Jump to content

BeAChooser

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    47,549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BeAChooser


  1. This scandal just better and better ...

     

    https://neonnettle.com/news/11868-photo-of-ghislaine-maxwell-sitting-in-queen-s-throne-in-buckingham-palace-emerges
     

    Quote

     

    Photo of Ghislaine Maxwell Sitting in Queen's Throne in Buckingham Palace Emerges


    by Jay Greenberg


    photo-ghislaine-maxwell-sitting-queens-t

    Ghislaine Maxwell is pictured sitting in the throne alongside disgraced actor Kevin Spacey


    A bombshell photo has emerged that shows child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's alleged "pimp" Ghislaine Maxwell sitting in the British Queen's throne inside Buckingham Palace, according to reports.


    Maxwell was arrested by U.S. authorities this week over her alleged role in Epstein's child sex slavery operation.


    The newly emerged image shows Maxwell sitting in the throne alongside disgraced actor Kevin Spacey during a private tour of the palace organized by Britain's Prince Andrew, it has been reported.


    The photo was obtained by British newspaper The Telegraph and was reportedly taken in 2002.


    The paper said that Maxwell was on a private tour organized by Andrew, the Duke of York, for former US President Bill Clinton, who isn't pictured.


    The Telegraph said it was not thought that Epstein was on the palace tour when the picture was taken.


    According to the paper's source, Spacey – whose career was left in tatters after he was accused of making unwanted sexual advances to a 14-year-old actor – was a guest of Mr. Clinton’s.

     

     

    The legacy of Bill Clinton lives.


  2. https://cms.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/06/exposing-lies-black-lives-matter-john-perazzo

     
     
    Quote

     

    Exposing the Lies of Black Lives Matter

    Where black racism and Marxism are dressed up as “social justice.” 

     

    July 2, 2020  

     

    by John Perazzo
     
    lkj7.jpg?itok=pL_1VC-s

     

    Black Lives Matter (BLM) was established in 2013 by a trio of self-identified Marxist revolutionaries. Striving to make white Americans “uncomfortable about institutional racism” and the “structural oppression” that allegedly “prevents so many [black people] from realizing their dreams,” BLM contends that blacks living under America's “white supremacist system” are routinely targeted for “extrajudicial killings … by police and vigilantes.” That claim has become an article of faith for the millions of American leftists who dutifully parrot BLM's talking points. The remainder of this article is dedicated to providing hard data which exposes BLM's worldview as nothing more than a mountain of malicious lies.

    Debunking BLM's Claims About Police Use of Force

    A major Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) report in 2001 examined incidents where police in the United States used deadly force to kill criminal suspects between 1976 and 1998. During that 23-year span, 42% of all suspects killed by police were black – a figure that comportedprecisely with the percentage of violent crimes committed by African Americans during that same period. This is enormously significant because we would expect that in police forces not plagued by systemic racism, officers would shoot suspects of various racial or ethnic backgrounds at rates closely resembling their respective involvement in the types of serious crimes most likely to elicit the use of force by police. And indeed, that is exactly what the evidence shows.

    The same BJS report found that in nearly two-thirds of all justifiable homicides by police during 1976-98, the officer’s race and the suspect’s race were the same. When a white or Hispanic officer killed a suspect, that suspect was usually (63% of the time) white or Hispanic as well. And when a black officer killed a suspect, that suspect was usually black (81% of the time).

    The BJS report also examined the rate at which officers killed suspects of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. In 1998, the “black-officer-kills-black-felon” rate was 32 per 100,000 black officers, more than double the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed black felons (14 per 100,000). That same year, the rate at which white and Hispanic officers killed white or Hispanic felons (28 per 100,000) was much higher than the “black-officer-kills-white-or-Hispanic-felon” rate of 11 per 100,000.

    In 1999, criminologists Geoffrey Alpert and Roger Dunham confirmed once again that police officers were more likely to use force against suspects of their own racial group, than against suspects from another racial group.

