Jump to content

Olivaw

Member
  • Content Count

    12,216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    No Party/Other

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    None

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Route 66
  • Interests
    Science, politics, motorcycles, travel.

Recent Profile Visitors

650 profile views
  1. I waffle between Biden and Warren. Biden is where my heart takes me. Warren is where my head takes me. Mayor Pete would be an excellent running mate. He’s tough but never nasty. Biden/Warren or Warren/Buttigieg would make me happy.
  2. Sanders decision to release a deceptively edited video attacking Joe Biden may backfire. Those of us who were not born yesterday know that Biden has fought for Social Security throughout his career. Bernie’s claim that he would cut Social Security and disability programs Is fundamentally dishonest. It says more about Bernie’s integrity than it says about Biden. This after the dispute with Warren about Bernie’s comment about a woman in the general. Sorry Bernie Bros, I would choose any one of the remaining candidates over Bernie At this point. If we nominate a candidate who seems dishonest, it will normalize Trump’s dishonesty. We need a an honest candidate.
  3. Proof is evidence that points to guilt. ALL the evidence points to guilt. There is far more than just witness testimony.
  4. The statement was made for show and the real response is due on Monday. Not a moment too soon. Right wingers are desperate for better talking points.
  5. House managers act as the prosecution. Trump has defense lawyers. The Chief Justice presides. Senators are jury and judge.
  6. We can wait, but it’s interesting to discuss - at least it is until Trump supporters act clueless.
  7. It does seem like they are playing the clueless card. I wonder if Trump’s defense team will come up with a more compelling defense.
  8. Far less laughable than anything that Bill Clinton was accused of. You’ll hear the evidence at trial, unless Moscow Mitch successfully suppresses it. https://sidebarsblog.com/crimes-in-articles-impeachment/ https://www.justsecurity.org/67738/federal-criminal-offenses-and-the-impeachment-of-donald-j-trump/
  9. Crimes were committed. Your weak technical defense has neither merit nor relevance. Bribery Honest Service Fraud Obstruction of Justice Obstruction of Official Proceedings Violation of Campaign Finance Law (requesting a campaign contribution from a foreign government) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations Contempt of Congress Violation of the Impoundment Control https://sidebarsblog.com/crimes-in-articles-impeachment/ https://www.justsecurity.org/67738/federal-criminal-offenses-and-the-impeachment-of-donald-j-trump/
  10. Actually it does. A sitting president cannot be indicted per Justice Department Policy. It is therefore pointless, from an impeachment perspective to document statute and code violations. That doesn’t mean he did not commit crimes. Criminal conduct lies at the heart of Trump’s wrongdoing,
  11. Your problem is that that Trump committed crimes. Period. Hair splitting does not change it. Bribery Honest Service Fraud Obstruction of Justice Obstruction of Official Proceedings Violation of Campaign Finance Law (requesting a campaign contribution from a foreign government) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations Contempt of Congress Violation of the Impoundment Control Act https://sidebarsblog.com/crimes-in-articles-impeachment/ https://www.justsecurity.org/67738/federal-criminal-offenses-and-the-impeachment-of-donald-j-trump/
  12. Wrong again, libertarian clown. I want to remove him at the ballot box because he is an awful president. Congress decided to impeach him and I think they made the right call. Intrinsic to the articles Of impeachment and the legal brief are evidence of statutory crimes.
  13. You claimed there were no statute violations. I showed you statute violations. You tried to move the goalposts but failed. You resorted to insult. Either you are too dense to understand or you are intentionally lying. Either way, this has become a face saving exercise for you. Not interested, Perhaps you can find comfort in the arms of the clueless clown. I’ll dismiss you, for now, but I reserve the right to call out your blatant BS whenever the mood suits me.
×
×
  • Create New...