Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    No Party/Other

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

3,634 profile views
  1. Of course I do. Do you realize RollingRockhead was talking about Sondland’s testimony of today. It must hurt being so damn slow and stupid.
  2. You mean all his perception and supposition? Might be enough for House demonrats, but it will get laughed out of the Senate.
  3. So, you’re moving the goalposts. You said in a court. Typical liberal move...when called out for factual error, change the narrative. I guess next comes the name calling and/or personal attacks.
  4. Really? You can show code law where what a witness assumes to be true is admissible? I, for one, would be interested in seeing that.
  5. Sorry...in the clip he says Guiliani told him, not that he got that at the "express direction of the President of the United States."
  6. His opinion...but given Starr's track record lately, I would not put a great deal of stock on what he says (see Baylor University).
  7. Really? I believe the bald guy is Sondland testifying today.
  8. Wow...everyone that doesn't agree with you is lying. How convenient.
  9. So he needs to deny an accusation BEFORE it is made? Please tell us you aren't that big of a partisan idiot.
  10. She (It) is...at least according to the "Rules of NHB". You asked her to prove her claim...she has refused. Welcome to No Holds Barred Helmets are recommended for beginners The asker of the unanswered question wins NO SPAMMING!! No more than five new threads a day No trash talking about member's children. No porn, or links to porn No gore pictures No cursing, cussing, swearing, or other bad language in thread titles No, 'outting' of members or their families; names, addresses, phone numbers, SSNs, etc. Linking to pages that have this info is permitted; ie: police reports No threats of physical violence or encouraging other to violence. (Internet lawyers are gonna come out on this one. We'll deal with that as it happens.) This is not a democracy, this is a benevolent dictatorship.
  11. On what topic? According to this, you are way off...rather, you are once again making shit up. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/ Even CNN says you're full of shit and the Schitt Show isn't changing anyone's mind. https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/19/politics/impeachment-polling-public-support/index.html
  12. Don't get your hopes up. If they rule he must testify, it will be appealed. Since we are rapidly approaching the "holiday season" and the Supreme Court already has oral argument times scheduled for other cases, I would bet they wouldn't do anything until after the first of the year. That will leave House demonrats in an unusual situation. If the Intelligence Committee refers articles of impeachment to the full House, does Piglosi allow a vote or does she sit on them until the Judiciary Committee finishes their work (wanting only one trial). Waiting pushes everything back in the Senate calendar and could make the Judiciary Committee feel they need to work real fast or not hear from McGahn. Waiting too long to send passed articles of impeachment to the Senate increases the chances of them just dismissing without a trial since it would be close to the actual election.
  13. Don't know if it is real or fake, but I will say (based on personal experience and advice) it would not be that unusual. For a couple of decades I did two types of volunteer work that required me to speak in front of groups of various sizes about several different topics. After a few times, most of what I said was "ad lib" as I knew what I wanted to cover and preferred to move around. However, I kept a bullet point list on something near me...just to make sure I didn't forget to cover something. In order to keep from having to walk over and take time to read normal print, my bullet points were; This size font
  14. "could" makes this nothing more than his opinion. <<yawn>>
  15. When? Where? Here is a link to the forum thread containing the call transcript...just to make it easy for you. https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/278222-read-the-transcript/?tab=comments#comment-1061465589
  • Create New...