Libswatter

Point to the funny part.

And that's what you would have said about Horowitz if he had reached the same conclusion..

Showing your ignorance again.

Go back to your sandbox, Harry.

It's figurative. Get it?

More truth. A waste of time. It won't be accepted here or in congress.

So.....he was right on both counts.

Butt, there's a perfectly good orifice just an inch away.

Pelosi: Pelosi, who voted in support of the resolution after announcing the impeachment inquiry last month, has historically opposed impeachment during the Trump presidency. She claimed previously in an interview in March, “I’m not for impeachment.” “Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country,” she declared. “He’s just not worth it.” Nadler: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4784654/user-clip-nadlers-comments-impeachment They are both shameless hypocrites.

Hmmm.....that sounds a bit massaginistic. I believe that's a one-way street for both sexes.

There......now it reads right.

Yeah....it's part and parcel of being a brain-dead leftie, and another clear indication of his (their) inability to comprehend.

Tantrum? Are you shytting me? Again, you suffer from an inability to comprehend.

Who?

Bill Clinton had frequent contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Bill and Hillary Clinton had frequent contact with Harvey Weinstein.