Jump to content

BeAChooser

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    49,637
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BeAChooser

  1. https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/if-unreliable-is-the-issue-why-did-social-media-never-block-anti-trump-stories/ *************** If ‘unreliable’ is the issue, why did social media never block anti-Trump stories? by Sohrab Ahmadi … snip video … This is what totalitarianism looks like in our century: not men in darkened cells driving screws under the fingernails of dissidents, but Silicon Valley dweebs removing from vast swaths of the Internet a damaging exposé on their preferred presidential candidate. That’s what Facebook and Tw
  2. https://babylonbee.com/news/facebook-bans-babylon-bee-for-being-too-accurate LOL!
  3. teacher … what’s wrong with this picture? I start a thread ( https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/331117-senator-tom-cotton-on-big-tech-censorship-“winter-is-coming”…/?tab=comments#comment-1062178172 ) highlighting an article about how antitrust laws are about to be used against Google, Big Tech and the big social media giants and before I can turn around (in the space of 30 minutes), in a thread with a total of 17 posts, Dontlooknow has posted 13 times. And you know it’s the usual DLN (tommy) sort of post. CURSE YOU for letting him back on the forum. Just saying ...
  4. tommy (DLN) is not too bright, is he? And there's apparently proof the lap top was turned over to the FBI. According to https://pjmedia.com/election/megan-fox/2020/10/14/did-the-fbi-sit-on-a-computer-containing-evidence-of-hunter-sex-tape-and-biden-burisma-corruption-n1054706 , The New York Post reported that “Photos of a Delaware federal subpoena given to The Post show that both the computer and hard drive were seized by the FBI in December, after the shop’s owner says he alerted the feds to their existence.”
  5. Wrong. Biden did collude, given that he was in on the meetings where they knew Hillary was creating a bogus dossier with Russian help. And then helped Hillary spread the lie. That's collusion.
  6. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/10/15/senator-tom-cotton-on-big-tech-censorship-winter-is-coming/#more-201792 Anyone who has spent time on the internet already knows Google manipulates the internet based on their self-defined ideology. In August of 2019 a Google employee and whistleblower came forward with documentary evidence explaining how they do it. Zachary Vorhies went public with the information in order to help people better understand the scope and scale of Google’s manipulative intent. [Link to Documents] Among those documents i
  7. Careful Ray. This ^^^^^ COWARD has said in the past "It is my greatest fantasy... to watch the blood spurt from republicans on this site as I and my duly authorized firing squad executes them for being domestic enemies of our glorious constitution." That's what's in store for you and me if he and his party win the coming election.
  8. Actually, they have, teacher ... campaign finance laws. Corporations are not allowed to contribute to federal campaigns. The FEC states that "A contribution is ANYTHING OF VALUE given, loaned or advanced to influence a federal election." That is CLEARLY what Twitter and Facebook are now doing ... trying to influence a federal election by keeping information from the public. The FEC states that "Goods AND SERVICES offered free of charge or at less than the usual and normal charge result in an in-kind contribution." Censoring, using obviously phony logic, one side of the political ai
  9. Then you're not paying attention to the leftist posts here at LF and other other places on the internet. They've been making a big deal about how the email were discovered ... as if that makes them questionable. Then why question how they were found? Why help the left make excuses to spin? ALL that matters is that they are real. Frankly, I couldn't care less if someone broke into the Biden home and stole them at this point. "pretty"? No, they are EXTREMELY SLEAZY AND CORRUPT. As sundance has sa
  10. Fired or just suspended? Because what I read is suspended ... which is meaningless. He should be fired for what he did and CSPAN should have its nonprofit public service status reexamined for even considering him as a moderator in the first place. He's was clearly biased long before he LIED about the tweet he accidentally made public.
  11. Does it matter one iota, if they're real? Why even entertain the excuses being put out by the other side now, Z09?
  12. Is there really any reason to doubt their veracity? Even the Biden campaign has not denied they are real.
  13. The answer to this isn't the FCC, Golfboy, it's the FEC. What Twitter and Facebook are doing are in-kind contributions to the democRATS with a value in the hundreds of billions of dollars. The FEC states such contributions are illegal for Corporations to give and there is also a limit on contributions even if they weren't corporations. The maximum penalty for knowingly violating the law (and Twitter and Facebook have to know this is a violation) is 200% of the contribution. So the FEC could fine Twitter and Facebook as much as half a billion dollars for doing this. Now THAT would ge
  14. Are you really this stupid? First of all, the laws states "ANYTHING OF VALUE". ANYTHING. And cutting off one party from the largest social media platforms right before an election is a gift to the other party worth BILLIONS (because, after all, as sundance says, *there are TRILLIONS at stake.").
  15. And just so everyone knows, the FEC rules state that “The maximum penalty for contributions and expenditures made in violation of these statutes, but which are not knowing and willful violations (and these ARE), is the greater of $6,500 or the amount of the contribution or expenditure involved. The penalty for knowing and willful violations is the greater of $11,000 or 200% of the amount of the contribution or expenditure involved." So if the value of the contribution from doing what Twitter and Facebook are doing is one the order of several hundred million dollars then the fine co
  16. All for that, after the election. But you won't get that done before the election and FEC laws are already in place. USE THEM.
  17. WRONG. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. The FEC states that "A contribution is ANYTHING OF VALUE given, loaned or advanced to influence a federal election." That is CLEARLY what Twitter and Facebook are now doing. The FEC states that "Goods AND SERVICES offered free of charge or at less than the usual and normal charge result in an in-kind contribution." Censoring, using obviously phony logic, one side of the political aisle is a service by social media to the democRATS. There is plenty of evidence to show that this has be
×
×
  • Create New...