Jump to content

Olivaw

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    15,742
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Olivaw

  1. 2 hours ago, Dontlooknow said:

    Investigate everything and kill this conspiracy and make trump look like an ass. 


    That makes sense to rational people but are we dealing with rational people?
     

    Obama released his birth certificate but it didn’t kill birtherism. The Mueller and Senate reports detailed Russian meddling and the cult still call it a hoax. COVID-19 has killed 262.6K Americans and they think it’s the sniffles. 
     

    The cult doesn’t care about evidence or truth. They believe what dear leader commands them to believe.

  2. 1 minute ago, Str8tEdge said:

    Define "fellow American". Many on the left are traitors or guilty of supporting traitors, coups, sedition. 

     

    If widespread fraud is proven, democrats should be rounded up as traitors to democracy and free people. 


    Careful, orderly. BAC can plead insanity. Can you? 

  3. 1 minute ago, BeAChooser said:

     

    Notice, folks, that Olivaw didn’t deny forming his opinion that Trump was guilty of all the bogus accusations made against him him based on MSM hit pieces on him, thus proving the point I made about Olivaw.  


    Notice folks that BeAChooser did not deny using this forum to convince members to shoot fellow Americans, thus proving the point I made about BeAChooser. 

     

     

     

  4. 1 hour ago, BeAChooser said:

     

    ^^^^^ Says either a communist or a moron (or both) ... who was perfectly ok with letting Trump be accused and convicted of bogus accusations by the MSM.


    ^sez a wacko who encourages people on a forum to shoot fellow Americans. 
     

    The media can’t convict. That’s up to the courts or Congress. 

  5. 46 minutes ago, pmurT said:

    where are all of the Liberal Lunatics, to mock this scenario?  Where's @SpyCar  @benson13 @slideman and the frootcake @Dontlooknow or @Fit2Serve  or @Olivaw and @Scout or @Toldya or sorryASS @calguy ... ROFL ... where are these freaks who like to mock Trump, for challenging the election??


    That’s not how it works, pTurd.

     

    It’s up to Trump et al to prove fraud.

     

    It’s up to you to lurch obediently at every unsubstantiated allegation and gleefully claim it’s a game changer, as @kfools did. 
     

    It’s up to us to kick back and enjoy your denial of Biden’s landslide victory. It’s up to us to call @BeAChooserout on his effort to promote insurrection. It’s not up to us to dissect wild speculation and unsubstantiated claims made by the losing candidate and his allies. 

     

    This was not a hearing. It was a Republican meeting in a hotel. What were the rules of evidence? Was opposing counsel present? Was there cross examination? 
     

    In the unlikely event that Trump et al. prove widespread vote fraud then we can address it. And by unlikely I mean infinitesimally remote.  🙂

    • Like 1
  6. 20 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

    Determining whether there are, or are not, illegal votes does not happen overnight......especially if it’s as widespread as many think. It’s going to take some time to determine that. As usual, I think Trump has hurt himself in this process via his legal team choices, twittering and such.....but he has every right to question any illegalities - whether real or perceived. The onus is on him to prove it, and he’s going against an extremely well funded, deeply entrenched Dem machine. We saw for four years what they’re capable of, so I put nothing past them as I don’t trust any of those cockroaches in DC......and especially the ones that have been there forever.

     

    What would confirm them as legal to my satisfaction? I’m a systems guy, and am concerned about the integrity of the system. If it were me, I’d want the questions surrounding the massive influx of early morning votes investigated by a neutral party (if there remains such a thing) and an honest answer as to how hundreds of thousands of votes were processed in such a short time, often with observers kept at bay......and how in the heck 98% of those votes all went to Biden. Statistically impossible. I’d like to know how in these Dem strongholds significantly more mail-in ballots were sent out than were requested, and to know exactly where those thousands of extras went. I’d also like to know how 10’s of thousands of votes, in these same districts, only voted for President. Ya, some do that.....but no where remotely near the numbers they’re talking. I’d also like to get to the bottom of this Dominen program, you know....the one manufactured outside of the US that Dems as recently as 2018 were screaming their heads off about how easy it is to change votes on. And finally, I’d really like to know how the same damn problems only happened consistently in Dem areas, in swing states. That’s called a pattern. Should this PA pan out the direction it’s seemingly going, then the same investigation for the very same reasons needs to occur in each of the swing states.