    A 2011 BJS study which covered the period from 2003 to 2009 sheds further light on the issue of police use of force against people of various racial and ethnic backgrounds. Of all suspects who are known to have been killed by police during that 7-year time frame, 41.7% were white, 31.7% were black, and 20.3% were Hispanic. It is also worth noting that during the 2003-2009 period—when blacks were 31.7% of all suspects killed by an officer—blacks accounted for about 38.5% of all arrests for violent crimes, which are the types of crimes most likely to trigger potentially deadly confrontations with police. These numbers do not in any way suggest a lack of restraint by police in their dealings with black suspects. On the contrary, they strongly suggest exactly the opposite.[1]

    In 2015, a Justice Department study of the Philadelphia Police Department found that black officers were 67 percent more likely than their white colleagues to mistakenly shoot an unarmed black suspect, and Hispanic officers were 145 percent more likely to do the same. That same year, a study of the New York Police Department by criminology professor Greg Ridgeway found that black officers were 3.3 times more likely than their white peers to discharge their guns in the course of their work. So much for the notion of trigger-happy white cops.

    In any given year, a mere 0.6 percent of black men report that physical force of any kind – including mild actions like pushing and grabbing – is used against them by the police. The corresponding figure for white men is approximately 0.2 percent. Though both figures are infinitesimally small, critics of the police are quick to complain that the figure for blacks is three times higher than the figure for whites. But as National Review points out, that disparity is fully accounted for by the fact that “black men commit violent crimes at much higher rates than white men,” as evidenced by data from the annual National Crime Victimization Survey.

    The available data indicate that a mere 0.08 percent of black men and white men alike are injured by police in any given year. This figure includes injuries sustained as a result of police actions that are legally justified, and often necessary, in order to thwart criminal behavior.

    In a 2018 working paper titled “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force,” Harvard economist Roland Fryer, who is African American, reported that police officers in Houston were nearly 24 percent less likely to shoot black suspects than white suspects. In a separate analysis of officer shootings in three Texas cities, six Florida counties, and the city of Los Angeles, Fryer found that: (a) officers were 47 percent less likely to discharge their weapon without first being attacked if the suspect was black, than if the suspect was white; (b) black and white individuals shot by police were equally likely to have been armed at the time of the shootings; (c) white officers were no more likely to shoot unarmed blacks than unarmed whites; (d) black officers were more likely to shoot unarmed whites than unarmed blacks; and (e) black officers were more likely than white officers to shoot unarmed whites. There is no evidence of anti-black racism in any of these findings, though some of them do seem to suggest an anti-white bias.

    A 2019 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows that white officers are no more likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot black civilians. “In fact,” writes Manhattan Institute scholar Heather Mac Donald, the study found that “if there is a bias in police shootings after crime rates are taken into account, it is against white civilians.” Specifically, Mac Donald adds, the authors of the study compiled a database of 917 officer-involved fatal shootings in 2015 and found that 55 percent of the victims were white, 27 percent were black, and 19 percent were Hispanic.

    Each and every year, without exception, whites who are shot and killed by police officers in the U.S. far outnumber blacks and Hispanics who meet that same fate. In 2017, for instance, 457 whites, 223 blacks, and 179 Hispanics were killed by police officers in the line of duty. In 2018, the corresponding figures were 399 whites, 209 blacks, and 148 Hispanics. And in 2019, the totals were 370 whites, 235 blacks, and 158 Hispanics. There is not a hint of anti-black racism anywhere in these figures.

    When we compare black rates of violent crime, with the rate at which blacks are shot and killed by police officers, we find that blacks are represented among those shooting victims at rates significantly lower than we would have expected in light of their crime rates. For example, in 2017, blacks were just 23.6% of all people shot dead by police, even though they were arrested for 37.5% of all violent crimes. The following year, blacks were 26.3% of those fatally shot by police, even as they were arrested for fully 37.4% of violent crimes.

    According to Heather Mac Donald: “The per capita rate of officers being feloniously killed is 45 times higher than the rate at which unarmed black males are killed by cops. And an officer’s chance of getting killed by a black assailant is 18.5 times higher than the chance of an unarmed black getting killed by a cop.”

    Debunking BLM's Claims About Interracial Crime Against Blacks

    In 2012 and 2013, blacks in the U.S. committed an annual average of 560,600 violent crimes (excluding homicide) against whites, while whites committed a yearly average of 99,403 violent crimes against blacks. In other words, blacks were the attackers in about 85 percent of all violent crimes involving blacks and whites, while whites were the attackers in 15 percent.[2]

    When white offenders committed crimes of violence (excluding homicide) against either whites or blacks in 2012-13, they targeted white victims 95.8 percent of the time, and they went after black victims a mere 4.1 percent of the time. By contrast, when black offenders committed crimes of violence against either whites or blacks in 2012-13, they targeted white victims a whopping 48.5 percent of the time, and they went after black victims 51.4 percent of the time.[3] If we factor into the equation the relative sizes of America's white and black populations, we find that, statistically, any given black person in 2012-13 was about 27 times more likely to attack a white, than vice versa.

