Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    No Party/Other

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

3,521 profile views
  1. In order to impeach democrats need to establish a crime involving various legal work that must be done in the traditional American common law ways in order to ensure that the USA continues to be a government by and for the people. Dark shadows (soap opera) Democrats are working in the dark like a fictional den of vampires who are subject to a count or countess person of nobility.
  2. You have gone off into soap opera mode with hearsay evidence, non admissible irrelevant evidence etc. USA courts and government have various rules to respect otherwise your own individual rights will obviously also be disregarded in the lower courts and you will possibly find yourself in violation of various non negotiable mandatory contract situations in a future where you no longer retain any individual legal ability's. You are accomplishing your own problems due to serious anger, resentment and fear, communist country's are full of poor peasants who are in violation of various socialist administrative authority civil code laws..
  3. Trump Makes Fake MASS SHOOTING IN CHURCH Campaign Video Benson666 =lies 24/7 Publicity stunt “That video was not produced by the campaign, and we do not condone violence,” said Trump campaign spokesperson Tim Murtaugh. The video appears to come from an account with the handle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>“TheGeekzTeam,”<<<<<<<<, noted Media Matters researcher Alex Kaplan.
  4. The whistle blower (if any) seems to be saying that normal USA presidential duties of persons who are elected by the "deplorable s" are somehow not legal. “Where is William Barr? We already know Russia-gate, the Steel Dossier, the deception of the FISA Court, we know all of these were felonies. Indeed, I consider it treason, and there is nothing? There is no action? Nothing, and that’s the most amazing thing to me when every legitimate whistleblower has been destroyed. Now, we have a fake one, a CIA operation against the President, and nobody even knows who the whistleblower is? It’s so transparent. If the American people fall for this they, will go down in history as the >>>>>>>most utterly stupid people<<<<<<<<< who have ever walked the earth, and they will deserve the consequences. It will be the end of America.” Paul Craig Roberts Democrats want big government, democrats receive big government and then they will obviously not like big government.
  5. Following the constitution and common law legal presidents is not gaming the system, the Counsel to the President is not poorly educated and if various legal rules are ignored with regard to strange accusations against a USA president your individual person-persons ability to face your accuser in court and call witnesses for defense will probably also be discontinued (if you are a USA citizen). (dupe process): You want big government with voter nullification where you just pop pills, sign into a commune and follow the leader without having to negotiate any of your own contracts, you receive new big government and then you don't like big government.
  6. Socialist were obviously having to lie about true socialist goals, (new anti-creation Monarchy, here is the new boss, he is not like the old boss) there can be no creator in socialism and of course no rules about telling the truth about anything. States (the deplorable s) vote for representatives who then vote on federal laws in America. Americans have been granted various individual freedoms and rights that are thought to be non removable unless the majority never receive any kind of common law leagal training and end up popping pills and joining a strange commune etc.
  7. Monarchical Remastering With Herd Animal Slaver Twist "Trump was elected by the people. Remember, Hillary called people who voted for Trump ‘deplorables.’(voters are deplorable) So, the people who go against the elite candidate are ‘deplorable.’ The voters are ‘deplorable.’ That’s what this is about. They have to get him out for that reason. They also know if they get him out for that reason, every other person that would step forward and actually try to lead the country rather than serve the ruling class, that person will know that he hasn’t a chance. Even if he gets into office, he’s going to be excoriated, framed up, lied about and driven out. Nobody will want that grief.” Paul Craig Roberts
  8. "To comply with the Constitution’s demands, appropriate procedures would include — at a minimum — the right to see all evidence, to present evidence, to call witnesses, to have counsel present at all hearings, to cross-examine all witnesses, to make objections relating to the examination of witnesses or the admissibility of testimony and evidence, and to respond to evidence and testimony. Likewise, the Committees must provide for the disclosure of all evidence favorable to the President and all evidence bearing on the credibility of witnesses called to testify in the inquiry. The Committees’ current procedures provide none of these basic constitutional rights. In addition, the House has not provided the Committees’ Ranking Members with the authority to issue subpoenas. >>>>>>The right of the minority to issue subpoenas subject to the same rules as the majority<<<<<<<<<<< — has been the standard, bipartisan practice in all recent resolutions authorizing presidential impeachment inquiries. The House’s failure to provide co-equal subpoena power in this case ensures that any inquiry will be nothing more than a one-sided effort by House Democrats to gather information favorable to their views and to selectively release it as only they determine, The House's utter disregard for the established procedural safeguards followed in past impeachment inquiries shows that the current proceedings are nothing more than an unconstitutional exercise in political theater." Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President Chongo: One sided effort comparable to a poor individual from Georgia walking into a courtroom for charges of non payment being repeatedly sentenced to prison without any legal representation.
  9. "230 + are in favor of an inquiry," Where did the number 230 come from and what about the presidents right to cross-examine witnesses, to call witnesses, to receive transcripts of testimony, to have access to evidence, to have counsel present, and many other basic rights guaranteed to all Americans.
  10. When did they ever begin impeachment inquiry after someone pulls a number out of a hat? Why don't we just eliminate the entire USA voting system and put the Chinese in charge of a new polling system?
  11. The house shall have power of impeachment does not mean that one, two or three people who may possibly be connected to various corruption that is being investigated shall have the power of impeachment, That's how the Russians were duped, socialism was supposed to eliminate monarchy rule and establish participation of the individual. Here is the new boss, he is the devils bargain.
  12. Establishing a new socialist-democrat authoritarian styled legal president, how will it effect the individual USA citizen? "Given that your inquiry lacks any legitimate constitutional foundation, any pretense of fairness, or even the most elementary due process protections, the Executive Branch cannot be expected to participate in it. Because participating in this inquiry under the current unconstitutional posture would >>>>>>>>inflict lasting institutional harm on the Executive Branch and lasting damage to the separation of powers<<<<<<<<<, you have left the President no choice. Consistent with the duties of the President of the United States, and in particular his obligation to preserve the rights of future occupants of his office, President Trump cannot permit his Administration to participate in this partisan inquiry under these circumstances." Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President
  13. After a vote so that USA people have been represented?
  14. Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President " Your “Inquiry” Is Constitutionally Invalid and Violates Basic Due Process Rights and the Separation of Powers. Your inquiry is constitutionally invalid and a violation of due process. In the history of our Nation, the House of Representatives has never attempted to launch an impeachment inquiry against the President without a majority of the House taking political accountability for that decision by voting to authorize such a dramatic constitutional step. Here, House leadership claims to have initiated the gravest inter-branch conflict contemplated under our Constitution by means of nothing more than a press conference at which the Speaker of the House simply announced an “official impeachment inquiry.” Your contrived process is unprecedented in the history of the Nation," The new democrat-socialist styled court system, how will it work?
  • Create New...