rick55

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shal

I'll start. 1) The party of slavery.

Thanks.

Because of the value of life, the premeditated mass murder of seniors (just coincidentally a large republican voting block) and those with debilitating maladies in nursing homes and extended care homes by governors must take first place on the despicable scale. But the democrat's voting/polling criminal chicanery certainly takes second place.

Fear of a Biden win -- Imagine what will happen if he does!

I was going to harshly call you out for what your title and this ^^^ rant portrays. But I thought better realizing you have lost touch with reality. For heaven's sake, please seek help.

Law enforcement did not protect people and property recently in several riots. Cops have discretionary powers. How many of us have been clocked at a high rate of speed, say 80, and the cop sited us for 75 so that it would not be reckless driving or just gave us a warning? Cops call for backup rather than go alone into a dire situation. An attorney explained to me that the job of law enforcement is to investigate crime. Of course, they also do other things. The presents of the police deters crime but not always. We shall see what happens to Scot Peterson when

I am glad you quoted a common oath correctly. It is not a matter of semantics. I see not where in that oath it even implies the police must, can, and will protect us all from harm all the time. Someone who thinks that lacks any common sense or is in denial or has lost touch with reality or suffers a combination thereof. Why must I repeat myself? I quoted what the standing law of the United States of America has been since 1981 and reaffirmed in 1989. Suppose a police officer is cruising by on a felony call and sees you being physically attacked. What does he or she do? That's right

The belief that the police must, can, and will always protect you is absurd on its face but central to the gun grabbers agenda. When you need a gun, nothing else will do.

It's not a concept; it's a fact that was affirmed and reaffirmed by the USSC and a self-evident one as well: The police cannot be everywhere at all times. If that were the test, lawsuits would abound, and all police departments would go defunct. (Requiring the police be on sight the instant they suspect a threat to one's safety would be as impossible to accomplish as your presumption.) Their job is to investigate crime. The Fourteenth Amendment protects the individual from the government, not from another individual: DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Ser

The police are not required to protect you. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Namely—on June 27, 2005, in Castle Rock v. Gonzales See: https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect#_ftn2

I am not interested in seeing people’s previous tax returns before assuming public office; I am interested in seeing people’s tax returns while holding public office.

The leftists who post such BS apparently never heard of depreciation (or accelerated depreciation) and other deductions. Daddy and mommy probably take care of everything for them.

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/09/28/project-veritas-massive-ballot-harvesting-election-fraud-minneapolis-tied-ilhan-omar/

WTF?