    In more recent years, the disproportionate prevalence of black-on-white crime has only gotten worse. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2018 there were 593,598 interracial violent victimizations (excluding homicide) between blacks and whites in the United States. Blacks committed 537,204 of those interracial felonies, or 90.4 percent, while whites committed 56,394 of them, or about 9.5 percent.

    When white offenders committed crimes of violence against either whites or blacks in 2018, they targeted white victims 97.3 percent of the time, and they went after black victims 2.6 percent of the time. By contrast, when black offenders committed crimes of violence against either whites or blacks during that same year, they targeted white victims 58 percent of the time, and they went after black victims 42 percent of the time.[4]

    City Journal reports that according to Justice Department data, blacks in 2018 were overrepresented among the perpetrators of offenses classified as “hate crimes” by a whopping 50 percent—while whites were underrepresented by 24 percent.

    The facts presented above can lead us to only one possible conclusion: BLM's claim that African Americans are routinely targeted for “extrajudicial killings … by police and vigilantes” is a monstrous lie. The purpose of the lie is to cause Americans of all races to detest their own country, so as to promote a desire to raze the nation's traditions to the ground, and to then erect a new Marxist utopia upon its ruins.

     

    NOTES

    [1] The annual violent-crime arrest statistics for 2003-2009, broken down by race, can be found here: 200320042005200620072008, and 2009.
    [2] Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey, 2012-13, Special Tabulation, Table 10.

    [3] Ibid.
    [4] Bureau of Justice Statistics, Criminal Victimization, 2018, Table 14.

     

     

    That's pretty convincing.    Just saying ...  

     


  3. 4 minutes ago, RickyTavy said:

    Nobody gets near trump without having been tested recently and wearing a mask now.  trump has protected trump from Covid.  And yet, he has convinced members of his cult to be proud of how he cares nothing for the health of his worshippers.  And, this is just one example of how trump has even more contempt for his suckers than I do.

     

    You poor ineffectual snowflake.   Why don't you shut up and LISTEN just ONCE.  :lol:

    • Thumb up 1

  4. https://www.foxnews.com/us/ghislaine-maxwell-rape-testify-evil-epstein

     

    Quote

     

    Woman claims Ghislaine Maxwell raped her '20-30 times'; willing to testify: 'She is just as evil as Jeffrey Epstein'


    by Bryan Lienas


    EXCLUSIVE — A woman who claims Ghislaine Maxwell raped her dozens of times – beginning when she was just 14 years old – says she is willing to take the stand and testify against Jeffrey Epstein’s ex-girlfriend.


    In an exclusive interview with Fox News, Jane Doe, who wishes to protect her identity, said Maxwell sexually abused her beginning in 1991 in Florida. She said the abuse continued until she was 16.


    Maxwell was arrested Thursday on federal charges for facilitating and participating in sexual abuse acts with minors,


    “She did rape me. I would say it’s more than 20 or 30 times,” she said. “She is just as evil as Jeffrey Epstein … She is a rapist.”


    Jane Doe claims years of sexual abuse came to an end only after she became pregnant with Jeffrey Epstein’s baby. At age 16, she had an abortion.


    “I had never been with anyone except for him [Epstein],” said Doe, who is part of a lawsuit filed against Epstein’s estate over a year ago. “The fact that I had to kill my child really affected me and my family.”


    Suspecting that she had told her grandparents about the abortion, and fearful she would talk to authorities, Doe says, Maxwell, Epstein and others gang-raped her one last time as punishment. “Ghislaine was a part of it,” Doe said. “I was drugged.”


    After the rape, Doe said, a driver with a gun drove her to her home. “I was dumped off in my grandparents yard naked, and was told that I wouldn’t come back alive the next time,” Doe said.


    Fearful for her life, Doe said, her grandfather put her into hiding. 


    She dropped out of high school. “I basically kind of vanished,” she said. “Ms. Maxwell was a participant, and she made it very clear that I was to keep my mouth shut or harm would come to my family and myself and harm did come to me.”

