Jump to content

superds77

Member
  • Content Count

    4,074
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    Conservative

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    Male

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Michigan

Recent Profile Visitors

2,200 profile views
  1. Hunter DID work for Burisma. Even Joe Biden acknowledges that. Joe Biden was in charge of US policy toward Ukraine, this we also know for a fact. These two things will not change. At best, this is an appearancwe of impropriety,
  2. I assume this is a rhetorical question. Of course they are biased and the bias only goes in one direction. Has there been a single presidential debate where the moderators were not biased against Trump or the Republicans? I say no moderators.
  3. Yes it is their site. At least it appears that there is a general acknowledgement of what they are doing.
  4. Scalia was unanimously confirmed. Times change. Garland. Sow the wind...reap the whirlwind. The "breeze" is blowing with the 3rd SCOTUS appointment by President Trump, Amy Coney Barret. I love this type of "payback". Give us more! Can you be honest and acknowledge that a democrat president and senate would do the EXACT SAME THING that is happening now? If, God forbid, the democrats won the senate, would they give a Trump nominee a hearing? Don't think so.
  5. post Garland theft.... a whole new ballgame. stand by for some serious reprecussions. Remember when Republicans tried to stop Sotomayor and Kagan? Neither do I.
  6. Kennedy was nominated more than 11 months before the 1988 election... and, the Senate confirmed Kennedy unanimously - even though the senate was held by democrats. Joe Biden was the chair of the judiciary committee who gave a REPUBLICAN president a SCOTUS justice in the last year of his presidency. Sad that Mitch couldn't be as gracious to Obama as Biden was to Reagan. Payback is a bitch. Interesting how you only cite one example. Secondly, payback is indeed a bitch. Can you say "Bork"? What "payback" is happening now?
  7. history does not bear that out..... and, beyond that... the numbers of SCOTUS justices who have been OVERWHELMINGLY confirmed by HUGE majorities of both parties does not bear that out. Really? Amazing how quickly SOME of these appointments were confirmed. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/12/fact-check-supreme-court-nomination-during-voting/5880544002/ " 1988: President Ronald Reagan nominated Justice Anthony Kennedy on Nov. 30, 1987. The Senate confirmed Kennedy on Feb. 3, 1988. 1940: President Franklin Roosevelt nominated Justice Fra
  8. Yet Twitter doesn't ban anonymously sourced stories, that have named sources contradicting those claims. The whole "military are kisers and suckers" nonsense. Hmmmm....
  9. Already gave the example twice. Perhaps you should review. Sorry I didn't go through 7 pages of posts. What is the most egregious example of ACB "legislating from the bench"? Should be easy to reference for you.
  10. Most blatant example of what? Be specific. Seriously? Legislating from the bench. It is your topic.
  11. The law .... https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=S00240&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y
  12. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/01/30/new-york-abortion-law-liberal-leaders-celebration-death-life-column/2670049002/
×
×
  • Create New...