Jump to content

BeAChooser

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    39,400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    United States

Previous Fields

  • Political Party:
    Conservative

Profile Fields

  • Website URL
    who knows?

Recent Profile Visitors

14,968 profile views
  1. LIAR. That is absolutely FALSE.
  2. Sorry snowflake, but you didn't prove anything I said is wrong. Neither did Toldya. You just keep yammering about reducing CO2 without actually proving it drives temperatures.
  3. You think you understand Venus? LOL! You think you understand the effect of water vapor? LOL! Here, just for you snowflake ... https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/06/hyperventilating-on-venus/ No it wouldn’t. 9000 kPa atmospheric pressure would occur on earth at an altitude many miles below sea level. No such place exists, but if it did – it would be extremely hot, like Venus. A back of the envelope estimate – temperatures on earth increase by about 80C going from 20 to 100 kPa, so at 9,000 kPa we would expect temperatures to be in the ballpark of : 20C + ln(9000/(100-20)) *80C = 400C This is very close to what we see on Venus. The high temperatures there can be almost completely explained by atmospheric pressure – not composition. If 90% of the CO2 in Venus atmosphere was replaced by Nitrogen, it would change temperatures there by only a few tens of degrees. How did such bad science become “common knowledge?” The greenhouse effect can not be the cause of the high temperatures on Venus. “Group Think” at it’s worst, and I am embarrassed to admit that I blindly accepted it for decades. Blame CO2 first – ask questions later. Give it up, Toldya. You CAN NOT win this argument. The facts and data are ALL on our side.
  4. You don't know that. And even if it were true ... SO WHAT? You haven't proven that CO2 drives temperatures. In fact ... http://icecap.us/index.php/go/in-the-news/the_phase_relation_between_atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_and_global_temperatur/ Give it up, Toldya. You can not win this debate.
  5. No, the answer is vote DemocRAT.
  6. You're an idiot. The only response anyone should make to you, Scout, is to link this post I made to you concerning rape and sexual assault ... https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/252149-the-results-of-capitalism/?tab=comments#comment-1061033291 It proves how little facts AND rape mean to you. You're nothing but a partisan hack.
  7. Are you trying to say this is not a problem? Well, Trump thinks it's enough of a problem to actually do something about it. https://whitehouse.typeform.com/to/Jti9QH
  8. I not sure what you mean, TBGS. Could you expand on that?
  9. From NBC (that left enough for you nf?) ... https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/poll-nearly-3-4-democratic-leaning-voters-would-consider-ocasio-n961191
  10. I didn't say you didn't write it. I asked you how many times you've spammed the forum with that exact same post?
  11. Ding. Ding. Ding. You are correct. We're she old enough, the modern DemocRATic Party would run her. Which tells you how far they've sunk.
  12. ^^^^^ Come on, Redwood, tell folks how many times you've now posted that SPAM.
  13. BeAChooser

    A Hysterical Cult Runs Society

    PJW is spot on once again.
  14. Yes. In fact, considerable data (like ice cores) shows that increasing co2 levels LAG increasing temperatures. Just as there is considerable data showing that it's the SUN, not CO2, that has driven earth's temperature shifts the last 150 years ...
  15. LOL! We can't count the number of times you've lied, COWARD.
×