     


    Read that and ask yourself why Clinton would *date* Ghislaine long after the allegations against Epstein and Ghislaine surfaced?  

     

    Why would the Clintons want Ghislaine at Chelsea’s wedding?

     

    aQAZcTi.jpg


  5. 55 minutes ago, IcebergSlim said:

    Beachooser -  The Fabian Socialist controlled Rockefeller Foundation even looked at a scenario by which more government control could result from a pandemic.

     

    This is bullshit...

     

    So I guess in your willful ignorance you never heard of LockStep?   It was one of four scenarios devised by the Rockefeller Foundation and published in a report titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010.   The scenario was titled “LOCK STEP: A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”  It described a coronavirus-like pandemic that is used to justify the imposition of a police-state with controls on movement, the economy, and other aspects of society.   Here's a link to the report, snowflake ...  http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller Foundation.pdf and an excerpt from the scenario ...

     

    Quote

     

    In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.

     

    The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery.

     

    China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

     

     


  6. UPDATE:

     

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8487049/Deloitte-says-Harvard-grad-blamed-Trump-supporters-losing-dream-job-internship.html

     

    Quote

     

    Harvard grad who blamed Trump supporters for getting her fired from 'dream job' at Deloitte after 'All Lives Matter' TikTok stab video did NOT work for accountancy firm


        •    Claira Janover posted a video threatening to stab anyone saying 'all lives matter'


        •    The video went viral, and on Wednesday she claimed she had been fired Janover said Trump supporters 'took my job away from me' 


        •    She accused Deloitte, who she said she worked for, of 'cowardice' in firing her


        •    Deloitte have confirmed however that she was never an employee at the firm


        •    Janover was due to complete a two-week internship at the end of the summer


        •    Deloitte canceled the internship owing to their policy against violent threats

     

     

    Wow.   Leftist professors really did a number of this young woman.


  7. 20 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

    The key to French cooking is sauces and roues.

     

    ... snip ...

     

    I am not going to waste my time with your  stupid Fabian obsession.

     

    See what I mean, folks?

     

    Quote

    And BLM  has a right to be Marxists

     

    See what I mean, folks?

     

    Quote

    All the supposed creators of the Fabian Society are quite deceased of old age.

     

    "supposed"?    You see what I mean, folks?

     

    And although they are dead, XO, they are still being celebrated by progressives everywhere.

     

    You see folks, it's ok to celebrate dead socialists/communists ... but woe be you celebrating one of our nation's Founders.

     

    Like George Washington.

     

    He was a *racist*!!!!!

     

    Quote

    There is no more to say about your wacko conspiracies.

     

    There's plenty to say.  It's just crickets from you every time I want to talk about things like Fabian Socialism, the rapes by Clinton or Obama's socialist/communist associates.  You RUN.


  8. 4 minutes ago, slideman said:

    I note that you studiously avoid mentioning your own academic credentials maybe that is because you have none. You are fixated on this because you failed to graduate high school.

     

    LOL!   I see.

     

    You don't want to discuss your statements that 

     

    “I never went to school.”

     

    “I am only semi literate as I dropped out of high school.”

     

    Yet somehow you got into college to study engineering?

     

    For those that don't know what I'm talking about, read our long exchange on this thread:

     


    B)


  9. What recent events, GED?    

     

    Are you claiming that Texas, for example, hasn't been double counting Covid cases and counting ANYONE with a positive COVID test in the hospital as a COVID hospitalization?

     

    At this point, how can you trust ANYTHING being claimed about COVID?

     

    When are you IDIOTS going to wake up and realize that the cure you are imposing on everyone is far worse than the disease?

No holds barred chat

  • By Imgreatagain

    Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • By deezer shoove

    grgle


  • By rippy38

  • By Str8tEdge

    Where’s at @slideman?


  • By Robot88

    Hola


  • By teacher

    I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • By impartialobserver

    What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • By kfools

    Where does it say 2?


  • By kfools

    So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • By teacher

    How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • By Duck615

    Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • By kfools

    Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • By Imgreatagain

    Mine too. 


  • By Imgreatagain

    I thought it was my location.. 


  • By kfools

    Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • By Duck615

    OK thanks

     


  • Test


  • By Blue Devil

    Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...