     

    I want a legitimate election for the sake of our Republic. If the shoe was on the other foot, and the circumstantial evidence be as broad as this, I’d want the same thing. The Constitution and this Republic are the most important aspects, and we should all want to exercise the privilege of voting and have an election with integrity.

     

    Oh ya, and I’d really like to know what in the hell happened to my wife’s ballot.



    I’m a retired system guy too. My understanding is that eligibility to vote/legality is determined before the ballot is cast. 
     

    If a person cannot prove their eligibility, then they can cast a provisional ballot. The voter has to provide proof within a very short timeframe or their ballot is discarded.
     

    In many jurisdictions, people who requested mail-in ballots but later vote in person are checked against the database to verify that they did not vote by mail. 

    Similarly, all mail-in votes are checked against the voter registration database to ensure the person did not vote in-person. 
     

    it’s one vote per eligible voter. It’s all signed off and people put their livelihoods and reputation on the line. 
     

    If the numbers that voter guy talked about are real, then it will be up to the people who run the system to explain it.
     

    [In one or two districts in Georgia (I think) they missed a few votes because they neglected to transfer SD cards. It’s a human mistake but the person who designed and supervised a system that accidentally disenfranchised voters should resign, IMO.]
     

    Again, Trump et al have not provided evidence of widespread fraud of the sort that would give millions and millions of unearned votes to Biden. All they have are vagaries, platitudes and a few glitches that wouldn’t affect the outcome. 
     

    ———
     

    You are justified in demanding to know what happened to your wife’s ballot. I’d be outraged too. It doesn’t support Trump’s allegation which seem to be that votes were manufactured, not lost. 

  7. 34 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

    Who said ANYTHING about tossing legal votes??? With all of the unusual circumstances in this election........it’s all about CONFIRMING those legal votes.

     

    As far as Rudy goes, not a fan.....but we’ll see where this goes. In the end, the system and its integrity should be the utmost important aspect of our elections, regardless of the bit players or any agenda.


    Trump has not established that there were illegal votes. In the absence of evidence to the contrary don’t we have to accept that certified votes are legal.

     

    What, beyond certification, would confirm them as legal to your satisfaction? Is there any unsubstantiated Trump allegation that can be dismissed?  Are Trump and his allies permitted to level new allegations daily? Do they bear any burden to prove that their allegations have merit? 
     

    if every vote was legal and counted, nobody is disenfranchised. That’s where we are right in a legal and moral sense. 

  8. 14 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

    01.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, Mirabeau knows who his father is.

     

    02.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was born into a family of great moral character.

     

    03.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, his parents taught him to be a LEADER and not a follower.

     

    04.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, his parents taught him the value of INVESTIGATING THE VERACITY of news articles.

     

    05.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he never has had any family member go to jail or prison, or be arrested for ANYTHING.

     

    06.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was born into a family that is extremely intelligent.

     

    07.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was born into a family that is self-sufficient.

     

    08.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was born into a family of PATRIOTS.

     

    09.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he has NEVER seen the inside of Section-8 housing.

     

    10.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he is admired and respected by all intellectuals and patriots.

     

    11.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was taught to ALWAYS SPEAK THE TRUTH.

     

    12.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he makes decisions based on REASON instead of EMOTION.

     

    13.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was taught to never eat mashed potatoes with his hands.

     

    14.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was taught how to practice good hygiene.

     

    15.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, his parents taught him to THINK FOR HIMSELF, instead of having a handler do it for him.

     

    16.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he knows that government HAS NO FUNDS other than those CONFISCATED from decent Americans.

     

    17.  Mirabeau is thankful that, unlike Dumbocrats, he was taught that "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you," IS A LIE!

