to punish and not inviting Putin to G7) based on unverified intel?
  2. Looks like you stepped on your dick again. You DID want Trump to act on unverified intel. Note from the above link: The clown has KNOWN that Russia was paying a bounty on OUR TROOPS and didn't care! Not only did he NOT take swift brutal action to PUNISH Putin's regime for this heinous action, he even asked them to come to the next G7 meeting!!! Now, once again, explain to me what kind of Naval officer expects the president to act on unverified intel? Also, you lied.
  3. Yes you did. What you do? Change the post in a feeble attempt to hide your glaring error? Bullshit and more bullshit, trying to cover up the glaring error he made in insisting the president act on unverified intelligence. The only insanity here is YOU claiming Trump should act on unverified intelligence, when even Schiff and Pelosi haave the common sense not to. Then you wonder why people wonder if this a case of stolen valor. No naval officer worth his salt would even suggest the president act on an unverified rumor. Which you are not and it isn't= And how do you know he didn't as, like you said, this is between him and his generals. You claim, yet you make a glaring error like expecting the president to go off half cocked on an unverified rumor.
  4. No, back where you thought the president should act on an unverified bit of intel. You DID say you were an intelligence officer, didn't you? So the Navy taught you to go off half cocked at every rumor you heard, right? Or was the whole intelligence officer thing more bullshit on your part? I'm presently leaning on more bullshit.
  5. And yet, none of that says, "I didn't read the report nor did I pass it on." As far as your "fake news" claim. We've already discussed that and I hate circular aarguments. Should you need a refresher, go back two pages and read our back and forth real s-l-o-w. Rinse and repeat until your heart's content.
  6. Just like you have no idea whether or not Trump cared or passed the information through the proper channels.
  7. Bullshit. The could have held hearings, they could have advised someone, instead they chose to DO NOTHING. Now if it's egregious for Trump, it's also egregious for Pelosi and Schiff. There's that
  8. And yet taking NO ACTION when they had the same ability to act that Trump did. There's that, of course.
  9. Gee. if that's your complain, Pelosi recieved the same intel as Schiff, yet she didn't pursue it either. Again, if this is so egregious, I would think the co-equal branches of government would step up to the plate and act. Schiff and Pelosi chose to do nothing. Why? Perhaps they could see it was a nothing burger and could be used as "fake news" to be weaponized.
  10. Leave it to you to try (and very poorly, I might add) to argue a distinction without a difference. What bearing would a PDB being involved have on a claim that Obozo heard a major event on the evening news? National security, perhaps? Then, Obozo claimed he heard about Fast and Furious on the evening news. A border patrol agent being murdered by gun provided by the government isn't a national security issue? Or how about Obozo claiming he heard about the IRS targeting conservatives on the evening news? That wasn't an issue of national security? No, I wouldn't think there's a difference. Trump may have called it "fake news" for a number of reasons. There may have been some Super Secret Squirrel stuff going on. Hemay have been trying to protect assets. Obozo, on the other hand, was just trying to be deceptive. I understand. To you, black man good, orange man bad. It colors every judgment you have about the two.
  11. I don't know: why would Obozo tell us that he heard many major events on the evening news just like we did. For Obozo, that makes no sense. But Democrats had no trouble swallowing it.
  12. So then I could make a similar argument: He read the report and acted on it, by passing it along, and no one would know except Trump and the general he passed it along to.
  13. How do you know Trump didn't read the report?
  14. If anyone is attempting to blow serious smoke, it's YOU. The bottom line of your party's whole platform is this constant lecture on how responsible we are for one another. Now we see how much you believe all that constant lecturing. I never said that. However when American lives are in danger, he is responsible to do something. And you know this how? Were you there? Fake news? Whose media is calling rioters "peaceful protesters"? Seems to me it's your media that's the fake news. Yet it's reported Schiff took no action. NO ACTION.
  15. No hypocrisy here. If someone is sexually irresponsible, I'm not responsible to pay for their abortion, yet your party wants to force the responsibility on me. If someone joins a caravan and shows up on a US border, I'm not responsible to feed and house them, yet your party wants to force the responsibility on me. Yet American lives are on the line and somehow Schiff escapes your Brother's Keeper mantra. And this has what to do with what? You've obviously never taken an ethics class in your life. If you had you'd know it's not what the other side is doing, its what your doing. Like I said, you're out of the loop: it was reported in the media. No, I know multiple sources stated he took no action. He did nothing.

No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...