     

    18.  Mirabeau is thankful that HE CLEANSED his corner of the world of Dumbocrats.

     

    Have a happy Thanksgiving.

     

     

     

     


     

    Congratulations TEX. You won the birth lottery. Born with a silver spoon in your ass, were ya? 

    Come visit us in the hood some time. We’ll throw some ribs in the burning barrel and share a bottle of isopropyl. Wear blackface. Bring your own cutlery.

  9. 18 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:


    We’ve had dozens of such allegations that were noteworthy on the surface  but collapsed under scrutiny, BAC. 
     

    For example, Rudy alleged that there were more votes than voters. The numbers he produced in court compared registered voters from districts in one state to ballots in districts in an entirely different state.  Needless to say, he lost. 

     

    I lack the time or skill to scrutinize every allegation coming from Trump’s lawyers and political allies. I have to leave that to opposing counsel and the court. If they can convince a judge of fraud then I’d certainly have to accept it. So far, they haven’t. 

  10. 23 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

    His post is spot on to the core.

     

    Legal votes only.....anything else disenfranchises those legal voters.

     

    Hell.....my wife’s votes.....mailed in, never showed up which means wasn’t counted. Voting commission  said it never showed, USPS said it was “lost, but we’re investigating”. And my wife took vid of her ballot being sealed, and vid of it being dropped in the box AT THE POST offices physical facility. 
     

    Waaaaaaaay to many irregularities in this election.


    Oops, duplicate response. 
     

  11. 1 minute ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

    His post is spot on to the core.

     

    Legal votes only.....anything else disenfranchises those legal voters.

     

    Hell.....my wife’s votes.....mailed in, never showed up which means wasn’t counted. Voting commission  said it never showed, USPS said it was “lost, but we’re investigating”. And my wife took vid of her ballot being sealed, and vid of it being dropped in the box AT THE POST offices physical facility. 
     

    Waaaaaaaay to many irregularities in this election.

     

    I’m done with him. 
     

    Tossing legal votes disenfranchises voters. No court will do it. If one ever did, it would be quickly overturned by a higher court. 

     

    The burden rests with the challenger to prove that votes were illegal. Rudy and the team have claimed millions of illegal votes but have failed to offer evidence to a court of their existence. 
     

    Your wife has a right to have her vote counted.

  12. 14 minutes ago, RayDonavin said:

     

    It seems you are one fucked up individual. Counting only the legal votes is not ignoring the voters, in fact it gives them legitimacy. And if you haven't noticed there is no certified winner of the states presidential election yet. That is what the thread is about. Put the pipe down.


    Post respectfully or end up in the iggie bin. You have ONE chance to restate this post politely.

  13. 7 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

    It’s only something like two minutes......but I’ll give you the cliff notes:

     

    Dumbshitiani......What were the vote numbers during this timeframe?
     

    Vote dude.......over 570,000+

     

    Dumbshitiani......How many were for Trump?

     

    Vote dude......a little over 3,400

     

    Dumshitiani......does that indicate anything to you?
     

    Voter dude.......it indicates fraud

     

    Not verbatim, but pretty close to that...

     

    Is voter dude responsible for election integrity, directly or indirectly? 

    Was voter dude paid by a campaign or PAC? 

    Did voter dude back up his allegation with documentation? 

    Was voter dude cross examined? 
    Will vote dude testify in court under penalty of perjury?

    Why didn’t voter dude speak up sooner?

     

     

    You’ll excuse me if I’m skeptical after 40 or so Trump cases have been laughed out of court. 

     

     

  14. 9 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

    The video is about as direct to the source of this OP as you can get, short of being there in person.

     

    I’d bet you won’t be seeing this video on any of your “media”......it’s awfully difficult to explain away.


    Having followed a few of these links only see the allegations later collapse under scrutiny, I’ve decided to stop wasting my time on them. If a court rules that the evidence is admissible, it will show up in the legitimate media. 

×
×
  • Create New...